Thetownend.com

25% => The Boardroom => Topic started by: STFCere on Friday, April 30, 2010, 09:14:44



Title: County Ground developers selected
Post by: STFCere on Friday, April 30, 2010, 09:14:44
http://www.thisisswindontownfc.co.uk/news/headlines/8129356.County_Ground_developers_Whittled_down_to_one/

So it looks like Frank Whittle have been chosen as the project managers for the proposed redevelopment of the CG - this is great news...this company has an excellent track record.

however....are we not forgetting something??? Back in the early nineties didnt the chairman want to add a roof to the stratton bank? If i remember correctly this was blocked by a resident whos garden backs onto the stand.

Surely the same problem will arise?


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: DV on Friday, April 30, 2010, 09:23:58
Nope, we got permission for the roof but couldn't afford one.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Samdy Gray on Friday, April 30, 2010, 09:26:32
Deepdale would be a very good model. Relatively cheap at £9.5m too.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Barry Scott on Friday, April 30, 2010, 09:27:00
Nope, we got permission for the roof but couldn't afford one.

Unless the roof is going to have a sprinkler system that rains ice cold water onto opposition fans during winter, i fail to see why we should worry about providing any cover in a stand that away fans use.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: dogs on Friday, April 30, 2010, 09:30:20
Wasn't stratton bank going to be a whole new stand itself, costing around 800k?

As already stated it was granted planning permission, but getting relegated again saw to the end of that. Not sure why the residents would complain anyhow, they have great big trees already covering their gardens.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: pauld on Friday, April 30, 2010, 09:35:25
Good news. Nice to see some positive progress on this and very much looking forward to seeing some sensible plans for a change


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Friday, April 30, 2010, 09:39:17
Nope, we got permission for the roof but couldn't afford one.

This is correct. IIRC I think we still do have planning permission to put a roof on the bank but have never had the money. I think Mark Devlin and the old board were considering putting a temporary roof on the bank but again it came down to the money not being available.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: LucienSanchez on Friday, April 30, 2010, 09:39:48
I really like the Leicester Tigers example


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: jimmy_onions on Friday, April 30, 2010, 09:46:19
I sincerely hope the redevelopment of the home ends takes precedence over those on the away ends. The last thing we need is the away fans in a brand new stand with, most importantly, excellent acoustics, whilst were still stuck in the TE.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Sippo on Friday, April 30, 2010, 09:51:49
Deepdale would be a very good model. Relatively cheap at £9.5m too.

If we got something like Deepdale I would be chuffed to bits.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Peter Venkman on Friday, April 30, 2010, 09:57:30
Deepdale is a nice ground and as stated was cheap to rennovate, and Deepdale was a fucking shithole of a ground before redevelopment, one of the worst run down larger grounds I visited back in the 80's, comparable to Vale Park for its scruffy dirty scabbiness, they have done so well in changing it totally.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Sippo on Friday, April 30, 2010, 10:14:49
What ever happens there will be NIMBY's anyway..


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Peter Venkman on Friday, April 30, 2010, 11:16:56
What ever happens there will be NIMBY's anyway..

Nimbys stopped the original roof on the bank back in the 80's, apparently it cut out the sun from their back garden/allotments IIRC.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: DV on Friday, April 30, 2010, 11:27:43
How can there be NIMBY's the football stadium is already there? A bit late for them to moan about it?

Its the rare green crested newt we need to look out for.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Panda Paws on Friday, April 30, 2010, 11:59:19
The cost quoted, 9.5m, seems a bit low considering the main stand cost 9m


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: lambourn red on Friday, April 30, 2010, 12:20:58
Unless the roof is going to have a sprinkler system that rains ice cold water onto opposition fans during winter, i fail to see why we should worry about providing any cover in a stand that away fans use.

I am pretty sure that you have to provide a portion of the away section undercover, when the Arkells is re-built I would imagine it will be for home fans only with boxes etc so unless we give them some of the DRS then building a roof is the only option.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Ardiles on Friday, April 30, 2010, 12:27:22
The cost quoted, 9.5m, seems a bit low considering the main stand cost 9m

I could be mistaken, but the figure of £1.8 million sticks in my mind as the cost of the 'Intel Stand'.  Obviously, that was in 1994 prices...equivalent to approx £2.8 million now.  On that basis, maybe £9.5 million isn't too far wide of the mark.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Panda Paws on Friday, April 30, 2010, 12:53:51
I could be mistaken, but the figure of £1.8 million sticks in my mind as the cost of the 'Intel Stand'.  Obviously, that was in 1994 prices...equivalent to approx £2.8 million now.  On that basis, maybe £9.5 million isn't too far wide of the mark.

Fair enough, I was going on the figure quoted by footballgroundguide. Although it is important to bear in mind how much more expensive a main stand is, with boxes and all the facilities needed, compared to any other.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Power to people on Friday, April 30, 2010, 15:00:25
Maybe we should ask the local parlimentary candidates what their thoughts are on the CG being redeveloped and if they will back it


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: pauld on Friday, April 30, 2010, 15:20:55
Maybe we should ask the local parlimentary candidates what their thoughts are on the CG being redeveloped and if they will back it
Are you expecting any of them to say anything other than "Oooh, yes, absolutely"? NB that's "say" not necessarily "mean"


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, April 30, 2010, 15:21:56
I could be mistaken, but the figure of £1.8 million sticks in my mind as the cost of the 'Intel Stand'.  Obviously, that was in 1994 prices...equivalent to approx £2.8 million now.  On that basis, maybe £9.5 million isn't too far wide of the mark.

I think it might have been sightly less....at the time there were substantial grants available for upgrade, don't think the Intel cost the club more than about 250K....a similar job was to be done on the Bank but we couldn't afford that. Ray Hardman always used to claim that planning and drawings was his thing and he did it for the club for nowt, thus saving 100K or so....I've no reason to disbelieve him except for a lifetime's mistrust of chairman's motives.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: pride_of_wilts on Friday, April 30, 2010, 15:27:36
The away fans should be in the new stratton bank, Obviously there will be a roof on the new one, No need for them to be in with the home fans anymore.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: donkey on Friday, April 30, 2010, 15:35:06
I really like the Leicester Tigers example

The new stand is very impressive indeed.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Jobi on Friday, April 30, 2010, 15:43:42
here is an actual artists impression

[url width=640 height=480]http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/8/10/2043164//PNESTFC11.JPEG[/url]

 :hmmm: :D


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, April 30, 2010, 15:53:52
 Looking at that, the thought occurs, that to get boxes in the North Stand it might be necessary to reduce the capacity...which will be made up by a bigger TE and Bank.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: jimmy_onions on Friday, April 30, 2010, 16:08:52
here is an actual artists impression

[url width=640 height=480]http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/8/10/2043164//PNESTFC11.JPEG[/url]


titter titter :-)

 :hmmm: :D



Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Friday, April 30, 2010, 17:04:25
This seems like a good move by the board. Deepdale seems a little ground. Like what they have done there. Wouldn't mind something similar here really.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Jobi on Friday, April 30, 2010, 19:35:49
my friend is a preston fan, i went to stay with him for the weekend and went to a game a couple years back, its a nice cosy ground


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Talk Talk on Friday, April 30, 2010, 21:51:28
I don't want the CG redeveloped  :cry:

We will lose the floodlights...


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Crozzer on Friday, April 30, 2010, 22:23:48

Ironside and Malone failed to get chosen.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2PyeXRwhCE


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: pauld on Friday, April 30, 2010, 22:45:32
I don't want the CG redeveloped  :cry:

We will lose the floodlights...
Fuck off or we'll move out and build a new one on your tip ....


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Crozzer on Saturday, May 1, 2010, 01:10:50


Didn't Frank Whittle invent the jet engine?


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: nochee on Saturday, May 1, 2010, 01:51:19

Didn't Frank Whittle invent the jet engine?

No, Whittle invented the Waffle...............silly


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: pauld on Saturday, May 1, 2010, 09:37:37
As revealed exclusively in the Wilts and Glos Standard 3 days ago:

http://www.wiltsglosstandard.co.uk/sport/latestsport/8124380.TOWN_FLIER__Second_place_was_not_lost_at_Adams_Park/


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Saturday, May 1, 2010, 09:51:49
 I thought Whittle invented sitting around pointlessly shaving the end of a stick with a penknife.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: leefer on Saturday, May 1, 2010, 09:54:32
I thought Whittle invented sitting around pointlessly shaving the end of a stick with a penknife.

Quality!...didnt a certain Mr Whittle do the buisness with The Don at Palace in one memorable season.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Oaksey Moonraker on Saturday, May 1, 2010, 10:04:57
I don't want the CG redeveloped  :cry:

We will lose the floodlights...
[/quote

I think a few people on here have said it would be great to keep the floodlight pylons as they really stand out on the Swindon skyline, especially when you're coming in for an evening game off the M4 and down Queens Drive.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: @MacPhlea on Saturday, May 1, 2010, 10:31:50
I thought Whittle invented sitting around pointlessly shaving the end of a stick with a penknife.

No, that was Frank Whittling, Mr Whittle often gets mistaken for him


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Arriba on Saturday, May 1, 2010, 10:48:34
get rid of the floodlights.
am i the only one who thinks the lights have got dimmer over the years?
they've served us well but aint really up with the modern game.
times change.some decent lights along the top of the stands is the way to go


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: reeves4england on Saturday, May 1, 2010, 10:59:48
get rid of the floodlights.
am i the only one who thinks the lights have got dimmer over the years?
they've served us well but aint really up with the modern game.
times change.some decent lights along the top of the stands is the way to go
I like the floodlights. Maybe they need replacing, or a few extra bulbs or something, but they're a part of the skyline.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Panda Paws on Saturday, May 1, 2010, 12:55:52
Preston's flood lights are snazzy, we should have something similar


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: sonicyouth on Saturday, May 1, 2010, 13:31:33
here is an actual artists impression

[url width=640 height=480]http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/8/10/2043164//PNESTFC11.JPEG[/url]

 :hmmm: :D

this just got a mention from shaun on radio swindon whilst chatting to fitton. good work!


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Jobi on Sunday, May 2, 2010, 16:41:08
this just got a mention from shaun on radio swindon whilst chatting to fitton. good work!

 :D
haha really, what did they say?


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Samdy Gray on Sunday, May 2, 2010, 16:49:26
They're looking for a head designer and you're on the shortlist.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Jobi on Sunday, May 2, 2010, 17:56:03
They're looking for a head designer and you're on the shortlist.

haha


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: wheretherealredsare on Sunday, May 2, 2010, 19:54:33
get rid of the floodlights.
am i the only one who thinks the lights have got dimmer over the years?
they've served us well but aint really up with the modern game.
times change.some decent lights along the top of the stands is the way to go

No doubt you were warned as a young man that "it" would make you go blind?



Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Arriba on Sunday, May 2, 2010, 20:21:55
hahaha.must be true,as i've been wearing glasses just over a year.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Oaksey Moonraker on Monday, May 3, 2010, 15:03:19
I caught a bit of the Fitton interview on BBC Swindon on that way to the ground. Fitton said that the stands will be redeveloped on similar lines to the DRS in look and feel. They had considered rotating the ground 90 degrees but felt it was an unneccessary and that would add unwanted costs. What Fitton did say is that re-developed Town End would be the focal peice of ground with a glazed front that would add to the Swindon gateway and that they were considering changing the exit to the ground straight onto the Magic Roundabout.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: thedarkprince on Tuesday, May 4, 2010, 22:43:11
Presumably the glass front would be so people could sit in comfort and watch the visiting fans try and negotiate the magic roundabout?


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Riddick on Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 06:29:08
please not to similar to DRS it will take hours to get everyone out of the ground!


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Ardiles on Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 07:36:47
I caught a bit of the Fitton interview on BBC Swindon on that way to the ground. Fitton said that the stands will be redeveloped on similar lines to the DRS in look and feel. They had considered rotating the ground 90 degrees but felt it was an unneccessary and that would add unwanted costs. What Fitton did say is that re-developed Town End would be the focal peice of ground with a glazed front that would add to the Swindon gateway and that they were considering changing the exit to the ground straight onto the Magic Roundabout.

Seems very sensible - but in terms of size, I'd be interested to hear what the plans are for the Arkells Stand.  If we were simply going to build a near replica of the DRS on the site of the Arkells Stand, we would be looking at a reduction in capacity.  Now I've heard the summary, I'm keen to see the detail (if there is any yet).


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 07:45:42
Sure they'll build a bigger version of the DRS as the main sit down stand, from what we've heard it would have to be bigger than the current Arkells capacity if we were looking at 20k+


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: sn5_red on Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 08:12:59
even if arkells capacity was reduced surely the TE and SB would be much bigger than they are atm?


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 08:27:52
4 x DRS would equal about 18k, maybe that's the capacity we'll go for.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Ardiles on Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 08:51:06
Or we could be really radical and do something along these lines...

Arkells Stand  - 9,500 capacity
DRS (existing) - 4,500 capacity
Town End       - 4,000 capacity
Stratton Bank - fence


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: hobodan on Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 09:46:51
On the existing footprint I don't think the capacity of the CG will increase significantly.

Stratton bank: rebuilt, don't think the size will change much  2,500

Don rogers: to stay, 5,000

Town end: rebuilt with hotel etc adjacent, prob single tier (watford, wolves) 5,000 ish maybe extending around corner adjoining new north stand

North stand: rebuilt with two tier, supporting glass front executive boxes in between the tiers
capacity slightly bigger than existing north stand 8,000 ish

total capacity would prob be around: 20,500 ish. Don't think it will be any bigger tbh.
Looking forward to the plans. I have no doubt attendances will increase greatly with a new stadium. In 1970 our average attendance was 19,600! Let's hope we can pull in some great crowds again


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: Sippo on Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 10:03:01
Hopefully they'll build something with future expansion if needed.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: hobodan on Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 10:48:03
We would never need bigger than 25k, even in the prem.
Don't know if the trees behind the Don Rogers are protected? If not then expanding or adding another tier could add another 3-4,000.

I don't think fitton & co will go for 25k straight away, 20,500 max (probably slighty less)


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: (.)Boobies(.) on Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 11:06:00
We would never need bigger than 25k, even in the prem.
Don't know if the trees behind the Don Rogers are protected? If not then expanding or adding another tier could add another 3-4,000.

I don't think fitton & co will go for 25k straight away, 20,500 max (probably slighty less)


Why not? We were turning fans away and have planning permission granted and alot of the supports built ready under ground to increase to 38,500. In the Poremiership with the tag alongs, you would almost certainly break 30,000, and if you stay there, more so.

Aim for the sky and reach for the stars!

Pleased your redevelopment plans are underway, and I hope you do keep a few old features like the floodlights. New stadiums are mostly boring and very repetative.

[url width=470 height=200]http://www.bbc.co.uk/berkshire/content/images/2006/10/11/470_expansion_4_470x200.jpg[/url]

[url width=470 height=200]http://www.bbc.co.uk/berkshire/content/images/2006/10/11/470_expansion_2_470x200.jpg[/url]

It's a bit Arsenal, but the three stands expanded will remain one tier, the main one currently 8500 will be around 14000.

Got to get back there first tho, so this is very much on hold now.


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: hobodan on Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 11:50:11
Who knows, we could push over 25k in the prem, Untill we're there again we'll never know.
Reading & Swindon are similar sized clubs, without madjetski & still at elm park reading would prob be averaging the same attendances as us.

38,500 is very ambitious though! :O
there are big prem clubs that don't average 38k! Everton, Villa etc 


Title: Re: County Ground developers selected
Post by: nevillew on Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 19:30:43
No doubt you were warned as a young man that "it" would make you go blind?

In similar vein, I was told to 'Save it until you're married'  I had two bucketfuls.