STFCBird
Ralphy's Wet Dream
Offline
Posts: 10673
C U Next Tuesday!
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Friday, March 28, 2008, 15:08:05 » |
|
I'd just like a holiday, even if I have to stand in terminal 5 for 2 weeks least I'd be away from this shitting cunt hole
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sussex
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: Friday, March 28, 2008, 15:08:34 » |
|
Gatwick's fine. Malpas out!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC4LIFE
Fence Fucker
Offline
Posts: 2785
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: Friday, March 28, 2008, 15:33:59 » |
|
Somebody will be blaming Malpas in a minute..... I do. He's also the reason Lucy Beale ran away.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 34014
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: Friday, March 28, 2008, 16:27:55 » |
|
I pity anyone who has to deal with BA's customer service. Worst CS department ever. Even worse the NTL (of old). That bad.
surely you should have said 'I pity the fool...'
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ronnie21
Offline
Posts: 6154
The Mighty Hankerton
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: Friday, March 28, 2008, 16:59:53 » |
|
Somebody will be blaming Malpas in a minute..... I do. He's also the reason Lucy Beale ran away. I thought that was Fred Elliott's fault!! 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sussex
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: Saturday, March 29, 2008, 17:34:40 » |
|
15-20,000 backlog of bags now. Oh dear. That'll cost a bit in compo.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36340
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: Saturday, March 29, 2008, 17:53:40 » |
|
15-20,000 backlog of bags now. Oh dear. That'll cost a bit in compo. Depends at which end of the range it is I would guess. If it's only 15 it won't be much 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sussex
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: Saturday, March 29, 2008, 18:05:53 » |
|
Surprising how many people will have just bought digital cameras, camcorders and mobile phones that they'll be claiming for.. 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 58100
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: Friday, April 11, 2008, 10:34:08 » |
|
May affect some peoples bookings with BA http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7342263.stm British Airways has delayed moving most of its long-haul flights to Heathrow's new Terminal 5 until June.
"It is only sensible to ensure that Terminal 5 is operating consistently at a high standard before the move begins," said BA boss Willie Walsh.
The new £4.3bn terminal has been plagued by problems, especially with its baggage handling, since it opened.
Almost all of BA's long-haul flights were supposed to switch from Terminal 4 to Terminal 5 on 30 April.
Tough opening
In a joint statement with BAA, the airports operator, BA said that: "While a normal flight schedule has been operated at Terminal 5 since Tuesday, we want to ensure that customers can be confident of high service standards when additional flights are introduced."
"We will work together to iron out any remaining problems, including the baggage system and its operation, and develop a robust timescale for phasing the move of Terminal 4 services into Terminal 5."
BA's Mr Walsh added that the companies had taken the decision "in the interests of customers".
"Though Terminal 5 is now working well, we need to have confidence that good service can be maintained when the terminal is handling larger numbers of customers."
Sixty arrivals and 60 departures per day were due to be moved.
Customers whose terminal has been changed will be contacted shortly, BA and BAA said.
Lost bags
BAA's chief executive Colin Matthews said: "BAA fully recognises that the inauguration of Terminal Five has not been as smooth as we and BA would have wished."
"BAA regrets this postponement and we recognise the impact it has on other airlines," he added.
Terminal 5 opened on 27 March, but was not able to offer its full short-haul schedule until 8 April.
Thousands of passengers have lost their bags and hundreds of flights have been delayed or cancelled.
Last week, BA said the problems had cost it at least £16m so far.
"This is a sensible move, which gives time to make sure everything works smoothly," said Paul Kenny, general secretary of the GMB union.
BA shares opened 1.4% higher in London and were not significantly moved by the announcement.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Luci
Offline
Posts: 10862
Fatbury's Stalker
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: Friday, April 11, 2008, 10:49:27 » |
|
I'd definitely reconsider flying BA in the future.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BANGKOK RED
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: Friday, April 11, 2008, 11:30:36 » |
|
Poor people this morning turning up to check in at 4am for a 06.45 flight ended up missing their flight cause staff didn't know what they were doing!
Surely somebody must have though it odd that so many people where missing from the flight, did anybody get on the plane?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Luci
Offline
Posts: 10862
Fatbury's Stalker
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: Friday, April 11, 2008, 11:32:27 » |
|
Apparently the plane did leave with passengers but the systems they had in place were so bad communication wise that they didn't know where to locate the passengers in the terminal!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BANGKOK RED
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: Friday, April 11, 2008, 11:34:20 » |
|
On the subject of Airports, anybody been to Singapore Airport? It is fucking ace.
You NEVER have to wait for your luggage, and on departure it has a wicked rooftop terrace bar thing overlooking the runway. Best airport I have been to by far.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 58100
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: Friday, April 11, 2008, 11:36:24 » |
|
On the subject of Airports, anybody been to Singapore Airport? It is fucking ace.
You NEVER have to wait for your luggage, and on departure it has a wicked rooftop terrace bar thing overlooking the runway. Best airport I have been to by far. Briefly as a connecting flight. I thoroughly recommend the Singapore Airways business class lounge. Didn't really leave that to be honest.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 16138
We'll never die!
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: Friday, April 11, 2008, 14:40:01 » |
|
I'm meant to be flying out of Terminal 5 at the end of June I think. Hopefully they'll get it all sorted by then!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|