|
Title: Signatures Post by: BrightonRed on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 15:07:28 Not sure if anyone agrees with me here, but I think we should avoid having large pictures or animations for signatures. Anyone who browses www.otib.co.uk will know just how shit they can look when peole fill their signature with large pictures.
I find them really distracting when reading the threads... Any chance we could have a size restriction (as with the avatars) and maybe a no animation rule? or am I just being a forum Nazi? http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y98/trebblej82/Nazi_Smiley.gif Title: Signatures Post by: Kinky Tom on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 15:09:53 I don't like the big pictures as sigs either really BR - you're not alone.
Title: Signatures Post by: reeves4england on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 15:11:29 I don't like large pictures, but don't want to lose my smiley animation signature!!!
Title: Signatures Post by: Kinky Tom on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 15:12:51 That's fine R4E - it's small enough to not notice it, if you see what I mean.
Title: Signatures Post by: Piemonte on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 15:23:15 Quote from: "Kinky Tom" - it's small enough to not notice it, if you see what I mean. thats what my mrs said when i stuck it up the wrong 'un :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: Title: Signatures Post by: Kinky Tom on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 15:25:18 Wicked PM - good to have you back on board.
Title: Signatures Post by: magicroundabout on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 15:33:23 mine is ok
Title: Signatures Post by: Leggett on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 16:48:10 :cry: :( do i get exemption because of Cam's fit arse?
Title: Signatures Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 16:54:23 I'd agree.....when you get one of those I just scroll up and don't bother reading it, because its annoying, which is a shame because if someone takes the trouble to post I'll take the trouble to read it, no matter the drivel level.
Title: Re: Signatures Post by: sonicyouth on Thursday, June 30, 2005, 21:11:53 Quote from: "BrightonRed" Not sure if anyone agrees with me here, but I think we should avoid having large pictures or animations for signatures. Anyone who browses www.otib.co.uk will know just how shit they can look when peole fill their signature with large pictures. I find them really distracting when reading the threads... Any chance we could have a size restriction (as with the avatars) and maybe a no animation rule? or am I just being a forum Nazi? http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y98/trebblej82/Nazi_Smiley.gif I hate large and/or animated sigs, so I agree with you there - I'll use my discretion, anything ridiculously large I'll remove myself. Sigs the size of magicroundabout's is absolutely fine and Leggett's is alright as well, as far as I'm concerned. Title: Signatures Post by: Leggett on Friday, July 1, 2005, 13:03:52 :soapy tit wank: result!!!
Title: Signatures Post by: le god cuervo on Friday, July 1, 2005, 15:14:11 what about my new one?
can make it a bit smaller if need be but to be honest its no worse than leggett's or tails' its not as gay as the oitb one's - they have about 4 massive pics stuck together which is shit. at least i made a bit of effort with mine Title: Signatures Post by: sonicyouth on Friday, July 1, 2005, 16:22:02 that's cool as well 8)
|