Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: fatbury on Friday, September 23, 2005, 07:14:00 Id like to see
Heaton Jenkins Collins Ifil Smith Migz McDermott Whalley Shakes Fallon Roberts Subs Bulman Pook Nicolau Thorpe Cureton :mrgreen: Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: DMR on Friday, September 23, 2005, 08:06:42 Heaton
Jenkins O'Hanlon Ifil Smith Shakes McDermott Whalley Nicolau Fallon Roberts On the basis that we need a change, we need some width and we need some pace up front. Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: fatbury on Friday, September 23, 2005, 08:08:55 Obviously if O Hanlon makes it (i don think he will!) he will be in for Collins
Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: Kinky Tom on Friday, September 23, 2005, 08:19:07 I think we all know it will be a 3 - 5 - 2 fromation after a reasonable show at Bournmouth, as such you are both wrong. :|
I wonder who will be at the back in Gurn's absence? Will CC-P come in, or will Jenks move to the centre with Lapham making a rare appearance - of course Sean O' could be fit meaning it will be a straight swap. I reckon: Code: Heaton Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: McLovin on Friday, September 23, 2005, 08:21:32 Tommo's lineup actually looks sort of ok. I'd take Migz or Whalley out for Heath though, as they are both similar, and having a bad season.
Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: fatbury on Friday, September 23, 2005, 08:22:20 Im just wondering what surprise Kingy will have up his sleeve for us? :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:
Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: sonicyouth on Friday, September 23, 2005, 08:27:13 Quote from: "Kinky Tom" Will CC-P come in, or will Jenks move to the centre with Lapham making a rare appearance - of course Sean O' could be fit meaning it will be a straight swap. That's assuming King does the logical thing and replaces like-for-like, something he never does, instead opting to fuck about with the formation and confuse the players further. I'd expect a 4-4-2 tomorrow. I read yesterday that Jenks is struggling to be fit again and Seano didn't play in the reserve game in the week, so I'd be surprised if either were available. On that basis, I'd expect King to go for a lineup along these lines. Code:
whereas I'd go for Code:
Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: DMR on Friday, September 23, 2005, 08:43:46 I thought Pook was mega shight at Bournemouth 8)
Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: walrus on Friday, September 23, 2005, 09:29:42 I'm hungover and can't be bothered to do the rest of the team, although it pretty much picks itself. But striker-wise is a problem. Cureton and Roberts both scored for the reserves, Thorpe supposedly did okay at Bournemouth(?) and Fallon must start. I'd like to see Thorpedo given another chance alongside Fallon, with Cureton coming on early second half if he's not performing.
I would also put Roberts on the right, just because he has to be on the pitch but there's too much competition up front. I'm wondering whether King will go back to a 4-3-3 with the players he has - particularly when we played it when we had the donkeys of Sabin and Invincibile up front! Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: DMR on Friday, September 23, 2005, 09:41:33 Thorpe was equally shit at BM as any other game- that's to say he stands around and doesn't do alot
Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, September 23, 2005, 10:17:52 Our problem is we've a lot of players, who are at the moment a much of a muchness, so we can field a decent reserve side, but the first XI is no better.
Only Fallon on current form is indespensible. Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: DV on Friday, September 23, 2005, 11:00:07 Heaton
Jenkins Collins Ifil Smith Shakes Miglioranzi Pook Nicolau Fallon ROBERTS! Kingy, for fuck sake start Roberts. Can you see David Weatherall keeping up with him Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: le god cuervo on Friday, September 23, 2005, 11:03:03 agree DV85, roberts must start!
Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: McLovin on Friday, September 23, 2005, 11:47:27 I'd drop Migz. We can't afford him dwelling on the ball as per the last few games and getting dipossessed. It puts pressure on our crumbly defence.
I love Migz, but he is a bit rubbish at the moment. Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: DV on Friday, September 23, 2005, 11:49:29 Quote from: "Dave Blackcurrant" I'd drop Migz. We can't afford him dwelling on the ball as per the last few games and getting dipossessed. It puts pressure on our crumbly defence. I love Migz, but he is a bit rubbish at the moment. I dont think he has been that rubbish at all.... Plus, he looks easily our fittest player and will put the running in which is what the midfield need to do. Seen as Gurns is suspended and O'Hanlon is injured he should be captain! Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: McLovin on Friday, September 23, 2005, 11:50:35 Fraser McHugh ran round loads. He wasn't that good though was he?
Migz needs to get up to speed. He doesn't have as much time as he thinks he does. Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: DV on Friday, September 23, 2005, 11:51:52 Quote from: "Dave Blackcurrant" Fraser McHugh ran round loads. He wasn't that good though was he? Migz needs to get up to speed. He doesn't have as much time as he thinks he does. but we all know Migz has the talent. I certianly wouldnt drop him in favour of Whalley! Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: McLovin on Friday, September 23, 2005, 11:56:14 Then he needs to show his talent, because its times like these our supposed better players need to pick the team up by their bootstraps and get them playing well.
Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: DV on Friday, September 23, 2005, 11:58:36 Quote from: "Dave Blackcurrant" Then he needs to show his talent, because its times like these our supposed better players need to pick the team up by their bootstraps and get them playing well. Bar Southend, He hasnt been that bad but I dont suppose you were at Tranmere or Walsall?? Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: McLovin on Friday, September 23, 2005, 13:09:19 I was at Wallsall, my old man was at Tranmere. We share similar views.
Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: santini on Friday, September 23, 2005, 13:21:16 Migz and Whalley are not having the impact on the game that we need. Both seem content to lay off short passes to the side when what we need is decisive forward passes or movement.
We cannot afford the luxury of both in the same side. In fact I'd replace them both with Heath and Wells. Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: McLovin on Friday, September 23, 2005, 13:25:32 I agreed with Sanini (as i usually do) until he mentioned Wells. Not that i disagree, but i don't really know much about him. Heath needs to play more IMO.
Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: DV on Friday, September 23, 2005, 15:21:33 Quote from: "Dave Blackcurrant" I was at Wallsall You were? :shock: Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: Spud on Friday, September 23, 2005, 15:24:12 All i know is Heath should start and Collins shouldnt even be on the bench.
Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: Leggett on Friday, September 23, 2005, 15:29:34 but where would you put heath? not on the left, leave nicolau on the left cos he actually possesesessesses (sp?) a left peg, and shakes has to start!
Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: le god cuervo on Friday, September 23, 2005, 15:38:32 if king wants to save his bacon he should go all out to win the game with a 4-3-3 (thats 4-3-3, not 4-5-1!!!). makes sense with the amount of strikers & attacking midfielders we have.
-------------heaton--------- jenks--ohanlon--ifil--smith heath------migz------pook roberts---fallon---thorpe bench: bulman, collins, whalley, shakes, nicolau Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: Spud on Friday, September 23, 2005, 15:38:39 Heath in the centre with Migz, Whalley hasnt done anything, Nicolau on the left, Shakes on the Right, Fallon and Roberts up front.
Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: Leggett on Friday, September 23, 2005, 15:41:56 cuervo, i agree. go out to win the fucking, not draw. i'd rather go down fighting than playing shitty defensive football, when the team blatantly has no real decent defense!!!
Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: Spud on Friday, September 23, 2005, 15:44:46 If we start with 4-5-1 then im going to consider going back down the steps of the Nationwide stand and watching Soccer Saturday on the tv screens.
Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: RappersDelight on Friday, September 23, 2005, 16:06:59 Quote from: "Dave Blackcurrant" I was at Wallsall,. no you weren't! Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: Dazzza on Friday, September 23, 2005, 16:30:34 Code:
I'm not entirely happy with the central pair of Migs and Whalley unless Migs takes up more of a defensive role like he's done rather well on occasions. That said I’d just fucking go for it if I were King he can’t keep a clean sheet so he may as well go out there all guns blazing in a make or break game. Bradford have a few defensive concerns including Rickets (out) so I don’t see much point in being lean trying to get forward. Please for the love of god I hope he uses his two wide players. They may not be consistently effective to date but both are coming in from having not played first team football and need to play games to settle. On form both have looked to be potentially great players. I’d stick with Thorpe up front again he’s another that would benefit from a bit of consistency and a run in the team rather than being swapped every other week, which for a striker is not the greatest of confidence builders. Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: adje on Friday, September 23, 2005, 16:54:18 I just dont know any more
Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: Spud on Friday, September 23, 2005, 17:55:12 Please dont start Thorpe!.
Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: DV on Friday, September 23, 2005, 18:31:07 Quote from: "RappersDelight" Quote from: "Dave Blackcurrant" I was at Wallsall,. no you weren't! Ha, didnt think so MUST.....START.....ROBERTS He has that bit of confidence and arrogance we are lacking. He is a man who isnt scared to take a man on.... Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: adje on Saturday, September 24, 2005, 18:32:37 Shakes?Nicolau?-injured?
Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: Kinky Tom on Saturday, September 24, 2005, 18:34:29 Quote from: "adje" Shakes?Nicolau?-injured? God only knows pal. :roll: Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: adje on Saturday, September 24, 2005, 18:37:48 For fucks sake!Our two natural wide players and they're not even on the bench at home?
Title: Team V Bradford City Post by: Spud on Sunday, September 25, 2005, 00:30:24 Quote from: "adje" For fucks sake!Our two natural wide players and they're not even on the bench at home? Says it all about the man in charge! :roll: |