Title: John Bostock Post by: Flashheart on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 14:55:13 Who? What? Eh?
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Bogus Dave on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 14:57:02 He came through at palace, played for them really young then went to spurs and dissappeared. Would be the Ferry-like play people have been asking for
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: london_red on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 14:57:58 Attacking midfielder who was highly touted as a youngster. He was the one who had scouts from Barcelona watching him when he was about 15 playing for Crystal Palace's reserves.
Played a few times for Shef Weds on loan earlier in the season. Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: bigbobjoylove on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 14:58:11 Yeah, not sure why the Adver called him a defender. He's an attacking midfield player.
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Bogus Dave on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 14:58:29 Looking at his career, has a whiff of a samba about him.
Oooohhhh so negative Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: gingernuggets on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 14:59:09 He was amazing as a kid but hasn't hit his full potential yet and has been shipped out on loan all over the place. Shows touches of genius still though, see goal on debut for Hull.
Was touted as future England regular 4/5 years ago. Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: LJ9 on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:01:07 28 games in 5 years.
Mate, who is a Spurs fan, says he's a poor Jermaine Pennant. If he does the business though. I won't be complaining Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: LucienSanchez on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:02:53 At our level, he'd be more than decent (if his attitude was up to scratch, not that i have any reason to suggest it wouldn't be...)
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: phelpsieboy on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:04:05 Would be a quality signing at this level!
Has performed well in Championship for Hull and done decent for Wednesday in league one Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: bigbobjoylove on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:05:00 I thought we were close to the wage cap before bringing Jay whathisname and this guy? Are we using Wembley money for these 2?
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Peter Venkman on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:05:27 Very highly rated sometimes goes missing in games, may well stand out at this level.
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Swindon Please Win on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:08:44 I thought we were close to the wage cap before bringing Jay whathisname and this guy? Are we using Wembley money for these 2? Obviously Magera was on a decent amount. Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Flashheart on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:09:54 Perhaps this lad is another one we are looking at for next season then?
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Chubbs on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:11:12 very highly rated as a 15/16yr old, made the move to the big time a bit too soon and didnt get his break through, think he'd still do a job at Swindon.
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Spud on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:13:48 I refuse to comment until someone has uploaded a screenshot of his FM stats.
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: jayohaitchenn on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:15:31 FUCKING BANG
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXCCIkJsnKI Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: suttonred on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:19:35 jeez that is a goal.
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: kaufman on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:19:57 I'll see your bang and......
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zjXWSP4pWc (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zjXWSP4pWc) Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: jayohaitchenn on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:20:55 Oooooo he's fucking hit that well.
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Weasel on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:22:47 Worried about “Not as much effort as Leon Clarke” bit.
http://www.owlsonline.com/?page=forum&thread_id=23253 (http://www.owlsonline.com/?page=forum&thread_id=23253) Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Batch on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:23:22 Are we assembling the Galacticos del League 2?
That said, the Wendies don't rate his attitude one bit. Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Boeta on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:26:30 he's obviously got a fair amount of ability and he won't last long under the great man if he doesn't put the yards in
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Flashheart on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:30:11 Not too shabby
[url width=800 height=600]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v490/jamiethon/Bostock.jpg[/url] Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: suttonred on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:33:04 Are we assembling the Galacticos del League 2? That said, the Wendies don't rate his attitude one bit. I reckon he's on last chance alley. If paolo can't knock him into shape, then he'd best get his burger flipping skills up to scratch, would be my take on it. Clearly talented but too much too early possibly. Wasn't he the kid that went for several million when he was 15 or 16? Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Chubbs on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:34:45 That said, the Wendies don't rate his attitude one bit. Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Langers on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:36:47 Saw him play a couple of times for Palace when he first got in their team, he looked a real talent.
More of a Ferry than a Smith/Risser/Cox, reckon he would do a great job at this level. Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: DRS on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:38:44 Wednesday fans don't rate fucking anyone do they.
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: phelpsieboy on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:41:30 Wednesday fans are deluded, they actually think Prutton is decent and rather him on the bench than Bostock :doh:
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Baggins on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:43:39 Wednesday fans are deluded, they actually think Prutton is decent and rather him on the bench than Bostock :doh: Its a fact that some players do well at some clubs and badly at others. Charlton didn't rate Benson. Southend really rate Timlin. Many decent clubs did rate Prutton - I'm fairly sure he is a decent player, and it just didn't work out here. Same for (and I'm sure I'll be banned for this) Jamie Cureton. Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: SuggWillSugg MBE on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 15:47:26 So the way I see it, he's a Simon Ferry that can score goals? (and some pretty special ones at that!)
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Dirk Diggler on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 16:10:32 Just spoke to my mate who is a Sheff Wed STH. He said that he didn't really shine however they did play him on the wing. He says that its obvious that he is a centre mid.
I think that this could be a fantastic player at this level. What is does suggest is the quality of player that we are attracting is, for this level, and to parapraise, the great man "Amazing!" Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: SuggWillSugg MBE on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 16:16:16 Tottenham midfielder John Bostock has joined Swindon until the end of the season #stfc
From Gary Rose. Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: tj2002 on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 16:24:28 Really excited about this signing. Clearly got/had something a bit special and if Paolo can sort him out we could have a real player at this level
Title: Re: Re: John Bostock Post by: Batch on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 16:26:55 Maybe I'm stating the obvious but it seems to me we are scouting, trialling and recruiting with next season in mind already.
Just to be clear this seems good to me! Also strengthens us for the run in too and keeps everyone on their toes. Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: phelpsieboy on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 16:27:22 These two signings today show the Paolo factor
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: kerry red on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 16:29:44 Hopefully, it also shows that, come what may, PdC will be here next season to oversee these players
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Flashheart on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 16:33:25 Are we not getting ahead of ourselves think Bostock will be here next season?
There's been no suggestion of it turning permanent. How highly do spurs value him? Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: magicroundabout on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 16:38:43 do we really need bostock? we've fucking loads of players!
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Peter Venkman on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 16:39:13 Are we not getting ahead of ourselves think Bostock will be here next season? He won't be here permanently next season I very much doubt, but this will set him up for a season long loan next year if it works out well for both parties.There's been no suggestion of it turning permanent. How highly do spurs value him? Harry has said in the past he does rate him and thats good, I think we onlt have him because of Paolos friendship with Harry. Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Flashheart on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 16:39:39 do we really need bostock? we've fucking loads of players! Yes. We don't have cover for Ferry (until now) Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Saxondale on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 16:40:43 The extension to the dressing room is the first stage of the CG redevelopment.
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Peter Venkman on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 16:42:02 Lots of defensive midfielders but as Mr Flashheart says we have no attacking midfielders in the squad as back up for Ferry, and its a long run in to the title we need as many class players in as we can get.
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 16:42:56 As long as the wage budget supports it, we could have a squad of 100 for all I care.
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: tans on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 16:50:58 Bodin gone to crewe
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Flashheart on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 16:55:57 Bodin gone to crewe Torquay fans will be well pissed off Did Bodin extend his contract here? Title: Re: Re: Re: John Bostock Post by: Frigby Daser on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 16:57:09 Bodin gone to crewe Can only be to free up funds for Bostock. Lure him for next year. There can't be plans to ship him out, can there? Shame he won't be at Wembley. Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: bigbobjoylove on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 16:57:20 http://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/sport/sportlatest/9608289.Bodin_heads_to_Crewe/
Yep. That's annoying. He's better than the French bloke who was pointlessly signed. Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 16:58:59 Bostock was supposed to be the saviour of English football when Spurs stole him from Palace...so I was interested to see him playing for an England Under something or other a year or so ago...he was terrible, well in a sort of not living up to the big billing way. Should have stayed at Palace...
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Langers on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 17:03:44 I thought Bodin would have been involved quite a bit for us for the rest of the season.
I reckon it is all part of PDC's master plan to keep Oxford in league 2... Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Spud on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 17:04:25 http://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/sport/sportlatest/9608289.Bodin_heads_to_Crewe/ Yep. That's annoying. He's better than the French bloke who was pointlessly signed. This. I know we shouldn't judge a player after one start and a couple of sub appearances, but I am a Swindon fan and thats what we do. Just don't think he'll be good enough for League One next season. Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Spud on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 17:12:06 Long shots 15......SHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT!
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Nemo on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 17:12:17 Bloody hell, he was meant to be shit hot a few years ago.
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: TheMajorSTFC on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 17:18:47 So both Bostock and McEviley are available on Sunday...would you play them if you were Paolo?
Tricky decision, although reading his adver column he suggests he will pick the best team available. Maybe a bit harsh but I'd back him whatever team he picks! Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Flashheart on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 17:19:34 Long shots 15......SHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT! Long shots 15----> Player instructions ----> Long shots ----> often Dribbling 15 ----> Player instructions ----> Run with ball ----> often Creativity & passing 13 ----> Team instructions ----> Set as play maker Workrate 7 ----> Training ----> Send to Paolo Di Canio Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Batch on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 17:22:51 So both Bostock and McEviley are available on Sunday...would you play them if you were Paolo? Nope, but I'm not. a) They haven't earned the right. b) The haven't played for us yet. Why risk unbalancing the team while they learn our system at Wembley., Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: stfctownenda on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 17:34:40 Can only be to free up funds for Bostock. Lure him for next year. There can't be plans to ship him out, can there? Shame he won't be at Wembley. Bodin was cup tied for Wembley anyway so he couldn't of played. Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: @MacPhlea on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 17:35:12 http://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/sport/sportlatest/9608289.Bodin_heads_to_Crewe/ Yep. That's annoying. He's better than the French bloke who was pointlessly signed. Paolo's last role of the dice to derail Oxfords play off ambitions? Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Barry Scott on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 17:39:48 Paolo's last role of the dice to derail Oxfords play off ambitions? Or part of the deal to bring in Nick Howell? :) Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Flashheart on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 18:02:53 Bostock did intimate at the end of his interview he could be here next season
He's surprisingly articulate for a footballer Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 18:06:05 Harry has clearly done Paolo a favour here. Apparently other clubs from L1 were interested. He comes with good rep but it seems his attitude might be poor. Hopefully he does the business here though.
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: leefer on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 18:14:15 Owls fans didn't rate him,lets hope he does the biz.....in league 1!
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 18:15:37 Harry has clearly done Paolo a favour here. Apparently other clubs from L1 were interested. He comes with good rep but it seems his attitude might be poor. Hopefully he does the business here though. To name all the players used this season, is going to be one hell of a pub quiz question....I used to be able to do T*dd/King's 36 from 00-01....which I think the record.....I'd suppose I could do this season, but would most likely fal asleep before the end. Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Only Me on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 18:27:37 The extension to the dressing room is the first stage of the CG redevelopment. :clap: Title: Re: Re: John Bostock Post by: Frigby Daser on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 18:36:10 Smith
Foderingham Lanzano Caddis Thompson Flint Mccormack Devera Boateng Comazzi Cibocchi Risser Ridealgh Kennedy Ritchie Esajas Gabilondo Holmes Rooney De Vita Timlin Ferry Smith, J Cox Jervis Montano Clarke Benson Tehouhe Connell Murray Bodin Kerrouche Magera Storey Bostock (no appearances) McEveley (no appearances) That's dealt with that train journey...35 so far...if Timlin played (not sure). Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 18:44:59 Timlin played the first game of the season so he's on the list.
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: ronnie21 on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 19:02:48 Nope, but I'm not. I don't know about unbalancing the team, I thik it would not be a good move for the sake of the morale amongst the players who have got us there. Feed them in as and when - no problem, but not on Sunday.a) They haven't earned the right. b) The haven't played for us yet. Why risk unbalancing the team while they learn our system at Wembley., Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: STFC_Manc on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 19:13:58 Smith Foderingham Lanzano Caddis Thompson Flint Mccormack Devera Boateng Comazzi Cibocchi Risser Ridealgh Kennedy Ritchie Esajas Gabilondo Holmes Rooney De Vita Timlin Ferry Smith, J Cox Jervis Montano Clarke Benson Tehouhe Connell Murray Bodin Kerrouche Magera Storey Bostock (no appearances) McEveley (no appearances) That's dealt with that train journey...35 so far...if Timlin played (not sure). You missed Ahmed Abdulla Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Raffia De Vito on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 19:17:32 The younger Thompson played at Leicester as well, come on pull your finger out!
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Gnasher on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 19:18:40 Bodin gone to crewe I just can't believe Bodin's behind Murray and Tallulah. Still, we mustn't criticise :zipped: Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Coca Fola on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 19:21:15 Fantastic signing. Paolo owes 'Arry.
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: fittons_coaching_badge on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 19:22:57 Once again I feel compelled to ask ..... How are affording all this?
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: DV on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 19:23:07 Am I the only one who is a bit meh about this.
Bostock is slowly working his way down the leagues and Bodin has been playing well, I suppose as long as its to get Bodin first team football and not us trying to get rid... Has Bodin played enough to get a winners medal? shame if he hasnt because he's scored a few vital goals. Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Baggins on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 19:29:01 Smith Foderingham Lanzano Caddis Thompson Flint Mccormack Devera Boateng Comazzi Cibocchi Risser Ridealgh Kennedy Ritchie Esajas Gabilondo Holmes Rooney De Vita Timlin Ferry Smith, J Cox Jervis Montano Clarke Benson Tehouhe Connell Murray Bodin Kerrouche Magera Storey Bostock (no appearances) McEveley (no appearances) That's dealt with that train journey...35 so far...if Timlin played (not sure). On a different thread I got this far: 38? Who have I missed? 1. Lanzano 2. P Smith 3. Foderingham 4. Kennedy 5. Ridehalgh 6. Cibocchi 7. Comazzi 8. Devera 9. Flint 10. McCormack 11. Risser 12. Caddis 13. Cox 14. Ritchie 15. Ferry 16. J Smith 17. Rooney 18. Bodin 19. De Vita 20. Holmes 21. Benson 22. Connell 23. Tehoue 24. Gabilondo 25. Timlin 26. Thompson 27. Esajas 28. Clarke 29. Magera 30. Murray 31. Abdulla 32. Kerrouche 33. Jervis 34. Montano 35. Boateng Title: Re: Re: Re: John Bostock Post by: Batch on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 19:30:51 I don't know about unbalancing the team, I meant unsettle as in new players with no settling on period. Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: DV on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 19:34:06 http://swindon-town-fc.co.uk/Squad.asp?Current=YES&Season=2011-2012
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Processed Beats on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 19:50:53 Bizarre.
Great potential but massive ego and terrible attitude is what I'm hearing but, as we all know, if anyone can get the best out of a player, then it's Paolo. Hope Bostock really takes his chance here; I'm sure he'll have heard about what happened to Clarke and to a lesser extent Montano, so he'll definitely have to be on his toes and up for making an impact. At the very least, it gives us some form of cover for Ferry who we really have become too reliant on. As for Bodin, I honestly can't understand this one. The Torquay move did him the world of good and he came back with some good League Two experience and chomping at the bit to be involved here. Paolo didn't let him return there because he wanted him involved here, yet he's readily let him go to Crewe when, in my opinion, he offers us something more significant up front than both Tehoue and Murray. Either way, I hope this temporary move is exactly that: temporary. Massive, massive potential to be a star and would like him to be here next season. Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: leefer on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 19:56:56 Or maybe he saw Torquays climb up the table as a bit of a threat....with Bodin,s goals doing the damage as the reason he didn't go back to Torquay.
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Flashheart on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 20:18:58 Did Billy extend his contract here?
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: fittons_coaching_badge on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 20:23:36 Did Billy extend his contract here? Dont think so, still at the talks stage. I wouldnt be at all surprised if he went in the summer which would be a real shame. Really though this 55% wage cap ...... I am guessing there a million and one ways around it, or the finance director is creative in the extreme? Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: suttonred on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 20:37:48 Bizarre. Great potential but massive ego and terrible attitude is what I'm hearing but, as we all know, if anyone can get the best out of a player, then it's Paolo. Hope Bostock really takes his chance here; I'm sure he'll have heard about what happened to Clarke and to a lesser extent Montano, so he'll definitely have to be on his toes and up for making an impact. At the very least, it gives us some form of cover for Ferry who we really have become too reliant on. As for Bodin, I honestly can't understand this one. The Torquay move did him the world of good and he came back with some good League Two experience and chomping at the bit to be involved here. Paolo didn't let him return there because he wanted him involved here, yet he's readily let him go to Crewe when, in my opinion, he offers us something more significant up front than both Tehoue and Murray. Either way, I hope this temporary move is exactly that: temporary. Massive, massive potential to be a star and would like him to be here next season. I read the other day in the FL paper that Swansea have been looking at BB. Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Barry Scott on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 20:39:23 I just watched his interview and he seems like a nice bloke, who comes across as level headed, with no arrogance or attitude. I think he's going to fit in well.
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: kerry red on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 20:46:57 Maybe Bodin is going to Crewe so they can run the rule over him as a possible player+cash move for Nick Powell in the summer - would need to be a shed-load of cash, though
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Flashheart on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 21:04:13 We won't get Powell
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Processed Beats on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 21:05:51 We won't get Powell Agree. Will be off to a Premiership or Championship side in the Summer. Looked quality both on the opening day of the season and on Saturday. Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: sonicyouth on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 21:32:06 [url width=320 height=256]http://www.swindontownfc.co.uk/javaImages/f8/49/0,,10341~10635768,00.jpg[/url]
what's going on with that beard? Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Flashheart on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 21:33:23 He loves Jesus...
No, really. He really really loves Jesus. I am not kidding Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: gingernuggets on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 22:52:36 He's not shy in saying that Sheff Wednesday love their hoofball. Comes across pretty well, if he gets stuck in he could be class for us.
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: penhill red on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 22:56:34 Didnt Simon Jordan quit Palace because of his disbelief at the amount the tribunal agreed Spurs should pay Palace for the at the time very highly rated John Bostock?
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Swindon Please Win on Thursday, March 22, 2012, 23:54:30 I would assume him and Foderingham know each other, both coming up the youth ranks at Crystal Palace at similar times, hopefully will help him settle and if he does well hopefully Wes can have a little word.
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: cheltred69 on Friday, March 23, 2012, 00:03:25 I would assume him and Foderingham know each other, both coming up the youth ranks at Crystal Palace at similar times, hopefully will help him settle and if he does well hopefully Wes can have a little word. He left Palace a couple of years before Wes joined from Fulham. Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Dirk Diggler on Friday, March 23, 2012, 05:50:30 Wes has already intimated on twitter that he knows "my man John Bostock" and is asking that STFC fans follow him. Suggests that they know each other well.
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: tans on Friday, March 23, 2012, 07:09:31 Yeah on wednesday bostock tweeted him asking for his number as he needed to speak to him urgently
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Gnasher on Friday, March 23, 2012, 10:09:45 We could have a team with the longest necks in the football league. Giraffe Town FC.
[url width=478 height=359]http://www.thisisswindontownfc.co.uk/resources/images/1948382/?type=articleLandscape[/url] [url width=468 height=286]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/01/08/article-2083922-0F5E6AF600000578-758_468x286.jpg[/url] Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: pericarp on Friday, March 23, 2012, 12:17:39 My spurs supporting friend says he properly sick.
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Batch on Friday, March 23, 2012, 12:18:28 My spurs supporting friend says he properly sick. Has he tried lemsip? Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: SuggWillSugg MBE on Friday, March 23, 2012, 12:18:59 Calpol?
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: Ardiles on Friday, March 23, 2012, 12:23:45 So we're signing a crock?!
Brilliant. Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: bobby barnes jink on Friday, March 23, 2012, 12:31:15 We could have a team with the longest necks in the football league. Giraffe Town FC. [url width=478 height=359]http://www.thisisswindontownfc.co.uk/resources/images/1948382/?type=articleLandscape[/url] [url width=468 height=286]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/01/08/article-2083922-0F5E6AF600000578-758_468x286.jpg[/url] Couldn't agree more. I think we need to sign Gladstone Small to even things up. Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: kerry red on Friday, March 23, 2012, 12:59:38 . . . and Mary, Queen of Scots
Title: Re: John Bostock Post by: donkey on Friday, March 23, 2012, 22:13:21 Charles I. A short arse before the head incident.
|