Title: New Triallist Post by: DiscoDazR on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 07:49:52 David McNamee, ex Coventry, Plymouth and 4 Scotland caps.
Defender...playing for the ressies at Swansea today Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Cookie on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 07:51:37 Yeah, another McNamee, I hope he can do stepovers
Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Samdy Gray on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 07:57:11 He's another fullback isn't he? What the fuck do we need yet another fullback for?
Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 07:58:33 Yes, he's a right-back
Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Samdy Gray on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 07:59:25 We're going to end up playing 6-3-1 at this rate.
Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Sippo on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 08:00:45 I'm confused.
We have amankwaah and caddis, so why the hell do we need another rb? Caddis won't be played on the right wing. What is the reasoning behind this??! Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: A Gent Orange on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 08:06:30 I guess it costs us nothing to have a look. All it takes is one nasty injury and we might need the number of an experienced full-back.
Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Benzel on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 08:33:02 Exactly ^
What's the bloody problem! Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Samdy Gray on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 08:36:11 Too many full backs not enough centre backs, that's the problem.
Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 08:46:51 But we've kept two clean sheets?
</crackstemporarilycovered> Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 08:50:53 Exactly ^ What's the bloody problem! It's more money on a position we don't really need cover for though isn't it Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: magicroundabout on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 08:53:55 whilst cover is good but we desperatly need a CB.
unless this lad can play CB???? don't know anything about him. Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Rodney on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 08:55:43 I'll be keeping an ear out for how he gets on:
http://news.scotsman.com/news/Thug-bites-off-part-of.2376372.jp Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Arriba on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 08:56:51 we really need another full back don't we.
Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: magicroundabout on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 09:00:12 http://www.pafc.co.uk/page/ProfilesDetail/0,,10364~22736,00.html
versatile scottich defender. So maybe he can play CB? Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 09:04:38 Well hes Scottish so he fits the bill for new signings :D
I get the feeling that manks may no longer be in Dannys first team plans. Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 09:07:25 Which would be surprising since he was given a new deal last season.
Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 09:35:02 http://www.pafc.co.uk/page/ProfilesDetail/0,,10364~22736,00.html Don't think he is any taller than Caddis so not a centre half. This a stupid stupid fucking thing he is doing and a total waste of time. There must be about 50 hundred out of contract defenders just doing fuckall he may aswell give them a run out. So if he plays today i assume that will be at Nathan Thompsons expense then will it versatile scottich defender. So maybe he can play CB? Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: iffy on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 10:08:36 Never let a complete absence of facts get in the way of a strong opinion
Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 10:12:28 What facts are they iffy. is he a right back? is he on trial?
Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Batch on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 11:18:55 Does seem to be a right back. Which makes it a little odd as to why we are looking at him. Its only a trial though, may not go anywhere,
http://www.ccfc.co.uk/page/ProfilesDetail/0,,10269~22736,00.html Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: sonicyouth on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 11:19:45 http://www.talksport.co.uk/sports-news/football/football-league/9726/former-watford-skipper-set-shock-wolfsburg-move
Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Foggy on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 12:21:46 Never let a complete absence of facts get in the way of a strong opinion You really are a patronising twat arent you? Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: DV on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 12:28:44 He's 4 inches taller than Caddis, although McNamee only stands at 5' 11.
I assume he has, at some point played centre back in his career? Otherwise this seems like a complete waste of time? Nothing wrong with Kevin Amankwaah. I still think Caddis is a winger and if worst came to worse we've got Nathan Thompson. If McNamee is a right back and nothing but a right back and he did sign - that would give us 4 right backs and 3 centre backs Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: phelpsieboy on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 12:35:31 Might be worth looking at Callum Davenport, had trial at Leeds and didnt get a deal, now playing for his hometown club 6 divisions lower than us to gain fitness, might be worth a punt if wages are cheap
Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Foggy on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 12:38:04 Might be worth looking at Callum Davenport, had trial at Leeds and didnt get a deal, now playing for his hometown club 6 divisions lower than us to gain fitness, might be worth a punt if wages are cheap Might be worth a stab (Sorry Neville) Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: leefer on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 12:39:19 Heard he would give blood for the cause.
Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 12:40:39 We looked at him a month or so back. Dave he has played something like 50 games in the last 5 years .
Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: DV on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 12:43:55 Yep, very injury prone but so was Gr££r before he got here.
Looking at the reserve team line up - I cant quite work out the formation Smith, McNamee, LJF, Evans, Rose, Parsons, Clark, Thompson, Said, O'Brien, Dossevi. I'm not sure if thats 4-5-1 with Thompson Centre Mid?! or 4-4-2 with O'Brien upfront/off the striker or 4-5-1 with Thompson and Rose and wing backs? Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Sippo on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 12:50:40 Might be worth a stab (Sorry Neville) He might not be as sharp mind. Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: suttonred on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 14:00:04 Oh dear, Injured himself in the warmup...
Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 14:16:06 Ah well won't matter we got plenty of fucking cover ;)
Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: sonicyouth on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 17:20:12 Hamstring problem per chance?
Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: LucienSanchez on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 17:27:14 Callum Davenport was a good Championship standard defender, so i'd give him a trial to see if he still has it.
Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Frigby Daser on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 18:34:17 Oh dear, Injured himself in the warmup... The sceptic in me says he was never going to play - why would we waste time looking at another full back? Why, on the other hand, we might want to do an agent a favour by publicising one of his player's availabilty nationally - today Virgin, Sky, BBC, GivemeFootball, Coventry's site, our site, numerous papers etc, all ran stories about a right back who none of us knew was available...get a favour in another player in return... Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 18:50:34 Pardon
Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Frigby Daser on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 19:22:50 Pardon Probably a bit far-fetched, I'll admit. Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: iffy on Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 23:50:21 You really are a patronising twat arent you? Thanks for making my point for me. Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: wacko on Wednesday, September 8, 2010, 10:16:05 well it sounds like we were all really up for signing this guy. I think Davenport would be a good shout
Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: tans on Wednesday, September 8, 2010, 10:21:10 We looked at him a month or so back. Dave he has played something like 50 games in the last 5 years . Who davenport or mcnamee? Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Samdy Gray on Wednesday, September 8, 2010, 10:59:37 Davenport.
Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Power to people on Wednesday, September 8, 2010, 13:01:08 The sceptic in me says he was never going to play - why would we waste time looking at another full back? Why, on the other hand, we might want to do an agent a favour by publicising one of his player's availabilty nationally - today Virgin, Sky, BBC, GivemeFootball, Coventry's site, our site, numerous papers etc, all ran stories about a right back who none of us knew was available...get a favour in another player in return... Can you really see Wilson or Fitton agreeing to do something like this just to stroke an agents ego ? Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: chalkies_shorts on Wednesday, September 8, 2010, 13:07:48 Can you really see Wilson or Fitton agreeing to do something like this just to stroke an agents ego ? Well we took the useless cunt that was Hutchinson on to get Ferry on loanTitle: Re: New Triallist Post by: Frigby Daser on Wednesday, September 8, 2010, 17:06:57 Like I said, I doubt it...stranger things have happened. I remember Wise saying when we got Brezovan that the agent owed him a favour - which would imply clubs help the agents out occasionally, maybe even by helping ship a player off to another club, in return for first refusal on another player.
Remote chance... Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, September 8, 2010, 17:18:50 Well stranger things have happened, particularly as DW has said he hasn't given up on darby. Why would we need 5 RB's?
Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: wheretherealredsare on Wednesday, September 8, 2010, 20:36:08 Well stranger things have happened, particularly as DW has said he hasn't given up on darby. Why would we need 5 RB's? For when we play teams with 5 LM's. Next question. Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: donkey on Thursday, September 9, 2010, 16:45:06 Well stranger things have happened, particularly as DW has said he hasn't given up on darby. Why would we need 5 RB's? So we can get right back in the playoffs. Title: Re: New Triallist Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, September 9, 2010, 20:41:04 Well stranger things have happened, particularly as DW has said he hasn't given up on darby. Why would we need 5 RB's? Spot betting? |