Thetownend.com

25% => Players => Topic started by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:09:22



Title: SSP
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:09:22
...released by Looton today, as was Sol Davis.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Spencer_White on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:12:30
Welcome home.

No brainer.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Rich Pullen on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:14:02
What a sorry situation to be in.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: walrus on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:15:17
Surely he'd be mad to turn us down after the downturn his career as suffered after leaving Town?


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Doore on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:15:47
Really not sure about this one.  It clearly hasn't worked out for him since leaving - not sure I'd want to see him come back and fail.

I might actually be more in favour of bringing Sol back.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Samdy Gray on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:16:16
As much as my heart says yes, my head is screaming no.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Spencer_White on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:17:01
Look at Neil Harris with Millwall!


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: blinkpip on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:17:25
If cox goes, I want a forward with pace. Not sure we could have Parkin plus another decent Forward.
Davis is worth a trail.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:18:22
No,no,no, obviously sentiment involved, but if he's been let go by a conference side.....


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Spencer_White on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:19:34
If cox goes, I want a forward with pace. Not sure we could have Parkin plus another decent Forward.
Davis is worth a trail.

Sell Billy Paynter then.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Rich Pullen on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:20:14
If we had never had Parkin and he had the same stats we'd be all saying "let's have a look at him". It's a free transfer and in this current climate surely we cannot simply rubbish this?

Sol Davis also applies.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:21:55
Sorry, dont agree, both had too many injuries, wouldn't last the pace anymore.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: blinkpip on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:22:58
Sell Billy Paynter then.
No way, Paynter is better than Parkin (now)

Paynter, Parkin plus another (cox hopefully) isn't to much to ask for is it?


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Spencer_White on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:25:13
No way, Paynter is better than Parkin (now)

Paynter, Parkin plus another (cox hopefully) isn't to much to ask for is it?

I agree. Paynter most of the time would be better than SSP now.

But Parkin would be more consistant. Nothing wrong with an old school 4-4-2 in League 1. Paynter and Parkin?


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:31:06
Is this a wind up. Parkin is now fat bald and importantly Shit


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Rich Pullen on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:33:02
Parkin has been fit for a while now - he's just been either out-of-form (he is human!) or not selected (Harford wasn't playing him as he wasn't a future player).

I'm not lobbying for everyone to accept that Parkin should be a target because I'm really not as bothered as this post may suggest but it's a free transfer and I doubt he'll struggle to find a club.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:34:47
Last summer i'd have said yes but this time no. He didn't prove himself in League Two with Luton sadly and he even got a decent run of games on loan at Orient and didn't score. Looked nowhere near the same SSP when we played them on Boxing Day. I hope he finds a half decent club though.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Spencer_White on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:37:54
I thought he was their best player on Boxing day.

He looked low on confidence and didnt score himself. But he put 2 point blank chances on a plate for other Orient players who didnt convert.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:40:05
I thought he was their best player on Boxing day.

He looked low on confidence and didnt score himself. But he put 2 point blank chances on a plate for other Orient players who didnt convert.

Maybe so but Orient were fucking awful that day and he and McAndawire (or however you spell it) were the best of a very very bad bunch.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Spencer_White on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:46:08
They were awful. Got to ask questions of how the same team managed to beat us at the CG just 6 weeks ago.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:50:13
Pawel abbott,billy clark and that ibehere are all players available for free i would rather any of those.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:52:46
Billy Clark would be a good signing.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Rich Pullen on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:55:22
Billy Clarke's first firm offer is Notts County. His loan spells have been good - he was once tipped for big things. Why not?


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 22:57:41
I saw that rich got offered a 2 year deal.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 23:03:02
Notts County? Ha surely we can compete with them. I'm sure a few other clubs have been linked with him though.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: pauld on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 23:37:39
If we had never had Parkin and he had the same stats we'd be all saying "let's have a look at him".
I think more likely we'd be saying he was good two or three seasons ago, but never recaptured the form he showed at club x and has since been inconsistent and injury prone. Oh and loads of people would be posting stuff from Ipswich message boards saying how shit he was for them (which he wasn't really IIRC but they really didn't take to him).


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Rich Pullen on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 23:38:31
...fair point Paul, but it's a free and we're on a budget etc.

Mind you he'll scare a few off with his wage demands no doubt.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: pauld on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 23:40:51
...fair point Paul, but it's a free and we're on a budget etc.

Mind you he'll scare a few off with his wage demands no doubt.
Yeah, and like you but kind of the opposite way round I'm not saying we shouldn't sign him, although I'll confess to being swayed by the sentimental argument that I'd hate for him to come back and not be what he was.

Oh and DRS there's nothing wrong with being fat and bald, having been both in the past couple of years. And quite shit, as well, come to that


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Simon Pieman on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 00:03:36
Last summer i'd have said yes but this time no. He didn't prove himself in League Two with Luton sadly and he even got a decent run of games on loan at Orient and didn't score. Looked nowhere near the same SSP when we played them on Boxing Day. I hope he finds a half decent club though.

I'm the opposite, would have said no then but yes now. Now we can get him on lower wages and he'd work his bollocks off to make sure he didn't let us down. I think the loan deal disrupted his comeback from injury, it was a disruption and probably meant he couldn't focus so much on knuckling down.

Orient were really, really shite and as Spencer says he was their best player and biggest threat that day. Definitely worth another look, but only if the wages were right.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: jonny72 on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 00:10:51
You can't read too much in to their last year or so at Luton, calling them a conference side is a bit much as well - they'd probably still be in League 1 if it weren't for their financial problems.

Got to be worth having a look at them, on the basis they might come here on lower wages trying to rebuild their careers at a club they've done well at before.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: yeo on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 03:00:07
no no no no


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Luci on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 07:42:46
I have absolutely no idea what to think of this. Although part of me would love to see him back, I can't help thinking the other part thinks it would be a huge mistake.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: herthab on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 07:44:42
If he came back and was poor it would have a detrimental effect on peoples memory of his time here before. For that reason I don't want him back.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: pauld on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 07:50:56
I have absolutely no idea what to think of this. Although part of me would love to see him back, I can't help thinking the other part thinks it would be a huge mistake.
Which parts?


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Melksham Red on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 07:58:12
SSP is now shit and unwanted by non-league Luton. Why on earth would we want him for our assault on the League One championship!


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: nevillew on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 08:06:41
no no no no


Unless this is a Vicar of Dibley moment, I agree with Yeovil


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Arriba on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 08:18:31
give him a trial,during a tough pre season.
you never know, he could be rejuvinated by it?


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Simon Pieman on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 08:39:48
It's the sort of thing which would get the fans back. It could begin the momentum of a successful season or it could fail miserably.

For me, the fact that he's a Swindon legend is no longer relevant, especially as half the people think he's shit. I just think he'd be worth a gamble, but like Arriba says a trial may be a good option because if he is pants we haven't committed to a deal. We'll probably buy a striker to replace Cox when he is gone so our main two will be that player and Paynter but we need decent strength in depth as I don't want to see Peacock play up front.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 09:06:37
I dont want peacock to play full stop


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Peter Venkman on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 09:07:34
give him a trial,during a tough pre season.
you never know, he could be rejuvinated by it?

I agree, hes obviously not the player he was but he does love the club and may want to play his bollocks off for us and become a success again.

If he cant do it in friendlies then he wont do it in the league (probably).


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Bogus Dave on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 09:09:31
Parkin wont be coming back


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Simon Pieman on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 09:11:37
I dont want peacock to play full stop

We have a bit of a crisis in the centre of the pitch and up front. If Peacock isn't good for either then we've only got 2 strikers and 2 centre midfielders and one of those is Easton who I'm not sure has signed his deal.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: juddie on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 09:12:38
Parkin has been released because Luton can;t afford his wages in the conference. However, he has had no offers yet.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: ahounsell on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 09:31:42
My instinct is that a return for Parkin wouldnt work.

Might be worth a trial though, his record last season is no worse than his record at Northampton the year before he came here in the first place.

His injury record is a big worry though. If we wanted to take that kind of gamble we could have kept Corr.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Spencer_White on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 09:39:34
He is a leader. We need one badly up front.

Paynter cannot and will not carry the burden of being our main striker.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Phil_S on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 09:50:34
I don't think he will be back. A F has said before that he doesn't believe in players going back as it rarely works out.
Mind you there are always exceptions that prove a rule so to speak. SSP was suppossedly shit the first time we signed him according to Northampton fans .
Maybe he can only really be good playing for clubs with the initials STFC !?


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: THE FLASH on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 09:52:44
Just really sad to see such a dreadful decline in his career!


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Rich Pullen on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 09:56:26
Just really sad to see such a dreadful decline in his career!

This is it. It just went so wrong! Injury and Jim Magilton at Ipswich and then everything at Luton.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 09:57:25
Maybe he can only really be good playing for clubs with the initials STFC !?

I didn't realise he ever played for Shrewsbury.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Phil_S on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 10:12:22
I didn't realise he ever played for Shrewsbury.

He hasn't, but of course would be really good there too


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Danjackson10 on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 10:30:58
I say try him on a trial, if he is poo then dont touch him! If he shows his qualities which we all know he has then go for it! One thing you can be sure of if he does sign and becomes good he will be with us for the rest of his career and not fuck off to a bigger club!


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 10:51:25
Im with Luci - I love him but not sure

We could resurrect the facebook group?? :)

Sam always says theres 2 places he feels popular - at Swindon and at his mums!

Not sure what that really says but if hes feeling down and low on confidence we might be the boost he needs


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: THE FLASH on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 11:40:03
Im with Luci - I love him but not sure

We could resurrect the facebook group?? :)

Sam always says theres 2 places he feels popular - at Swindon and at his mums!

Not sure what that really says but if hes feeling down and low on confidence we might be the boost he needs

His mum reckons hes shit now!


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: land_of_bo on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 11:59:19
The only Free Parkin I want is in Monopoly.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: ahounsell on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 12:06:17
I don't think he will be back. A F has said before that he doesn't believe in players going back as it rarely works out.

This is often quoted, but doesnt really stand up to scrutiny.

There are plenty of examples of players going back to clubs and doing well. Neil Harris was mentioned earlier in this thred. Chris Kamara & Jimmy Quinn both had successful second spells here. Paul Bodin scored the goal that put us into the Premiership in his second spell.

Of course there are also examples where it didnt work. (David Kerslake and Phl King spring to mind).

If you think about it though, the ones were it worked were good players joining a club on the up under a good manager.

Kerslake and King rejoined a club in decline being managed by a complete cock.

So a player returning to a club can work if he still has something to offer, and the club is well managed. Just like any other signing really.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Dazzza on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 12:11:07
Easy one for me, sign him up for a trial with a view to a contract.  Sentiment aside I don’t think you can ignore any player that has a goal scoring record like Parkin at this level.

If he is genuinely rubber ducked then medicals and a bit of pre-season will show that up pretty quickly.  If he’s out of form and low on confidence as it appears a shift back to Town could be just the tonic.  We have taken punts on Barry Corry and Sturrock in recent years so I don’t see an issue with giving him a trial.

Sentiment aside and all this crap that it’ll never work out is utter cock sticks.  



Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Spy on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 12:19:18
I think the problem would be that if we took him on a trial then the adver would go nuts and everyone would get excited and there would then be pressure to sign him.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: fatbury on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 12:23:34
depends on wage demands but he would be a useful addition


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Power to people on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 13:06:50
I think that there would be too much pressure on SSP if he returned as big things would be expected of him and if he fails his hero status would be ruined.

I wish him luck finding a new club but I think we have moved on as he is not the force he once was as injuries have taken their toll - if we eanted to take a risk on a striker we should have kept Corr.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Anteater on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 13:21:29
I think that there would be too much pressure on SSP if he returned as big things would be expected of him and if he fails his hero status would be ruined.

I wish him luck finding a new club but I think we have moved on as he is not the force he once was as injuries have taken their toll - if we eanted to take a risk on a striker we should have kept Corr.

Agree with that ! Maybe it's not out of the question to give SSP a trial and then pay as you play contract in the same vein as touted for Corr if it worked out. Sadly though really think his days with STFC in the sun are over. (and IMO he was poor against us at Orient)


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Phil_S on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 13:22:10
This is often quoted, but doesnt really stand up to scrutiny.

There are plenty of examples of players going back to clubs and doing well. Neil Harris was mentioned earlier in this thred. Chris Kamara & Jimmy Quinn both had successful second spells here. Paul Bodin scored the goal that put us into the Premiership in his second spell.

Of course there are also examples where it didnt work. (David Kerslake and Phl King spring to mind).

If you think about it though, the ones were it worked were good players joining a club on the up under a good manager.

Kerslake and King rejoined a club in decline being managed by a complete cock.

So a player returning to a club can work if he still has something to offer, and the club is well managed. Just like any other signing really.

I'm not saying we shouldn't have him back. I'm saying that AF doesn't appear to agree with players returning, & he is the one who pays the wages.
FWIW, I think if it IS confidence then having him as a "Second" striker to someone like Coxy (if not the man himself)  would take the pressure off. If he could regain the confidence any where it would be here because the fan base would give him more leeway.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: SCM on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 14:38:23
People really need to let go of the whole Parkin thing.

He's scored 15 goals since he left us 4 years ago. I'm not saying he wouldn't be worth a trial, but those that'd expect him to be as good as he used to be (and that's a fair few) would be severely let down.

We had a great striker for 3 years, i'd hate for him to undo all that by coming back and looking half the player.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Rich Pullen on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 14:49:59
I don't think anyone has said he'd replicate his past form. We need striker(s), we have little funds - it's worth discussion.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Ardiles on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 14:56:15
I'm completely against him coming back.  Let's leave our memories of the good times intact, rather than showing our heroes up for the mere mortals they really are.  Sam was exciting 5 years ago because he was a young player on an upward trajectory with a bright future ahead of him.  He's now in his late 20s and injury prone.

You have to ask yourself the question 'would we be even thinking of having him back if his successful spell had not been with us, but with another club?'  There's no room for sentiment here - and if the answer is 'no' (and it is), we should steer well clear.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Spy on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 15:00:09
I find it amazing that internet discussion on a theoretical subject like this can gain such momentum people start talking like it's actually going to happen.  :eek: :soapy tit wank:


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 15:02:37
I find it amazing that internet discussion on a theoretical subject like this can gain such momentum people start talking like it's actually going to happen.  :eek: :soapy tit wank:

 80% bollocks on here...and that's on a good day.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: SCM on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 15:14:06
I don't think anyone has said he'd replicate his past form. We need striker(s), we have little funds - it's worth discussion.
What we don't need is striker's who can't score, otherwise it's a waste of those little funds isn't it. We might as well have kept Sturrock if we were going to do that.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: The Grim Reaper on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 15:24:16
Is this a wind up. Parkin is now fat bald and importantly Shit

This.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 15:40:20
Twat is that better.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Simon Pieman on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 15:48:22
Twat's better


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: DiV on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 15:56:10
yes, get him in...


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 15:59:48
Ummmm can I make a small correction?? he isnt bald - he prob had the same amount hair he has when he played for us he just shaves his head now.

Thanks xxx



Title: Re: SSP
Post by: RobertT on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 18:35:05
I couldn't give a toss if he came back and was shit, it wouldn't in any sense detract from what he did before.  kerslake was a star for us, Kerslake was also pretty shit 2nd time around but I forget about those games. All this don't let him ruin the memories bollocks suggests we should just be worried about what has happened in the past.  I want to concentrate on the hear and now.

Having said all that, I don't fancy signing Sam Parkin on the basis that his record in the past few years is pretty average at best and he has a record of injury problems.  Given a tight budget I'd prefer us to sign someone with potential with those wages.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: pumbaa on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 19:14:00
ah fuck it, sign him up. NOW!


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: 4D on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 19:38:30
Ummmm can I make a small correction?? he isnt bald - he prob had the same amount hair he has when he played for us he just shaves his head now.

Thanks xxx



Can I make a small correction? You've got had and has the wrong way around  :)


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Rich Pullen on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 19:41:48
[url width=320 height=320]http://www.swindontownfc.co.uk/javaImages/5f/4f/0,,10341~3297119,00.jpg[/url][url width=415 height=275]http://i.thisislondon.co.uk/i/pix/2009/01/sam-parkin-415x275.jpg[/url]


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: 4D on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 19:45:28
I think JFW is on to something  :sherlock:


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Kinky Tom on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 19:58:06
Quote
4D wrote

Quote
Quote from: Jamiesfuturewife on Today at 15:59:48
Ummmm can I make a small correction?? he isnt bald - he prob had the same amount hair he has when he played for us he just shaves his head now.

Thanks xxx




Can I make a small correction? You've got had and has the wrong way around 


That depends really on where you place the emphasis in that sentance...


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: 4D on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 20:05:32
True (but there's no "a" in sentence) ;)


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Kinky Tom on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 20:08:09
touche...


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: 4D on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 20:11:51
Aha! There's no "e" in touch......Oh!  :-[   :D


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: pauld on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 20:36:00
Aha! There's no "e" in touch......Oh!  :-[   :D
No, but there should be an acute accent on the word he meant (see how I carefully avoid falling into the pedantry trap because I don't know how to type funny foreign accents either)


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: pumbaa on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 20:43:19
Think of it this way. Less wind resistance when your sprinting then and launching yourself into a diving bullet header into the top corner of the Franchise net for the third time that afternoon......plus that extra body mass adds more power to said header. All in all, a winner.....


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: SWINRICH on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 21:25:58
I would love to see Parkin back. I can't see it happening though as I think there are other strikers Wilson will look at. I think a trial would be a good idea to get an idea of his fitness. The other players on Lutons released list McVeigh , Brill (quality goalkeeper) if we don't get Lucas and maybe Sol Davis would be good signings.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 21:59:26
Realistically Parkin should be busting a gut and doing his own pre season. There is no difference here between him and Corr and if anything Cors still scored when returning from injury


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Batch on Friday, May 29, 2009, 07:16:56
Adver have a bit on SSP today

http://www.thisisswindontownfc.co.uk/news/headlines/4404383.Parkin_wouldn_t_say__no__to_Town/

Quote
FORMER Town goal machine Sam Parkin has refused to rule out a return to the County Ground, after being released by relegated League Two outfit Luton Town.

The 28-year-old striker, pictured left, was one of five players who did not have their contracts renewed by the Hatters, with another former Town player, full-back Sol Davis, also among their number.

Parkin was a firm favourite with the Town faithful during a three-year stay at the club between 2002 and 2005, during which time he scored 73 goals in 135 appearances, although a County Ground comeback seems unlikely.

He was touted as a possible Town transfer target last summer, but while chairman Andrew Fitton is convinced a fit Parkin is more than capable of doing a job in League One, he doubts the wisdom of bringing back a former hero idolised by the fans.

When asked if he would consider a return to his most successful stomping ground, the Roehampton-born striker said: “I think I’d be stupid to turn my nose up at anything, especially in the predicament I find myself in. I’d listen to all offers.

“Everyone knows the affection I’ve got for the club (Swindon).

“You always look out for your old side, they are always going to be one of the first results I look for and I was pleased they managed to stay up.”

Parkin feels League One is a realistic level for him to aim at given that he has been part of a struggling team in recent times.

“I’d obviously love to stay in the League,” he said.

“I’m realistic, I’m probably not going to get a Championship club because of the last couple of years.

“But I’m confident in my ability, I’ve scored goals when I’ve been a regular in a side.

“I’m just looking forward to getting a fresh start. My agent will be talking to various clubs and hopefully can get something sorted.”

The former Town hitman also gave his verdict on Simon Cox, whose future has been the subject of much speculation since the turn of the year.

“To be honest I’ve not seen a great deal of him, apart from the goals, but he looks like an absolutely fantastic player from the little glimpses I’ve seen,” said Parkin.

“Inevitably he’s going to go on and play at a higher level, I’m sure he’s ambitious.

“You find it difficult to turn down when there are three or four Championship clubs around you.

“Swindon can only sell if the price is right, and the club may say the money is too good to turn down. It will be out of his hands like it was out of my hands.”

Personally I don't think we should go for it. It's a shame but Parkin isn't what he was. He needs a season of being fit, but I don't think we can risk it.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: nevillew on Friday, May 29, 2009, 07:17:05
I can't be the only one that has realised that SSP also stands for Statutory Sick Pay ?


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Friday, May 29, 2009, 08:34:41
Lets restart the Facebook group!! :)


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Friday, May 29, 2009, 08:38:35
Would it be called the "We'd like SSP back, but only if he captures his former form and so we are not really sure" group?


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Friday, May 29, 2009, 08:42:34
We could re name it that? :)


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Simon Pieman on Friday, May 29, 2009, 08:47:32

Personally I don't think we should go for it. It's a shame but Parkin isn't what he was. He needs a season of being fit, but I don't think we can risk it.

He was fit all last season wasn't he?


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Rich Pullen on Friday, May 29, 2009, 09:11:18
He was fit all last season wasn't he?

He was certainly fit for the majority.

I don't understand why people are saying "if he's not good enough for a Blue Square team..."

Are people unaware of Luton's decline? Do they not understand how much money he'd be on for Non-League? Baffles me.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Simon Pieman on Friday, May 29, 2009, 09:23:20
I don't think it's a question now of whether he is able to stay fit for a season, more if he is able to score enough goals.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Rich Pullen on Friday, May 29, 2009, 09:26:36
Although I'm still sitting on the fence with Parkin - I don't think he should be written off.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Panda Paws on Friday, May 29, 2009, 10:37:09
Like others have said, get him in on trial for pres-season and if he proves hit fitness, offer him a one year deal on sensible money. He hasn't got much to bargain with, so why not have him as the third or fourth striker, chuck him on with 15 to go? At the moment, he's not good enough to be classed as a first team striker for an average League 1 club, but just to have him around the place and on the bench would be worth it.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Arriba on Friday, May 29, 2009, 11:02:50
goal scoring is a natural ability,parkin has this and you cannot really teach the fella much more about how to hit the net.
for whatever reason(i think injuries,and being in and out of teams)he hasn't hit the net anywhere near the amount he is capable of.he went to ipswich,scored 7 pretty quickly then got injured.then moved again started well,then got injured.he wont have lost his scoring touch,i think its down to other things why he hasn't scored alot.
if he can get 100% fit.i'm sure he will score goals if starting games regularly.that's why i said a trial rather  than signing him up.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: strooood on Friday, May 29, 2009, 12:34:18
I fucking love Sam Parkin.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Luci on Friday, May 29, 2009, 13:57:34
goal scoring is a natural ability,parkin has this and you cannot really teach the fella much more about how to hit the net.
for whatever reason(i think injuries,and being in and out of teams)he hasn't hit the net anywhere near the amount he is capable of.he went to ipswich,scored 7 pretty quickly then got injured.then moved again started well,then got injured.he wont have lost his scoring touch,i think its down to other things why he hasn't scored alot.
if he can get 100% fit.i'm sure he will score goals if starting games regularly.that's why i said a trial rather  than signing him up.

Good post Arriba, can't do any harm in giving him a trial.

Although, if we did sign him, I can't help thinking how much revenue would be generated for shirt printing! :D


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Friday, May 29, 2009, 14:18:58
Id maybe just dig out my old black and gold stripey away strip from back in the day - save a bit of cash?


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, May 29, 2009, 14:21:25
Id maybe just dig out my old black and gold stripey away strip from back in the day - save a bit of cash?

Worst away shirt ever....incineration would be too good.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Friday, May 29, 2009, 14:23:39
Oh Reg Do be quiet - it was properly nice - Ive got the whole kit with Parkin 9 on the back - I sometimes wear it round the house


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Simon Pieman on Friday, May 29, 2009, 14:28:28
Do you usually wander round naked or have you stopped doing that?


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Dazzza on Friday, May 29, 2009, 15:05:26
Fully agree, get the big bald fella in for a trial it worked last time for him pre-season so there’s no harm in giving it another go.

If he’s properly assessed and not crumbling like the digestive that was poor Barry Corr was then he’s worth a punt.  All this guff about him soiling his reputation is sentimental nonce-sense.  His record stands and always will stand during those magnificent few seasons he had.

At the end of the day all this horse shit is hypothetical.  It’s Danny Wilson’s call and if he sees a fully fit Sam Parkin fitting into his plans then I can’t see Fitton rejecting it out of hand on principle unless of course the financials didn’t stack up.  What is interesting is that Parkin usually did well against Wilson’s Shitty and Dongs teams so I wonder if he’ll raise a Roger Moore special at his availability.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Friday, May 29, 2009, 15:09:25
whats a Rodger Moore special?


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Samdy Gray on Friday, May 29, 2009, 15:34:32
A cheeky eyebrow.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Friday, May 29, 2009, 15:35:09
ahhhhhh I see - love it!


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Crozzer on Saturday, May 30, 2009, 00:51:54

What's wrong with a trial for SSP?  If he is fit, then it's all about confidence.  If he isn't fit, then Aldershot can give him a trial.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: wokinghamred on Saturday, May 30, 2009, 09:39:23
What's wrong with a trial for SSP?  If he is fit, then it's all about confidence.  If he isn't fit, then Aldershot can give him a trial.

Agreed, He hasn't got a club. Lets invite him to train with us pre-season - seems like win-win, and nothing to lose. He would probably be very grateful for the offer.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Sunday, May 31, 2009, 13:37:06
SUUUUUUUUUUUUUPER SUPER SAM!!!! Bring Back SSP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: leefer on Sunday, May 31, 2009, 20:26:51
Lots of players look fit in trials,get a fat contract offer then suddenly there unfit....offer him a pay as you play deal...ive got to say he looks a shadow of his former self as a player...good player though he was for us.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Rich Pullen on Sunday, May 31, 2009, 20:30:22
SUUUUUUUUUUUUUPER SUPER SAM!!!! Bring Back SSP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D

Gazza has spoken.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Monday, June 1, 2009, 01:48:48
Gazza has spoken.

I would probably urinate myself if he came back. But with a realistic hat on, I don't think he is the player he was before,however maybe being at a club where the fans love him and don't criticise him like Ipswich, Leyton Orient etc. will help him recapture some sort of form. Even 15 goals alongside Billy P 15 would be half decent... Are we really going to be able to bring in a 20 plus goalscorer (assuming cox goes)?, Leroy Lita may be worth a punt even if he is a former slave trader. Not long ago was banging them in but would likely want massive wages.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Power to people on Monday, June 1, 2009, 07:24:12
I would probably urinate myself if he came back. But with a realistic hat on, I don't think he is the player he was before,however maybe being at a club where the fans love him and don't criticise him like Ipswich, Leyton Orient etc. will help him recapture some sort of form. Even 15 goals alongside Billy P 15 would be half decent... Are we really going to be able to bring in a 20 plus goalscorer (assuming cox goes)?, Leroy Lita may be worth a punt even if he is a former slave trader. Not long ago was banging them in but would likely want massive wages.

I'm not sure Parkin is the type of player that could play alongside Paynter though ??


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Weasel on Monday, June 1, 2009, 07:33:46
But with a realistic hat on,

What sort of hat is that?


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Sippo on Monday, June 1, 2009, 07:54:41
If he came back, did shit he would probably lose his legendary status.

I wouldn't risk it if I were him.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Monday, June 1, 2009, 08:51:27
I would think he is more interested in paying his mortgage than his "legendary status" at a poxy division 3 club.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Power to people on Monday, June 1, 2009, 12:57:11
But if he came back and did sh1t then that would probably be his league career over with, whereas if he went elsewhere with less expectation he may find it easier to re-build his career and reputation


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Simon Pieman on Monday, June 1, 2009, 16:15:39
Does anyone think his legendary status is already gone?


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Rich Pullen on Monday, June 1, 2009, 18:12:28
Probably because I've been unable to go to games week in/week out - I've never really considered Sam Parkin a 'legend' - he was awesome for us without a doubt.

Perhaps I have high expectations on what I believe a 'legend' is or because I was brought up on the stories of the 60's, 70's and 80's by my old man.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Spencer_White on Monday, June 1, 2009, 18:19:52
When we signed Sam Parkin, we needed to get a decent player more than anytime since Ive been going to Swindon. In the 2 seasons before he signed, we must have been through 60 odd players and most of those were garbage. We had no money and he was a talisman for us who helped us rebuild the club.

I dont think he is a legend in pure footballing terms. But he is a player who was vital to the club. Thats where his claim to legendary status is.


Title: Re: SSP
Post by: Rich Pullen on Monday, June 1, 2009, 18:26:00
I dont think he is a legend in pure footballing terms. But he is a player who was vital to the club. Thats where his claim to legendary status is.

I wouldn't argue with this at all Spencer.