Thetownend.com

What an absolute twat Suarez is.

Ivanovich must have some self-restraint - I would have laid the cunt out if he had bitten me

Disgraceful player

He cheats, he dives, he'll eat your arms and thighs - Louis Suarez - Louis Suarez.

heh, heh!

Bet he wouldn't have bitten him if he was black...

Hopefully Brendan Rogers will be sensible about it and dock him pay/think of some form of humiliating punishment. He's not going to suspend him, no manager would do that.

Ivanovich could of course sue him. The fact they were playing football doesn't stop it from being a physical attack. Attempted Bodily harm?

Player of the year, Fuck Off

Lock him up then deport him.

If he was a dog he'd be put down.

Ajax did suspend him before he was later banned for 7 games for doing the same thing 3 years ago.  Given that and other recent disciplinary issues, you'd hope a sizeable ban would be put in place, several months worth at least.

Human rights act probably negates than course of action.

He's a fucking brilliant footballer, him being a cunt just makes it more interesting. Got big enough teeth to sink in aint he

Could Ivanovich sue if he gets Rabies?

Perhaps he'd settle for a tetanus jab after the game...

 :)

Fantastic role model!

It annoys me that these highly paid footballers are allowed to act so anti-socially. If I were to bite someone at work I'd lose my job - Why doesn't the same happen to footballers? Yes, I know, Man City or another big club would come along and buy him.

Why can't people like Suarez, Terry etc be 'black-balled' and just fade into oblivion?

Having already been banned for 7 games for biting an opponent, and 8 games for racially abusing an opponent how many games will he be banned for this time.

For me, anything less than 10 will mean he has got off lightly.
Personally I would double the 7 games he got for doing it last time.

I think this behavivour should be encouraged. Maybe give him 7 extra games?

Nah. He didn't draw blood.

Rewards should only be given after blood has been drawn.

Only just seen it on MOTD2.  Pretty unbelievable, like watching a toddler trying to get a toy back from another toddler.

Bang goes any chance of Player of the year and another ban coming.  Twat.

Perhaps its customary to do this in Uruguay? Or he was kissing him? What a bloody footballer mind  :)

Must have been hungry during the game and fancied some human meat! What a knob end he is! Not sure he'll get a ban, as didn't realise Jermain Defoe did the same thing to Javier Mascherano in 2006-no ban or fine!

If he looks like a donkey, kicks like a donkey and bites like a donkey, then it's safe to say the bloke is a fucking donkey.  

My mrs summed him up nicely... 'Is that bloke fucking retarded or what?'

Times have changed, that would have been a straight red if the ref say it today.

Will be interesting to see how the FA punish Suarez. Can't see it being anything less than a 3 game red but take his previous ban for the same offence, the racism ban, his general conduct and the bad publicity it has generated and who knows. Could see it being 8 games or more.

Liverpool really need to get rid of him. They always go on about their club philosophy and he's making a mockery of it.

With Defoe the ref saw it and awarded a yellow card, therefore retrospective action can't be taken. With Suarez the ref didn't see it so retrospective action can be taken...I'll be surprised if doesn't get a lengthy ban. Plus Defoe didn't have previous...

[url width=344 height=300]http://i934.photobucket.com/albums/ad185/swindon123/Scouser02_zps932a8914.jpg (http://s934.photobucket.com/user/swindon123/media/Scouser02_zps932a8914.jpg.html)[/URL]

Sadly Suarez wont ever have to worry about work.

Ha ha. He's fucked....reckon "clearly insufficient" means a good few more than 3....

 :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: Careful though, we don't want a repeat of the window lickers thread.

10 game ban.

Bit harsh

Especially when Defoe did the same thing and only got a yellow!

Cue another saga

Did he not have a few extra games suspended from one of his previous offenses? Imagine that has something to do with it.

Didn't that lunatic Thatcher get less than that for deliberately hospitalising Pedro Mendes?

Considering it wasn't career threatening, like some of the near leg breakers we see quite regularly, it is harsh. But I guess being bitten isn't your usual football hazard, whereas being on the end of a two-footed lunge is par for the course.

Having been banned for 7 games for doing the same thing before, they could hardly make it less.

Think this is what did for him. The FA would have looked right twats if they were seen as more lenient than the Dutch.

Disappointed with the statement from Liverpool, seems they still haven't learnt from the fiasco around the racism case.

No one's going to sack a multi million pound player but Liverpool should have banned him for 5 games themselves and fined him - instead they continue to prefer to trash their own reputation with their pathetic backing of their own players.  How difficult is it not to bite an opponent?

I realise that Liverpool are not the only club that would do this, but this tribalism bollocks really fucks me off. Of course he deserves to be banned, and he was never going to get anything shorter than what he did last time. Frankly as a second offense for biting and the second time in a year he's been in serious disciplinary trouble he's lucky it isn't 10 months.

I don't care how exquisitely talented you are (and he is) you can't just be a total psychopath. A bad tackle is clearly to be frowned upon but will occasionally happen in football from clumsiness. Biting someone unprovoked is just ludicrous and needs an exemplary punishment.

Knocking the little fuckers teeth out with a stray elbow would do the job fine....like to see him try gumming Terry at Stamford Bridge.

To those who say, "but 'x' did a career threatening challenge and only got a 5 game ban" I would say this:

Person A commits one crime, a pretty serious one, but has an otherwise unblemished record and he gets 5 years.

Person B is frequently in trouble, nothing too awful and nothing as bad as person A, but he keeps getting the odd six months here and year there, but despite being given countless chances just does not seem to learn or change his ways.  Eventually he does the courts lose patience and throw the book at him and give him 10 years.

Is it wrong person B got a longer sentence than person A? Personally, I don's think so.

In summary, I think they should burn the cunt at the stake, but only after pulling all his fingernails out.

In some ways I hope Liverpool appeal against the ban, and that they add a few more games for a frivolous appeal.

It's football not the streets stop being a melodramatic cunt

Fuck off you cock juggling thunder cunt, I wasn't being melodramatic but merely observing that multiple offences are worthy of a more severe punishment than a single infraction.

im surprised the fucker doesnt get in more trouble outside football

I doubt he goes out in public much here. The man is hated by half the country.

That's only because the other half doesnt really care

Ban is fine but the the FA missed a trick here. What is required after this is the confirmed safety of other players, the ridicule and punishment of Suarez sufficient to deter him from doing it again, and entertainment of the football watching public.... so why not just make him wear a Hannibal Lecter mask for the whole of next season ?