alanmayes
 Offline
Posts: 1437
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: Tuesday, July 15, 2008, 20:19:20 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"It's not delusions of grandeur sir,it's intolerance of mediocrity and minimal performances."
|
|
|
SwindonTartanArmy
Go Team GB!
Offline
Posts: 2917
London Scottish - More History than Franchise!
|
|
« Reply #46 on: Wednesday, July 16, 2008, 09:45:55 » |
|
Press & Journal in sheep land says no fee was invloved as well! Cant imagine that being the case!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Vi er best i verden! Vi er best i verden! Vi har slått England 2-1 i fotball!! Det er aldeles utrolig! Vi har slått England! England, kjempers fødeland. Lord Nelson, Lord Beaverbrook, Sir Winston Churchill, Sir Anthony Eden, Clement Attlee, Henry Cooper, Lady Diana--vi har slått dem alle sammen. Vi har slått dem alle sammen. Maggie Thatcher can you hear me?
Your boys took a hell of a beating!"
|
|
|
|
Spencer_White
|
|
« Reply #47 on: Wednesday, July 16, 2008, 17:31:04 » |
|
Fuck you Southend. He didnt want your crappy League 1 club either!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
alanmayes
Offline
Posts: 1437
|
|
« Reply #48 on: Wednesday, July 16, 2008, 17:34:12 » |
|
Press & Journal in sheep land says no fee was invloved as well! Cant imagine that being the case!
Jez Moxey Wolves CEO begs to differ! http://www.wolves.premiumtv.co.uk/page/News/0,,10307~1344880,00.html |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"It's not delusions of grandeur sir,it's intolerance of mediocrity and minimal performances."
|
|
|
pumbaa
Ha, no cunt in my title anymore. Oh.....
Offline
Posts: 6351
Fartmeister
|
|
« Reply #49 on: Wednesday, July 16, 2008, 19:25:06 » |
|
Aberdeen ain't exactly the Costa del Sol is it? What on earth made him want to go there? Its grim oooppp north (especially in the Granite City)......
Oh well, never mind, we have an injury ravaged LB to look at instead.....ho hum.....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Elvis
Offline
Posts: 91
|
|
« Reply #50 on: Wednesday, July 16, 2008, 19:56:58 » |
|
Aberdeen's nice, the granite looks good, especially in the summer. The lad's Scottish so fair play to him for heading back up. As others have said just pleased he didn't join Saffend.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Luci
Offline
Posts: 10862
Fatbury's Stalker
|
|
« Reply #51 on: Wednesday, July 16, 2008, 19:58:25 » |
|
I really liked Aberdeen when I went to visit friends and I went in November!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pumbaa
Ha, no cunt in my title anymore. Oh.....
Offline
Posts: 6351
Fartmeister
|
|
« Reply #52 on: Wednesday, July 16, 2008, 20:08:34 » |
|
I was taking the piss.....where is that whooooosh smiley again? I'll stick to being sensible in the future.
Although Aberdeen IS a dump. IMO of course.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
lambourn red
|
|
« Reply #53 on: Thursday, July 17, 2008, 08:22:18 » |
|
Fun to be had on BBC 606 with Southend Fans http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A38399656comments like "Swindon Town - Is someone having a laugh - STFC fan poking fun at Southend! History is history, SWTF is a tin pot club with fan base to go and a shocking ground" deserve to be replied. why do Southend suddenly think they are such a big team |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tans
You spin me right round baby right round
Offline
Posts: 26759
|
|
« Reply #54 on: Thursday, July 17, 2008, 10:55:53 » |
|
another comment:
"Past is History.
Southend are moving up and growing, Swindon Town are not and have not been for a while now.
SOUTHEND UNITED ARE AS IT STANDS A BIGGER SUPPORTED CLUB, WITH BETTER RESOURCES AND A NEW STADIUM ON THE WAY THAT WOULD PUT THE LIKES OF THE CG TO ABSOLUTE SHAME!"
erm yeah alright then
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27180
|
|
« Reply #55 on: Thursday, July 17, 2008, 10:59:14 » |
|
SOUTHEND UNITED ARE AS IT STANDS A BIGGER SUPPORTED CLUB Probably true if you look at their crowds for the last few months of last season compared to ours. WITH BETTER RESOURCES High unlikely. We've got loadsa money. AND A NEW STADIUM ON THE WAY THAT WOULD PUT THE LIKES OF THE CG TO ABSOLUTE SHAME!" Again, probably true. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36334
|
|
« Reply #56 on: Thursday, July 17, 2008, 15:35:18 » |
|
I think the last point is wrong. We've painted stuff red. That's way betterer.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spencer_White
|
|
« Reply #57 on: Thursday, July 17, 2008, 17:12:09 » |
|
Fair play to Southend. They have just about doubled their attendances in 2 years.
Still only getting 8,000 though. We'll get that this season.
Not all new stadiums put ours to shame. The Walkers is still half finnished. Some of these new grounds are going to look very shabby very quickly. The Kassam springs to mind.
They are never bigger than us. No history either.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #58 on: Thursday, July 17, 2008, 17:21:59 » |
|
OK if our ground is a shithole what does that make Roots Hall?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
|
« Reply #59 on: Thursday, July 17, 2008, 17:22:08 » |
|
Rivalry aside - you're right the Kassam did age very, very quickly.
I hope we don't one day go for the "bowl stadium", unless they try and make it at least a little bit unique!!!
The fact that Mulgrew rejected Southend says alot - they're no different to us, other than the fact they've enjoyed a bit of Championship football recently. I believe the beating they got against Doncaster could prove to be a significant turning point for them - as Brighton was for us.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
