Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Danjackson10 on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 16:21:40 Sunderland 1-0 up! :shock:
Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Danjackson10 on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 16:23:44 certainly would they were 16/1 to win! :D
Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Ben Wah Balls on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 16:27:07 I hope Chelsea win because it would be funny if Sunderland didn't reach double figures this season.
Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Ben Wah Balls on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 16:33:08 They need to concede another 61 to get to a hundred though so they would have to have a lot of hammerings to do that. 1-1 now.
Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Gelbfüßler on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 16:33:32 We want to keep at least 1 Premiership record, people might forget we were ever there
Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Ben Wah Balls on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 16:42:01 Thing is we scored 47 which was very good and more than 8 teams that year including 10th placed Aston Villa. That's more than Everton scored last year and they finished 4th qualifying for the champions league.
Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: stfc11 on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 17:34:06 2-1 now, Robben scored, went to celebrate with his fans, and got sent off cause he'd already had a yellow earlier in the game!
Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Ben Wah Balls on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 17:34:20 Robben sent off for celebrating? What the fuck is that about. :?
Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Simon Pieman on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 17:37:33 Ahahahaha classic :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:
That is a bit gay though Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Bennett on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 17:49:03 they know the rules! i'm listening to it so i've yet to see what he actually did. BUT the commentators are saying "oh that's silly" etc, BUT as i say...the players know what they're allowed to do or not.
plus it's chelsea they're going to win everything anyway, who fucking cares Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: reeves4england on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 18:19:13 Quote from: "bennett" they know the rules! i'm listening to it so i've yet to see what he actually did. BUT the commentators are saying "oh that's silly" etc, BUT as i say...the players know what they're allowed to do or not. If you celebrate with the fans its a yellow card. The rule is there, the players should know not to do it.plus it's chelsea they're going to win everything anyway, who fucking cares It is their job NOT to do it. Referee did nothing wrong. Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Ben Wah Balls on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 18:29:18 The referee should exercise some common sense. It's fucking ridiculous. I don't think we'd be too happy if that was one of our own players. Being booked for celebrating is a harsh and pointless rule anyway but a red card just takes the piss. Madness.
Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: McLovin on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 18:45:31 He'd be rapped by the FA for not doing the right thing by the letter of the law. in my eyes it was the correct decision, even if i disagree with the law itself.
Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: DMR on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 19:51:56 Quote from: "Ben Wah Balls" The referee should exercise some common sense. It's fucking ridiculous. I don't think we'd be too happy if that was one of our own players. Being booked for celebrating is a harsh and pointless rule anyway but a red card just takes the piss. Madness. God you're such a blinded cunt about King, Crouch and non-Arsenal sides aren't you? Yes, it's a shit rule, but everyone knows it. Off the pitch = yellow card. Ben, that is a FACT, that is a LAW, if you're going to go off on one then you're an idiot. Rant over. Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Bennett on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 19:54:09 Quote from: "reeves4england" Quote from: "bennett" they know the rules! i'm listening to it so i've yet to see what he actually did. BUT the commentators are saying "oh that's silly" etc, BUT as i say...the players know what they're allowed to do or not. If you celebrate with the fans its a yellow card. The rule is there, the players should know not to do it.plus it's chelsea they're going to win everything anyway, who fucking cares It is their job NOT to do it. Referee did nothing wrong. were you adding to my point or taking exception to it?! dmr has managed to, in his outraged state, say what i planned to. good work youngling Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Ben Wah Balls on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 19:58:35 Whatever Dave, fact is sending someone off for being happy about scoring is a complete joke. So what if it's the rules, the rules should be changed or at least use some discretion, i.e. don't send someone off for scoring. Common sense, simple common sense.
If this wasn't Chelsea I imagine people would see how stupid it is. As it was, it didn't make any difference but it's still a ridiculous rule. I'm not so much complaining about the referee but the whole rule about bookings for celebrating like that. What's the point. Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: DMR on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 20:01:10 Quote from: "bennett" Quote from: "reeves4england" Quote from: "bennett" they know the rules! i'm listening to it so i've yet to see what he actually did. BUT the commentators are saying "oh that's silly" etc, BUT as i say...the players know what they're allowed to do or not. If you celebrate with the fans its a yellow card. The rule is there, the players should know not to do it.plus it's chelsea they're going to win everything anyway, who fucking cares It is their job NOT to do it. Referee did nothing wrong. were you adding to my point or taking exception to it?! dmr has managed to, in his outraged state, say what i planned to. good work youngling :grin: Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Bennett on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 21:47:12 Quote from: "Ben Wah Balls" Whatever Dave, fact is sending someone off for being happy about scoring is a complete joke. So what if it's the rules, the rules should be changed or at least use some discretion, i.e. don't send someone off for scoring. Common sense, simple common sense. If this wasn't Chelsea I imagine people would see how stupid it is. As it was, it didn't make any difference but it's still a ridiculous rule. I'm not so much complaining about the referee but the whole rule about bookings for celebrating like that. What's the point. yes it's stupid but the point is that they know what to expect....so they should realise not to do it. common sense from the players (cos there's near enough none at the FA) is all that can be done Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Spud on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 21:53:29 I thought Robben's 2nd booking was harsh but funny!, although it does state in the rules that you're not allowed to jump into the fans to celebrate.
Mcdermott got booked when he did it against City so why should it be any different in the Premiership?. Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: reeves4england on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 21:58:58 Quote from: "Spuddy_STFC" I thought Robben's 2nd booking was harsh but funny!, although it does state in the rules that you're not allowed to jump into the fans to celebrate. Exactly. And you can't make an exception for somebody who has already been booked. That would be even more ridiculous. Then you would have arguments about what other rules should be applied like that.Mcdermott got booked when he did it against City so why should it be any different in the Premiership?. The rules say he had to go. End of. Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Spud on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 22:01:37 Quote from: "reeves4england" Quote from: "Spuddy_STFC" I thought Robben's 2nd booking was harsh but funny!, although it does state in the rules that you're not allowed to jump into the fans to celebrate. Exactly. And you can't make an exception for somebody who has already been booked. That would be even more ridiculous. Then you would have arguments about what other rules should be applied like that.Mcdermott got booked when he did it against City so why should it be any different in the Premiership?. The rules say he had to go. End of. I was getting pissed off with Andy Gray keep going on and on about how harsh it was!, you cant not book him just because he's already been booked. Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Bennett on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 22:03:03 unless it's michael essien or chelsea are at home
Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Ben Wah Balls on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 22:13:11 Quote from: "reeves4england" Quote from: "Spuddy_STFC" I thought Robben's 2nd booking was harsh but funny!, although it does state in the rules that you're not allowed to jump into the fans to celebrate. Exactly. And you can't make an exception for somebody who has already been booked. That would be even more ridiculous. Then you would have arguments about what other rules should be applied like that.Mcdermott got booked when he did it against City so why should it be any different in the Premiership?. The rules say he had to go. End of. Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Spud on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 22:16:48 Its the rules though Ben and the players should know that by now!.
Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Bennett on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 22:18:23 Quote from: "Spuddy_STFC" Its the rules though Ben and the players should know that by now!. i'd like to second this Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Spud on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 22:20:39 When Mcdermott was interviewed after the Brizzle game he said something along the lines of "i knew i was going to bet booked but i thought sod it".
Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Whits on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 22:20:42 Quote Chelsea manager Jose Mourinho on Robben's dismissal: "Under the rules, the referee had no option. I don't like the rule because part of the show is the players' relationship with the crowd. "Arjen has to learn when he already has a yellow card, he has to control himself. "It's an experience for him, next time he has a yellow card and scores he has to make sure he stays on the pitch." Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: reeves4england on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 22:24:55 No I wouldn't be HAPPY if a Town player was sent off, but they are the rules so you can't argue with the referee.
I would be more pissed off with the player myself. Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Ben Wah Balls on Sunday, January 15, 2006, 22:51:35 Well according to match of the day by the rules he should not have been booked because he didn't climb over, or onto the railings, only an advertising hoarding. Also, the rules apparently do say that the referee should use his discretion. So a very poor decision by the referee. End of. :P
Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Simon Pieman on Monday, January 16, 2006, 02:43:00 Quote from: "Ben Wah Balls" Well according to match of the day by the rules he should not have been booked because he didn't climb over, or onto the railings, only an advertising hoarding. Also, the rules apparently do say that the referee should use his discretion. So a very poor decision by the referee. End of. :P Surely that very argument condemns the first. The referee felt that he shouldn't have done that and that's his decision. From the sound of it getting the fans worked up can have a negative effect (from tales of yesterday). Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Ben Wah Balls on Monday, January 16, 2006, 03:00:51 No it doesn't condemn it at all.
Firstly Robben did nothing wrong so shouldn't have got a second booking anyway, and even if he had jumped into the actual crowd, they were suggesting that the referee can still use his discretion and not book him which if it would be a sending off would be a good idea. Any talk of oh you can't make any exceptions just because he's already been booked is bollocks, it's not like referee's never do that. It's just the same if a player makes a bad tackle the referee might warn him and if he makes a similar tackle again then he'll book him, some decision are just down to the referees judgement and a good ref should realise how ridiculous it is to send someone off for scoring, so if they thought it was a borderline booking they wouldn't make it two yellows. Really though it wasn't a booking anyway so the ref shouldn't have done anything. Inciting the other team's fans is one thing but he didn't do that, they were Chelsea fans and there was a barrier between him and them so to send him off is fucking stupid. To be honest I see no reason why a player shouldn't be able to jump in the crowd and run half way up the stand hugging people if that's how they want to celebrate and they shouldn't be booked. I can't believe so many people are actually defending the decision, the only reason I can think of is because of hating Chelsea because if it was anyone else I don't think you would. I'd still think it was ridiculous whichever team it was, if it was someone playing Swindon I'd take it but it would be a shite decision. Still I guess it would make be an interesting rulechange if every time a player scores he gets sent off. Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: STFC Village on Monday, January 16, 2006, 03:16:04 I agree with Ben, there's no way Robben should've been sent off for that celebration. However, i can see why the referee did send him off, although i disagree with the decision.
Robben's first booking shouldn't have been a yellow anyway Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Luci on Monday, January 16, 2006, 08:39:42 Quote from: "Ben Wah Balls" No it doesn't condemn it at all. Firstly Robben did nothing wrong so shouldn't have got a second booking anyway, and even if he had jumped into the actual crowd, they were suggesting that the referee can still use his discretion and not book him which if it would be a sending off would be a good idea. Any talk of oh you can't make any exceptions just because he's already been booked is bollocks, it's not like referee's never do that. It's just the same if a player makes a bad tackle the referee might warn him and if he makes a similar tackle again then he'll book him, some decision are just down to the referees judgement and a good ref should realise how ridiculous it is to send someone off for scoring, so if they thought it was a borderline booking they wouldn't make it two yellows. Really though it wasn't a booking anyway so the ref shouldn't have done anything. Inciting the other team's fans is one thing but he didn't do that, they were Chelsea fans and there was a barrier between him and them so to send him off is fucking stupid. To be honest I see no reason why a player shouldn't be able to jump in the crowd and run half way up the stand hugging people if that's how they want to celebrate and they shouldn't be booked. I can't believe so many people are actually defending the decision, the only reason I can think of is because of hating Chelsea because if it was anyone else I don't think you would. I'd still think it was ridiculous whichever team it was, if it was someone playing Swindon I'd take it but it would be a shite decision. Still I guess it would make be an interesting rulechange if every time a player scores he gets sent off. Spot on. Glad somebody watched the rules too! Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: fatbury on Monday, January 16, 2006, 08:42:26 The referee was correct to send him off .. if you jump the surrounding fence its a yellow card .. and he had one already so really should have used a bit of intelligence ...
However its hardly inciting the crowd -- as its a goal ... and to be honest FIFA needs to look at changing the rule for this Sunderland deserved a draw for their hard work Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: DMR on Monday, January 16, 2006, 12:24:21 Ben, this shit about it being an advertising board is Le Saux on MOTD talking bollocks as usual.
The rule is that it's a booking if you leave the field of play. Which he did. Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Bennett on Monday, January 16, 2006, 12:26:14 le saux is a gay for gods sake. now they really are barely people!
Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Batch on Monday, January 16, 2006, 12:42:13 As said, leaving/entering the field of play without consent is a bookable offence. Rules are rules. Refs have a bee in their bonnet about it at the moment so that's that. It doesn't matter if it is a stupid rule or not, it's a booking.
http://www.fifa.com/en/laws/Laws12_04.htm - Cautionable Offences, law 12, point 6 & point 7, cautionable offences. Quote from: "fifa" A player is cautioned and shown the yellow card if he commits any of the following seven offences. 6. enters or re-enters the field of play without The Referee’s permission 7. deliberately leaves the field of play without The Referee’s permission. End of discussion Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Ben Wah Balls on Monday, January 16, 2006, 13:07:50 The field of play is anything inside the touchline which means that rule is utterly ridiculous and fifa should change it immediately because is a very sad situation when a player is sent off merely for celebrating a goal he's scored. It is ridiculous and shouldn't be allowed to happen. End of.
Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: DMR on Monday, January 16, 2006, 13:09:47 http://soccerword.com/media/Shhh.jpg
Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Luci on Monday, January 16, 2006, 13:12:25 After the game they did a report on it and showed the footballing rules and regulations. When comparing what Robben did and the regulations the conclusion was that it didn't warrant the booking. Fowler got a booking for doing it the other day but thats because he was inciting the opposition fans which is something Robben did not do.
Also he didn't actually go into the crowd, the crowd came to him as he was behind the barrier. It also mentioned in the regulations that common sense is something the referee should use in such circumstances which is clearly something he didnt use at all! Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Batch on Monday, January 16, 2006, 13:14:50 I stand corrected, sorry:
Quote from: "fifa in ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR REFEREES, ASSISTANT REFEREES AND FOURTH OFFICIALS" Celebration of a goal While it is permissible for a player to demonstrate his joy when a goal has been scored, the celebration must not be excessive. FIFA recognised in Circular No. 579 that such reasonable celebrations are allowed. The practice of choreographed celebrations is not to be encouraged when it results in excessive timewasting and referees are instructed to intervene in such cases. A player must be cautioned when: • in the opinion of the referee, he makes gestures which are provocative, derisory or infl ammatory • he climbs on to a perimeter fence to celebrate a goal being scored • he removes his shirt over his head or covers his head with his shirt Leaving the fi eld to celebrate a goal is not a cautionable offence in itself but it is essential that players return to the fi eld as soon as possible. Referees are expected to act in a preventative mode and to exercise common-sense in dealing with the celebration of a goal. Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Ben Wah Balls on Monday, January 16, 2006, 13:26:48 Yeah I thought there must be some more rules about it., that makes more sense
The referee chief has said he was booked for jumping on the rail not just for crossing the touchline. http://www.sportinglife.com/football/news/story_get.cgi?STORY_NAME=soccer/06/01/16/SOCCER_Referees.html&TEAMHD=soccer Quote Hackett said: "The reason he received a yellow card is that he jumped over the advertising hoardings, jumped on to the rail and created a crowd surge. But he didn't jump on the rail that so that guy really should watch the footage again and having seen the footage it didn't look at all dangerous so as he'd already been harshly booked there was no need to book him again. Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Luci on Monday, January 16, 2006, 13:31:09 Quote from: "Batch" I stand corrected, sorry: Quote from: "fifa in ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR REFEREES, ASSISTANT REFEREES AND FOURTH OFFICIALS" Celebration of a goal While it is permissible for a player to demonstrate his joy when a goal has been scored, the celebration must not be excessive FIFA recognised in Circular No. 579 that such reasonable celebrations are allowed. The practice of choreographed celebrations is not to be encouraged when it results in excessive timewasting and referees are instructed to intervene in such cases. A player must be cautioned when: • in the opinion of the referee, he makes gestures which are provocative, derisory or infl ammatory • he climbs on to a perimeter fence to celebrate a goal being scored • he removes his shirt over his head or covers his head with his shirt Leaving the fi eld to celebrate a goal is not a cautionable offence in itself but it is essential that players return to the fi eld as soon as possible. Referees are expected to act in a preventative mode and to exercise common-sense in dealing with the celebration of a goal. :nod: His celebration wasn't excessive, he didnt make provocative gestures, he didn't climb on the fence, he didn't remove his shirt - now someone tell me what grounds there were for a booking? Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Simon Pieman on Monday, January 16, 2006, 13:35:48 Dennis Rodman: "I don't give a shit"
Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Spud on Monday, January 16, 2006, 13:39:35 Quote from: "STFCLady" Quote from: "Batch" I stand corrected, sorry: Quote from: "fifa in ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR REFEREES, ASSISTANT REFEREES AND FOURTH OFFICIALS" Celebration of a goal While it is permissible for a player to demonstrate his joy when a goal has been scored, the celebration must not be excessive FIFA recognised in Circular No. 579 that such reasonable celebrations are allowed. The practice of choreographed celebrations is not to be encouraged when it results in excessive timewasting and referees are instructed to intervene in such cases. A player must be cautioned when: • in the opinion of the referee, he makes gestures which are provocative, derisory or infl ammatory • he climbs on to a perimeter fence to celebrate a goal being scored • he removes his shirt over his head or covers his head with his shirt Leaving the fi eld to celebrate a goal is not a cautionable offence in itself but it is essential that players return to the fi eld as soon as possible. Referees are expected to act in a preventative mode and to exercise common-sense in dealing with the celebration of a goal. :nod: His celebration wasn't excessive, he didnt make provocative gestures, he didn't climb on the fence, he didn't remove his shirt - now someone tell me what grounds there were for a booking? He plays for Chelsea!. :wink: Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Bennett on Monday, January 16, 2006, 14:11:04 hurrah spuddy! good work son
Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: Ben Wah Balls on Monday, January 23, 2006, 02:25:18 Can't believe after Robben being booked and sent off for nothing Neville gets away without even a booking for deliberately inciting Liverpool fans. What is worse is wasn't even his goal. If anything's going to cause crowd trouble that is it.
What's even worse is I had a bet on it being 0-0. :x Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: McLovin on Monday, January 23, 2006, 09:23:06 Neville is my new hero after that. Brilliant!
Title: Sunderland v Chelsea! Post by: fatbury on Monday, January 23, 2006, 09:34:35 Simon Yeo got sent off for the same thing this weekend
|