michael
The Dude Abides
Offline
Posts: 3237
|
 |
« on: Monday, March 30, 2009, 17:26:12 » |
|
Should have used the internet element of their package to download a decent bit of grumble off the net for free.
Silly boy.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27183
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: Monday, March 30, 2009, 17:27:29 » |
|
Exactly. £10 for two films? The fucking idiot.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nemo
Shit Bacon
Offline
Posts: 23657
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: Monday, March 30, 2009, 17:28:24 » |
|
I don't care about the porn, 23k for her house a year seems a bit dodgy.
140 MP's claim the full second home housing allowance, 6 of which have constituencies in Greater London- they can sod right off.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
A Gent Orange
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: Monday, March 30, 2009, 17:30:16 » |
|
It's sick. They watched Ocean's 13 twice!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57935
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: Monday, March 30, 2009, 18:21:59 » |
|
It's sick. They watched Ocean's 13 twice!
It's thick. They could have bought the film for less.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
genf_stfc
Offline
Posts: 1272
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: Monday, March 30, 2009, 20:03:25 » |
|
i want to know what the names of the films were - of course its still a misuse of the expense account either way, but "adult films" could actually be something reasonably innocent with an 18 certificate for all we know. Or it could be Cum Sluts 3 and somthing about fisting starring peter mandleson
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jonny72
Offline
Posts: 5554
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: Monday, March 30, 2009, 20:30:57 » |
|
What gets me most about it isn't that it was porn, but the fact they put in an expenses claim for something they shouldn't have - something which MP's seem to do on an almost daily basis.
If anyone else (ie not an MP) put in false expense claims at work at minimum they would get a massive bollocking and a strong warning as to their future conduct, potentially a verbal warning (or more). Yet they seem to get nothing more than a slight slap on the wrist, sometimes not even that.
How can you trust them to run the country when you can't even trust their expenses claims?
On the other hand, I wish I'd been there when her husband had to tell her what he'd done. That would have been funny. Maybe it will appear on YouTube at some point. I mean, your wife catching you out for renting porn movies and knocking one off on your own is bad enough but having it plastered all over the news as well?
Maybe she is shit in bed and needs to put out a bit more.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: Monday, March 30, 2009, 20:34:12 » |
|
I bet it was something really tame like the on the erotic thriller seasons Five used to do when the channel first started up . I wonder if it starred Shannon Tweed.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jonny72
Offline
Posts: 5554
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: Monday, March 30, 2009, 20:37:18 » |
|
Judging by the bill they showed on the news they're with Virgin. Whilst I haven't checked out the on demand movies on Virgin, if there is any porn I can't believe its going to be that hard and the same goes for the porn channels they carry.
It does add to the stupidity when he could have got a good dose of hardcore action for free via the net.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
genf_stfc
Offline
Posts: 1272
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: Monday, March 30, 2009, 21:15:44 » |
|
Dubya Does Dallas ?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|