Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Paul Caddis  (Read 8993 times)
flammableBen

« Reply #30 on: Monday, March 7, 2011, 00:22:51 »

I'm still some what surprised we havent tried Amankwaah at right back and Caddis right midfield more often.

Caddis to me looks like an old fashion winger, ball down the line, run, cross.



Your the stats man DV. Didn't JPM have a fairly impressive assist total last season or did I imagine that? Most of the time with Amankwaah behind him.
Logged
DV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 33872


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #31 on: Monday, March 7, 2011, 00:28:38 »

JPM topped the whole division with 17.

He's a good player who I like, last season was easily the best of his career.

He hasnt been half as good this season, neither has Amankwaah - which I put down to individual form and the break up of the partnership.

JPM has been so off form that right now i'd rather see Caddis right wing to be honest.
Logged
london_red

Offline Offline

Posts: 2142





Ignore
« Reply #32 on: Monday, March 7, 2011, 08:07:58 »

Understand what people are saying about his issues playing full back due to lack of physicality.

Still think he's a skilful player though and not worth just casting aside, should be able to find a role for a player of his quality.
Logged
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel

Offline Offline

Posts: 27180





Ignore
« Reply #33 on: Monday, March 7, 2011, 08:18:48 »

Like DV, I think he's more of a winger or an attacking full back than a pure right back.

The trouble is, he's being asked to do a lot of defending which because of his size he easily gets muscled off the ball or loses out on headers.

I think if we'd had Caddis last season when we were taking the game to others teams every week he would've been a stand out player.
Logged
Saxondale

Offline Offline

Posts: 6481





Ignore
« Reply #34 on: Monday, March 7, 2011, 08:43:07 »

Ive been impressed with his positioning and use of his body + speed rather than height to get to the ball.  He's good.  Different style to Amankwaah.
Logged

Never knowingly overstated.
Coca Fola

« Reply #35 on: Monday, March 7, 2011, 18:04:07 »

I prefer Amankwaah at RB. Caddis is a winger not a defender.
Logged
Sippo
Living in the 80s

Offline Offline

Posts: 15614


I ain't gettin on no plane fool




Ignore
« Reply #36 on: Monday, March 7, 2011, 18:14:29 »

Caddis is a good player, but an attacking RB a bit like Ashley Cole. Likes to get forward as much as possible. Is that viable in L1? Who knows.
Logged

If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit...
Peter Venkman
Past glories motivate us when times are bleak.

Offline Offline

Posts: 64615


Perfection is not attainable



« Reply #37 on: Monday, March 7, 2011, 18:19:16 »

Caddis is a good player, but an attacking RB a bit like Ashley Cole. Likes to get forward as much as possible. Is that viable in L1? Who knows.

Lets hope that the bit thats like Cashley Cole is not his trigger finger Cheesy
Logged

From the station at Colchester
To the cells of Warrington
From the services at Leicester
To the slums of Northampton

We travel over England
And one day Europe too

Cos we all follow the Swindon
We're the famous Town End crew.
Sippo
Living in the 80s

Offline Offline

Posts: 15614


I ain't gettin on no plane fool




Ignore
« Reply #38 on: Monday, March 7, 2011, 18:21:29 »

Some of our players need shooting, so hopefully he is!
Logged

If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit...
cheltred69

Offline Offline

Posts: 1058





Ignore
« Reply #39 on: Monday, March 7, 2011, 19:18:48 »

I generally think he's been good at RB - as pointed out earlier in the thread his tackling is great and not many wingers get past him.  However, I've been less impressed with his distribution out of defence at times - too many passes have gone astray, which seems at odds with thinking he'd be a good midfielder!
Logged
Saxondale

Offline Offline

Posts: 6481





Ignore
« Reply #40 on: Monday, March 7, 2011, 19:21:55 »

Ive yet to see him whip in a truly great cross which is what we we're led to believe he'd be doing.  Still time I suppose.
Logged

Never knowingly overstated.
leefer

Offline Offline

Posts: 12851





Ignore
« Reply #41 on: Monday, March 7, 2011, 19:23:50 »

I generally think he's been good at RB - as pointed out earlier in the thread his tackling is great and not many wingers get past him.  However, I've been less impressed with his distribution out of defence at times - too many passes have gone astray, which seems at odds with thinking he'd be a good midfielder!

Good points...fact is though every time a defender looks to distribute the ball up front there is no one in place.....so it gets lumped,Cuthbert who i think had a better game on Saturday didn't have any options many times.....so instead of getting caught with the ball it was Hoooooof.
Logged
wacko

« Reply #42 on: Monday, March 7, 2011, 22:11:12 »

Ive yet to see him whip in a truly great cross which is what we we're led to believe he'd be doing.  Still time I suppose.

That's most probably down to the fact we have no fucker in the box to cross it too !
Logged
RobertT

Offline Offline

Posts: 12312




Ignore
« Reply #43 on: Monday, March 7, 2011, 22:19:41 »

Caddis would have slotted in nicely in our 95/96 team.  He'd be perfect in a 5 man defence with attacking full backs.  I'd prefer him in right midfield playing 4-4-2.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: