Thetownend.com

25% => Players => Topic started by: medwayred on Saturday, December 29, 2012, 18:46:29



Title: Matt Richie
Post by: medwayred on Saturday, December 29, 2012, 18:46:29
Twitter is reporting Palace making a bit for Richie. My son will be gutted if he goes. Can we replace Richie?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: STFC4LIFE on Saturday, December 29, 2012, 18:50:57
It's bollocks


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: SuggWillSugg MBE on Saturday, December 29, 2012, 18:58:41
It's bollocks

It's Tans..


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: medwayred on Saturday, December 29, 2012, 18:59:15
Well let's hope so


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Flashheart on Saturday, December 29, 2012, 19:09:03
Tans. I tip my hat to you sir. That's two whoppers in one day.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Stef Troll on Saturday, December 29, 2012, 19:13:06
Palace got a winger called Bolasie who is much better then Ritchie


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: stfcinbmth on Saturday, December 29, 2012, 19:26:15
Tans. I tip my hat to you sir. That's two whoppers in one day.

He's done well today


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Langers on Saturday, December 29, 2012, 20:21:19
The Brighton one was my favourite...


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RpeedieRed on Saturday, December 29, 2012, 21:04:58
The stuff on twitter started as wolves then changed to Brighton then to palace.
God it's  only December and its started already. I hate transfer windows.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Coca Fola on Saturday, December 29, 2012, 21:20:20
Obviously this isn't serious but if we could get anything north of £1 million I would sell him.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Shaw Rosso on Saturday, December 29, 2012, 21:35:53
Who started the Di Canio to Barnsley rumour then? Own up  :)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: SuggWillSugg MBE on Saturday, December 29, 2012, 21:37:01
Do you even need to ask?


Title: Re: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: tans on Saturday, December 29, 2012, 21:45:33
Today has been a good day.


Title: Re: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Shaw Rosso on Saturday, December 29, 2012, 21:48:56
Today has been a good day.

Well done, have you considered setting up an ITK account for January? I will follow you just for the laughs


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: tans on Saturday, December 29, 2012, 23:30:27
Got one already


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Sunday, December 30, 2012, 08:54:18
Got one already

[url width=150 height=150]http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o209/candyheart235/a.jpg[/url]

:)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Peter Venkman on Sunday, December 30, 2012, 09:26:36
Mr Tans strikes yet again, love it! even the facebook Swindon Town page mentioned you! I doff my titfer.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Benzel on Sunday, December 30, 2012, 09:35:22
Boooooooooorrrrring.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Power to people on Sunday, December 30, 2012, 19:40:07
Fair play Tans that is soo funny all the ones that fell for it


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RpeedieRed on Monday, January 14, 2013, 09:41:12
Is it worth spending a quid to vote for Ritchie in the Advers sportsman of the year award?...er no, sorry Matt.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: STFCforeigner on Monday, January 14, 2013, 10:05:36
No idea if it's true, but just read on twitter that Wolves have made an offer


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Shaw Rosso on Monday, January 14, 2013, 10:50:09
No idea if it's true, but just read on twitter that Wolves have made an offer

I think I started that one off last week, £1.4m it was, It got a couple of lines in the Independent Online  :)

ITK  ;)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: THE FLASH on Monday, January 14, 2013, 11:13:06
Wolves can pay our fucking sponsorship money then....


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: STFCforeigner on Monday, January 14, 2013, 11:28:04
I think I started that one off last week, £1.4m it was, It got a couple of lines in the Independent Online  :)

ITK  ;)

Haha. So YOU'RE the face behind @npowertransfers ?  :D


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: jimmy_onions on Monday, January 14, 2013, 11:59:43
isnt all this starting transfer talk a little unsettling - wouldnt it be funnier to start rumours for non stfc players, or players coming to stfc?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Flashheart on Monday, January 14, 2013, 12:02:48
They're not unsettling in the slightest to anybody that is not gullible enough to believe them.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: jimmy_onions on Monday, January 14, 2013, 12:06:26
in order for these spoofs to be even vageuly credible (and therefore for the whole 'joke' to work), they have to have a certain amount of plausibility - which in my opinion makes them potentially damaging.

Even so, my point was, surely it would be funnier to 'unsettle' or not as the case may be, Constable, for example.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Flashheart on Monday, January 14, 2013, 12:09:55
Nah!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Monday, January 14, 2013, 12:33:20
Even so, my point was, surely it would be funnier to 'unsettle' or not as the case may be, Constable, for example.

Paolo already did the Constable one.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Shaw Rosso on Monday, January 14, 2013, 17:42:26
Haha. So YOU'RE the face behind @npowertransfers ?  :D

Not me  :)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: THE FLASH on Monday, January 14, 2013, 18:57:10
They're not unsettling in the slightest to anybody that is not gullible enough to believe them.

Fuck off...I'm unsettled.....off me grub and everything..


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RpeedieRed on Tuesday, January 22, 2013, 09:53:48
Off to Palace now apparently to replace Zaha? Is Zaha supposed to be going to Arsenal?
Cut out the middle man I say, Wenger should sign Ritchie. He couldn't be any worse than some of the donkeys he's signed over the past few years, he'd be a bargain, and he's British. Maybe we could get Arshavin in return, looks like he could do with the Paolo treatment.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, January 22, 2013, 09:55:40
Off to Palace now apparently to replace Zaha? Is Zaha supposed to be going to Arsenal?
Cut out the middle man I say, Wenger should sign Ritchie. He couldn't be any worse than some of the donkeys he's signed over the past few years, he'd be a bargain, and he's British. Maybe we could get Arshavin in return, looks like he could do with the Paolo treatment.
More chance of Wenger coming round your house and shaving your arse than getting Arshavin.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: LittleRed on Tuesday, January 22, 2013, 10:11:56
Being suggested zaha is off to manchester united


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DRS on Tuesday, January 22, 2013, 11:20:55
Being returned to palace on loan though


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: bigbobjoylove on Wednesday, January 23, 2013, 20:49:11
http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11095/8429470/Sky-Sports-understands-Crystal-Palace-have-bid-for-Swindon-winger-Matt-Ritchie

Hopefully just a re-hash of the earlier rumour.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Quagmire on Wednesday, January 23, 2013, 20:51:26
“@SkySportsPeteO: Crystal Palace have made a bid for Swindon winger Matt Ritchie. #CPFC #STFC”


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Gnasher on Wednesday, January 23, 2013, 20:53:09
http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11095/8429470/Sky-Sports-understands-Crystal-Palace-have-bid-for-Swindon-winger-Matt-Ritchie

Hopefully just a re-hash of the earlier rumour.

That's my thought. They made an enquiry, nothing more.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Wednesday, January 23, 2013, 21:01:20
Need to keep hold of him. This is when the uncertainty over the sale of the club is worrying. Who's making the decision on whether to accept or reject and for what reasons.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: leefer on Wednesday, January 23, 2013, 21:02:30
http://www.cpfc.org/forums/showthread.php?t=235257&page=2

Eagles take on it.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Peter Gibbons on Wednesday, January 23, 2013, 21:29:49
Perhaps as some kind of exchange deal?

[url width=800 height=300]http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/c0.100.851.315/p851x315/131635_430179880376382_833569850_o.jpg[/url]


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, January 23, 2013, 21:36:50
Not sure if this has any truth to it, but he's certainly good enough. Big big loss if he goes.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: hobnob on Wednesday, January 23, 2013, 21:50:18
Tell them he will cost 13 million - sorted!

 :D


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Shaw Rosso on Wednesday, January 23, 2013, 22:03:50
Mark R ‏@AdvertiserSport
Ritchie is a top talent outside of the Championship. Holloway, as I said yesterday, told me he won't talk about other club's players. #cpfc

The Croydon Advertiser's uneventful comments on the matter


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RedRag on Wednesday, January 23, 2013, 22:06:11
Talking of Ritchie, it seems Eden Hazard has been taking lessons

Anyone see the altercation between Hazard and the Swansea ballboy trying to waste time?





Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: LittleRed on Wednesday, January 23, 2013, 22:11:29
Swindon Town have said they have not received any bid.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: hobnob on Wednesday, January 23, 2013, 22:25:08
Talking of Ritchie, it seems Eden Hazard has been taking lessons

Anyone see the altercation between Hazard and the Swansea ballboy trying to waste time?




Little chav is on Twitter bragging about it, although Hazard shouldn't have booted him like that!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: TheMajorSTFC on Wednesday, January 23, 2013, 22:30:10
Morshead has tweeted saying unaware of any bid for Ritchie!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: [email protected] on Wednesday, January 23, 2013, 23:52:55
I'm sure someone will make a cheeky bid for him after the bollocks about us about to go into administration, but IF we were to let him go, what do you feel a fair offer for him would be?

PDC has stated he would want £2m for him but personally I think somewhere in the region of £1.5m to £1.75m.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: LittleRed on Thursday, January 24, 2013, 19:25:18
Doesnt Matt Ritchies contract end in the summer. I would have thought talks should be ongoing about a new one but i would also imaghine Ritchies would want to wait to see the outcome of this season before he does commit but its leaving it all a bit fine to me.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Saxondale on Thursday, January 24, 2013, 19:26:47
Nope.  18 months to go I believe.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Summerof69 on Thursday, January 24, 2013, 19:28:32
Nope.  18 months to go I believe.

Yes, Ritchie signed an extension in the summer.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: LittleRed on Thursday, January 24, 2013, 21:06:08
Yes, Ritchie signed an extension in the summer.

cheers


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Cibocchi_Is_God on Thursday, January 24, 2013, 21:47:54
Desperately hope that we can keep hold of Ritchie in this window, vitally important to our system and is as consistent as you can be as a League One winger.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: leefer on Thursday, January 24, 2013, 21:53:01
Depends on if Wilfred gets his big move i reckon.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: suttonred on Thursday, January 24, 2013, 22:17:54
I would hazard a guess that he will stay as pdc will say if we dont go up and they come back for you in the summer...


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: TheMajorSTFC on Thursday, January 24, 2013, 22:27:52
I think Palace have targeted Albert Adomah from Shitty??


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Friday, January 25, 2013, 08:40:14
I would hazard a guess that he will stay as pdc will say if we dont go up and they come back for you in the summer...

I think you're right SR but can we please stop talking about Hazard. :-)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: bevanoli on Monday, January 28, 2013, 21:24:42
We need him to stay.. but to be fair.. hes good.. but.. has he been found out in League 1 or was League 2 just that too easy for him!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: suttonred on Monday, January 28, 2013, 22:43:43
Big piece on him in the mail today. That fat beardy twat has been having a go, saying how come he got off with a yellow for tangling with the ball boy at the shed, when ( i know i know) hazard got a 3 game ban.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Swindon Please Win on Monday, January 28, 2013, 22:58:34
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/article-2269299/Eden-Hazard-ball-boy-kick-charge-shows-FA-hypocrites--Martin-Samuel.html

There's the article. Still talking about the stupid ballboy incident, Ritchie didn't even kick the ballboy so you can't really compare them.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: jonny72 on Monday, January 28, 2013, 23:13:26
It amazes me how many so called expert journalists and pundits don't even know the rules and regulations.

The ref saw the Ritchie incident and issued a yellow, which means there is nothing else the FA can do - they're not allowed to change it to a red or issue a ban. The ref saw the Hazard incident and issued a red, the FA are allowed to issue the punishment they (or rather the panel) sees fit. You might think the rules stupid (and I think it mainly comes from a FIFA directive that the refs decision is final) but they're the rules that the game is played to.

Which makes the majority of that article nothing more than the ramblings of a moron.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: TheMajorSTFC on Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 00:13:54
Yellow Cards for these ballboy incidents was so 2012!


Title: Re: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: tans on Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 06:09:48
Them Oxford fans were still fucking going about it. Fuck knows why, they won the game.

Anyway when we drew them in the cup, the ballboy tweeted 'hello swindon, love the ballboy'


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 08:54:32
It amazes me how many so called expert journalists and pundits don't even know the rules and regulations.

Which makes the majority of that article nothing more than the ramblings of a moron.

Wiki reckons he gets paid over £400k a year to write for them. Fuck me - i'm in the wrong job.



Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: pumbaa on Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 09:18:44
Wiki reckons he gets paid over £400k a year to write for them. Fuck me - i'm in the wrong job.



In so much as you get paid nothing to write the same quality shit?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Benzel on Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 09:31:03
Grabbed round the throat and kicked?! Fuck off.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 10:38:40
In so much as you get paid nothing to write the same quality shit?

Exactly. :-)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Red Frog on Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 10:45:02
Daily Mail in biased, bigoted article shock.  :eek:

If you don't want to get angry, don't go there.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: pumbaa on Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 10:55:15
Exactly. :-)

You are so deserving of more.....


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 11:11:20
You are so deserving of more.....

Thanks. If you have the contacts, feel free to put me in touch with the right people.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: pumbaa on Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 11:26:26
I hear the FL Paper is after somebody with some creative writing skills.....


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 12:13:34
I hear the FL Paper is after somebody with some creative writing skills.....

Be sure to put a good word in with your boss for me then...


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: LittleRed on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 15:49:31
New bid for Ritchie from Bournemouth


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: LJ9 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 15:50:42
New bid for Ritchie from Bournemouth

getting a little boring now with Bournemouth bidding for Ritchie.

This is what, the 4th or 5th time???


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: LittleRed on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 15:52:14
Maybe they hav met Paolos 15m valuation. Sweet! We should start bidding for their players. Okane anyone.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 15:59:01
Swap him for David James


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Trashbat? on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:00:45
Most likely testing the water to see if we still need the money or not


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: newmarket red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:01:22
 :sherlock:I bet they have bid 700,000 with add ons.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: FormerlyPlymRed on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:02:05
I wish we just responded in an email saying 'no, now will you fuck off'.



Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:02:55
Most likely testing the water to see if we still need the money or not

This. Unless of course they have matched paolo's valuation which is probably about 3.5 million now


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Bob's Orange on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:08:08
Unconfirmed reports suggest #stfc have agreed a fee of £600,000 with #afcb for Matt Ritchie.



Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: sonicyouth on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:08:40
Bournemouth reporter suggests we've accepted a 600k bid

which is baffling


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:09:33
Its not quite £15m is it?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Weasel on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:09:41
Jed out!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: magicroundabout on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:09:58
Bournemouth reporter suggests we've accepted a 600k bid

which is baffling

backwards move if you ask me


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:10:00
Haven't we turned down more money before?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: tans on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:10:19
Bournemouth Sports Reporter: @neilperrettecho: Unconfirmed reports suggest #stfc have agreed a fee of £600,000 with #afcb for Matt Ritchie.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Gnasher on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:11:29
The first actions of the new board?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:12:01
McCory Out


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: magicroundabout on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:14:05
if it is the actions of the new board then surely they'd have someone else in mind to replace him as he has been a major part of our squad and would be difficult to replace


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:15:15
This can't be right, surely?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:15:44
if it is the actions of the new board then surely they'd have someone else in mind to replace him as he has been a major part of our squad and would be difficult to replace
Bradley Wright Phillips ?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: jimmy_onions on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:16:04
wrong club, wrong amount, wrong time. Cant be true.

(1000)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Posh Red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:16:25
IF THIS IS TRUE  it surely tells us all we need to know about the new owners.

We won't get Championship football selling our best players, unless we have a replacement of equal quality lined up.

How long before Paolo follows him out of the door


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Ardiles on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:17:09
If true, the rationale/explanation for the sale from the new owners (whoever they are) will be the first clue as to their plans for the Club.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Gnasher on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:17:46
if it is the actions of the new board then surely they'd have someone else in mind to replace him as he has been a major part of our squad and would be difficult to replace

If the new board are only with us for 6 months (maybe they'll buy a bigger club), they could sell all our best players, bring in freebies and then sell the club for a profit in the Summer  8)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: LucienSanchez on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:19:24
If this is true, I'll be livid. The new board will win no friends by doing this, and neither will Black for selling to them.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Cibocchi_Is_God on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:19:45
If true, who has made this decision? The new owners or Black? Hardly endearing to your new fans IF it is the new owners...
Morsehead also said that the new owners & Black will retain joint running of the club until the takeover is ratified, so has it been accepted to fund the club during that period?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: magicroundabout on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:20:22
Bradley Wright Phillips ?

i'd be happy with that


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: london_red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:20:47
Hold up guys, this is only unconfirmed reports, from the Bournemouth local rag. As we are acutely aware after the last few weeks, it's not unheard of for local media to report off incorrect information


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: sonicyouth on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:21:32
Haven't we turned down more money before?

£900,000 if you believe this

http://www.thisisswindontownfc.co.uk/news/9821780.Ritch_fee_/


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Gnasher on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:22:38
i'd be happy with that

I'd want Shaun W-P if we sell Ritchie!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: The_Doctor on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:22:51
If this is the first act of the board to come in pocket half a million they can go fuck themselves. I do hope this isnt true. To sell now and under PDC's nose as well.... I do hope 2+2=5


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Riddick on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:25:34
Will not be happy if this turns out to be true!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Samdy Gray on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:25:51
I think this is the same journo that was shit stirring the last time that B'mouth were in for Ritchie.

I'd take this "news" with a gigantic pinch of salt.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: AldbourneRed on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:26:22
Given the only source for this 'unconfirmed report' at the moment is a reporter for the Bournemouth Echo, and our recent experiences with exactly how (in)accurate "news"papers can be, I'm not going to worry or start speculating just yet.

Maybe some port and a nice strong stilton will help keep the panic button at bay


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Shaw Rosso on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:27:34
The only person I know with any connection to the club whatsoever tells me that Ritchie is going and Madine is coming in, subject to paperwork.

Don't mean its true though


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: tans on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:28:31
Bbc wiltshire -
@BBCWiltshire: SPORT: @BBCWiltshire understands that #Swindon Town had already called in financial accountants before the takeover was completed. #stfc

- @BBCWiltshire: SPORT: The accountants are understood to have sent a list to all Football League clubs stating that every #Swindon Town player was for sale


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: kaufman on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:29:19
BBC Wiltshire ‏@BBCWiltshire
SPORT: It's important to point out that today's takeover of #Swindon Town means that is no longer happening. #stfc

confusing isn't it


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Riddick on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:30:15
So Bournemouth made the offer earlier in the week when this went out. Hopefully we no longer need to accept it now


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: tans on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:30:17
What the hell


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: adje on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:30:20
That would be the worst bit of business since Fjortoftgate


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: LJ9 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:30:23
this is interesting tweet from BBC Wilts

"SPORT: The accountants are understood to have sent a list to all Football League clubs stating that every #Swindon Town player was for sale"

EDIT: Sorry Tans


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: random_five on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:31:17
Hasn't Moorshead already covered this? Admin error or something??


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:32:21
What the fuck is going on?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Abrahammer on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:33:28
What the fuck is going on?

People getting carried away with everything they read on social media


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Trashbat? on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:33:38
If anything it shows how close to being totally fucked we were.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: sonicyouth on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:33:51
something is rotten in the state of DenmarkSwindon


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: yeo on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:34:08
exciting isnt it


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: magicroundabout on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:34:14
someone tweet SM and find out as it's quite confusing


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: random_five on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:35:01
1:34pm

 Today's report in the Daily Mail which suggested Swindon Town's players were all up for sale and that the club was about to be plunged into administration appears to have been the result of an erroneous email.
 
The Advertiser has learnt that an agent issued the missive, which intimated that every member of the Town squad was available for transfer, last night.
 


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: LJ9 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:36:15
AAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!

MIND FUCKKKKKKKKKKK!!!!!!

 :crash: :crash: :crash: :crash: :crash: :crash: :crash:


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:36:29
How tinpot. Embarrassing.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: kaufman on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:36:33
Important

Last night all clubs were told all our players were for sale, a letter prematurely sent out.

BBC have stated now the takeover has happened this is now not the case.

Hopefully that means Matt Richie is not going anywhere but was subject to a bid from last night email should the deal not have gone though.

Makes sense?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: random_five on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:36:36
someone tweet SM and find out as it's quite confusing

SM tweeted this 2 mins ago

Sam Morshead‏@SamMorshead_SA

club's finances had prematurely sent out an email saying all players available for transfer last night.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: TheMajorSTFC on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:36:47
Fuck off Bournemouth with your 3 sided tin pot piece of shit ground  :D (sorry, any excuse to have a little dig)...again I won't believe this until Ritchie has a Bournemouth scarf above his head on their bog of a pitch!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:36:53
exciting isnt it
But it isn't a Friday! Statement Friday is dead! We want statement Wednesday!!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Red Frog on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:37:59
Makes a bit of a difference if it turns out it was the club's accountants rather than an agent putting the news out. A little like the earlier use of the "A" word, this sounds like playing brinkmanship games in public.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:38:32
The woodwork squeaks and out come the freaks...


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: jimmy_onions on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:38:52
SM tweeted this a couple of secs ago..


Sam Morshead‏@SamMorshead_SA

In answer to all your questions, I have no fucking idea what the fuck is going on...I am preparing for full scale panic and meltdown....aaaaaaarrrrghhhhh...what the fuuuuck

I think he's lost it.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Abrahammer on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:39:43
So basically some agent got carried away when he saw the prospect of earning himself a few £

Says more about agents than our club


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: sonicyouth on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:40:37
So basically some agent got carried away when he saw the prospect of earning himself a few £

Says more about agents than our club
but it wasn't an agent.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Gnasher on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:41:19
SM tweeted this a couple of secs ago..


Sam Morshead‏@SamMorshead_SA

In answer to all your questions, I have no fucking idea what the fuck is going on...I am preparing for full scale panic and meltdown....aaaaaaarrrrghhhhh...what the fuuuuck

I think he's lost it.

I might buy tomorrow's Adver if he publishes that.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: blinkpip on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:43:08
What a lot of shite. Even if we sell Ritchie for 600k, Portsmouth probably get half.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: magicroundabout on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:44:30
SM tweeted this 2 mins ago

Sam Morshead‏@SamMorshead_SA

club's finances had prematurely sent out an email saying all players available for transfer last night.


would explain the shitty offer from Bournemouth then. But what a fuckup by the financial dept at STFC though


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Ardiles on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:44:41
This is all feeling very 2007.

I think I'm due another internet holiday.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Abrahammer on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:45:09
but it wasn't an agent.

According to Adver it was, contradicts BBC Wilts though which does to back to Contanza's point regarding sitting back and waiting for official news.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Trashbat? on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:46:07
This couldn't happen to any other club, feels like im watching an episode of Mike Bassett


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: sonicyouth on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:48:17
According to Adver it was, contradicts BBC Wilts though which does to back to Contanza's point regarding sitting back and waiting for official news.
nah, both the Adver and BBC Wilts are reporting that it was a fuck up by the interim financial restructuring folks (aka administrators)

https://twitter.com/SamMorshead_SA/status/296657096940851201
https://twitter.com/SamMorshead_SA/status/296657268039114754


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: kerry red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:48:30
Feck me - players come, players go.

Who gives a shit


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Langers on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:50:04
I'm really fucking confused.

Bit surprised we haven't heard anything from the club, even just to deny the Ritchie rumours (assuming they aren't true)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:51:06
Feck me - players come, players go.

Who gives a shit

Really?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Abrahammer on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:51:24
nah, both the Adver and BBC Wilts are reporting that it was a fuck up by the interim financial restructuring folks (aka administrators)

https://twitter.com/SamMorshead_SA/status/296657096940851201
https://twitter.com/SamMorshead_SA/status/296657268039114754

Fair enough, my head hurts

Things like this were so much easier in the days more instant media


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: sonicyouth on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:51:35
Feck me - players come, players go.

Who gives a shit
seriously?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: random_five on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:52:25
Feck me - players come, players go.

Who gives a shit

Eh?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Abrahammer on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:52:39
KR

You know this is Swindon fans forum?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: welshred on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:52:58
As far as I see it, things were looking pretty bleak on the takeover last night so the e-mail was released to the press with a view to getting some money in before the end of the transfer window.

The takeover is now complete so no its no longer applicable.

Simple.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: kerry red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:53:30
Really?

Look - we, as supporters, are at the very bottom of the pecking order.

Always have been, always will be.

Nobody in the Boardroom gives a flying fuck what the supporters think.

So why bother with all the hand-wringing and wrist-slashing


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: jonah on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:53:36
This is why it's so exciting being a Swindon supporter - we never know what the fuck is going to happen!
 :eek:
Winning at Wembley and getting to Premiershit, subsequent relegation to bottom division, administration twice, fight for clubs very survival, Italian superstar takes over - Champions of our division and promotion - WTF!!!

Almost makes me feel sorry for the likes of Man Ure fans - what with their near constant stream of success and stability...... They're missing out on the highs and lows that only Swindon fans can appreciate (and Portsmouth of course)....


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Gnasher on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:53:41
Feck me - players come, players go.

Who gives a shit

First game after 10 years away and you've given up already?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: sonicyouth on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:54:25
As far as I see it, things were looking pretty bleak on the takeover last night so the e-mail was released to the press with a view to getting some money in before the end of the transfer window.

The takeover is now complete so no its no longer applicable.

Simple.
it was sent prematurely but there's no real confirmation that any deal for the club has been done, just "understanding" from the Adver.

the Ritchie stuff sounds like a story that has come out a few days late


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: china red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:56:16
The 'no comment' from both ourselves and AFCB regarding bids for Ritchie concerns me


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: kerry red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:56:59
First game after 10 years away and you've given up already?

It's not a case of giving up - but, honestly, what's the point in all the shock-horror stuff when many of us have seen it all before - more than once.

If Ritchie stays, fine

If he goes, get on with it. It wont stop me going to games


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:58:14
Look - we, as supporters, are at the very bottom of the pecking order.

Always have been, always will be.

Nobody in the Boardroom gives a flying fuck what the supporters think.

So why bother with all the hand-wringing and wrist-slashing

You may be right (to a reasonable extent), but supporting a team lasts longer than just 90 minutes on a Saturday or Tuesday night. It's just the way it is!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: sonicyouth on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 16:58:50
It's not a case of giving up - but, honestly, what's the point in all the shock-horror stuff when many of us have seen it all before - more than once.

If Ritchie stays, fine

If he goes, get on with it. It wont stop me going to games

here is the point: X











this is you: Y

see how you are missing it?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Quagmire on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:00:12
Pointless worrying about anything just yet, it's all reports, until something official comes out it's not concerning.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: AldbourneRed on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:01:00
The 'no comment' from both ourselves and AFCB regarding bids for Ritchie concerns me

I imagine the club are too busy tying up the takeover to worry about commenting on some speculative offer from Bournemouth, and if AFCB haven't heard back from us yet they're not likely to want to comment either


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: adje on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:01:21
"Players come and players go"-yes,but hopefully not to close rivals!Shearer to Blackburn all over again.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: kerry red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:01:30
Jeez, what I mean is it doesn't matter what you or I think of the situation.

What will happen, will happen with very little, if any, regard to the fans.

I just don't get the doom and gloom if Ritchie is sold - it's what clubs like Swindon do ad infinitum


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: random_five on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:01:57
Only at STFC could we get new owners who's first act is to sell our best player to a smaller club for 50p and a bag of grapes


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Gnasher on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:03:11
It's not a case of giving up - but, honestly, what's the point in all the shock-horror stuff when many of us have seen it all before - more than once.

If Ritchie stays, fine

If he goes, get on with it. It wont stop me going to games

I don't think it's Ritchie leaving that's causing the panic - it's the amount of money supposedly being accepted, and what it says about the intensions of the new board. Personally, I think it's a load of bollocks but I'm happy to play along.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Bob's Orange on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:04:06
So far, neither #afcb nor #stfc making any comment on Matt Ritchie bid. Deal could be done today or in morning understands @BmthEchoSport

Hmmm.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: kerry red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:05:40
Again - it's nothing the fans have any control over.

If we are about to get fucked over by Jedward there aint nothing we can do about it.

For all we know the new mob may sell ALL the players, pocket the cash and fuck off.

Then again, they may well be fine, upstanding and sympathetic owners!!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: adje on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:06:44
Jeez, what I mean is it doesn't matter what you or I think of the situation.



It doesn't really matter what we think of anything-but its what forums are for I guess


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Bumpkin on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:07:08
"Players come and players go"-yes,but hopefully not to close rivals!Shearer to Blackburn all over again.

Hope we don't sign another Terry Gibson type.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Red Frog on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:07:50
nah, both the Adver and BBC Wilts are reporting that it was a fuck up by the interim financial restructuring folks (aka administrators)

https://twitter.com/SamMorshead_SA/status/296657096940851201
https://twitter.com/SamMorshead_SA/status/296657268039114754

The hand of Andronikou?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Gnasher on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:08:29
Sam Morshead ‏@SamMorshead_SA

I've been told Bristol City are interested in #stfc striker Andy Williams, of whom City boss Sean O'Driscoll is said to be a big admirer.


Could be the youth team playing Crawley  ;)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: jonah on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:08:45
Jeez, what I mean is it doesn't matter what you or I think of the situation.

What will happen, will happen with very little, if any, regard to the fans.

I just don't get the doom and gloom if Ritchie is sold - it's what clubs like Swindon do ad infinitum

I know where you're coming from - as fan, we are the  bottom feeders so to speak. The ones who support the club regardless of whether they are high flying or dredging the bottom of the leagues....

BUT I'd be mightly pissed off if he does go, just like when Fjortoft went and Shearer.... it would send out all the wrong signals (unless of course the club is fucked financially and we're it's sending out all the correct signals)....





Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: phelpsieboy on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:08:52
Add Andy Williams to the list


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:09:04
Again - it's nothing the fans have any control over.

If we are about to get fucked over by Jedward there aint nothing we can do about it.

For all we know the new mob may sell ALL the players, pocket the cash and fuck off.

Then again, they may well be fine, upstanding and sympathetic owners!!

If we ever go to war can i be in the trenches with you?

As supporters there's nothing we can do about the football on a match day - it doesn't stop us giving a toss though.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:09:14
If we're going to sell one of our best places for 300k+ less than the amount we've previously turned down the we might as well give up full stop.

Selling players on the cheap is not something an ambitious club does and a non ambitious club goes no where, does fuck all and appoints Paul fucking Hart as manager


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:10:02
I wouldn't be surprised if a fee was agreed before the takeover was complete.

I'll be completely pissed off if he actually goes to sodding Bournemouth since the takeover is apparently 'on track'. Palace I can understand, but sodding Bournemouth.  no.



Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Bumpkin on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:11:25
We are a selling club, but why do we never scalp anyone?

We always sell below market value.


Title: Re: Re: Matt Ritchie
Post by: Frigby Daser on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:12:11
This is a car crash. It feels like we're watching all of the good work from the past few years undone in one swoop.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Bob's Orange on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:14:10
The Advertiser understands the prospective new owners of Swindon Town do not want to sell Matt Ritchie, after a £600,000 bid is believed to have been tabled by the Robins' League One rivals.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Gnasher on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:14:23
If an email was erroneously sent to all league clubs then we're bound to receive a few cheeky offers. It's up to the club to tell them all to fuck off.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Bumpkin on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:16:45
I tried to recall an email at work the other day.

Never easy.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: jimmy_onions on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:18:12
while we are all waiting for updates, can someone please explain to me, on twitter, what is the difference between things that are trending with and without hash tags...if there is no difference, what is the point of putting the hash tag in?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:18:54
If an email was erroneously sent to all league clubs then we're bound to receive a few cheeky offers. It's up to the club to tell them all to fuck off.
Exactly!

I tried to recall an email at work the other day.
Never easy.

Even harder for a fax ;)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:19:37
while we are all waiting for updates, can someone please explain to me, on twitter, what is the difference between things that are trending with and without hash tags...if there is no difference, what is the point of putting the hash tag in?

Just so you can search for the #tag and see all posts made about that topic, its just convention.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: jimmy_onions on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:20:54
yes, but you can search for anything and it will come up in tweed, ht'ed or not?



edit, tweets, not tweed.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:27:43
yes, but you can search for anything and it will come up in tweed, ht'ed or not?



edit, tweets, not tweed.

Just convention. You are right it makes no odds.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Coca Fola on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:30:43
If we sell one of our players against Paolo's will he'll be off. Let's hope these rumours aren't true.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:33:35
Why would send an email out like that and appoint administrators for financial restructuring (not going into admin) if we knew a deal so sell was close? It makes no sense at all.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Coca Fola on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:35:17
Why would send an email out like that and appoint administrators for financial restructuring (not going into admin) if we knew a deal so sell was close? It makes no sense at all.
In case the deal fell through?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Abrahammer on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:35:57
If we sell one of our players against Paolo's will he'll be off. Let's hope these rumours aren't true.

He won't stay at any club on a long term basis if he adopts that attitude


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Coca Fola on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:40:44
A manager with ambition deserves a club with ambition.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:47:21
The Advertiser understands the prospective new owners of Swindon Town do not want to sell Matt Ritchie, after a £600,000 bid is believed to have been tabled by the Robins' League One rivals.

Thank. Fuck.

Well all this shit flying around isn't going to be very unsettling to the players is it?? ???


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: ChalkyWhiteIsGod on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:50:09
If that's a PR stunt by the potential new owners then that is genius


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:50:39
If we sell one of our players against Paolo's will he'll be off. Let's hope these rumours aren't true.
Last night, when he was talking about the defeat, he said there were some individual situations that he wanted to sort and that he wasn't afraid to bring in youngsters.....I wouldn't be surprised if he was considering selling a few even if he doesn't have to.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Gnasher on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:50:51
Thank. Fuck.

Well all this shit flying around isn't going to be very unsettling to the players is it?? ???

Hopefully the current board feel the same as the new board.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 17:51:08
[devils advoicate]
"prospective new owners of Swindon Town"

Its not just down to them!
[/devils advocate]


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: BruceChatwin on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 18:20:28
Don't know what to believe and what to ignore any more. The club are hardly providing any clarity. All I know is it's amateur hour around Swindon at the moment.

The word administration has kept on reappearing in the media for a couple of weeks without a strong and convincing enough rebuffal from our chairman to make it stop, our current owner is suffering panic attacks and wants out of a club he has already poured millions of pounds into to try and get to the Championship just as they get themselves on the verge of getting to the Championship, Knight Commander of the Order of St Michael and St George Sir William of Arabia Patey has done fuck all since he's been here except disillusion the fans and get his teeth fixed, we're trying to rush through a sale to investors led by a man who sounds just about fit and able to run a Sunday league team not one with a £250,000 wage bill half a season from the Championship, and amidst this uncertainty, there's still 24 hours left in the transfer window, and other teams are circling like vultures around our assets because of a supposedly erroneous letter sent around all the FL clubs saying 'our players are for sale, come get them on the cheap' (because emails often erroneously write themselves and send themselves to 92 clubs around the country).

It seriously comes to something when Di Canio has seemed like the statesman and voice of reason around this club the last couple of weeks. Happy fucking 2013 Swindon fans.

 :blowup:


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: reeves4england on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 18:22:09
Don't know what to believe and what to ignore any more. The club are hardly providing any clarity. All I know is it's amateur hour around Swindon at the moment.

The word administration has kept on reappearing in the media for a couple of weeks without a strong and convincing enough rebuffal from our chairman to make it stop, our current owner is suffering panic attacks and wants out of a club he has already poured millions of pounds into to try and get to the Championship just as they get themselves on the verge of getting to the Championship, Knight Commander of the Order of St Michael and St George Sir William of Arabia Patey has done fuck all since he's been here except disillusion the fans and get his teeth fixed, we're trying to rush through a sale to investors led by a man who sounds just about fit and able to run a Sunday league team not one with a £250,000 wage bill half a season from the Championship, and amidst this uncertainty, there's still 24 hours left in the transfer window, and other teams are circling like vultures around our assets because of a supposedly erroneous letter sent around all the FL clubs saying 'our players are for sale, come get them on the cheap' (because emails often erroneously write themselves and send themselves to 92 clubs around the country).

It seriously comes to something when Di Canio has seemed like the statesman and voice of reason around this club the last couple of weeks. Happy fucking 2013 Swindon fans.

 :blowup:


What a load of crap.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Barry Scott on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 18:28:20
What a load of crap.

Agreed. There's some serious over-speculation filling up the forum today!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: leefer on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 18:41:22
A manager with ambition deserves a club with ambition.

Better to have a club at all though.....we need funds and our resolve will be tested.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Summerof69 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 18:43:51
Bournemouth Sports Reporter: @neilperrettecho: Unconfirmed reports suggest #stfc have agreed a fee of £600,000 with #afcb for Matt Ritchie.

This is the guy who said it was a 'done deal' this time last year.

He can do one !!


Title: Re: Re: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: herthab on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 18:45:36
What a load of crap.
Just sit back, put your feet up and enjoy it. When I know what to panic about, I'll join in. Until then, chill Winston.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: leefer on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 18:48:51
People are entitled to voice there opinions....dosn't mean there panicking does it :hmmm:



Title: Re: Re: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: herthab on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 18:53:47
People are entitled to voice there opinions....dosn't mean there panicking does it :hmmm:
Voicing concern is fine Lee, it's when people post theories as fact that it becomes ridiculous.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: leefer on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 18:54:55
Voicing concern is fine Lee, it's when people post theories as fact that it becomes ridiculous.

Correct......but panicking :no:


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: BruceChatwin on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 18:55:11
What a load of crap.

It was about 85% tongue-in-cheek crap and 25% sincere opinion in accordance with the ratio demanded by this website. Good to play the LouisCassius role up once in a while and get all your paranoia and worst fears out of your system.

I now feel cleansed and at peace.

 :harp:


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 18:56:18
The Ritchie bid probably came in and was accepted as a contingency plan, just in case the deal didn't go through.

If he ends up at Bournemouth I'll be amazed and question his ambition.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: leefer on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 18:57:32
The Ritchie bid probably came in and was accepted as a contingency plan, just in case the deal didn't go through.

If he ends up at Bournemouth I'll be amazed and question his ambition.

But if we are prepared to sell him Batch.....he will question ours.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: BruceChatwin on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 19:02:08
But if we are prepared to sell him Batch.....he will question ours.

All this is dependent on the new owners. It was the old owners that were willing to sell him. The new owners supposedly want him to stay.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 19:09:42
Don't know what to believe and what to ignore any more. The club are hardly providing any clarity. All I know is it's amateur hour around Swindon at the moment.

The word administration has kept on reappearing in the media for a couple of weeks without a strong and convincing enough rebuffal from our chairman to make it stop, our current owner is suffering panic attacks and wants out of a club he has already poured millions of pounds into to try and get to the Championship just as they get themselves on the verge of getting to the Championship, Knight Commander of the Order of St Michael and St George Sir William of Arabia Patey has done fuck all since he's been here except disillusion the fans and get his teeth fixed, we're trying to rush through a sale to investors led by a man who sounds just about fit and able to run a Sunday league team not one with a £250,000 wage bill half a season from the Championship, and amidst this uncertainty, there's still 24 hours left in the transfer window, and other teams are circling like vultures around our assets because of a supposedly erroneous letter sent around all the FL clubs saying 'our players are for sale, come get them on the cheap' (because emails often erroneously write themselves and send themselves to 92 clubs around the country).

It seriously comes to something when Di Canio has seemed like the statesman and voice of reason around this club the last couple of weeks. Happy fucking 2013 Swindon fans.

 :blowup:


Well said...I particularly like the Paolo bit...to think there's a few on here who'll be happy to see the back of the man, not just the refuseniks, but those upset by his post match comments.

A couple of weeks ago when it started to kick off, I said we'll need tin hats and sandbags....things are getting critical, so I reckon nuclear fallout shelters might be of more use.  It would be nice to think we could still call on the entrepreneurial spirit of former Town legend Vince Farrar...who along with the Lay Brothers wanted to flog us shelters for 10K a time back in 1980 and we'd only just lost 5 in a row and sacked Bob Smith


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 19:09:45
But if we are prepared to sell him Batch.....he will question ours.

No, the bid was pre new owners. It wasn't the case of wanting to sell him, it was having to in order to exist. He's clearly not surplus, but the fact he is our most saleable asset.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 19:16:30
I see the Boremuff fans are creaming in their jeans at the prospect....quotes like put in a cheeky £600k bid we should get him they are in financial trouble ::)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Summerof69 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 19:31:48
I see the Boremuff fans are creaming in their jeans at the prospect....quotes like put in a cheeky £600k bid we should get him they are in financial trouble ::)

Bournemouth is more likely to go into admin that ourselves,especially if the Russian buggers off. Their spending this season is unsustainable by far.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 19:38:11
Also why the fuck would he want to go to a team lower in the league than us playing worse football than us and with a poorer manager than us?

If the bid is anything less than £1.5 million I would say we would not accept it, we may start talking at that figure upwards, which Boremuff will not pay especially after paying £800k for Tubbs who can be said to be an unmitigated epic fail.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RobertT on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 19:39:33
Has anyone asked the most pertinent question yet?

Does OST have to do anything?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 19:58:13
@SamMorshead_SA
Reports in Bournemouth suggest a deal to take Matt Ritchie to Dean Court is complete #stfc #afcb

WHAT THE FUCK. This better be wrong.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Flashheart on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 19:58:26
Sam Morshead ‏@SamMorshead_SA
Reports in Bournemouth suggest a deal to take Matt Ritchie to Dean Court is complete #stfc #afcb


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: corner on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 19:59:51
We must have a replacement lined up......    Ritchie will still have to agree personal teams......


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: magicroundabout on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 19:59:59
if this is the case and has been the doing of the new board (which they have said they don't want to sell him) then it's a massive backwards step in us going forward.

unless, they have a major coup coming in to replace him


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: wiggy on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:01:41
Sam Morshead ‏@SamMorshead_SA
Reports in Bournemouth suggest a deal to take Matt Ritchie to Dean Court is complete #stfc #afcb

Fucking wanky bollocks if correct


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: newmarket red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:02:57
Pissed off if true, why are we being kept in the dark for this is fucking ridiculous just like the old days again.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: TheMajorSTFC on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:03:29
@SamMorshead_SA
Reports in Bournemouth suggest a deal to take Matt Ritchie to Dean Court is complete #stfc #afcb

WHAT THE FUCK. This better be wrong.

 :eek:  :no:  :headhurts:


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:03:36
http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/sport/10195163.Cherries_close_in_on_Ritchie_deal__updated_/

In talks...sources..blah blah blah


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Barry Scott on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:03:48
Quite fancy Ramon Nunez as a replacement if he goes. Saw he was released by Lids and his stats look decent.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RobertT on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:06:22
That article also refers to having to restructure finances as being the reason, due to the debt.  Which is in direct contrast to other reports that the debt has been wiped out.
I may be being a little too hopeful, but I sniff a sense of reporters just making shit up all over the place right now.  There is probably a tea lady to blame somewhere.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: cheltred69 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:06:45
Initial reports suggested Cherries had tabled an offer in the region of £600,000, although the Daily Echo believes the figure could be lower.

If that's right it really is a case of a panic sale and either indicative that the new owners aren't likely to push for C'ship or that the reports of the takeover being complete are premature.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: BruceChatwin on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:07:51
Ambitious these new owners then.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: sonicyouth on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:08:42
Sam Morshead ‏@SamMorshead_SA
Reports in Bournemouth suggest a deal to take Matt Ritchie to Dean Court is complete #stfc #afcb
[url width=500 height=361]http://i.imgur.com/Qt5T6hX.gif[/url]


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Riddick on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:08:57
What the hell is going on today, the club have made no comments at all! Selling Ritchie i can accept for a good amount to a team in a higher division (over 1m to championship) but 600k to a league one rival. Worried about the news to be released tomo.

Why do this to the club now it just doesn't make any sense


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RobertT on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:09:02
As they don't actually own the club yet - FL have to sanction it, not sure how they can do anything.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Flashheart on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:11:49
[url width=500 height=361]http://i.imgur.com/Qt5T6hX.gif[/url]

Innit.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: mrverve on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:12:59
As they don't actually own the club yet - FL have to sanction it, not sure how they can do anything.

Maybe that's the problem. In the time it takes the FL to sanction it Black wont put anymore of his own money into the club hence selling a player.

Just a thought


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: BruceChatwin on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:13:49
As they don't actually own the club yet - FL have to sanction it, not sure how they can do anything.

Can't believe Black would sell players behind their backs after agreeing a takeover.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: donkey on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:14:03
Well, fuck a duck, this thread has been 'interesting'.  I hope Batch posts more on it...I feel better after his calmer posts.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Dr Pierre Chang on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:14:21
Quote
SPORT: BBC Wiltshire understands the proposed takeover of Swindon Town has fallen through. #stfc


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Flashheart on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:14:35
I've noticed Simon Ferry has deleted his twitter account recently. Make of that what you will.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:14:38
Neil Perrett ‏@neilperrettecho

#afcb have completed the signing of #stfc winger Matt Ritchie for a fee of around £500,000.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: BruceChatwin on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:16:08
Gonna need a bigger Gif.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: newmarket red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:16:19
Didnt this happen last time the club was sold when fitton and co took over we got rid of tozer to newcastle.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Dr Pierre Chang on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:16:23
What a joke. Looks like it will be a while yet untill we reach the Championship.

I just hope we can keep hold of PDC, but that Ritchie deal suggests our ambition is League 1 for as long as possible.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: donkey on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:16:45
Neil Perrett ‏@neilperrettecho

#afcb have completed the signing of #stfc winger Matt Ritchie for a fee of around £500,000.

Not what I had in mind, Batch!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Dr Pierre Chang on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:16:58
Didnt this happen last time the club was sold when fitton and co took over we got rid of tozer to newcastle.
Flogging your best player on the cheap or selling a kid - really similar!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: sonicyouth on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:17:01

ha ha.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:17:33
[url width=300 height=225]http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mbnuffzz3N1rqfhi2o1_400.gif[/url]


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:17:44
Has anyone asked the most pertinent question yet?

Does OST have to do anything?
I'm seriously thinking of crying :hmmm:


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RobertT on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:18:07
Maybe that's the problem. In the time it takes the FL to sanction it Black wont put anymore of his own money into the club hence selling a player.

Just a thought
That does make sense.  The sale of a player would guarantee funding of the club for a few months at the very least, allowing time for everything to go through properly.  It would equally not be impossible in that situation to sanction a few loans coming in as it's ongoing cash required that the sale couls easily cover in the interim.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Riddick on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:19:55
500k for Ritchie is a joke amount! Clearly we'll take what ever we can get at the moment. Who else is off then.

Fucking livid at the moment


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:20:09
[url width=900 height=675]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xN0CUCo2QkE/UCKkveVvcGI/AAAAAAAAA3M/b0a7H8TrtEY/s1600/Kent%2520panic.gif[/url]


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: sonicyouth on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:20:10
i'm starting to think that @neilperrettecho is just on the wind up.

or perhaps i'm just clinging to straws?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: blinkpip on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:21:22
Nothing official as yet, either way.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: SuggWillSugg MBE on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:21:24
I'll believe it when I see a scarf pic.

Why should a sale be different to a purchase?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: TheMajorSTFC on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:21:54
I'd expect to see Madine, Wright-Phillips and ANO coming in tomorrow...then again I never thought Ritchie would be off after the takeover was agreed this afternoon...just WHAT THE FUCK is going on?!  :sherlock: (looking out for the scarf above head pic still...!)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: donkey on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:22:12
I'll believe it when I see a scarf pic.

Why should a sale be different to a purchase?

I think they're two halves of the same walnut (as it were).


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:22:48
i'm starting to think that @neilperrettecho is just on the wind up.

or perhaps i'm just clinging to straws?
That's a pretty impressive wind up...

http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/sport/10195163.Cherries_complete_deal_for_Ritchie__updated_/


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:23:02
I thought the days of selling our better players on the cheap to the first bidder were over, clearly not...
I thought the days of the club lacking ambition were over again clearly not
We're 3rd in L1 for fuck sake, we should not be selling our top players and for 500k - take out what we paid for him and Portsmouth cut and we've probably made a loss anyways.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Barnard on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:23:28
Surely we could have got more than 500k from a Championship side?

The perspex in that dugout must have been worth more than I thought.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:23:30
[url width=500 height=282]http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ma6cl3oPYt1r5r6hh.gif[/url]


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: LittleRed on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:23:38
perhaps i'm just clinging to straws?

I think you are, the asset stripping begins


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RobertT on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:24:09
It's not impossible that the potential time to conclude the takeover puts funding at risk for a month or so.  Black may well have said I'll write the debt off but I'm fucked if I am paying the bills for c lub you will actually own.  Club only has one day in which it can raise finance through selling a player and Ritchie going covers the entire period needed.  Prevents financial issues in the short term while nobody at the club can access either the old guys funds or the new guys funds.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Spud on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:24:39
Same old Swindon!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Quagmire on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:25:09
Have the club actually said anything official all day?

Only thing that pisses me off, if we are selling Ritchie in urgent need of cash, we have a perfectly good saleable asset at fucking Birmingham while we are stuck with some cunt that doesn't even play.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Gnasher on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:25:10
Hmmm, 500k is a giveaway if true. I would expect more players to follow.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Dr Pierre Chang on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:25:31
I thought the days of selling our better players on the cheap to the first bidder were over, clearly not...
I thought the days of the club lacking ambition were over again clearly not
We're 3rd in L1 for fuck sake, we should not be selling our top players and for 500k - take out what we paid for him and Portsmouth cut and we've probably made a loss anyways.
Fucking spot on, it's alright we still have a stable club though even if we will be in League 1/2 for the next 15 years!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Riddick on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:25:45
Fuck off Bournemouth, a disgrace to sell him to them, could of got more.

PDC to walk?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:26:11
OK, I've had time to consider and reflect on this at length and I conclude...

He was crap, I never rated him, we're better off without him and he's easily replaceable.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RobertT on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:27:09
Fucking spot on, it's alright we still have a stable club though even if we will be in League 1/2 for the next 15 years!

It's quite possible this was the bit about avoiding administration - if Black won't pay Febs bills and the new guys can't do anything without FL sign-off, we'd have been fucked.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:27:21
It's not impossible that the potential time to conclude the takeover puts funding at risk for a month or so.  Black may well have said I'll write the debt off but I'm fucked if I am paying the bills for c lub you will actually own.  Club only has one day in which it can raise finance through selling a player and Ritchie going covers the entire period needed.  Prevents financial issues in the short term while nobody at the club can access either the old guys funds or the new guys funds.
I'll go with that - sounds as good a theory as any.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:27:48
[url width=500 height=300]http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m7aeskXxFt1rzyvwuo1_500.gif[/url]


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:27:53
It's not impossible that the potential time to conclude the takeover puts funding at risk for a month or so.  Black may well have said I'll write the debt off but I'm fucked if I am paying the bills for c lub you will actually own.  Club only has one day in which it can raise finance through selling a player and Ritchie going covers the entire period needed.  Prevents financial issues in the short term while nobody at the club can access either the old guys funds or the new guys funds.

Promotion to the Championship is worth more than a measley 500k minus Portsmouths cut. Short sighted.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: sonicyouth on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:28:09
It's not impossible that the potential time to conclude the takeover puts funding at risk for a month or so.  Black may well have said I'll write the debt off but I'm fucked if I am paying the bills for c lub you will actually own.  Club only has one day in which it can raise finance through selling a player and Ritchie going covers the entire period needed.  Prevents financial issues in the short term while nobody at the club can access either the old guys funds or the new guys funds.
sir, you speak sense.



Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: BruceChatwin on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:28:28
I wonder what Di Canio's thinking?

I dread to think what Di Canio's thinking.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Ardiles on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:28:40
Hate football.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RobertT on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:29:09
Promotion to the Championship is worth more than a measley 500k minus Portsmouths cut. Short sighted.
Not if it caused going into Admin - hence the stories of the past week.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: SuggWillSugg MBE on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:30:48
"Ritchie signs for Bournemouth on a three and a half year deal."




Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: donkey on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:30:53
sir, you speak sense.



He may speak sense, but I agree with DV.  

Our new owners first act is to sell one of our best players for less than we should have got for him, to a promotion rival.  That's a shit start to their ownership.  

Actions speak louder than words...we need action tomorrow from the new owners.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Dr Pierre Chang on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:31:37
A defender or two and Bournemouth will win the league.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:31:57
Not if it caused going into Admin - hence the stories of the past week.

All for the sake of a couple of 100k

Willing to flog your best asset for about a third of what it's worth for the sake of one months wages or whatever...


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Samdy Gray on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:31:58
I wonder what Di Canio's thinking?

I dread to think what Di Canio's thinking.


I imagine there's a lot of arm waving and gesticulation.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RobertT on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:32:46
All for the sake of a couple of 100k

Willing to flog your best asset for about a third of what it's worth for the sake of one months wages or whatever...

But who is going to pay the bills if neither the current owner will, or the new owner can?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Flashheart on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:32:47
Sam Morshead ‏@SamMorshead_SA
Ritchie signs for Bournemouth on a three and a half year deal.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: SuggWillSugg MBE on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:33:32
Officially tweeted by club now too.

Only official thing they've said all day.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Posh Red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:33:57
Are we safe from relegation yet?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:34:10
Absolutely gutted. No more words to say...


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: donkey on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:34:38
Officially tweeted by club now too.

Only official thing they've said all day.

Has the takeover actually gone through (not being facetious, but could do with someone pointing me in the direction of actual confirmation)?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Dr Pierre Chang on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:34:55
Worse than the Greer sale? DV?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Ritchie_is_a_cherry on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:35:09
Also why the fuck would he want to go to a team lower in the league than us playing worse football than us and with a poorer manager than us?

If the bid is anything less than £1.5 million I would say we would not accept it, we may start talking at that figure upwards, which Boremuff will not pay especially after paying £800k for Tubbs who can be said to be an unmitigated epic fail.

Comments like this make signing Ritchie even more enjoyable.

Doesn't than 4-0 drubbing you gave us back in September seem like an eternity ago now?

 :smugfu:


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Summerof69 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:35:24
Has the takeover actually gone through (not being facetious, but could do with someone pointing me in the direction of actual confirmation)?

No official confirmation. Just from the Adver.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: welshred on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:35:42
What a shitty fucking thing to happen.

Out of all the fucking rubbish things that could have happened today, that was one I wasn't expecting. Whether the new owners are responsible for it or not, they've got to go on one hell of a charm offensive to get the fans back on side.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Sharpe on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:36:08
I hear Bournemouth is a nice place this time of year.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:36:14
http://www.afcb.co.uk/news/article/2013-01-30-cherries-sign-matt-ritchie-629109.aspx


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: donkey on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:36:17
No official confirmation. Just from the Adver.

My orange hat is in the wardrobe...it may be seen again soon.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: LittleRed on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:36:25
It's quite possible this was the bit about avoiding administration - if Black won't pay Febs bills and the new guys can't do anything without FL sign-off, we'd have been fucked.

This dont make sense, black funds feb, McCrory gives black the money and he keeps matt Ritchie, we maintain our push for the championship. If we have indeed sold him to Bournemouth we could even meet them in the playoffs let alone competing with them for an automatic spot. The consortium are running the club alongside current board apparently so both parties would have to be in agreement. The lack of response from the club suggests this is true and a simple statement would quash this.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Ardiles on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:36:37
What a fucking shambles.  It's like the Fjortoft sale all over again.

And to Bournemouth, FFS.  Matt deserved better than that.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RobertT on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:36:42
Has the takeover actually gone through (not being facetious, but could do with someone pointing me in the direction of actual confirmation)?
Agreement reached, FL have to sanction it though, so it could take days or weeks to complete legally.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: BruceChatwin on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:36:54

I imagine there's a lot of arm waving and gesticulation.

Hope he has an extra special reinforced dugout in his house with Fabrizio Piccareta in the corner to get him through this.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: lambourn red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:37:06
PDC will be gone within 24 hours there is no way he will put up with this


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:37:06
But who is going to pay the bills if neither the current owner will, or the new owner can?

I'm sure someone somewhere somewhere could have covered January's bills.

Fuck sake surely Black could have put it in and put an extra 250k or whatever into the deal.

We've lost out on 750kish here for no fucking reason


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RobertT on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:37:39
This dont make sense, black funds feb, McCrory gives black the money and he keeps matt Ritchie, we maintain our push for the championship. If we have indeed sold him to Bournemouth we could even meet them in the playoffs let alone competing with them for an automatic spot. The consortium are running the club alongside current board apparently so both parties would have to be in agreement. The lack of response from the club suggests this is true and a simple statement would quash this.
It was made clear on the radio last night that Black would not fund Feb.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: ghanimah on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:38:24
Comments like this make signing Ritchie even more enjoyable.

Doesn't than 4-0 drubbing you gave us back in September seem like an eternity ago now?

 :smugfu:

No not really, we're 3rd, one game in hand...we've been here before with other teams gloating only for it not to quite work out in hindsight...


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:38:27
What a fucking shambles.  It's like the Fjortoft sale all over again.

And to Bournemouth, FFS.  Matt deserved better than that.

 :nod:


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Samdy Gray on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:38:28
I'm with OST now, I think I want to cry.

I hope that positive comments re: reasons for the sale are forthcoming, but right now it feels like 5 years of hard work undone in a single afternoon.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:38:32
Worse than the Greer sale? DV?

It's certainly up there in levels of stupidity.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: donkey on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:38:37
Agreement reached, FL have to sanction it though, so it could take days or weeks to complete legally.

Is that the only problem then?  OK, not too bad.  Although given the new owners first act, they've got a lot of work to do to win me round (and a few others I suspect).


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Quagmire on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:38:45
For fuck sale.
The board done a great job for the last 4 years or whatever it is, but the last few days have been a fucking shambles.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: THE FLASH on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:39:02
What a fucking shambles.  It's like the Fjortoft sale all over again.

And to Bournemouth, FFS.  Matt deserved better than that.

Word......

PDC will be gone.


Also the club better come grovelling ref our sponsorship...


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: lambourn red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:39:21
what a fucking shambles absolutely livid at the moment , we all know what is coming next that the deal is off and admin awaits CUNTS


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Simon Pieman on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:39:52
Comments like this make signing Ritchie even more enjoyable.

Doesn't than 4-0 drubbing you gave us back in September seem like an eternity ago now?

 :smugfu:

The deal is for £3m, the £500k is just the upfront payment.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Ralphy on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:40:53
He's gone. Fucked off big time.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Langers on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:41:00
I'm speechless.

500k, what a joke. PDC will be rightly pissed off, would not be surprised to see him walk.

Just when things are on the up for us, so fucking angry. We need some answers as to what the fuck is going on.



Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: WEBBERhyde on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:41:30
http://www.youtube.com/v/N5p27Lr8y2s?hl=en_US&version=3&rel=0


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RobertT on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:41:33
I'm only jumping to conclusions, but this strikes me as a joint move by old and new owners.  The new guys won't chuck £0.25m or more in knowing it might not get ratified.  Black, from reports last night, had financially pulled the plug, so the club only has it's own income and no game at home until the 9th.  Black may have said the debt is going but I have no more cash I am willing to give you, so either you chuck money in before you own the club or we have a day to sell someone???????


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Gnasher on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:42:10
Comments like this make signing Ritchie even more enjoyable.

Doesn't than 4-0 drubbing you gave us back in September seem like an eternity ago now?

 :smugfu:

Your spending is unsustainable for such a tiny club with a 3 sided stadium. Give it a couple of years and you'll do a Portsmouth.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Barry Scott on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:44:17
I'm only really annoyed at is the fact we've given him away and that's causing me to have sensationalist style worries over PDC.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Bewster on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:44:50
and so it begins...............

Ah well it was fun while it lasted.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: LittleRed on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:45:35
Cherio pdc I thank you for what you have done


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:45:53
To fucking Bournemouth!!!!

Richie deserved better and we deserve better. Ok the Black money has gone. We deserve more than the silence coming out of the club at the moment though.

I know Morshead's doing his best but some of his tweets and reports have been so wide of the mark today.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: cheltred69 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:46:42
I'll be shocked if PdC sticks around much longer - this can't have been what he was claiming to be excited about recently!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Ritchie_is_a_cherry on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:46:51
No not really, we're 3rd, one game in hand...we've been here before with other teams gloating only for it not to quite work out in hindsight...

How many points were we behind you at the end of October? Just signed another winger Fraser from Aberdeen for 400k. I think we'll be above you by the end of the season.

We've been the underdog for so long its a nice to be on the other side for once.



Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Crispy on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:47:06
We're fucked. Paolo will leave now if the transfer was out of his hands, 5 years of hard work undone. Typical Swindon, never easy.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Whits on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:47:07
http://www.youtube.com/v/N5p27Lr8y2s?hl=en_US&version=3&rel=0

thanks for that, summed it up perfectly :D


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:47:13
POP

That's the bubble bursting.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Stef Troll on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:47:35
Maybe Ritchie wanted to leave ?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Bewster on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:48:07
How many points were we behind you at the end of October? Just signed another winger Fraser from Aberdeen for 400k. I think we'll be above you by the end of the season.

We've been the underdog for so long its a nice to be on the other side for once.

Enjoy it whilst you can


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Simon Pieman on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:48:17
Who has confirmed the £500k fee? Just doesn't seem like the sort of fee for a highly rated player with a bidding war going on for him (regardless if we're desperate for the money).


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Langers on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:48:24
Got a very bad feeling about this. Lack of takeover news and selling our best player for peanuts.

Haven't been concerned at all the last few days, but now I might have to dig out that panic button...


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: cheltred69 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:49:01
Even if he did want to leave I can't believe that we couldn't get more than £500K for him - seems like we've snapped up the first offer that came along this week.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Arriba on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:49:18
 I dunno what's worse, the alleged fee or selling him to another league 1 club?
That's our best player gone.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:49:20
Who has confirmed the £500k fee? Just doesn't seem like the sort of fee for a highly rated player with a bidding war going on for him (regardless if we're desperate for the money).

When have we ever held out for a fee worthy of our highly rated players?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RobertT on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:49:25
I'm going to go down the road of Kerslake's sale, it's easier on the body and soul if we use that one as the example.

Fjortoft was a club trying to survive, Greer was pre season.  Shearer I'll choose to ignore to satisfy my need for sanity.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:49:51
Even if he did want to leave, Bournemouth. Fucking Bournemouth. He's better than that for his next step.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: lambourn red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:49:52
How many points were we behind you at the end of October? Just signed another winger Fraser from Aberdeen for 400k. I think we'll be above you by the end of the season.

We've been the underdog for so long its a nice to be on the other side for once.



Oh do fuck off you cunt we will take great delight when your lot goes tits up you will be the next Portsmouth that is a certainty


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: ghanimah on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:49:57
How many points were we behind you at the end of October? Just signed another winger Fraser from Aberdeen for 400k. I think we'll be above you by the end of the season.

We've been the underdog for so long its a nice to be on the other side for once.



Quoted...yeah we had all this nonsense last season from Oxford. We've just been taken over, the transfer window hasn't finished yet and the dust hasn't settled. Best not to get above yourself just yet....


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: caveej on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:51:00
I post very very rarely. Only in times of annoyance. and right now the only work I can come up with is;

CUNT!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: random_five on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:51:31
This is the worst deal in the club's history. I am furious.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: newmarket red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:51:51
What afucking disgrace and not a word from the club same old swindon fucking pissed off. ::)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: donkey on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:52:01
I'm going to go down the road of Kerslake's sale, it's easier on the body and soul if we use that one as the example.

Fjortoft was a club trying to survive, Greer was pre season.  Shearer I'll choose to ignore to satisfy my need for sanity.

We do it again...it never works out...are we back to bopards again?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RobertT on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:52:06
This is the worst deal in the club's history. I am furious.

Behave, Fjortoft and Shearer by a country mile.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: blinkpip on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:52:15
Even if he did want to leave, Bournemouth. Fucking Bournemouth. He's better than that for his next step.

Closer to home I guess and a little pay rise.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Simon Pieman on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:52:37
When have we ever held out for a fee worthy of our highly rated players?

Charlie Austin & Simon Cox are most recent examples. We turned down a larger bid for Richie before.

Though has the takeover even been confirmed yet? I've literally only just come home to catch up on all of this and can't see the club confirming it.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RobertT on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:52:52
We do it again...it never works out...are we back to bopards again?

That's whay I'm using Kerslake.  That one was alright in the end, you just have to ignore the Shearer one.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Langers on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:52:58
Even if he did want to leave, Bournemouth. Fucking Bournemouth. He's better than that for his next step.

Yep, that is the worst of it. Even if we were desperate to sell, surely we could have a bigger fee from a bigger club. It's not like there was no interest in him.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:53:45
Charlie Austin & Simon Cox are most recent examples. We turned down a larger bid for Richie before.

Though has the takeover even been confirmed yet? I've literally only just come home to catch up on all of this and can't see the club confirming it.

Fuck that - we should have held out for more money for both Cox and Austin.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: welshred on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:54:45
Yep, that is the worst of it. Even if we were desperate to sell, surely we could have a bigger fee from a bigger club. It's not like there was no interest in him.

Even the same fee from a bigger club would have been preferable. Selling one of your best players to one of your rivals makes no fucking sense whatsoever. Rather he went to Oxford.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: magicroundabout on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:54:46
Jonathan Wilkes a closet town fan?

Jonathan Wilkes @Jonny_Wilkes

Bournemouth how is that a step up ?
8:43 PM - 30 Jan 13


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: donkey on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:54:53
That's whay I'm using Kerslake.  That one was alright in the end, you just have to ignore the Shearer one.

You mean the deal that convinced Hoddle the club had no ambition and meant he fucked off to Chelsea? (I have no idea this happened, but in my mind I've always decided this was true)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: SuggWillSugg MBE on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:54:58
Charlie Austin & Simon Cox are most recent examples. We turned down a larger bid for Richie before.

Though has the takeover even been confirmed yet? I've literally only just come home to catch up on all of this and can't see the club confirming it.

The only official line from the club all day is that Ritchie has left,

Moreshead & BBC Wilts have both siad the takeover is done subject to FL Clearance (That should be done overnight (I think))

would imagine club will confirm in the morning properly when it's signed and sealed.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Barry Scott on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:54:58
He's having a purple patch. He's small, he's slow and he's a touch greedy. Also, going back home he'll do a Brian Howard. He'll start getting drunk too often, especially with all the time off and lack of training he'll receive at Bournemouth, he'll become slower and less motivated and he'll fade away. You heard it here first. :D


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Simon Pieman on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:55:16
Fuck that - we should have held out for more money for both Cox and Austin.

Austin wanted away. Nobody would pay more for Cox.

We did alright from selling a few younger players too. Ben Tozer for example, never worth what we got for him.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:55:44
Bournemouth clearly have more ambition than we do...


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: TheMajorSTFC on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:56:22
The picture with a scarf* is up on Twitter! (*actually Ritchie with a Muff shirt)  :eek:


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Summerof69 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:56:27
Bournemouth clearly have more ambition than we do...

More like more money at the moment...


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: random_five on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:57:43
Behave, Fjortoft and Shearer by a country mile.
I disagree mate, seriously, Bournemouth 500k ?
At least fjortoft and shearer went to bigger club's. This deal is an utter laughing stock


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Langers on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:57:48
Moreshead & BBC Wilts have both siad the takeover is done subject to FL Clearance (That should be done overnight (I think))

would imagine club will confirm in the morning properly when it's signed and sealed.

If that is the case, then what an awful first impression for the new owners to make (if it was their decision)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:58:42
as long as he is the only key player to go, we'll be ok


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Power to people on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:58:50
I can only compare this to when we sold Shearer to blackburn we strengthened one of our rivals and got pipped to the post, I wonder if this is the last player sale or if there is any more to come


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: welshred on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:59:09
And I don't think PDC will go because of this. He's made of sterner stuff than that. I think it'll depend much more on the intentions of the new owners whether he stays or not. Hopefully, we'll get the new deal done tomorrow and announce a few new faces (winger please) or that we've signed Ritchie back for 3 million :)



Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Bumpkin on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:59:24
He's having a purple patch. He's small, he's slow and he's a touch greedy. Also, going back home he'll do a Brian Howard. He'll start getting drunk too often, especially with all the time off and lack of training he'll receive at Bournemouth, he'll become slower and less motivated and he'll fade away. You heard it here first. :D

As you lot say.... This ⬆


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Cibocchi_Is_God on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 20:59:40
"That's life, that's what people say... Riding high in April, shot down in May."
Adverts reflecting my mood right now.  :(


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Langers on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:01:22
BBC reporting £400k, probably not that reliable though.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Wandered on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:01:30
Eddie Howe somehow managed to sign our last 2 'best players' Charlie Austin and Matt Ritchie. What does he have over STFC?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: magicroundabout on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:02:06
a larger bank balance for starters


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Ritchie_is_a_cherry on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:03:04
Quoted...yeah we had all this nonsense last season from Oxford. We've just been taken over, the transfer window hasn't finished yet and the dust hasn't settled. Best not to get above yourself just yet....

How's the situation remotely similar to Oxford?  :hmmm:



Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: THE FLASH on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:03:26
Just had this from a Bmuff fan:

Enjoy!!

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BB4pLlTCIAEPd4c.jpg:large


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: magicroundabout on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:04:56
post back a picture of the league table. i'm sure we're above them with games in hand


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: SuggWillSugg MBE on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:05:52
I'll be absolutely amazed if PDC sanctioned this deal without having a replacement lined up,

I'm saying tomorrow at the pre match press conference, new owners will be announced and Ritchie's (Better) replacement will be announced.


Ever the optimist.

Think I might have a another beer now.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Dr Pierre Chang on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:06:27
I'll be absolutely amazed if PDC sanctioned this deal without having a replacement lined up,
Nothing to do with him.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: magicroundabout on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:09:44
he'd surely have a say in it. knowing the kind of character PDC is the existing/new board wouldn't go behind his back as they know he'd walk away from STFC over something like this


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: horlock07 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:09:57
Indeed I only get to 2-3 games a year and never genuinely never saw Ritchie have a good game so no reason not to be optimistic!!

Believe you all when you say he was fantastic but never saw it in the flesh myself

...straws being clutched!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: welshred on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:10:21
Nothing to do with him.

Nope, this decision would have been made above his head. The club is more important than one player though. I'm not happy with the reported terms of the deal, but the season is far from over. Tomorrow will be a very interesting day.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DMR on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:11:05
A good player but players come and go.

Anyone who puts his departure on a par with Parkin, Cox or Austin needs their head examined.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Swindon Please Win on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:11:12
Fuck sake... Back to the old Swindon is seems.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: manc_red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:11:19
And I don't think PDC will go because of this. He's made of sterner stuff than that. I think it'll depend much more on the intentions of the new owners whether he stays or not. Hopefully, we'll get the new deal done tomorrow and announce a few new faces (winger please) or that we've signed Ritchie back for 3 million :)



Could go one of two ways, he'll either go batshit fucking mental and do one - and to be fair he's always said the club needs to match his ambition and stick to the agreed plan - or you never know, it might just galvanise him and foster a sort of siege mentality to see it through in spite of adversity.

Three weeks ago I would have said the former, but now I'd wager (and hope!!!) the latter. In his interview after the Shrews game he sounded closer to the club and the fans than he ever has before.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: WEBBERhyde on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:11:44
old golden-balls himself is in the UK at the moment and without a club.......


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:11:53
Are Bournemouth fans not even a little bit worried by how much their club is spending?

As for how the hell they're staying under the 60 per cent. Now that really is baffling.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: THE FLASH on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:12:16
How's the situation remotely similar to Oxford?  :hmmm:



Tin pot cunts with only three sides to a shit ground.

Theres two for starters...

We did take fuck all off those cunts last season....4 off you ..cheers.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: joteddyred on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:13:12
Totally oblivious to what's been going on and log on to this utter shit.

I actually can't believe this is happening and totally didn't see it coming.  £500,000 to Bournemouth.  What a fucking joke.

I'm sick and tired of shit like this happening, I was actually stupid enough to think we'd seen the last of it, but oh no, here we go again.

We might as well have gone into administration and been docked 10 points.  We're going absolutely nowhere now anyway.

And anyone thinking that we're going to have a replacement lined up that costs less than £500,000 is in dreamland.  What a fucking mess.  Same old shit, same old Swindon.  Absolutely gutted to be honest.



Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:13:32
A good player but players come and go.

Anyone who puts his departure on a par with Parkin, Cox or Austin needs their head examined.

A. Why?

B. The reason why, who to and how much for is why people are livid.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: lambourn red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:13:58
It is not the fact he has been sold or to fucking tinpot bournemuff it is the fact it is for £400k that is criminal for a 23 year old that has been scouted by many championship sides


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Stegenfreud on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:14:07
I don't want this to sound too dramatic/pessimistic (cue dramatic pessimistic post)...

Other than losing our best player to a promotion rival... my main concern is the effect this now has on our manager.

Interesting times....

Totally gutted Ritchie has left, such a good player for us. POTY in our relegation season (not hard) league 2 POTY in our champ winning team and 9 goals 9 assists this season. £400,000? He's only 23.... should have been triple that. Whoever sanctioned that deal tonight has questions to answer for sure.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: pauld on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:14:23
he'd surely have a say in it. knowing the kind of character PDC is the existing/new board wouldn't go behind his back as they know he'd walk away from STFC over something like this
If I'd asked you yesterday if we'd have accepted a 400k bid from Bournemouth for Ritchie, you'd have laughed in my face. And so would I (assuming I can laugh in my own face). I think all logic and rationale went out the window when that email got sent from the "financial restructuring experts" last night


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RobertT on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:15:04
I think DMR is suggesting he's not in the same class as those players, and I worry myself by sort of agreeing.  I don't doubt we'll miss Ritchie but I think the rest of the team is better placed to handle the loss than other ones were with those players listed.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DMR on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:15:14
A. Why?

B. The reason why, who to and how much for is why people are livid.

Because all 3 of them were more important than MR, who has had the luxury of a bit more quality around him and a proper manager


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Summerof69 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:15:21
Are Bournemouth fans not even a little bit worried by how much their club is spending?

Obviously not, despite a few times they've been close to going to the wall.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: magicroundabout on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:16:08
If I'd asked you yesterday if we'd have accepted a 400k bid from Bournemouth for Ritchie, you'd have laughed in my face. And so would I (assuming I can laugh in my own face). I think all logic and rationale went out the window when that email got sent from the "financial restructuring experts" last night

very true. so it appears what was written in said email is true. they're all up for sale


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: leftside on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:16:54
If I'd asked you yesterday if we'd have accepted a 400k bid from Bournemouth for Ritchie, you'd have laughed in my face. And so would I (assuming I can laugh in my own face). I think all logic and rationale went out the window when that email got sent from the "financial restructuring experts" last night

That'll probably just cover their fees!

Transfer window deadline - traditionally the day when clubs pay OVER the odds for players...


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:17:00
Are Bournemouth fans not even a little bit worried by how much their club is spending?

As for how the hell they're staying under the 60 per cent. Now that really is baffling.
Uncanny parallels with this and us signing Collins from Shrews. This is exactly what Shrewsbury fans were saying about us.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:17:08
Do you think we've got a sell on clause.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:17:51
Its not the player per se, its the way he fitted into the way we played, and now a cog has gone the engine will fall apart, seen it before, this had better be explained and pretty quickly, otherwise all the good will that has built up over the last 4-5 years will be gone in a flash.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:17:54
Maybe Ritchie wanted to leave us and be closer to his home?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RobertT on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:18:16
Do you think we've got a sell on clause.
I imagine the deal will officially be undisclosed.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Bumpkin on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:18:24
If Muff were in a Admin a few years back looks like they've enough to pay back in full all those who only got 10p in every pound owed.



Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Swindon Please Win on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:18:34
Maybe Ritchie wanted to leave us and be closer to his home?

Think he just wants stability and we can't guarantee that right now.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Dozno9 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:18:41
He's paid for 2 months operating costs according to the figures flying about. It'll be interesting if Collins, Williams etc start leaving because then it gets a little bit darker.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: random_five on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:19:07
Williams to Bristol City now as well.

tin hats anyone?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Barry Scott on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:19:08
A good player but players come and go.

Anyone who puts his departure on a par with Parkin, Cox or Austin needs their head examined.

The voice of reason.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Bumpkin on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:19:24
Maybe he doesn't like training twice a day and on Sundays.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Flashheart on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:20:16
Maybe Ritchie wanted to leave us and be closer to his home?

This has crossed my mind also


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:20:33
Because all 3 of them were more important than MR, who has had the luxury of a bit more quality around him and a proper manager

Fair enough. I stand by my view that he's still worth 3 times what was paid and the main reason I'm fucked off is that I don't know what's going on. When they left we almost knew they were going to. This is different.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Gerinthere on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:23:09
Williams to Bristol City now as well.

tin hats anyone?

Fucking joking aren't you.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: manc_red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:24:12
Williams to Bristol City now as well.

tin hats anyone?

Source?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Ritchie_is_a_cherry on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:24:46
Tin pot cunts with only three sides to a shit ground.

Theres two for starters...

We did take fuck all off those cunts last season....4 off you ..cheers.

Arrgghh the Swindon arrogance plenty of us have noticed from your lot over the years. What have Swindon done in my life time? Played in the Prem for a season as the whipping boys being before being swiftly dispatched to the lower leagues.

New stand going up next season. Shame you won't be in the same league to enjoy it   ;)



Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Ardiles on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:25:14
Maybe Ritchie wanted to leave us and be closer to his home?

Portsmouth to Bournemouth is further than most probably think - about 55 miles and an hour by car.  So yes, Bournemouth is a little closer to Portsmouth than Swindon is, but not by enough to make much of a difference to a career decision.  Matt would have gone because

(a) he probably got offered a little more ££; and
(b) he was told he had to go.

With (b) being the main reason.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:25:17
Williams to Bristol City now as well.

tin hats anyone?
Where in the name of fuck did you hear that?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: TheMajorSTFC on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:25:27
Source?

It was reported earlier this afternoon by Sam Morshead on Twitter I believe.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: ChalkyWhiteIsGod on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:25:43
Danny Ward has only played 4 times for Huddersfield this season...anyone?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: SuggWillSugg MBE on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:26:02
Brisol City are interested in Williams.

Was reported earlier.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DMR on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:26:10
Arrgghh the Swindon arrogance plenty of us have noticed from your lot over the years. What have Swindon done in my life time? Played in the Prem for a season as the whipping boys being before being swiftly dispatched to the lower leagues.

New stand going up next season. Shame you won't be in the same league to enjoy it   ;)



He has a point :)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RobertT on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:26:17
Danny Ward has only played 4 times for Huddersfield this season...anyone?
Was a far better player, highly unlikely.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: ChalkyWhiteIsGod on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:26:26
Arrgghh the Swindon arrogance plenty of us have noticed from your lot over the years. What have Swindon done in my life time? Played in the Prem for a season as the whipping boys being before being swiftly dispatched to the lower leagues.

New stand going up next season. Shame you won't be in the same league to enjoy it   ;)



And you've been in the second tier for two seasons, once as the whipping boys I believe? Massive, you lot.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:26:38
Portsmouth to Bournemouth is further than most probably think - about 55 miles and an hour by car.  So yes, Bournemouth is a little closer to Portsmouth than Swindon is, but not by enough to make much of a difference to a career decision.  Matt would have gone because

(a) he probably got offered a little more ££; and
(b) he was told he had to go.

With (b) being the main reason.
At the end of the day he didn't have to go but he must have been put under so much pressure it would have been impossible to stay, I would guess.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DMR on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:26:58
Danny Ward has only played 4 times for Huddersfield this season...anyone?

He's on a par with Ritchie imo


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Bogus Dave on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:26:59
This sale will probably keep portsmouth afloat for another couple of weeks. Put that down as a charity donation, and its tax deductable.

Very astute bit of business by our new owners. Well done.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:27:13
Danny Ward has only played 4 times for Huddersfield this season...anyone?

Last time I saw him play he was a lot bigger and slower than he was when he was here.



Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: magicroundabout on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:27:21
He has a point :)

he does. £10 we beat them in the play off finals anyone :)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:28:40
He has a point :)

Haven't you got some golf to play?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Dr Pierre Chang on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:28:59
Danny Ward has only played 4 times for Huddersfield this season...anyone?
Dream on.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Barry Scott on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:29:14
Last time I saw him play he was a lot bigger and slower than he was when he was here.



If PDC had him though, you could bet your last pound he'd lose a stone in about 2 weeks, ala Martin.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Swindon Please Win on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:29:32
Time for Gary Roberts to step up, if he finds his form on in favoured right side it would help an awful lot.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Dozno9 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:30:22
Bournemouth are going to be in the Premier League in 2 years and probably Champions League in 3 and everyone should realise this. They are a sleeping giant of massive proportions and we should be thankful they gave us some of the crumbs off their table.

I only hope that the next time we play them they show us the same generosity and give us 4 points.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:30:45
If PDC had him though, you could bet your last pound he'd lose a stone in about 2 weeks, ala Martin.

No doubt. Although I don't think PDC will be around for much longer.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Dozno9 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:31:32
No doubt. Although I don't think PDC will be around for much longer.

I'll be fucking amazed if he's here in 2 weeks time.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: lambourn red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:32:38
My biggest concern is Foderingham if we sell him then the writing is on the wall


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DMR on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:32:52
Haven't you got some golf to play?

I'm sorry I don't care as much as you clearly do.

I make no secret of my apathy towards football these days.


Title: Re: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Frigby Daser on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:33:41
I'll be surprised if he is in 24hours. I fear full dismantling of this team.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Dozno9 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:35:10
I'll be surprised if he is in 24hours. I fear full dismantling of this team.

I didn't want to forecast that soon as I was trying to shield myself from the hurt.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:35:48
I'll be fucking amazed if he's here in 2 weeks time.

He deserves a club that can match his drive and ambition, we can't.

Between two consortiums and fuck knows how many millions we couldnt even work out a way to pay a months wages with out selling a player on the cheap.

Di Canio loses his parents and still turns up for fucking work. We don't deserve him.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Stegenfreud on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:37:30
Anyone thinking Ritchie won't be missed is deluded. Teams double up on him to nulify the threat he poses creating more space and time for others. His work ethic is incredible and finding someone to replace him won't happen in this transfer window.

At least the amount of shit we've had to deal with over the years makes days like today easier to deal with... sort of.

Fuck sake.



Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Dozno9 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:40:00
Ritchie on the radio said it was a deal between the new owners and past owners??



Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: tans on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:41:08
He deserves a club that can match his drive and ambition, we can't.

Between two consortiums and fuck knows how many millions we couldnt even work out a way to pay a months wages with out selling a player on the cheap.

Di Canio loses his parents and still turns up for fucking work. We don't deserve him.

Not often i agree with you Dan, but i agree with that.

Seething.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:41:21
I'm sorry I don't care as much as you clearly do.

I make no secret of my apathy towards football these days.

I know mate, no need to apologise. None of us can help our feelings. Just thoroughly fucked off sorry.


Title: Re: Re: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Frigby Daser on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:41:58
Anyone thinking Ritchie won't be miss is deluded. Teams double up on him to nulify the threat he poses creating more space and time for others. His work ethic is incredible and finding someone to replace him won't happen in this transfer window.

At least the amount of shit we've had to deal with over the years makes days like today easier to deal with... sort of.

Fuck sake.

We expected the crap before. This has been delivered by a man who said he would back us.... or worse, by those who take charge for the next chapter. There is no justification because the fee is so low. It seems a simple case of sell as quick as you can to the first bidder.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: welshred on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:42:17
Ritchie on the radio said it was a deal between the new owners and past owners??



This is interesting. Fuck knows why though.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:44:17
This is interesting. Fuck knows why though.

Maybe MR shat in Jed's bath in a previous life.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Shaw Rosso on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:47:21
Just listening to this Ritchie interview, I swear he said his sale was part of the takeover deal  :no:

Financial uncertainty at Swindon Town made the move easy. Felt like the uncertain times he experienced at pompey played a part in the sale moving forward.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Stegenfreud on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:48:50
Ritchie on the radio said it was a deal between the new owners and past owners??



Maybe to buy time until a deal can be completed?

It's just the fucking timing that grates.... we're third in the fucking league with a game in hand.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: magicroundabout on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:48:56
Just listening to this Ritchie interview, I swear he said his sale was part of the takeover deal  :no:

Financial uncertainty at Swindon Town made the move easy. Felt like the uncertain times he experienced at pompey played a part in the sale moving forward.

where can we listen to it


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Swindon Please Win on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:49:15
Just listening to this Ritchie interview, I swear he said his sale was part of the takeover deal  :no:

Financial uncertainty at Swindon Town made the move easy. Felt like the uncertain times he experienced at pompey played a part in the sale moving forward.

He's cursed! Bournemouth fans be worried it'll be a season and the same will happen to you!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Dozno9 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:49:18
Just listening to this Ritchie interview, I swear he said his sale was part of the takeover deal  :no:

Financial uncertainty at Swindon Town made the move easy. Felt like the uncertain times he experienced at pompey played a part in the sale moving forward.

Must surely be to bridge the funding gap?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Shaw Rosso on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:49:57
The only person I know with any connection to the club whatsoever tells me that Ritchie is going and Madine is coming in, subject to paperwork.

Don't mean its true though

Maybe it was true after all


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:50:18
https://soundcloud.com/hot-radio-sport/exclusive-ritchie-completes


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: welshred on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:51:42
https://soundcloud.com/#hot-radio-sport/exclusive-ritchie-completes

Do I have to sign up to listen?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Langers on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:52:08
There is a lot of explaining to be done...


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: leefer on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:53:12
Fucking joke.

Ritchie should take a gander at himself as well .

As for the new consortium.........if they aint fronting any money then they can fuck of.
If all debts have been wiped off why are we selling..........surely we are better off than before the new boys arrived.

Bournemouth for fucks sake...............when you playing again DMR >:(


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: lambourn red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:53:22
Just listening to this Ritchie interview, I swear he said his sale was part of the takeover deal  :no:

Financial uncertainty at Swindon Town made the move easy. Felt like the uncertain times he experienced at pompey played a part in the sale moving forward.

that sounds as if the new guys were not willing to put cash in without full due diligence and Black has said no more someone has to go . What I am still struggling to understand is if we are under the Fair play rules of 65% of turnover then why do we need to sell to survive next month it suggest's that AB is having to fund a shortfall each month which is against the rules.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Langers on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:53:58
Fucking joke.

Ritchie should take a gander at himself as well .

Sounds like he didn't have a great deal of choice.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:54:54
Do I have to sign up to listen?

No, there should be a "click here to play" at the top of the page.

Hold on, that link isn't working..

https://soundcloud.com/hot-radio-sport/exclusive-ritchie-completes


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: jonny72 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:55:16
I still think Paolo was behind it. Didn't think Ritchie was up for playing in The Championship next season so thought he'd offload him now and bring someone better in. No way he'd have been sold without Paolo being in on it.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: magicroundabout on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:55:21
that sounds as if the new guys were not willing to put cash in without full due diligence and Black has said no more someone has to go . What I am still struggling to understand is if we are under the Fair play rules of 65% of turnover then why do we need to sell to survive next month it suggest's that AB is having to fund a shortfall each month which is against the rules.

if thats the case then his fee has covered 2 months wages etc. i just hope the new guys have said to PDC don't worry. you've money to spend


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: TheMajorSTFC on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:55:46
There is a lot of explaining to be done...

I can't see any coming until a PdC press conference tomorrow...hopefully a pre-match one rather than a resignation one  :(


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Langers on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:56:06
And all of this just in time for our live game on Sky...


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: welshred on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:56:13
Ritchie reckons Eddie Howe is one of the best managers in England  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: Did a great job with Burnley.

Sounds like the only reason he left was the 'uncertainty'. He clearly been pushed out. Just wish we knew why.



Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: magicroundabout on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:56:16
https://soundcloud.com/#hot-radio-sport/exclusive-ritchie-completes

says the stream is empty


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:57:48
says the stream is empty

Fixed link, lent on keyboard

https://soundcloud.com/hot-radio-sport/exclusive-ritchie-completes


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: magicroundabout on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 21:59:39
cheers batch


Title: Re: Re: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: london_red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:01:29
I still think Paolo was behind it. Didn't think Ritchie was up for playing in The Championship next season so thought he'd offload him now

Haha if only


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:02:41
Ritchie reckons Eddie Howe is one of the best managers in England  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: Did a great job with Burnley.

Sounds like the only reason he left was the 'uncertainty'. He clearly been pushed out. Just wish we knew why.



He's just towing the party line. Players like Richie don't have to worry about 'uncertainty'. Even if we went to the wall he'd pick a new club up in minutes.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: TheMajorSTFC on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:04:16
Just came across this... http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11710/8456823/ ...did we put a first refusal on a loan deal for him?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Samdy Gray on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:07:47
Just realised, the curse of the TEF player sponsorship strikes again. Greer, Paynter and now Ritchie.

Can we sponsor someone shit next season pease?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: blinkpip on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:08:40
Just realised, the curse of the TEF player sponsorship strikes again. Greer, Paynter and now Ritchie.

Can we sponsor someone shit next season pease?
Henville.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: jonah on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:08:48
I can only hope Boremuff enjoy our generous charity - 'cause that's what that price suggests.



Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: leefer on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:09:14
Just realised, the curse of the TEF player sponsorship strikes again. Greer, Paynter and now Ritchie.

Can we sponsor someone shit next season pease?

I want my money back....or at least some laces :D


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: dave_bambers_right_sock on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:11:19
Just realised, the curse of the TEF player sponsorship strikes again. Greer, Paynter and now Ritchie.

Can we sponsor someone shit next season pease?

Lee cox


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Samdy Gray on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:14:38
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSXHDmk5Edc


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Simon Pieman on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:16:51
Hopefully the press have accidentally missed a 0 off the end of the sales figure.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: leefer on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:20:33
Knowing our luck they have probably added one.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:21:05
Knowing our luck they have probably added one.

first laugh of the day


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Bumpkin on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:21:43
Bit left field this....but

Could Ritchie's contract been owned by one of the directors? A bit Carlos Tevez style?





Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: tans on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:22:12
Knowing our luck they have probably added one.

:clap:


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: LucienSanchez on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:22:51
Do we have any other right-wingers (apart from PdC, guffaw)?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: joteddyred on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:23:50
Just realised, the curse of the TEF player sponsorship strikes again. Greer, Paynter and now Ritchie.

Can we sponsor someone shit next season pease?

It's also the curse of my son's favourite player.  Austin now Ritchie.  I'm not looking forward to telling him tomorrow morning, he's going to be devastated  :(


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:23:57
I hope they agreed to forget about plexiglassgate as part of the deal.

It's also the curse of my son's favourite player.  Austin now Ritchie.  I'm not looking forward to telling him tomorrow morning, he's going to be devastated  :(

Likewise. My son that is, not yours. Do your own dirty work!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: welshred on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:29:05
Bit left field this....but

Could Ritchie's contract been owned by one of the directors? A bit Carlos Tevez style?





Very left-field. Think that form of player ownership isn't allowed in this country.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:29:21
Do we have any other right-wingers (apart from PdC, guffaw)?

Odds on Rooney wont be going to cheltenham, there's that gap filled.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: donkey on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:32:13
Odds on Rooney wont be going to cheltenham, there's that gap filled.

I may remain the only person who thinks Rooney's actually gonna be good for us...


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:35:22
I may remain the only person who thinks Rooney's actually gonna be good for us...
I would agree with that.


That he's going to be good - not that you're the only one who thinks it.


Title: Re: Re: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: london_red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:36:23
I may remain the only person who thinks Rooney's actually gonna be good for us...

You aren't, best player against Southend and Crawley last year.

[/sidetrack]

Back to the doom and gloom...


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Dozno9 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:36:32
De Vita has been superb this year and could play there also.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: slinky on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:40:04
Could be clutching at straws here, but is Roberts naturally a right sided player?  Could this explain why he has struggled with us so far on the left?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: oxonrobin on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:42:01
Could be clutching at straws here, but is Roberts naturally a right sided player?  Could this explain why he has struggled with us so far on the left?

That explains it, Richie has actually been holding us back. Roberts, vastly superior in every way! :pint:


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Honkytonk on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:42:40
Well this is a great big steaming pile of dog crap on top what has been a shit week for me. I can't believe after we rebuffed bids from Bournemouth so many times we've let him go for so bloody cheap. Disgusting. If this is our new owner at work god preserve us. Can't understand why this would be linked to the club takeover at all, unless the new owners want to see Ritchie gone for personal reasons, or Black et al have let him go just to spite those coming in.

Raffa at RM? Other than Luke Rooney, fuck knows who else we've got to play there. Williams? (No) Roberts? (he's having enough trouble on his natural side atm frankly...) All the games I've seen this season Ferry does a nice job of switching with Ritchie to screw around with defences, but I don't know if he's really tricky enough to replace him. Plus he's too important in the middle of the park. Maybe Navarro? He sounds like he'd be good on the right...

Anyone who doubts Ritchie's ability/influence should look at the fact he must have started damn near every single game this (and last) season. I think only Fods is even close to him. Paolo doesn't let players do that unless they deserve it.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Barry Scott on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:45:15
I may remain the only person who thinks Rooney's actually gonna be good for us...

I loved Rooney when he played. Didn't he "out assist" Ritchie in the short time he was starting?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: kerry red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:46:15
If I remember correctly, when Caddis was despatched the war cry from the forum was that Ritchie would never be as effective.

Now he's gone someone will step into the breach,

Fuck me, he aint that good


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: horlock07 on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:46:59
Ritchie reckons Eddie Howe is one of the best managers in England  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: Did a great job with Burnley.

Sounds like the only reason he left was the 'uncertainty'. He clearly been pushed out. Just wish we knew why.



From recollection didn't Ritchie sound rather keen on a move to Muff a year or so back when they were sniffing around previously?

We are all overlooking the obvious replacement at right midfield... Caddis can play there if PdC goes!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: leefer on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:50:17
Could be clutching at straws here, but is Roberts naturally a right sided player?  Could this explain why he has struggled with us so far on the left?

[url width=276 height=183]http://i934.photobucket.com/albums/ad185/swindon123/straw.jpg[/url]

Sorry slinky.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Honkytonk on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 22:57:31
Thought Rooney looked good last season when I saw him play. It's just a shame he runs like an 8yr old who's done a Simon Ferry and cropped himself. I think that's what people remember most, as opposed to his dribbling, pace, and passing/crossing ability. I certainly do. Nearly pissed myself first time I saw him run...


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: WEBBERhyde on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 23:00:48
With Jay Mc nearing match fitness....Al Macca at right mid??

Done well enough everywhere else and loves to stretch his legs every now and then, can put a few decent balls in the box too.

Bumping Thompson further up the field with macca sat behind could be an option too.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: STFC_Chris on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 23:01:35
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BB5CtXyCUAAN8bA.png:large


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 23:03:36
Thought Rooney looked good last season when I saw him play. It's just a shame he runs like an 8yr old who's done a Simon Ferry and cropped himself. I think that's what people remember most, as opposed to his dribbling, pace, and passing/crossing ability. I certainly do. Nearly pissed myself first time I saw him run...
But he's had 2 loans to L2 sides and done nothing. Can't see him being a saviour - Unless he goes to Chelters and they pay all of his wages!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: red socks on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 23:06:25
With Jay Mc nearing match fitness....Al Macca at right mid??

Done well enough everywhere else and loves to stretch his legs every now and then, can put a few decent balls in the box too.

Bumping Thompson further up the field with macca sat behind could be an option too.

That's if they are still here on Saturday.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Bumpkin on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 23:08:53
Very left-field. Think that form of player ownership isn't allowed in this country.

Yeah, it's not allowed, but I believe on most areas of life rules are broken occasionally?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: joteddyred on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 23:11:16
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BB5CtXyCUAAN8bA.png:large

He doesn't exactly look ecstatic does he?  Makes the whole situation even worse if he genuinely didn't want to left.

In terms of Rooney, he's not even been on the bench for months and done nothing while out on loan.  I'd be surprised if he was suddenly able to step into Ritchie's shoes.  Plus, I get the impression Di Canio doesn't think that highly of him.  De Vita struggles to play more than 60 minutes and Roberts, we're stil waiting for him to look anything like we were expecting.

In short, Ritchie is a massive loss and anyone who tries to dispute that is bloody daft.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 23:12:36
In short, Ritchie is a massive loss and anyone who tries to dispute that is bloody daft.

He's not going to be replaceable directly. Simple as that.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: kerry red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 23:12:59
Like Caddis would be a massive loss?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: LucienSanchez on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 23:18:02
Like Caddis would be a massive loss?

I get what you're saying, but it's slightly different. Caddis was a solid RB, wingers (and game-changers) like Ritchie are much harder to come by.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Posh Red on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 23:19:50
He's not going to be replaceable directly. Simple as that.

Not without spending money (which we don't appear to have) or by taking time (which we don't have if we want promotion this year) to nurture some young talent.

We may well still be ok, we may even still be pushing for promotion come the end of the season, but selling your best players (which Ritchie was certainly one off) will only make that more difficult.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 23:20:58
Caddis would improve our team. Thompson has been brilliant but Caddis is (currently) better.

Ritchie is a game winner and our best player. Can't see us getting another one at such short notice, that's assuming we have any money for a loan/perm. We might get lucky with a Danny Ward type signing, but over the years how many of this type have we had.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 23:21:38
Caddis would improve our team. Thompson has been brilliant but Caddis is (currently) better.

Ritchie is a game winner and our best player. Can't see us getting another one at such short notice, that's assuming we have any money for a loan/perm. We might get lucky with a Danny Ward type signing, but over the years how many of this type have we had.

Ricky errr... no forget that one.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 23:27:01
Ricky errr... no forget that one.

Jimmy Davis, Lee Holmes (1st time), James Milner, Danny Ward.  Even the I'd put an on form Ritchie above those, well I'd take Milner back right now I suppose :)

Still its done now innit. No point regurgitating it. That's DVs job :)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: sonicyouth on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 23:32:42
one of the best pkayers i've seen at Swindon - but that isn't saying a lot given the period of time i've watched us


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: joteddyred on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 23:48:11
Morshead has just tweeted that Pompey have a sell on clause on Ritchie, but he doesn't know what it is.

Not entirely unexpected, but FFS.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: slinky on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 23:51:42
[url width=276 height=183]http://i934.photobucket.com/albums/ad185/swindon123/straw.jpg[/url]

Sorry slinky.

No probs.  Just trying to take the glass half full approach from what has turned out to be a shite day.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: adje on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 23:53:24
Miles Storey is the answer


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: joteddyred on Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 23:58:44
Miles Storey is the answer

Done his hamstring again though.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RobertT on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 00:00:18
one of the best pkayers i've seen at Swindon - but that isn't saying a lot given the period of time i've watched us

That is a sad statement.  He's been a good player, very effective, but if he reached my top 20 list in my time of watching I'd be pushing him too high.  I'm not saying he wasn't one of the best in recent years, but the late80's and early 90's had entire teams better than him.  I'd still say Ward was a better player than him by a long way when he was here.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Coca Fola on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 00:07:30
Miles Storey is the answer
Could be good on the wing. Thompson and Macca would also have potential.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Coca Fola on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 00:08:22
After Troy's successful spell in CM I think putting him at RM could be good, he has all the natural attributes required for a winger.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 00:09:35
After Troy's successful spell in CM I think putting him at RM could be good, he has all the natural attributes required for a winger.

Inability to pass? Oh wait, its a piss take. definitely bed time!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: dogs on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 00:27:52
Fuck him. We're gonna have the last laugh. Di Canio will make sure of it.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Coca Fola on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 00:32:59
Fuck him. We're gonna have the last laugh. Di Canio will make sure of it.
He'll be gone by Monday.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: dogs on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 00:36:31
He'll be gone by Monday.

And if he does i'll fuck him by tuesday.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Berniman on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 00:46:42
Wes is our best player, and a game changer at that.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: nochee on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 00:59:34
 :soapy tit wank:
Wes is our best player, and a game changer at that.
Definitely! If Wes were to be sold then....................I can't even begin to imagine  :(


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: nochee on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 01:03:22
I'd like to add how happy I am that we've played Bmuff twice this season already.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Dostoyevsky on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 02:21:28
Too deflated now, "you build them up and you knock them down". If this is another complete fuck up then i'm out!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: GoSWINDON on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 02:56:07
Upset he's gone and surprised to bmuff and the shit price , but i  will be more worried if others start to go and obviously PDC . When  ( ritchie )  first joined you could see how much better he was than the players around him and you could see he was 5 seconds in front from playing at a higher level , but the players around him have adapted  and we have a much better team ( squad ) than the last time we  were in this league and i dont think we will miss him as much as we might think  and even though he got player of  the year last season i wouldnt of had him in my top 5  for Swindon  let alone the whole division . Anyway good luck Matt you ballboy beating cunt .


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Dirty Harry on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 03:18:26
Watch us end up landing Bournemouth in the play offs and Ritchie netting the winner :(


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 06:46:08
My 8 year old ad on hearing the news:

"Bournemouth? Did you say Bournemouth"..."Did we get loads of money?"....."then why?"

Welcome to supporting STFC son. The two Wembley visits and promotion were the oddity, the relegation and panic selling on the cheap seem far more normal.

I've slept on it, and while I understand there may not have been much financial choice I'm no less pissed off the sale went through yesterday for such little money.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Bewster on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 06:51:25
I've slept on it, and while I understand there may not have been much financial choice I'm no less pissed off the sale went through yesterday for such little money.

Glad you did. I had one of those nights when all I could envisage was Wes, Ferry et al leaving today along with PDC.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 06:55:56
Glad you did. I had one of those nights when all I could envisage was Wes, Ferry et al leaving today along with PDC.

Given yesterdays events we all have that. Hopefully selling Ritchie prevents it, and to be honest I may not be able to stomach a blow like that.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: @MacPhlea on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 07:20:09
The way I see look at it is this... His sale was never going to be popular, and the fact the publicised fee appears so low makes it worse BUT without this sale the takeover would not have gone through and the club would have been facing admin and a major points deduction from the FL (and you can guarantee we would have been spanked worse than Luton by them) so here's the rub... Ritchie's sale may appear cheap but despite his skills and talent we didn't have big teams knocking our door down to buy him... The only team to make an offer was Bournemouth and they wanted him badly.

So what would you rather?

keep Ritchie and get 20 point deduction and embargo

Sell Ritchie, save the club and have the opportunity to bring a replacement


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: china red on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 07:27:22
Gutted that Ritchie has gone to one of our rivals for such a paltry amount of money, it hurts and if it does mean our season goes off the rails then many of us will be really pissed off.

However, if as has been mention Black et a have written off almost £10 million of debt then they deserve a huge amount of credit and thanks from town fans.  Look at where we were 6 years ago, this group of owners are the reason we have a club, they gave us stability, a championship and we are in a much stronger position both on and off the pitch than we've been in years. 

Black seems to have lost a fair amount of money in the past year, has got desperate to sell but has done us a huge favour by writing off this debt.  Thanks Andrew Black

 


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: london_red on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 07:28:47
I can certainly see that side of it MacPhlea.

If there was a funding gap that had to be bridged I understand this was probably the easiest way of achieving that.

The main concern has to be the long term stability of the club and so a successful takeover eliminating worries of administration was the more important issue for me.

Having said that, the nature of Ritchie's departure, the destination and the fee can't help but rankle, could never have envisaged his leaving for a club below the Championship, and for such a derisory sum.

Mixed emotions, but at least we've still got a club who are unbeaten in 8 and 3rd in the league to fret about transfer wise today, and then go and support on Saturday for our customary 3-0 victory against Crawley.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: suttonred on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 07:30:31
The way I see look at it is this... His sale was never going to be popular, and the fact the publicised fee appears so low makes it worse BUT without this sale the takeover would not have gone through and the club would have been facing admin and a major points deduction from the FL (and you can guarantee we would have been spanked worse than Luton by them) so here's the rub... Ritchie's sale may appear cheap but despite his skills and talent we didn't have big teams knocking our door down to buy him... The only team to make an offer was Bournemouth and they wanted him badly.

So what would you rather?

keep Ritchie and get 20 point deduction and embargo

Sell Ritchie, save the club and have the opportunity to bring a replacement

I would say you are probably right, it's the not knowing that has been the problem. I explained this exact scenario to my wife at 1am!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: ghanimah on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 07:34:27
My 8 year old ad on hearing the news:

"Bournemouth? Did you say Bournemouth"..."Did we get loads of money?"....."then why?"

Welcome to supporting STFC son. The two Wembley visits and promotion were the oddity, the relegation and panic selling on the cheap seem far more normal.

I've slept on it, and while I understand there may not have been much financial choice I'm no less pissed off the sale went through yesterday for such little money.

Ain't that the truth...though another way of looking at it is we sold Ritchie for £10.5m


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Flashheart on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 07:34:45
Hopefully PDC will be given the wonga for a replacement. We may even get in a loanee better than Rtchie.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 07:40:32
Ain't that the truth...though another way of looking at it is we sold Ritchie for £10.5m
Good point :nod:


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DiV on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 07:43:52
I still fail to see why selling Ritchie was a prerequisite to getting the take over done.

All those money men could have come up with something better.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Bob's Orange on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 07:44:56
35 pages and the most irritating thing about this whole thing for me? The spelling of fucking 'Matt Richie'

Aside from that, I am a little narked at having sold him at what I think is below the going rate. I think a fee nearer 1 million would have been more realistic.

But, lets hold on until 11pm today and see who is brought in. Clearly Rooney, RDV and Roberts are now our only wingers and this isn't going to be enough to continue our promotion 'charge'. The ideal scenario is that Roberts replaces Ritchie like for like and starts to come good.



Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: THE FLASH on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 07:46:54
Strange, but the worst performance in a town shirt was away at Bmuff.

He wasn't much cop at Orient either....heads gone!!!!!!

Probably a blip though, he will do well for them.

I would fucking love it if we turn them over this season somehow.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 07:47:39
BBC Wilts understand deal was sanctioned by old and new boards.

Well that raises lots of questions and answers none!


Title: Re: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Frigby Daser on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 07:49:42
If it was required to bridge a funding gap, it would suggest the new lot aren't exactly flushed with cash. Brilliant.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: suttonred on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 07:50:49
35 pages and the most irritating thing about this whole thing for me? The spelling of fucking 'Matt Richie'

Aside from that, I am a little narked at having sold him at what I think is below the going rate. I think a fee nearer 1 million would have been more realistic.

But, lets hold on until 11pm today and see who is brought in. Clearly Rooney, RDV and Roberts are now our only wingers and this isn't going to be enough to continue our promotion 'charge'. The ideal scenario is that Roberts replaces Ritchie like for like and starts to come good.



I'll be amazed if anyone comes in. I'm just hoping we dont lose Williams,Collins and Fods.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 07:51:37
If it was required to bridge a funding gap, it would suggest the new lot aren't exactly flushed with cash. Brilliant.

Exactly!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: suttonred on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 07:53:00
If it was required to bridge a funding gap, it would suggest the new lot aren't exactly flushed with cash. Brilliant.

End of the month and paydays, if contracts were only exchanged lates last night it will take a couple of days for everything to go through. Mr Black certainly wouldnt be paying them, and I doubt if anyone has 75k cash in an envelope to cover bills until then.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Gerinthere on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 07:56:14
Strange, but the worst performance in a town shirt was away at Bmuff.

He wasn't much cop at Orient either....heads gone!!!!!!

Probably a blip though, he will do well for them.

I would fucking love it if we turn them over this season somehow.

Playoffs


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: hobnob on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 07:59:16
Wish we could fast forward to 11pm!!!!


Title: Re: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Bewster on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 08:10:55
If it was required to bridge a funding gap, it would suggest the new lot aren't exactly flushed with cash. Brilliant.

Broke before we start - triffic Rodney


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: kerry red on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 08:12:25
End of the month and paydays, if contracts were only exchanged lates last night it will take a couple of days for everything to go through. Mr Black certainly wouldnt be paying them, and I doubt if anyone has 75k cash in an envelope to cover bills until then.

I was under the impression that the club were 'ahead of their budget' - which means to me that the day to day running costs were being more than covered by club generated income.

Virtually all clubs run a bank overdraft - which we apparently did not - so surely if there was a dire need for some form of external short term funding, why not ask the bank.

Surely Black didn't empty his pockets each and every month to cover any shortfall


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: medwayred on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 08:18:13
Last night my 6 year old learned that football can be sad. He has idolised MR for the last 20 months. Always trying to emulate him when playing football. He kept calling to Richie on Tuesday night at LO. This Saturday he is mascot for town and was so excited about meeting MR. He is so sad this morning. Heartbroken. Gutted for him and Town.

Coyr


Title: Re: Re: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Frigby Daser on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 08:21:53
I was under the impression that the club were 'ahead of their budget' - which means to me that the day to day running costs were being more than covered by club generated income.

Virtually all clubs run a bank overdraft - which we apparently did not - so surely if there was a dire need for some form of external short term funding, why not ask the bank.

Surely Black didn't empty his pockets each and every month to cover any shortfall

I am not sure that we budgeted for an operating profit. I think that is exactly what Black has been doing, hence his will to get out.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: pauld on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 08:22:39
We had a few wobbly lips in our house this morning too, MR. My youngest couldn't understand why we'd sell him to promotion rivals (and why he'd go) "because they're not even better"


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: london_red on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 08:26:33
Surely Black didn't empty his pockets each and every month to cover any shortfall

Yes he did unfortunately - I believe Black was funding the club to the tune of £250k a month or so.


Title: Re: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Frigby Daser on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 08:27:35
In 20 years time, I wonder if these same children will be saying..."same old Swindon, I remember when we sold Matt Ritchie for nothing in 2013."


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: pauld on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 08:28:46
In 20 years time, I wonder if these same children will be saying..."same old Swindon, I remember when we sold Matt Ritchie for nothing in 2013."
As a father, that's the legacy of misery and disappointment I've been very much hoping to bequeath to my children, yes


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Ardiles on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 08:37:33
I'm going to copy this from an e-mail sent by my friend Matt (not that one) to the London Reds mailing list.

Yesterday I felt I was back in a science lesson in March 1995, reading in disbelief the words £1.3 mil on the back of a copy of the Adver 'liberated' from the school staff room.

Today I feel better.  It seems it was Black who sanctioned the Ritchie sale, not the new lot.  If he wanted half a mil back after writing off a 10 mil loss who can blame him?


Which is a very fair point.  We still know next to nothing about the new lot (other than JedMac's writing skills not being up to much).  Still massively disappointed about the Ritchie sale, but have to sit back and wait.  Whatever happens, it's going to have bugger all to do with anything any of us say or do.  Que sera, sera.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 08:42:26
Nothing we can do about the fact that he has gone. If he wanted to go, then its best he's gone. If he had to go to sustain the club then so be it. (Remember PDC talking a couple of weeks ago about a scenario where one player was sacrificed to improve the team) The thing that seems a little odd is the amount that we got for him. All that I can think is:
- There is something in the deal that hasn't been disclosed yet (e.g A player [Mention of Bournemouth having lots of competition on the wing in the intervierw with Ritchie] coming in the other direction or contribution to wages of another player?)
- PDC has a replacement lined up (Maybe Wright Phillips on loan if yesterday's rumour is correct)
- Caddis to come back and play right wing? Or maybe to be sold to give us a bit more cash?
- Maybe defender coming in [from Bournemouth?] to act as cover at the back and release McCormack to play on the right?

I guess we'll find out soon.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: random_five on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 08:44:36
I've heard rumours we are trying to bring in Jermaine Mcglashan as a replacement, not sure if he is any good or not


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Red Frog on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 08:48:23
We had a few wobbly lips in our house this morning too, MR. My youngest couldn't understand why we'd sell him to promotion rivals (and why he'd go) "because they're not even better"

I haven't told my 8-year-old yet. He IS Matt Ritchie with his Swindon top in his Paris football team, to the bemusement of the other kids, and his front line at table football consists of Ronaldo-Messi-Ritchie. Think I'll wait till after 11pm before I try to wean him onto Andy Williams...


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Bob's Orange on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 08:48:41
I've heard rumours we are trying to bring in Jermaine Mcglashan as a replacement, not sure if he is any good or not

I saw him against Everton and he wasn't great. Maybe a straight swap for Rooney?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 08:52:33
I haven't told my 8-year-old yet. He IS Matt Ritchie with his Swindon top in his Paris football team, to the bemusement of the other kids, and his front line at table football consists of Ronaldo-Messi-Ritchie. Think I'll wait till after 11pm before I try to wean him onto Andy Williams...
Why? You want him to follow Bristol City? :-(


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Peter Venkman on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 08:53:57
I heard a rumour, no names, no players, and nothing to do with the club.



Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Red Frog on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 08:55:05
Nothing we can do about the fact that he has gone. If he wanted to go, then its best he's gone. If he had to go to sustain the club then so be it. (Remember PDC talking a couple of weeks ago about a scenario where one player was sacrificed to improve the team) The thing that seems a little odd is the amount that we got for him. All that I can think is:
- There is something in the deal that hasn't been disclosed yet (e.g A player [Mention of Bournemouth having lots of competition on the wing in the intervierw with Ritchie] coming in the other direction or contribution to wages of another player?)
- PDC has a replacement lined up (Maybe Wright Phillips on loan if yesterday's rumour is correct)
- Caddis to come back and play right wing? Or maybe to be sold to give us a bit more cash?
- Maybe defender coming in [from Bournemouth?] to act as cover at the back and release McCormack to play on the right?

I guess we'll find out soon.

I think you have to accept we've got what we've got: £500k plus sell-on (Sky are even reporting the fee as £400k!). We needed the cash very quickly, and only one club was making a firm offer - they held all the cards. It's a rubbish deal, but Black was prepared to sacrifice the difference for the sake of funding the transition.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: horlock07 on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 09:00:51
Nothing we can do about the fact that he has gone. If he wanted to go, then its best he's gone. If he had to go to sustain the club then so be it. (Remember PDC talking a couple of weeks ago about a scenario where one player was sacrificed to improve the team) The thing that seems a little odd is the amount that we got for him. All that I can think is:
- There is something in the deal that hasn't been disclosed yet (e.g A player [Mention of Bournemouth having lots of competition on the wing in the intervierw with Ritchie] coming in the other direction or contribution to wages of another player?)
- PDC has a replacement lined up (Maybe Wright Phillips on loan if yesterday's rumour is correct)
- Caddis to come back and play right wing? Or maybe to be sold to give us a bit more cash?
- Maybe defender coming in [from Bournemouth?] to act as cover at the back and release McCormack to play on the right?

I guess we'll find out soon.

I suppose the other thing to bear in mind is the timing of the payment, I assume that we have got this cash immediately if its funding the bridge, wheras normally if we had got more it would have been spread over a prolonged period of time - Just a thought like.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Shaw Rosso on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 09:01:31
Broke the news to my 7 yr old this morning.  He has 'Ritchie 10' printed on his new home shirt, only just got it for Christmas. He walked out with Matt Ritchie at the pre season game against Supermarine. He was his footballing hero in every sense of the word. After 10 minutes of tears he has decided he wants Collins 9 on his shirt, I hope we don't sell him too or he will need counselling  :cry:


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 09:03:51
I suppose the other thing to bear in mind is the timing of the payment, I assume that we have got this cash immediately if its funding the bridge, wheras normally if we had got more it would have been spread over a prolonged period of time - Just a thought like.
That's the spin I'm putting on it as well - now all we need to is hold on to Williams then it won't seem quite so bad....please.....let us hold on to Williams :headhurts:


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Arnold.J.Rimmer on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 09:18:32
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=u75XQdTxZRc

Reminds me of this. Good bit of business STFC


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: welshred on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 09:19:37
I remember my Dad waking me up early morning in 1992 telling me that Duncan Shearer had signed for Blackburn for £800,000. I was 10, and devastated.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Barry Scott on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 09:25:28
If it was required to bridge a funding gap, it would suggest the new lot aren't exactly flushed with cash. Brilliant.

No, as has been said several times and seems to be over looked by all, it implies the club is in limbo, with neither the new or old owners able to provide funding.

Black is STILL the owner until the league approve the deal and wants no further part, so money needs to come from somewhere. The new owner likewise can't put money into something he doesn't own. Makes sense to me.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Dostoyevsky on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 09:30:02
I remember my Dad waking me up early morning in 1992 telling me that Duncan Shearer had signed for Blackburn for £800,000. I was 10, and devastated.

A lamentable day indeed, I was 10 also at the time. Does anyone know if Duncan has ever returned to the club as a guest? Hope he harbours fond memories towards us.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Bewster on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 09:39:56
We had a few wobbly lips in our house this morning too, MR. My youngest couldn't understand why we'd sell him to promotion rivals (and why he'd go) "because they're not even better"

Ditto. I had to explain that this is what happens when you are a fan of a smaller club. I told him that he has a choice - to be part of a smaller club like Swindon or go a follow a big team with lots of money like Man City or Chelsea.

He looked at me with tears in his eyes and resolutely announced "I am NOT changing teams daddy".


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 09:42:44
No, as has been said several times and seems to be over looked by all, it implies the club is in limbo, with neither the new or old owners able to provide funding.

Black is STILL the owner until the league approve the deal and wants no further part, so money needs to come from somewhere. The new owner likewise can't put money into something he doesn't own. Makes sense to me.

Which creditors wouldn't wait the few days to get paid though. I'm sure there's more to this than "having" to sell for cashflow issues. Also aren't most transfer fees paid in instalments anyway.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Red Frog on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 09:43:29
Whatever happens, it's going to have bugger all to do with anything any of us say or do.  Que sera, sera.

Agree that off the pitch and on it, we are only spectators. That doesn't mean we have no role to play if things aren't to our liking (viz the Trust in the past). It's no coincidence that attendances have been on an upward curve during the recent period of stability. If we go back to being a basket-case, they'll quickly drop away again. That's our shareholding that the board have an interest in protecting.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: welshred on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 09:44:09
Which creditors wouldn't wait the few days to get paid though. I'm sure there's more to this than "having" to sell for cashflow issues. Also aren't most transfer fees paid in instalments anyway.

Cash up front may have been part of the deal (hence why it was so low) and Bournemouth may have been the only team able/willing to do that.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: WR5 on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 09:45:09
Ditto. I had to explain that this is what happens when you are a fan of a smaller club. I told him that he has a choice - to be part of a smaller club like Swindon or go a follow a big team with lots of money like Man City or Chelsea.

He looked at me with tears in his eyes and resolutely announced "I am NOT changing teams daddy".

Pretty much this too,

It was wobbly lip time in our house this morning, then the wife told me to man the fuck up and tell the boy


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Bob's Orange on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 09:45:12
I'm going to copy this from an e-mail sent by my friend Matt (not that one) to the London Reds mailing list.

Yesterday I felt I was back in a science lesson in March 1995, reading in disbelief the words £1.3 mil on the back of a copy of the Adver 'liberated' from the school staff room.

Today I feel better.  It seems it was Black who sanctioned the Ritchie sale, not the new lot.  If he wanted half a mil back after writing off a 10 mil loss who can blame him?


Which is a very fair point.  We still know next to nothing about the new lot (other than JedMac's writing skills not being up to much).  Still massively disappointed about the Ritchie sale, but have to sit back and wait.  Whatever happens, it's going to have bugger all to do with anything any of us say or do.  Que sera, sera.

I thought you were going to take an internet holiday Ardiles?

My dad is on holiday in Devon and I doubt he will have any idea what is going on. He's in for a bit of a surprise when he gets back tomorrow.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Ardiles on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 09:46:40
Agree that off the pitch and on it, we are only spectators. That doesn't mean we have no role to play if things aren't to our liking (viz the Trust in the past). It's no coincidence that attendances have been on an upward curve during the recent period of stability. If we go back to being a basket-case, they'll quickly drop away again. That's our shareholding that the board have an interest in protecting.

Couldn't agree more (about the longer term influence of the Trust etc.)  Just feel like a bit of a bystander this week, that's all.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: PetsWinPrizes on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 09:51:47
I'm going to copy this from an e-mail sent by my friend Matt (not that one) to the London Reds mailing list.

Yesterday I felt I was back in a science lesson in March 1995, reading in disbelief the words £1.3 mil on the back of a copy of the Adver 'liberated' from the school staff room.

Today I feel better.  It seems it was Black who sanctioned the Ritchie sale, not the new lot.  If he wanted half a mil back after writing off a 10 mil loss who can blame him?


Which is a very fair point.  We still know next to nothing about the new lot (other than JedMac's writing skills not being up to much).  Still massively disappointed about the Ritchie sale, but have to sit back and wait.  Whatever happens, it's going to have bugger all to do with anything any of us say or do.  Que sera, sera.

This 'Matt' sounds a reasoned, and dare I say it, wise man.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: welshred on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 09:52:39
Ditto. I had to explain that this is what happens when you are a fan of a smaller club. I told him that he has a choice - to be part of a smaller club like Swindon or go a follow a big team with lots of money like Man City or Chelsea.

He looked at me with tears in his eyes and resolutely announced "I am NOT changing teams daddy".

I've got all this to come. My boy is 4 and is surrounded by smug kids in their Swansea City shirts. He still wears his Swindon shirt when he goes to football though.

Not sure whether to ensure he follows Swindon (and offer him a life full of heart-ache) like my Dad did to me, or suggest he follows his home town team.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Ardiles on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 09:52:57
This 'Matt' sounds a reasoned, and dare I say it, wise man.

Oh, he is.  He is.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Honkytonk on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 09:54:10
God I'd nearly forgotten how shit it could be to be a Swindon fan. Hardly the best start to the new owner's tenure. I still remember being a 9 year old sat in my Dad's car on the way home and hearing about the financial difficulties at the club, and that George Ndah was being sold to Wolves. But at least we got 1mill for him...


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: london_red on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 09:56:10
This 'Matt' sounds a reasoned, and dare I say it, wise man.

Hopeless at finding his way from a station to a pub though.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 09:59:49
Cash up front may have been part of the deal (hence why it was so low) and Bournemouth may have been the only team able/willing to do that.

Yay! Yet more maybe's. And why couldn't we just make the creditors who are due payment wait a couple more days? I am seriously worried.

Oh and it's your boys choice. Has to be Town all the way though. Bewster's boy is "da man"


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Nijholts Nuts on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 10:02:25
Good players come, good players go. There will be other Ritchies and Austins. I appreciate what he's done for us and I am very grateful, I will also miss the 30 yard screamers. However, the fact remains we are Swindon and we go on regardless, we shall adapt and adjust and make the best of the situation (far from ideal as it is). I trust PDC and his team to replace as he sees fit, I also feel we've got the strength in depth to cope whilst such a replacement is sought.

The season isn't over folks, not yet not by a long stretch.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Mister Lorenzo on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 10:04:08
Pretty much this too,

It was wobbly lip time in our house this morning, then the wife told me to man the fuck up and tell the boy
:clap:


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: welshred on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 10:04:38
Oh and it's your boys choice. Has to be Town all the way though. Bewster's boy is "da man"

His choice?! I never had a choice in the matter, why should he?!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Red Frog on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 10:09:06
Good players come, good players go. All I can promise you is blood, sweat, toil and tears. There will be other Ritchies and Austins. I appreciate what he's done for us and I am very grateful, I will also miss the 30 yard screamers.  However, the fact remains we are Swindon and we go on regardless, we shall adapt and adjust and make the best of the situation (far from ideal as it is). We shall never be defeated. I trust PDC and his team to replace as he sees fit, I also feel we've got the strength in depth to cope whilst such a replacement is sought. Never in the football field of human conflict, has so much been owed by so many to so few.

The season isn't over folks, not yet not by a long stretch. This isn't the end, nor even the beginning of the end, but it is the end of the beginning.

(No need to thank me.)  ;)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 10:12:50
His choice?! I never had a choice in the matter, why should he?!

Haha. Me neither. Keep him on the straight and narrow too then.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: suttonred on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 10:26:59
Oh, he is.  He is.

Oh no he isn't..


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Benzel on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 10:29:16
See you round, Ritchie. Admire the guy for sticking with it last season, scored some utterly stupid goals and earned himself a move. Whether this was the right one or not remains to be seen and whether he actually wanted it or is a mystery.

Bloke couldn't get his name sung for love nor money but I imagine there'll be a rendition of "one Matt Ritchie" before Crawley this weekend.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: PetsWinPrizes on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 10:32:58
Hopeless at finding his way from a station to a pub though.

I don't know his excuse obviously, but I'd imagine it was Apple Maps fault.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: suttonred on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 10:40:03
I don't know his excuse obviously, but I'd imagine it was Apple Maps fault.

Some one should paint L and R on his shoes ala Jimmy Cricket. They dress more or less the same so no one would notice.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: dave_bambers_right_sock on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 11:01:44
I've got all this to come. My boy is 4 and is surrounded by smug kids in their Swansea City shirts.
Just wondering Which part of Swansea you live? Parents used to live in Manselton  :D


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: welshred on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 11:04:42
Just wondering Which part of Swansea you live? Parents used to live in Manselton  :D

I'm not a million miles away. I live in Ynystawe on the East side. I'm Swansea born and bred but my Dad grew up in Swindon.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: dave_bambers_right_sock on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 11:12:35
Hopefully be down there in a few weeks time got some family research to do


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: joteddyred on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 11:53:25
Broke the news to my 7 yr old this morning.  He has 'Ritchie 10' printed on his new home shirt, only just got it for Christmas. He walked out with Matt Ritchie at the pre season game against Supermarine. He was his footballing hero in every sense of the word. After 10 minutes of tears he has decided he wants Collins 9 on his shirt, I hope we don't sell him too or he will need counselling  :cry:

My 9 year old doesn't have the name on his shirt, in fact after a similar 10 mins worth of crying announced 'I'm glad I haven't got his name on my shirt' .  This was followed up by 'Why would we sell Matt Ritchie to Bournemouth? Who will play in his place, our other wingers are rubbish.  That's it, we won't go up now'.  Perfectly reasonable questions and observations that I was unable to answer.

After a night's sleep, I am still completely pissed off with the situation.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Benzel on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 11:54:25
I didn't know we were a one man team.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Leggett on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:04:20
Its all my fault. Found two programmes stuffed in the bottom of my work bag this morning, one of Benson, one on Ritchie. my bag appears to be the end of swindon careers...


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: joteddyred on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:05:02
I didn't know we were a one man team.

We're not, but take out Ritchie's goals and assists this season and we'd have a lot less points than we've got.

And this is a 9 year old talking, although I do slightly agree!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Flashheart on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:08:24
We're not, but take out Ritchie's goals and assists this season and we'd have a lot less points than we've got.


Yet somebody else would have been playing in that position. Some, if not all, of those goals and assists would have been replaced by another player.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: jimmy_onions on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:24:23
jsut seen a pic of MR training with muff..already!...must be weird for a pro footballer to chop and change like that...imgaine one day having a compeltely new set of work mates...having to re build relationships, be pally with them etc...


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: adje on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:25:16
Its all my fault. Found two programmes stuffed in the bottom of my work bag this morning, one of Benson, one on Ritchie. my bag appears to be the end of swindon careers...

Can you find the one with Roberts on the front?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:33:44
Quote
THE STFC Board acknowledge the disappointment expressed by many fans over the sale of Matt Ritchie to AFC Bournemouth yesterday but it is important that the sale of Matt Ritchie is put into context.

As everyone is fully aware, following the requirement to seek new owners for the club, Swindon Town FC faced the very serious prospect of administration, had it not been successful in securing new investors in an incredibly compressed time frame.  Within this time frame a new consortium has been identified and yesterday evening contracts were exchanged for the sale of the majority shareholding. There now follows a brief period whilst the new owners await Football League approval under the Owners & Directors Test and during this period of time the club requires funding. A joint decision was taken between the current and prospective new owners to sell Matt Ritchie in order to meet this funding requirement.

The alternative to not securing new owners and securing short term funding would have seen a significant restructure to the Club and the possibility administration. As such, the club’s long term survival and wellbeing had to be the priority.

Losing Matt Ritchie from Paolo Di Canio’s Championship challenging side is very disappointing but the prospective new owners of the club remain committed to supporting Paolo Di Canio and assisting him with the quest to achieve promotion to the Championship at the end of the season.


http://www.swindontownfc.co.uk/news/article/mattritchiesale-630167.aspx


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: welshred on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:35:43
Nice to finally get an explanation.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: ghanimah on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:36:21
jsut seen a pic of MR training with muff..already!...must be weird for a pro footballer to chop and change like that...imgaine one day having a compeltely new set of work mates...having to re build relationships, be pally with them etc...

Must feel like shit I would've thought, we ask players to show loyalty and passion for the shirt then treat them no better than cattle as some part of a takeover bid he's not even party to, for a knock down price.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:36:34
So basically Black is or was unwilling to fund the club even for a short period whilst the new lot take over.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: jimmy_onions on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:40:27
batch was spot on......however, I still question whether selling MR was like a sledgehammer to crack a nut...surely funds could be found from somewhere to fuind the running of the club for a few days?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: dave_bambers_right_sock on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:41:05
Think the club could have released the statement a bit sooner than they did


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: horlock07 on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:41:10
So basically Black is or was unwilling to fund the club even for a short period whilst the new lot take over.

I imagine the conversation went something like...

Black - Well I am buggered if I am going to fund for another month after taking this hit!
New Owners (cannot believe we have got to fit and proper persons test stage and don't know who the grinder is behind the monkey) - Well we ain't funding it whilst it doesn't belong to us!

What I still don't get is why it suddenly became the most urgent thing ever to sell immediately, either Patey didn't get a sale as quick as he was supposed to or something has happened with Black that means he needs out quickly?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Power to people on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:41:39
But that does not explain why we sold him so cheap,

If the new owners do not forsee any problems with the Director Tests why could they not put the required money in now if they expect to take control imminently

Why is the money needed so quick could it not have waited a few days until the takeover had been ratified

Oh and lastly,

Why are they not prepared to releases the names of who is in this consoritum it seems a bit cloke and dagger


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:42:16
batch was spot on......however, I still question whether selling MR was like a sledgehammer to crack a nut...surely funds could be found from somewhere to fuind the running of the club for a few days?

The new owners might have refused as they are officially not yet in control. Wouldn't surprise me if that pissed Black off so he said if "you aren't going to fund it we'll have to sell a player or there's no deal".


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: thedarkprince on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:43:28
Think the club could have released the statement a bit sooner than they did

I want to go back to the days fo Statement Thursdays/Fridays so this new lot are showing a lot of promise.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: horlock07 on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:45:11
batch was spot on......however, I still question whether selling MR was like a sledgehammer to crack a nut...surely funds could be found from somewhere to fuind the running of the club for a few days?

But where.... my one previous hope was that Wray/Fitton were still involved and if so they could fund, but with such a clean break there will always be this abeyance. I would normally expect those incoming to pay into a holding account on the understanduing that would be repaid if it didn't proceed, but I assume things were so bad this wasn't an option?

I also assume someone has buggered up the Caddis loan so we cant recall as he may have been a better and less damaging sale option.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: thedarkprince on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:45:24
But that does not explain why we sold him so cheap,

If the new owners do not forsee any problems with the Director Tests why could they not put the required money in now if they expect to take control imminently

Why is the money needed so quick could it not have waited a few days until the takeover had been ratified

Oh and lastly,

Why are they not prepared to releases the names of who is in this consoritum it seems a bit cloke and dagger

Think someone mentioend it earlier but perhaps Bournemouth agreed to pay the bulk up front rather than over installments. 


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:46:09
batch was spot on......however, I still question whether selling MR was like a sledgehammer to crack a nut...surely funds could be found from somewhere to fuind the running of the club for a few days?

Agreed. I still want to know which creditors weren't prepared to wait a few days (while the takeover goes through) for their money. My guess is the Richie money (if indeed we have been transferred it) will be used to pay the rest of the players this month as it's pay day today. This seems very worrying to me.

Oh fuck i sound like Reg!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Flashheart on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:46:45
Nobody is happy the Ritchie has sold. I expect we all wish that a better alternative was found.

However, to see idiots calling the board cunts (and not in the TEF way) over it makes me wish I could upload myself to be downloaded at their end where I could have a 'chat' with them


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: STFCforeigner on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:47:06
A shame an agreement couldn't be made instead of offloading Ritchie

Anyhow, doesn't seem like he really wanted to go. So up yours Muff


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: hobnob on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:49:14
Ritchie was good for us but he ain't Messi so I am sure we can manage without him.

Just wanna beat Bmuff to promotion and leave him behind in League 1.

That would be awesome and if PDC stays is quite likely to happen.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: horlock07 on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:49:20
But that does not explain why we sold him so cheap,

If the new owners do not forsee any problems with the Director Tests why could they not put the required money in now if they expect to take control imminently

Oh and lastly,

Why are they not prepared to releases the names of who is in this consoritum it seems a bit cloke and dagger

Cheap as I believe they were the only offer received and as I said previously I suspect they played hard ball as they knew we needed the cash immediately - I suspect we would have got more if we could accept staged payments as per a normal deal.

The issue of fair and proper test has crossed my mind as well....


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Barry Scott on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:50:18
I also assume someone has buggered up the Caddis loan so we cant recall as he may have been a better and less damaging sale option.

I don't believe you can cancel a season long loan. It's set in stone for the duration.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:51:05
I don't believe you can cancel a season long loan. It's set in stone for the duration.

Shouldn't have sanctioned it then.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: horlock07 on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:51:11
Agreed. I still want to know which creditors weren't prepared to wait a few days (while the takeover goes through) for their money. My guess is the Richie money (if indeed we have been transferred it) will be used to pay the rest of the players this month as it's pay day today. This seems very worrying to me.

Oh fuck i sound like Reg!

There are not creditors as far as I understand - this was cash flow pure and simple!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:52:37
There are not creditors as far as I understand - this was cash flow pure and simple!

Ummm, sorry but if you owe money to someone then they are a "creditor" whether it be an individual (e.g. a player) or a company. What else do you use "cash" for?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Family at War on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:56:12
Don't think PDC will be that upset at this as he always said in recent interviews he was planning already and it might be he had to sacrifice one player. Ritchie was a good player but not the be all and end all and if anyone can replace him Paolo can!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: jonny72 on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:56:34
Ummm, sorry but if you owe money to someone then they are a "creditor" whether it be an individual (e.g. a player) or a company. What else do you use "cash" for?

Not that simple. You might owe someone £100k now and be owed £200k that you're not being paid until next week. Technically (and according to the books) you're worth £100k, but in the short term your cash flow is fucked and you're broke.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Power to people on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:57:16
I don't believe you can cancel a season long loan. It's set in stone for the duration.

There is usually a break clause inserted so the player can be recalled or sent back to his club in January


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: dporter on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 12:57:44
I feel sad for Ritchie in so much that he was sacrificed to keep us afloat, i don't think he had much choice in the decision and interestingly the photo of him with the Bournemouth shirt doesn't make him look overjoyed to be there. He was a great player for us and put everything into Swindon Town. On the other hand i totally understand why it was done and am so relieved the club is not in administration. Ultimately one player doesn't make a team so hopefully today's new signings can get us this seasons aim of promotion.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 13:00:00
Hmm the statement just says what we knew, we needed the cash badly and this was the only option. Lets be honest, it was the only explanation given the low fee and expedited procedure.

What we don't and won't know till later is:-
    - is that it re: player sales.
    - why the consortium couldn't fund a bridging loan*
    - what PDC thinks
    - Whether the club sale is "anyone will do" or has a good long term future
    - who the new perspective owners are
    - and many many more.

* to some extent, why would they. But they have lost an asset and this doesn't suggest to me they are minted (or minted right now).

When I look back to the deep dark days I'd be delighted with how things stand right now. But having tasted success, its all a bit disappointing. Though clearly that feeling can change.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: horlock07 on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 13:00:33
Ummm, sorry but if you owe money to someone then they are a "creditor" whether it be an individual (e.g. a player) or a company. What else do you use "cash" for?

If you want to descend into semantics then you are possibly correct. However if you were a player with a mortgage to pay would you delay payment on the off chance that you get paid, equally Black who has essentially given the club £10m understandably didnt want to bung them another half mill for luck.

You need cash to pay people, simple as that.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: bigbobjoylove on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 13:04:01
I feel sad for Ritchie in so much that he was sacrificed to keep us afloat, i don't think he had much choice in the decision and interestingly the photo of him with the Bournemouth shirt doesn't make him look overjoyed to be there.

Exactly. Board probably told him we'd have to go into admin unless he left.

If the Russians get bored then AFCB are going to have to have a massive sell-off so wouldn't be the least bit surprised to see him back here with us.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: suttonred on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 13:06:56
I feel sad for Ritchie in so much that he was sacrificed to keep us afloat, i don't think he had much choice in the decision and interestingly the photo of him with the Bournemouth shirt doesn't make him look overjoyed to be there. He was a great player for us and put everything into Swindon Town. On the other hand i totally understand why it was done and am so relieved the club is not in administration. Ultimately one player doesn't make a team so hopefully today's new signings can get us this seasons aim of promotion.

Yeah It's a lot brighter today, and even though I bet the poor sods were locked in a room for 24 hours thrashing the deal out, a pity 30 seconds wasnt found to explain, as they have this morning.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Bob's Orange on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 13:10:17
His interview that Samdy put up with him sat in the radio studio certainly, showed that he didn't seem overjoyed with the decision but ultimately it was out of his hands. He wasn't exactly doing cartwheels down the studio and decreeing his love for AFC Bournemouth. It wouldn't surprise me if he got sent off on his debut in frustration.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: lambourn red on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 13:11:35
I imagine the conversation went something like...

Black - Well I am buggered if I am going to fund for another month after taking this hit!
New Owners (cannot believe we have got to fit and proper persons test stage and don't know who the grinder is behind the monkey) - Well we ain't funding it whilst it doesn't belong to us!

What I still don't get is why it suddenly became the most urgent thing ever to sell immediately, either Patey didn't get a sale as quick as he was supposed to or something has happened with Black that means he needs out quickly?

My take on it is that Black has been saying since Fitton left I want out this has gone on for months with Wray securing funds from Black who continually is saying no more. I am guessing that Wray and Watkins had been charged with finding new owners but in the meantime were still promising funds to PDC. AB has said around the time of the Umbargo that is it and got SWP in to sell the club and also stop the spending, in the meantime AB has lost a lot on the stock exchange and other investments so STFC is the obvious thing to remove from his portfolio as it is never going to show a return.. AB has set a 1st of Feb deadline to SWP with a definitive no more money whatever passed this date.
Now this is where it gets scary for me if we are supposedly under the 65% FFP rules and revenues are up how have we got a situation where a rumoured 50k per week is needed to stave off admin surely this is against those rules which is all very baffling. We can only hope that there is someone in the new consortium that can fund that shortfall for the foreseeable future until some the player contracts are up for renewal in the summer. Jeremy Wary was very open to a mate of mine when he met him 3 weeks ago telling him that things were not rosy , possible admin and talking to new prospective owners but I just dismissed it at the time as trying to wind me up. As long as we keep PDC that has to be the priority ,the next few days are certainly going to be interesting once the new consortium members are revealed .


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: TheMajorSTFC on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 13:11:42
It wouldn't surprise me if he got sent off on his debut in frustration.

Happens to be Franchi$e v Muff on Saturday, big game for the play off positions!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: jimmy_onions on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 13:16:11
jsut seen a pic of MR training with muff..already!...must be weird for a pro footballer to chop and change like that...imgaine one day having a compeltely new set of work mates...having to re build relationships, be pally with them etc...

and even more so now that it appears richie was essentially sacrificed for the sake of the club..you have to feel a little sympathy for him and the whole upheaval he has faced...

then again, maybe he doesnt give a shit, and just enjoys playing week in week out, wherever it is..who fookin knows.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: sonicyouth on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 13:26:22
i don't understand why Black is flat out refusing to finance the club? i can understand if he's fed up of pouring money in, but if it's a case of covering running costs until the takeover came through could the two parties not have negotiated a deal? didn't Bill Power do this during his failed takeover attempt?

i still think the sale of Ritichie to a promotion rival for such a low fee is bad business, short sighted and doesn't fill me with confidence but appreciate the fact this sale could keep us in business.

what happens if the deal collapses, which is still possible at this late stage? what happens if the FL refuse to ratify it?

the statement from the club today is 12 hours too late. very surprised at it being released in hindsight given the current/old board had developed a reputation for transparency and foresight.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: ghanimah on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 13:30:24
Hmm the statement just says what we knew, we needed the cash badly and this was the only option. Lets be honest, it was the only explanation given the low fee and expedited procedure.

What we don't and won't know till later is:-
    - is that it re: player sales.
    - why the consortium couldn't fund a bridging loan*
    - what PDC thinks
    - Whether the club sale is "anyone will do" or has a good long term future
    - who the new perspective owners are
    - and many many more.

* to some extent, why would they. But they have lost an asset and this doesn't suggest to me they are minted (or minted right now).

When I look back to the deep dark days I'd be delighted with how things stand right now. But having tasted success, its all a bit disappointing. Though clearly that feeling can change.

I would imagine the problem with a bridging loan is the issue of security. Swindon resides with a holding company, the current major shareholder clearly is unwilling to underwrite the risk, and as the new shareholders have not yet had approval they obviously can't provide security especially given that the threat of administration was hanging over our heads.

Nor I suspect would they be willing to pump in their own money, given that the takeover hasn't been officially approved. Ritchie's sale therefore was the only means to meet the salary obligations at the end of the month if nothing else


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Stegenfreud on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 13:31:43
i don't understand why Black is flat out refusing to finance the club? i can understand if he's fed up of pouring money in, but if it's a case of covering running costs until the takeover came through could the two parties not have negotiated a deal? didn't Bill Power do this during his failed takeover attempt?

i still think the sale of Ritichie to a promotion rival for such a low fee is bad business, short sighted and doesn't fill me with confidence but appreciate the fact this sale could keep us in business.

what happens if the deal collapses, which is still possible at this late stage? what happens if the FL refuse to ratify it?

the statement from the club today is 12 hours too late. very surprised at it being released in hindsight given the current/old board had developed a reputation for transparency and foresight.

I agree, I would suggest the lack of transparency is down to the uncertainty surrounding the club. Patey has no experience of communicating with fans and was brought in to get the club sold so probably doesn't care about keeping us informed. I'd also argue that most of the current employees were/are in the dark as well.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Arriba on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 13:32:26
I think he's a huge loss, I also think the club offered him to Bournemouth.  :badmood:


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Abrahammer on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 13:33:54
Shame Austin wasnt sold in the last few days so could get our share of that.

That would have solved this funding gap issue


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 13:34:38
Spilled milk. Finished. Over.....What's coming next?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: sonicyouth on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 13:35:34
Spilled milk. Finished. Over.....What's coming next?
Reg was right.

THE END IS NIGH


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Jimmy Glass is an Alien on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 13:35:43
Shame Austin wasnt sold in the last few days so could get our share of that.

That would have solved this funding gap issue

Wouldn't it piss you off if Austin did go today for stupid money, and we got a sell on equal to greater then money for selling Ritchie.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: suttonred on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 13:36:33
i don't understand why Black is flat out refusing to finance the club? i can understand if he's fed up of pouring money in, but if it's a case of covering running costs until the takeover came through could the two parties not have negotiated a deal? didn't Bill Power do this during his failed takeover attempt?

i still think the sale of Ritichie to a promotion rival for such a low fee is bad business, short sighted and doesn't fill me with confidence but appreciate the fact this sale could keep us in business.

what happens if the deal collapses, which is still possible at this late stage? what happens if the FL refuse to ratify it?

the statement from the club today is 12 hours too late. very surprised at it being released in hindsight given the current/old board had developed a reputation for transparency and foresight.


what happens if the deal collapses, which is still possible at this late stage? what happens if the FL refuse to ratify it?

What happens is a player was sold to cover us now and if this happens would be my guess, part cash flow, part Insurance.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: sonicyouth on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 13:40:22

what happens if the deal collapses, which is still possible at this late stage? what happens if the FL refuse to ratify it?

What happens is a player was sold to cover us now and if this happens would be my guess, part cash flow, part Insurance.
my point was what happens beyond that - if we have a wage bill of 250k per month, the Ritchie sale will surely only cover us for a month


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: @MacPhlea on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 13:45:41
If I were a 'silent partner' I wouldn't throw any cash at the club until the deal was ratified and completed - it would be a bit like paying money for substantial repairs on a house on which you have just exchanged contracts - if the deal falls through you have lost your money.  Doing it this way means neither party loses out...

As someone alluded to a number of days ago, buying a football club is just like buying a house...


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: pauld on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 13:56:19
If I were a 'silent partner' I wouldn't throw any cash at the club until the deal was ratified and completed - it would be a bit like paying money for substantial repairs on a house on which you have just exchanged contracts - if the deal falls through you have lost your money.  Doing it this way means neither party loses out...
Except for the club who lose a good player well under value. There's plenty of ways of doing this that protects both parties, so long as both parties are serious - put the money in an escrow account as an insurance against the FL blocking the deal for example. Unless you haven't got it, of course


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: LittleRed on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 14:02:16
Sounds like the new owners were unwilling to put in money (silent investors) until the deal is ratified. It's like paying for repairs on a house that you are waiting to have the mortgage approved for. Black drew a line in the sand and said no more beyond January. The only way the club could operate and pay wages was to sell Matt Ritchie. Im gonna be positive and think that these new owners are confident once the deal is ratified that they can make amends for this loss. The other scenario is that this consortium doesn't have a pot to p*ss in and they will keep the club just alive (with it being self funding) and gradually sell the good players off and cream a little off for themselves each time. This way they have not lost anything and financially gained themselves. They declare us insolvent and administrators walk in and sell the club or wind it up. I'm hoping for the former.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: pauld on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 14:03:19
Sounds like the new owners were unwilling to put in money (silent investors) until the deal is ratified.
That's not what silent partner (I assume that's what you meant) means


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: BenTheRed on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 14:06:54
The other scenario is that this consortium doesn't have a pot to p*ss in and they will keep the club just alive (with it being self funding) and gradually sell the good players off and cream a little off for themselves each time. This way they have not lost anything and financially gained themselves. They declare us insolvent and administrators walk in and sell the club or wind it up. I'm hoping for the former.

At this level there is nothing to 'cream off' - only a couple of clubs turn a profit in the FL. They would be pretty foolish if they thought so.
I will await judgement until we here from them or their spokesperson


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 14:16:01
If you want to descend into semantics then you are possibly correct. However if you were a player with a mortgage to pay would you delay payment on the off chance that you get paid, equally Black who has essentially given the club £10m understandably didnt want to bung them another half mill for luck.

You need cash to pay people, simple as that.

Ummm sorry but i was only responding to you descending into semantics.

Fuck me i know you need money to pay people. My question is why so desperately? If the takeover is actually likely to be ratified in the next few days then i'm sure most players/people would understand. If not tough in the short term anyway. We wouldn't be the first club to defer payment of wages for a week.

Obviously players have mortgages and outgoings but you make it sound like the club had to give them a choice. It might piss them off a little but just tell them they're being paid this time next week. Most (if not all) would go along with it i'm sure.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: jonny72 on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 14:44:01
Except for the club who lose a good player well under value. There's plenty of ways of doing this that protects both parties, so long as both parties are serious - put the money in an escrow account as an insurance against the FL blocking the deal for example. Unless you haven't got it, of course

Not sure why they couldn't have guaranteed any advance against future player sales, or ticket sales.

But on the other hand, after Black got the club on the straight and narrow maybe he didn't want to do anything that could risk the club going bad again. So the only option was to sell quickly before the window closes. Having said that, why not wait until today on the off chance Austin goes or Birmingham get the cash to buy Caddis?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 14:54:20
Not that simple. You might owe someone £100k now and be owed £200k that you're not being paid until next week. Technically (and according to the books) you're worth £100k, but in the short term your cash flow is fucked and you're broke.

Thanks but i know how cash flow works.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: pauld on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 15:02:57
my point was what happens beyond that - if we have a wage bill of 250k per month, the Ritchie sale will surely only cover us for a month
Been worrying me too sonic. Bizarrely, I'm taking that as a positive sign that they must have at least some sort of cash behind them and/or a decent plan or they won't reach the end of the season. And that would be just too ridiculous even for us, wouldn't it?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: jonny72 on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 15:05:54
Wonder if they went to Burnley to see if they would buy out the sell on clause? Say he's valued (likely to be sold) at £8m and they paid us £2m with a sell on clause of 15%, it's worth £900k. Could have said give us £400k now to buy it out.

Southampton did the same thing with Arsenal for Walcott when they were in the shit.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 15:08:51
Wonder if they went to Burnley to see if they would buy out the sell on clause? Say he's valued (likely to be sold) at £8m and they paid us £2m with a sell on clause of 15%, it's worth £900k. Could have said give us £400k now to buy it out.

Southampton did the same thing with Arsenal for Walcott when they were in the shit.

Might have been worth a shot. Although Arsenal do have a little more money than Burnley to throw around, despite Arsene's apparent reluctance to spend it.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: LittleRed on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 15:16:02
That's not what silent partner (I assume that's what you meant) means

No that's not what I meant. Part of the consortium ( investor ) but not on the board. As I understand it it is these men that have the cash. These were the individuals that were not willing to put in the money until it the deal was ratified which is understandable. That's what I meant.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: london_red on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 15:19:17
No that's not what I meant. Part of the consortium ( investor ) but not on the board. As I understand it it is these men that have the cash. These were the individuals that were not willing to put in the money until it the deal was ratified which is understandable. That's what I meant.

Huh? Did I miss that?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: pauld on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 15:22:21
Huh? Did I miss that?
Think we've all missed that. It's yet to be demonstrated that anyone has the cash


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: london_red on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 15:27:07
Think we've all missed that. It's yet to be demonstrated that anyone has the cash

True. But amid the speculation and rumour, the one concrete line we got on the subject from the club themselves is good enough for me until proven otherwise.

Quote
with the current owners writing off most of their debts and the new consortium’s funding, the Club has a strong financial base to continue the battle for Championship football


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: ahounsell on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 15:31:33
Clubs with a "strong financial base" do not panic sell players to pay bills.

It may be that the club will have a strong financial base once the takeover is formally completed but the sale of Ritchie is a very clear indication that either the sale is going to take a while yet to be completed, or the new owners are not prepared to inject as much cash as the previous ones.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: ahounsell on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 15:34:43
if we have a wage bill of 250k per month, the Ritchie sale will surely only cover us for a month

If we have a wage bill of £250k per month we should be able to pay at least most of it from the clubs own income. The clubs turnover should be well over £250k.

Going by the most recent accounts I have seen we are probably losing a fair bit per month but Id be shocked if it was anywhere near £250k. £100k I could believe, in which case the sale would cover the shortfall for the remainder of the season without needing any more cash from the owners.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: jonny72 on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 15:41:22
If we have a wage bill of £250k per month we should be able to pay at least most of it from the clubs own income. The clubs turnover should be well over £250k.

Going by the most recent accounts I have seen we are probably losing a fair bit per month but Id be shocked if it was anywhere near £250k. £100k I could believe, in which case the sale would cover the shortfall for the remainder of the season without needing any more cash from the owners.

The £250k wage bill only refers to the playing staff, the total wage bill (ie all staffing costs) is around £400k a month (well it was in the 10/11 accounts). Think the monthly loses are more likely around £150k a month, again based on recent accounts.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Peter Venkman on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 15:42:22
I think we will be able to buy him for next to nothing when Boremuff eventually go bust sooner rather than later.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DiV on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 15:44:38
I bet promotion to the Championship is worth more than 400k


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: london_red on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 15:49:03
The £250k wage bill only refers to the playing staff, the total wage bill (ie all staffing costs) is around £400k a month (well it was in the 10/11 accounts). Think the monthly loses are more likely around £150k a month, again based on recent accounts.

Black was putting £250k a month in to keep the books balanced this season.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 15:51:12
Black was putting £250k a month in to keep the books balanced this season.

Really? That sounds high. So that's a £3 million pound loss for the year. Where did that figure get reported?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: jimmy_onions on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 15:51:49
Black was putting £250k a month in to keep the books balanced this season.

^madness

A general comment on the state of football finances...I dont know why anyone bothers, when and how are they aver going to see a return on their investment?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: jonny72 on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 15:51:55
Black was putting £250k a month in to keep the books balanced this season.

Where did that figure come from? It would mean we're losing £3m a season, don't think we've gone much above £2m before. It also doesn't stack up with the last few years, based on the increased owings we've been losing on average £1.5m a season.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: TheMajorSTFC on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 15:53:56
The £250k a week comment has been around for weeks, I think SWP said it at the time AB wanted to sell up. That was our wagebill, so that may only cover players, management and staff...who knows about simple things like electricity and gas bills...could be more/could be less


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 15:56:22
The £250k a week comment has been around for weeks, I think SWP said it at the time AB wanted to sell up. That was our wagebill, so that may only cover players, management and staff...who knows about simple things like electricity and gas bills...could be more/could be less

It's only been around "for weeks" in reference to the wage bill as you say. There's a massive difference between a wage bill and a shortfall.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Power to people on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 16:02:12
Dont forget we will have to pay SWP bonus for selling the club, loyalty bonus to Ritchie, agent fee's for Ritchie, auditors fee's inc late night working ot be able to fax clubs with available players so out of the 400,000 we will get we will probably have around 50,000 to keep us afloat


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: DiV on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 16:06:36
Dont forget we will have to pay SWP bonus for selling the club, loyalty bonus to Ritchie, agent fee's for Ritchie, auditors fee's inc late night working ot be able to fax clubs with available players so out of the 400,000 we will get we will probably have around 50,000 to keep us afloat

Not forgetting Portsmouths cut


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: london_red on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 16:07:47
It's only been around "for weeks" in reference to the wage bill as you say. There's a massive difference between a wage bill and a shortfall.

It kind of doesn't matter though does it? The new owners will have seen the books before agreeing to exchange contracts (presumably!). So they will know how much it will cost to fund the club to the end of the season.

Ritchie, unfortunately, had to be sold to fund the small gap between Black pulling the financial plug and the new ownership structure being in place.

The fact that we're then signing players today would indicate that they aren't just looking to slash the wage bill to minimise that shortfall.

Not in dreamland, and more details are certainly needed about the club's financial position post-takeover, but may as well look forward rather than back.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RpeedieRed on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 16:16:27
Sorry I'm a bit late with this, can't type for tears.  Matt looks confused dazed & generally buggered in the video clip, he can hardly string his sentences together. (yeah I know he isn't the most eloquent of speakers at the best of times). If he'd have gone to a bigger better club I could be happy for him, but I'm not, I am heart broken. I will miss him so much. Earlier I felt like cutting up my no 10 shirt and posting it to him at BM, but now I can see it wasn't his decision and I can't blame him. He's been sacrificed like a lamb. I can't even wish him well because of where he's gone and their horrible smug fans who are so pleased to have him.  Makes me literally sick. The thought of never seeing him in a Town shirt again makes me cry.  What a shit shit day. (btw I am a young female fan who has met him on several occaisions hense the high emotions - hopefully I'll feel better soon )  :cry:


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: mexico red on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 16:21:51
oh jesus, 75 pages


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Saxondale on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 16:23:14
45. Eyesight going mex?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: mexico red on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 16:24:37
i meant in response to the post at the top of the page, let the vultures circle


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: TheMajorSTFC on Thursday, January 31, 2013, 16:39:13
Sorry if this already been posted (and I know it has over the past few weeks) but how the fuck are Bournemouth still under the wage cap? They're throwing cash around left, right and centre! I get stadium sponsorship etc, but they've spent a fair whack and I imagine their wage bill must be big! Is it Championship or bust this season for them?  :hmmm:


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Flashheart on Saturday, February 2, 2013, 16:08:14
Either I've fallen for a wind-up or..... he's been bought on as a left back.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: nochee on Saturday, February 2, 2013, 16:10:06
Either I've fallen for a wind-up or..... he's been bought on as a left back.
Yep, replaced Elphick. Although Elphick may be playing midfield


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Barry Scott on Saturday, February 2, 2013, 16:10:43
Either I've fallen for a wind-up or..... he's been bought on as a left back.

I'm sure I've asked this many a time, to no avail, but I was sure he was described as a left back (able to play as an attacking winger) when we bought him.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: wheretherealredsare on Saturday, February 2, 2013, 16:11:07
Howe knows best!

(Maybe Agent Ritchie can knock in a few OG's while he's there? At LB I mean)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: ghanimah on Sunday, February 3, 2013, 11:52:19
I'm sure I've asked this many a time, to no avail, but I was sure he was described as a left back (able to play as an attacking winger) when we bought him.

I had a look, I can't find anywhere where he was described as a left back, The Advertiser from when we had on him on loan described him as a winger (http://www.thisisswindontownfc.co.uk/news/headlines/5001709.BREAKING_NEWS__Town_land_Ritchie/), BBC describes him as a midfielder / wide man both as a loan (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/s/swindon_town/9229946.stm) and when we signed him (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/s/swindon_town/9342333.stm).


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Stegenfreud on Sunday, February 3, 2013, 12:49:02
I saw him play LB for pompey against Reading once, so I know he's played there but he certainly not a full back.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: kerry red on Sunday, February 3, 2013, 12:50:54
Sorry if this already been posted (and I know it has over the past few weeks) but how the fuck are Bournemouth still under the wage cap? They're throwing cash around left, right and centre! I get stadium sponsorship etc, but they've spent a fair whack and I imagine their wage bill must be big! Is it Championship or bust this season for them?  :hmmm:

I may be wrong here, but I think it is up to individual clubs to inform the FL that they have breached the cap.

Just as we did, thus bringing on the umbargo.

The FL are not going to know the financial matters of clubs until any accounts are filed. I presume any breach that comes to light that clubs have 'sat on' will carry some sort of penalty


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: cheltred69 on Sunday, February 3, 2013, 13:39:52
I may be wrong here, but I think it is up to individual clubs to inform the FL that they have breached the cap.

Just as we did, thus bringing on the umbargo.

The FL are not going to know the financial matters of clubs until any accounts are filed. I presume any breach that comes to light that clubs have 'sat on' will carry some sort of penalty

I thought that all clubs had to file a budget at the start of the season and then periodically update with forecasts.  I can't recall whether we fessed up before a forecast was due or if was simply that we needed to update and this brought the consequences.
Of course any financial forecasts need to build in a degree of optimism or prudence and it would seem likely that a number of clubs are needing lots of positive outcomes to stay within the limit.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Notts red on Sunday, February 3, 2013, 14:25:42
It was strange watching Matt celebrate with the Bournemouth players after a goal on the FL show last night so soon after he was playing against them. That's not a dig at him, it just felt weird.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: ronnie21 on Sunday, February 3, 2013, 15:13:06
I thought that all clubs had to file a budget at the start of the season and then periodically update with forecasts.  I can't recall whether we fessed up before a forecast was due or if was simply that we needed to update and this brought the consequences.
We went over our limits due to a transfer tribunal, we had budgeted to pay over two years but the FL (bastards) said it had to be cash up front!!  That's what fucked us up, and the money put aside for january spending was used up to get us out of it!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: walrus on Monday, February 4, 2013, 12:48:06
Who is Matt Richie?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: kerry red on Monday, February 4, 2013, 13:03:41
Landlord of the Queen Vic?

or married to Madonna?

or some kind of boring biscuit - oops, that's Rich Tea


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: paddieu on Sunday, February 10, 2013, 15:08:03
bournemouth left back... we need one of those...maybe our new rich owners can put in a bid for him ?  :D


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: dave_bambers_right_sock on Sunday, February 10, 2013, 19:03:40
Who is Matt Richie?
Lionel Richie's brother?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: THE FLASH on Monday, February 11, 2013, 16:05:50
Asked the club ref our options for Sponsorship.

Watch this space.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Monday, February 11, 2013, 16:10:09
Can we sponsor someone shit please?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Power to people on Monday, February 11, 2013, 16:24:11
Best left back B'Muff have had apparently


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Fred Elliot on Monday, February 11, 2013, 16:46:23
Can we sponsor someone shit please?

 :D

We all know that is Gary Stanley's perogative


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Shaw Rosso on Monday, February 11, 2013, 17:01:26
I would like to sponsor a scummer player next year, it would be great to see something heavily associated with STFC in everyone of their matchday programme  :)


Title: Re: Re: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: AldbourneRed on Monday, February 11, 2013, 17:14:40
I would like to sponsor a scummer player next year, it would be great to see something heavily associated with STFC in everyone of their matchday programme  :)

Constable?

With some clever sponsors name their programme could actually say
"James Constable, Stayed at Oxford and Won F-All"


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Shaw Rosso on Monday, February 11, 2013, 17:19:33
Something along those lines  :D


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: dphunt88 on Monday, February 11, 2013, 18:34:59
It was three years ago to the day that Matt Ritchie first joined Town on loan. 129 appearances and 27 goals later... He now finds himself at left-back for Bournemouth. What a bastard shame!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: TheMajorSTFC on Monday, February 11, 2013, 21:10:17
I would like to sponsor a scummer player next year, it would be great to see something heavily associated with STFC in everyone of their matchday programme  :)

There are better charities around, but I like your idea!  :clap:


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: THE FLASH on Monday, February 11, 2013, 21:55:04
From the club:

Apologies, I have been meaning to contact you but as you can appreciate there has been an awful lot happening at The Club just of late.  The situation with Matt was very much unexpected and all happened so very quickly, we as members of Staff had no idea that Matt was on his way to Bournemouth and found out at the same time everybody else did.  When a player/s leaves the club the normal protocol is to switch/transfer your sponsorship to another player/the next available.  However, there are no available players currently.  We have at least one other sponsor in the same situation, who has seen the two players he sponsored both leave the Football Club.  Hopefully, we will see some new recruits joining The Club shortly and with this in mind we will transfer your sponsorship across.


Maybe Mr Pack if the fucker ever signs???


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: sonicyouth on Monday, February 11, 2013, 21:57:03
can we sponsor Lee Cox?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RedRag on Monday, February 11, 2013, 22:18:28
You mean Small Pox?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Shaw Rosso on Tuesday, February 12, 2013, 00:02:18
From the club:

Apologies, I have been meaning to contact you but as you can appreciate there has been an awful lot happening at The Club just of late.  The situation with Matt was very much unexpected and all happened so very quickly, we as members of Staff had no idea that Matt was on his way to Bournemouth and found out at the same time everybody else did.  When a player/s leaves the club the normal protocol is to switch/transfer your sponsorship to another player/the next available.  However, there are no available players currently.  We have at least one other sponsor in the same situation, who has seen the two players he sponsored both leave the Football Club.  Hopefully, we will see some new recruits joining The Club shortly and with this in mind we will transfer your sponsorship across.


Maybe Mr Pack if the fucker ever signs???

I bet we end up with the winner of the Samsung Sign A Pro Contract 2013  :no:


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: yeo on Tuesday, February 12, 2013, 00:13:25
Ask if we can have a forum member on the team sheet instead


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Shaw Rosso on Tuesday, February 12, 2013, 00:32:36
Or a free beer/burger for each member of the Matt Ritchie consortium by way of compensation to cover our loss.

Funny enough I had a chat with Nick Watkins a few days back and when I told him of my disappointment of Ritchie being sold just 5 weeks after investing in the Ritchie 10 printed shirt for the boys Xmas present, he kindly suggested they would replace the shirt free of charge and print it with his new favourite players name and number (Collins 9), very decent of him, although the assistant in the shop made Mrs R sign a bit of paper to say if Collins goes anywhere we can't have another replacement, fair enough.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Hoboken on Tuesday, February 12, 2013, 08:17:20
From the club:

Apologies, I have been meaning to contact you but as you can appreciate there has been an awful lot happening at The Club just of late.  The situation with Matt was very much unexpected and all happened so very quickly, we as members of Staff had no idea that Matt was on his way to Bournemouth and found out at the same time everybody else did.  When a player/s leaves the club the normal protocol is to switch/transfer your sponsorship to another player/the next available.  However, there are no available players currently.  We have at least one other sponsor in the same situation, who has seen the two players he sponsored both leave the Football Club.  Hopefully, we will see some new recruits joining The Club shortly and with this in mind we will transfer your sponsorship across.


Maybe Mr Pack if the fucker ever signs???

Did they really write that last sentence about Pack?




Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: suttonred on Tuesday, February 12, 2013, 08:49:45
Ask if we can have a forum member on the team sheet instead

If we can I'm changing my name to "oxford fans like to suck each other off" and would like to be nominated.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: china red on Tuesday, February 12, 2013, 09:06:55
Can we transfer the sponsorship to Bournemouth


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: fatbasher on Tuesday, February 12, 2013, 09:28:32
I had my second physio last night at Kate Cady's place. The WL who did my treatment works on the Gloucester City team and one of their players is good friends with Marlon Pack and apparently the deal is still on.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Simon Pieman on Monday, February 18, 2013, 19:38:45
Ask if we can have a forum member on the team sheet instead

Having learnt about the passing of nevillew. I vote for this.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: leefer on Monday, February 18, 2013, 19:39:24
Having learnt about the passing of nevillew. I vote for this.

Great Idea.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: donkey on Monday, February 18, 2013, 19:40:00
Having learnt about the passing of nevillew. I vote for this.

Sounds good to me.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Saxondale on Monday, February 18, 2013, 19:40:19
Thirded.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Gnasher on Monday, February 18, 2013, 19:50:41
Great idea.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Flashheart on Monday, February 18, 2013, 19:52:33
I'm all for that!


Title: Re: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: herthab on Monday, February 18, 2013, 19:54:59
Agreed.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Notts red on Monday, February 18, 2013, 19:56:05
Nice touch, I'm all for that.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Whits on Monday, February 18, 2013, 19:58:52
Having learnt about the passing of nevillew. I vote for this.

when did that happen?!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Simon Pieman on Monday, February 18, 2013, 20:01:50
when did that happen?!

http://thetownend.com/index.php?topic=50662.0


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: THE FLASH on Monday, February 18, 2013, 20:14:40
I will ask the club if its a goer.....


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Monday, February 18, 2013, 21:30:54
Ta.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: slinky on Monday, February 18, 2013, 23:19:07
I will ask the club if its a goer.....

Fingers crossed. A really nice touch that I'm sure will be appreciated by his friends and family.  Lets hope the club agree after what has been a shit day!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Swindon Please Win on Sunday, March 24, 2013, 22:21:45
Just won League One player of the year, Makes no sense that the voting takes place before the year end, kind of beats the purpose of the award.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: joteddyred on Sunday, March 24, 2013, 22:25:43
Just won League One player of the year, Makes no sense that the voting takes place before the year end, kind of beats the purpose of the award.

Ridiculous.  Up until his goal yesterday, he's done nothing in the two months he's been at Bournemouth.  Who selects the candidates?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Swindon Please Win on Sunday, March 24, 2013, 22:28:31
Ridiculous.  Up until his goal yesterday, he's done nothing in the two months he's been at Bournemouth.  Who selects the candidates?

It's based on manager votes.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: chalkies_shorts on Sunday, March 24, 2013, 22:30:30
It's based on manager votes.
And most of those have been fucked off in the last couple of months


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Ritchie_is_a_cherry on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 20:20:02
Looks like Matt made the right move.

Who's next? Austin?  :soapy tit wank:


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: tans on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 20:24:58
Haha i see your fans reckon its a done deal austin is signing for you.

:Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Ritchie_is_a_cherry on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 20:27:43
Haha i see your fans reckon its a done deal austin is signing for you.

:Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:

Almost as amusing as us having no chance of signing Ritchie for less than £15 million or whatever figure was quoted by PDC


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: tans on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 20:30:31
He aint going to you, premier league only


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Summerof69 on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 20:30:44
Almost as amusing as us having no chance of signing Ritchie for less than £15 million or whatever figure was quoted by PDC

Yawn !!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Flashheart on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 20:32:09
How very classy


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Summerof69 on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 20:33:47
If I was them, I'd enjoy it while it lasts. Could be a Pompey Mk II.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Ritchie_is_a_cherry on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 20:35:18
If I was them, I'd enjoy it while it lasts. Could be a Pompey Mk II.

Could be a Swansea, Wigan, Reading MkII



Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: janaage on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 20:36:42
Good luck to Bournemouth, good to see a smaller club get some success. Hope they do well in championship next year. Hope some how we manage to sneak up there too.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Summerof69 on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 20:37:57
Could be a Swansea, Wigan, Reading MkII



What with crowds of 8k !!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Ritchie_is_a_cherry on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 20:41:47
Good luck to Bournemouth, good to see a smaller club get some success. Hope they do well in championship next year. Hope some how we manage to sneak up there too.

Cheers bud. Really looking forward to seeing who we bring this summer and some of the fixtures.

Will be interesting to see if Demin continues to put money in, and push for the Premiership.

Must admit, I do feel for you having the wheels well and truly pulled off the cart by Mr Black deciding to sell up when you were well-placed. I think you had an excellent chance of top 2, in what is a pretty weak League 1 this year. We had similar when promoted from League 2 a couple of years ago, when Mitchell decided to offload some of best players and as result Howe left to Burnley.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Costanza on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 20:45:46
Must admit, I do feel for you having the wheels well and truly pulled off the cart by Mr Black deciding to sell up when you were well-placed.

You can't come on here and give it the big one about having Ritchie at Bournemouth and then show sympathy for Swindon because of Black's withdrawal of support... The decision that resulted in Town losing Ritchie.

Trolling can't be that hard can it?

 ;)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Ritchie_is_a_cherry on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 20:46:38
What with crowds of 8k !!

New stand going up in the summer. A sustained period at a higher level should see crowds improve consistently. I know the other sides have bigger grounds, but I remember Reading pulling in same attendances as in the late 90's, along with Swansea and Cardiff averaging less than us

Decent catchment area and I know plenty of glory hunters who'll buy tickets regularly no we've been promoted.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Ritchie_is_a_cherry on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 20:48:33
You can't come on here and give it the big one about having Ritchie at Bournemouth and then show sympathy for Swindon because of Black's withdrawal of support... The decision that resulted in Town losing Ritchie.

Trolling can't be that hard can it?

 ;)

I can and I have


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Arriba on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 20:52:13
Fair play to ballmouth for throwing money at it. If we had carried on then we would have pissed the league. Wheels fall off eventually though so enjoy it's while you can ballmouth fans.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Dostoyevsky on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 20:54:41
16th largest urban area in UK:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_urban_areas_in_the_United_Kingdom

Good scope for development, particularly with the wealth in the area, but with so many people in the Bournemouth Connurbation having fluxed in from other parts of the UK (retirees, students, sunseekers etc) I guess they seldom form an allegiance for the Cherries because they've already formed their footballing affinities elsewhere?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: dalumpimunki on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 20:56:14
What with crowds of 8k !!

What sort of crowds do you remember Wigan getting in the 3rd division? I can't think they ever got over 5-6,000.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Dr Pierre Chang on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 21:07:12
Well done on promotion, hopefully we will join you.

Really enjoyed both our matches this season, the home one for obvious reasons and the 1-1 in January was a great battle between two top sides.

So what if it goes tits up in a few years and you have to rebuild - I would much prefer that than season after season of midtable medriocity which I worry is where we are heading with this board. Football is all about winning and that usually requires money being chucked at it.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Mother Brown on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 21:19:42
At risk of sounding pedantic, but ain't it "Ritchie" ?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Berniman on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 22:15:11
Push for the Premiership!?!

Oh dear!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: janaage on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 22:24:07
Fucking hell lads, think some people need to give a little slack here, Bournemouth have good financial backing and that backing means they can have a good go at the championship next season.  Few good results early on and who knows, PO's with a good run?  Good luck to them, let's face it if our finances were better we'd be celebrating with them right now and we'd be thinking about pushing for the premiership ourselves, as it'd only be a step away.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Stef Troll on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 22:29:20
Fucking hell lads, think some people need to give a little slack here, Bournemouth have good financial backing and that backing means they can have a good go at the championship next season.  Few good results early on and who knows, PO's with a good run?  Good luck to them, let's face it if our finances were better we'd be celebrating with them right now and we'd be thinking about pushing for the premiership ourselves, as it'd only be a step away.

Top post


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Berniman on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 23:07:51
Fucking hell lads, think some people need to give a little slack here, Bournemouth have good financial backing and that backing means they can have a good go at the championship next season.  Few good results early on and who knows, PO's with a good run?  Good luck to them, let's face it if our finances were better we'd be celebrating with them right now and we'd be thinking about pushing for the premiership ourselves, as it'd only be a step away.

No we wouldn't, we would be hoping to finish 4th from bottom, and be bloody happy with it.  I have nothing against them, but thinking that they will have a go at the Prem is naïve to say the least.  Championship is a whole different ball game since the last time we were there.

They should just enjoy the championship rather than thinking that they will be pushing for the Prem.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: janaage on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 23:10:57
With Eddie Howe in charge and a few decent signings, I hope to see Bournemouth mid table, and being the tight division it tends to be that means they'll be within touching distance of the top flight and good luck to them.

With our previous board and PDC in charge I wouldnt have been looking at 4th from bottom I have to say. However with the current set up, I dread to think what lies in store if we did go up.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: sonicyouth on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 23:12:32
With Eddie Howe in charge and a few decent signings, I hope to see Bournemouth mid table, and being the tight division it tends to be that means they'll be within touching distance of the top flight and good luck to them.

With our previous board and PDC in charge I wouldnt have been looking at 4th from bottom I have to say. However with the current set up, I dread to think what lies in store if we did go up.
why don't you go and fucking support them you turncoat


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 23:12:47
I'd still rather be struggling in the Championship than league 1 Jan.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: 4D on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 23:13:17
I imagine a lot if people in Bournemouth travel to Southampton every other Saturday


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Dr Pierre Chang on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 23:13:28
When Bristol City reached the Championship play off final, was that not their first season after promotion from League 1? And that was without a loaded Russian throwing loads of cash at it.

Very unlikely, but it can be done.

Not sure why I used City as an example actually when Southampton did it last season.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: janaage on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 23:17:46
I'd still rather be struggling in the Championship than league 1 Jan.

Absolutely, not saying I wouldn't. And my conspiracy theory head hopes that this board will put the for sale signs up as soon as we get promoted tbh.

Would love it if we managed to get back to the second tier!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Honkytonk on Saturday, April 20, 2013, 23:53:01
Fucking hell, this is a football forum. If a troll comes, you're supposed to play along for a bit, get him all excited so he links to his mates, before sticking the boot in and making him look a proper tit. Not start noshing him off.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Benzel on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 08:33:48
Just won promotion.

Spend the evening on Swindon's MB.

Lad.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: RedRag on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 08:50:49
No we wouldn't, we would be hoping to finish 4th from bottom, and be bloody happy with it. 

Agreed - and let's hope we do make it.

Darragh McAnthony (Posh Chairman) was on Sky the other evening discussing Peterborough's "sustainable model" on 7-8,000 crowds which is to go for youth and how he had stuck by Darren Ferguson after losing 14/18 etc.  No plans to compete with the parachute clubs or the non parachute clubs with big gates - just a plan.

Where are Posh - 4th from bottom with goal difference keeping them afloat at the minute

Our present board appears incapable of articulating any plan, let alone showing any financial backing

Sorry a bit off topic...f**k the Cherries


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Ritchie_is_a_cherry on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 08:51:10
Just won promotion.

Spend the evening on Swindon's MB.

Lad.

More entertaining than watching that crap film quoted in your signature :smugfu:


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Benzel on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 08:53:09
More entertaining than watching that crap film quoted in your signature :smugfu:

Straight back on.

No hangover.

Dude.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: horlock07 on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 09:05:19
What sort of crowds do you remember Wigan getting in the 3rd division? I can't think they ever got over 5-6,000.

They don't get many more than that in the premier.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: dalumpimunki on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 09:09:17
They don't get many more than that in the premier.

Average attendance this year just shy of 19,000.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: horlock07 on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 09:13:24
Good luck to them,  it will give the nutter chairman a wider audience, although I do fear that the owner's wife may need to step up her knowledge with the team talks to survive at championship level.

Let's see where they are in 3 years financially and position before we wish we were them,  isn't all the money loaned by the chairman and subject to interest (I may have misinterpreted that) is so it has the potential to bite back big style if he loses interest.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: horlock07 on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 09:15:53
Average attendance this year just shy of 19,000.

I do wonder how much that is bolstered by neutrals, offers and away support,  worked in Wigan for 4 years and it's RL through and through no one I worked with took any interest in football.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 09:24:59
Pleased for Matt Ritchie, couldn't give a fuck either way about Bournemouth.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: leefer on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 09:54:53
Pleased for Matt Ritchie, couldn't give a fuck either way about Bournemouth.

Funny that when a player leaves he gets the plaudits.....managers however :hmmm:

Granted both did a fine job for the club but a tad strange never the less.

Both could have stayed if they had wanted....that aside it will be interesting to see how Ritchie takes to the Championship.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: tj2002 on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 09:56:11
Funny that when a player leaves he gets the plaudits.....managers however :hmmm:

Granted both did a fine job for the club but a tad strange never the less.

Both could have stayed if they had wanted....that aside it will be interesting to see how Ritchie takes to the Championship.

My understanding was that Ritchie had no say in the matter


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Flashheart on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 09:57:53
I don't recall Matt Ritchie leaving in a hissy fit!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: sonicyouth on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 10:00:06
Not this again...


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: leefer on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 10:01:36
My understanding was that Ritchie had no say in the matter

You his agent then?....course he did....he wanted to go and good luck to him.
No player under contract has to go anywhere.

Not knocking him at all....like i didn't knock Paolo.......just saying both could have said no.

Flasheart...if someone having a hissy fit leaves you in such a mess i suggest you never get married :D

Not going to go over old ground anyway.......its all been said before ::)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Honkytonk on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 10:02:39
Pleased for Matt Ritchie, couldn't give a fuck either way about Bournemouth.

He'll play for them for another half season or so, then get his big move away from that south-coast den of scum and villainy.

They might last two seasons in the Championship if they're REALLY lucky. Then their owner will get bored and pull the rug out from under their feet, forcing them to sell off their best player(s) for a pittance, a fraction of their actual value, and the fans will feel betrayed.

Bitter much, me? Noooooooooooooo!


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Flashheart on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 10:03:12
I am married.

Who's in a mess?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: leefer on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 10:03:41
That aside it will be interesting to see him at a higher level....not sure myself.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Ritchie_is_a_cherry on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 11:15:05
Straight back on.

No hangover.

Dude.

I know. Just back from the gym and straight back on again!

Not everyone feels the need to go out and get smashed as a form of celebration.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: ghanimah on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 11:18:14
I know. Just back from the gym and straight back on again!

Not everyone feels the need to go out and get smashed as a form of celebration.

I guess you want to stay sober so you can remember it all given it doesn't happen very often...


Title: Re: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Batch on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 12:05:07
Leefer, I have it on reasonable authority Ritchie didn't enjoy his early days at muff and didn't want to be there. Sauce could be wrong, and he's no doubt changed his mind by now.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Honkytonk on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 12:11:28
Leefer, I have it on reasonable authority Ritchie didn't enjoy his early days at muff and didn't want to be there. Sauce could be wrong, and he's no doubt changed his mind by now.

Tbh, if I was a high-scoring, creative focal point of a team which I had loads of friends in, and then was told I needed to be sold to keep the club solvent, only for the club I'd been sold to to turn around and say 'Hey, we're going to play you in defence', I'd be pretty pissed.

I don't pertain to know or understand Matt Ritchie, but common sense tells me he probably wasn't all that pleased when he first arrived there.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Bewster on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 12:30:00
I like it when smaller teams do well and give the bigger boys a bit of a bloody nose. Which is why I don't mind Muff going up - however I would rather they didn't have Ritchie. All credit to Howe for turning it round - after all they were dogshit up here.

If you watched the video interview with Ritchie it was quite obvious he didn't want to go - happy that is has worked out for him.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Flashheart on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 12:40:16
I too like it when smaller teams do well.

I also like to call a spade a spade and recognise when they've done it thanks to a massive budget and not miraculous management skills. If it was us people would be accusing us of cheating. As it happens that Walsall thread referred to us as cheats.

In that vain, and for the sake of balance: Fuck Bournemouth, they cheated their way to promotion and can't wait to see them in administration. 


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 12:43:24
I too like it when smaller teams do well.

I also like to call a spade a spade and recognise when they've done it thanks to a massive budget and not miraculous management skills. If it was us people would be accusing us of cheating. As it happens that Walsall thread referred to us as cheats.

In that vain, and for the sake of balance: Fuck Bournemouth, they cheated their way to promotion and can't wait to see them in administration. 

To be balanced, can we praise Brentford? I'm sure someone's about to throw some financial reality at me, but it doesn't look to me like they're particularly chasing the dream but they've done bloody well and looked a decent team against us.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Flashheart on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 12:44:41
To be balanced, can we praise Brentford? I'm sure someone's about to throw some financial reality at me, but it doesn't look to me like they're particularly chasing the dream but they've done bloody well and looked a decent team against us.

By all means.

Well done Brentford, and Yeovil for that matter.

And for what it's worth I don't actually know enough about Muff's finances to really be sure they deserve to be called cheats, but since when has ignorance been a reason for other clubs to hold back on judging us?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Benzel on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 14:14:41
I know. Just back from the gym and straight back on again!

Not everyone feels the need to go out and get smashed as a form of celebration.

Much better to stay indoors and troll eh.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Ritchie_is_a_cherry on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 16:16:18
Much better to stay indoors and troll eh.

although, ironically, you're also trolling on this thread.

Maybe we'll speak again if you make it as far as the FA Cup 3rd round  :bye:





Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Paolo69 on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 16:46:51
although, ironically, you're also trolling on this thread.

Maybe we'll speak again if you make it as far as the FA Cup 3rd round  :bye:





Oh how times change. It wasn't that long ago you were appealing for donations to stay afloat.

Is your chairman still getting lashed up and arguing with fans on the pitch or is he saving that for next season when you're not doing quite so well?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Costanza on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 17:13:31
It's nice to be the go to club for gloating and faux-rivalry.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Honkytonk on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 17:22:42
It's nice to be the go to club for gloating and faux-rivalry.

Certainly helps SY's bank balance and dreams of world domination.



Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Fred Elliot on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 22:05:32

Both could have stayed if they had wanted....


What a crock of fucking shite Lee


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: 4D on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 22:09:00
although, ironically, you're also trolling on this thread.

Maybe we'll speak again if you make it as far as the FA Cup 3rd round  :bye:





If you get that far, the cup could be your escape from a depressing 2013/14 season. Good luck  :)


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: donkey on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 22:13:00
I think Bournemouth will reach the third round of the cup...I'd put money on it.


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: Spud on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 22:27:49
although, ironically, you're also trolling on this thread.

Maybe we'll speak again if you make it as far as the FA Cup 3rd round  :bye:

I didn't realise Bournemouth are playing in Europe next season?


Title: Re: Matt Richie
Post by: 4D on Sunday, April 21, 2013, 22:35:50
I think Bournemouth will reach the third round of the cup...I'd put money on it.

Oops, I forgot, that's when the big boys come in (that means muff too)  :-[