Pages: [1]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Legal buffs have a look  (Read 1517 times)
dell boy

« on: Thursday, June 21, 2007, 08:16:55 »

This was posted on the old ThisIs site by Wherealltheredsare:

... is the company formerly known as Dunwoody Sports Marketing, now known as D460 Ltd since 3/4/2007!!! From the new forum shaw red posted this yesterday:

"A friend of a friend reckons some company called D460 Ltd are involved in the alleged 'investment' at Swindon Town.

Worringly, i google d460Ltd and the first name that appears is Dunwoody?

Am I missing something here?

Rob T, Glos Robin, or someone with a bit of knowledge help me out here!

I have no idea."

This is the Google page he mentions;
http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=t&hl=en-GB&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLJ,GGLJ:2006-25,GGLJ:en-GB&q=D460+Limited

Now, what if D460 are taking over? "New" owners, same board, some money and redevelopment profits to the new shareholders? I wonder who owns D460 Ltd shares and in what percentages?

Link to WebCHeck at Companies House:

http://wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk/655664792525e377d89a0b472b08d176/compdetails
Logged
RobertT

Offline Offline

Posts: 12320




Ignore
« Reply #1 on: Thursday, June 21, 2007, 08:26:21 »

d460 is the latest incarnation of PIA Advertising/Dunwoody Sports Marketing - it's also the one that is in a CVA, supervisors by Mr Andronikou and it's the same period behind in it's accounts as the club.

I think the shares are held by Diamandis' wife IIRC.
Logged
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel

Offline Offline

Posts: 27180





Ignore
« Reply #2 on: Thursday, June 21, 2007, 08:29:16 »

I wouldn't have thought Dunwoody/D460 have the millions needed to keep us afloat, so I think it's bollocks.
Logged
Ardiles

Offline Offline

Posts: 11588


Stirlingshire Reds




Ignore
« Reply #3 on: Thursday, June 21, 2007, 08:30:24 »

Good grief.  If it does turn out that our 'mystery investor' is none other than Mikey Diamandis, this is going to get uglier still.  Only speculation, obviously, but sadly rumour & speculation is the closest this board will ever get to a communications strategy.

I think I'm going to lie down.
Logged
STFC Bart

Offline Offline

Posts: 1114




Ignore
« Reply #4 on: Thursday, June 21, 2007, 08:33:42 »

Anyone who does invest will be connected to Diamandis chronies- that way they can keep their dirty little secrets. It stinks
Logged
Foggy

Offline Offline

Posts: 1948

Ketchup wanker




Ignore
« Reply #5 on: Thursday, June 21, 2007, 08:57:18 »

:blahblahblah:  :boring:
Logged

Sad to say, i must be on my way
Batch
Not a Batch

Offline Offline

Posts: 57758





Ignore
« Reply #6 on: Thursday, June 21, 2007, 09:10:24 »

As Rob says, D460 are in CVA, Surely that means they can be discounted......

Unless they are fronting the real investor (I love the smell of  conspiracy theory first thing in the morning) Smiley
Logged
dell boy

« Reply #7 on: Thursday, June 21, 2007, 09:15:51 »

Surprised nobody has commented on this paragraph yet!!!!


Mr Prescott sought permission to appeal to this court from the order of Simon J on the following grounds: the restrictive covenants were not enforceable because the Partnership had been dissolved for the following reasons: first, Mr Prescott's purported expulsion from the partnership on or around May 5, 2005 caused the Partnership to dissolve by operation of the partnership agreement; second, the Partnership ceased to trade and was dissolved on July 31, 2005 and the subsequent transfer of the Partnership's assets to the Company did not transfer any cause of action to the transferee Company; third, the Partnership should have been dissolved at its inception because Mr Diamandis was at that time in breach of a director's disqualification between 1997 and November 2004 which later became the subject of criminal investigations. Mr Prescott argued that Mr Diamandis had also committed various repudiatory breaches prior to Mr Prescott leaving the partnership. Mr Prescott also argued that: the restrictive covenant against soliciting customers did not apply because it contained a carve-out for those customers which an outgoing partner has introduced to the firm, and any football and rugby customers solicited by Mr Prescott had previously been introduced to the firm by him; Ms Rutter had not interfered with clients of the firm; her contribution to the firm had been exaggerated by the Company; her contribution was in any event subject to an overhead of £34,800 which should have been deducted from the damages awarded.
Logged
pauld
Aaron Aardvark

Offline Offline

Posts: 25436


Absolute Calamity!




Ignore
« Reply #8 on: Thursday, June 21, 2007, 09:29:48 »

D460 is indeed one of the latest incarnations of Dunwoody and plenty of people commented on that Dell - we did that weeks ago on here. Do keep up.

And slightly more helpfully, here's the link:
http://www.thetownend.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=20894
Logged
janaage
People's Front of Alba

Offline Offline

Posts: 14825





Ignore
« Reply #9 on: Thursday, June 21, 2007, 09:38:19 »

To be fair it is getting quite difficult keeping up with all of this, and keeping tabs on the full time job as well.

It's doing my head in!!  Fair play to the trust members for all their efforts, how some of you haven't had a break down already is beyond me!!
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: