Title: Burgess move off. Post by: magnum150 on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 12:28:19 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/r/rushden_and_diamonds/4637475.stm
Contract talks have broken down with Swansea as he was taking too long. I wonder if King is still interested? Title: Burgess move off. Post by: Piemonte on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 12:29:59 He might be, but unless we can swap him with fallon for example then it aint going to happen due to the fee involved.
Title: Burgess move off. Post by: RappersDelight on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 15:18:12 even better, we can get rid of fallon at the same time!
Title: Burgess move off. Post by: red macca on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 15:27:29 i reckon the board would allow 50-75k to spend still
Title: Burgess move off. Post by: magnum150 on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 15:30:20 Burgess was rumored to be £250K. :(
Title: Burgess move off. Post by: Piemonte on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 15:42:03 Quote from: "deanored" i reckon the board would allow 50-75k to spend still why? they cut the wage budget by £200k. what makes you think that we've cash to spend on transfer fees? Title: Burgess move off. Post by: unclemark on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 15:42:03 Now that we are getting thorpe and cureton we will have enough strikers for a swap.
Title: Burgess move off. Post by: kaufman on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 16:00:25 http://www.swindontownfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/News/NewsDetail/0,,10341~679241,00.html
hes on about keeping 5 strikers!!!!!!!!! Title: Burgess move off. Post by: unclemark on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 16:10:49 We simply don't need that many front men , but if they can play in midfield...
Title: Burgess move off. Post by: le god cuervo on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 16:17:30 i think its great we have 5 strikers! gives a lot of competition for places & puts pressure on them to score goals.
remember last season when we just had parkin & fallon to start with, fallon knew he was guaranteed to start and got lazy. the same probably would have happened this season with roberts, so this is a kick up the arse to all of them. besides, roberts and cureton can both play out wide, and caton doesnt count yet Title: Burgess move off. Post by: unclemark on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 16:25:19 good point , but I would rather have burgess than fallon
Title: Burgess move off. Post by: alex on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 19:40:11 Quote from: "nozza" good point , but I would rather have burgess than fallon Yeh i have to agree. I think it would be nice to have 5 strikers next year, but at the moment, we don't seem to have a midfield! Although ideally i would keep burgess and fallon, i think that a central midfielder is needed far more than a striker at the moment. After sitting around on the bench for two seasons, I expect fallon wants a change anyway... would suit all parties involved. Title: Burgess move off. Post by: Spud on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 20:04:16 Id sooner have Burgess than Fallon, Rory gives it his all but i cant see him getting 10 goals in a season and thats no good im afraid.
|