|
Title: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: Navyred stfc on Thursday, March 8, 2012, 19:36:37 :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:
Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: 69 er on Thursday, March 8, 2012, 19:44:14 Oxford for me,3 sided shit ground, shit history, shit fans, this is the right level for them
Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: Ralphy on Thursday, March 8, 2012, 19:51:07 If this is a serious question then Cheltenham without doubt.
They average about 2,500 to 3,000 while 2nd in the league. Never been higher than League 1 and are traditionally a non league side. Oxford are a bigger club with bigger support and have played in the top flight. Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: Dozno9 on Thursday, March 8, 2012, 19:51:56 How Cheltenham have been in the football league for this long God only knows.
Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: cheltred69 on Thursday, March 8, 2012, 19:52:41 Depends what you mean by tinpot.
Cheltenham are a small local club and know they are - for them going up to League 1 is over-performing. Most of their fans recognise that they are a solid well run club recently established in the league, are fine with that and don't pretend anything more. not tinpot. Oxford, on the other hand, have delusions of grandeur, probably based on the mild success funded by the crook Maxwell Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: leefer on Thursday, March 8, 2012, 20:08:26 Cheltenham to me are a good club.
They have shown how a non league side coming into the league should be run. No extravagance and though not a hotbed of football have a loyal hardcore of fans,nothing tinpot about that in my eyes. Yep,there are a lot of clubs in the lower league who could look at Cheltenham and learn a bit. Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: Exiled Bob on Thursday, March 8, 2012, 20:15:24 Yep, can't argue with that cheltred. Oxford fans really do come across as halfwits that believe their rightful place is somewhere in the upper echelons of the League (although it's probably best not to talk about success being founded on crookedness considering what happened to Swindon after our 1st promotion to the Premier League).
I've got no problem with Cheltenham anyway. Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: Bewster on Thursday, March 8, 2012, 20:20:00 This thread is tinpot
Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: Ƭ̵̬̊: The Artist Formerly Known as CWIG on Thursday, March 8, 2012, 20:25:25 Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: chalkies_shorts on Thursday, March 8, 2012, 20:44:27 Cheltenham are a bunch of non entities whereas the Scum are a bunch of cunts. Both tinpot in their own ways.
Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: Chubbs on Thursday, March 8, 2012, 21:08:45 boring
Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: Nemo on Thursday, March 8, 2012, 21:18:49 Is this the kettle calling the pot tin?
Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: Baggins on Thursday, March 8, 2012, 22:10:55 Is this the kettle calling the pot tin? Indeed it is. Two small clubs, being discussed by fans of a slightly bigger club. A bit silly really. Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: Freddies Ferret on Thursday, March 8, 2012, 22:20:21 who.....fucking.....cares?????
Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: hobnob on Thursday, March 8, 2012, 23:06:03 who.....fucking.....cares????? SecondedTitle: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: Saxondale on Thursday, March 8, 2012, 23:10:21 Fuck me we're turning into Leeds fans.
Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: Barry Scott on Thursday, March 8, 2012, 23:19:09 Yawn.
Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: Ironside on Thursday, March 8, 2012, 23:32:50 I've had a shit in both Cheltenham and Oxford.
Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: DRS on Friday, March 9, 2012, 00:05:45 Is that the Cheltenham and Oxford who have both beat us this season
Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: reeves4england on Friday, March 9, 2012, 00:19:55 I thought more of the TEF. Glad to see others share my dismay.
Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: Barry Scott on Friday, March 9, 2012, 00:24:04 I thought more of the TEF. Glad to see others share my dismay. :nod: It's a cringey thread. Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Friday, March 9, 2012, 07:57:48 :nod: It's a cringey thread. Agreed 100%Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: MarkyTee on Friday, March 9, 2012, 09:37:06 Fuck me we're turning into Leeds fans. That was my first thought on reading the title of the thread. Remember how annoying as fuck they were? Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: Benzel on Friday, March 9, 2012, 11:28:51 We're all in League Two.
Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: MarkyTee on Friday, March 9, 2012, 11:29:59 True that
Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: Ralphy on Friday, March 9, 2012, 11:38:27 I thought more of the TEF. Glad to see others share my dismay. I think this thread is rather tongue in cheek. Title: Re: Who's more tinpot Cheltenham or Oxford? Let's discuss.... Post by: 4D on Friday, March 9, 2012, 12:05:46 I think this thread is rather tongue in cheek. More "head up arse" Ralphster :D |