Title: Mornington Crescent. Round 2. Post by: BANGKOK RED on Tuesday, February 2, 2010, 19:49:19 I must say that I thoroughly enjoyed the last game because without a doubt there are a number of keen strategists amongst us. Therefore I feel that another game is in order.
According to the unification of the Western variation's convention, which occurred as recently as 93 , I get to start this second round because I was the winner of the last one. I must confess that I started the previous game with "Baker Street" thinking that I would be playing with novices and imbeciles. However I was proven wrong and so from now on I shall respect my foe as a worthy one and be much less complacent. Therefore I shall start this round with something a little more challenging and with a little added spice to whet the appetite: Pinner Title: Re: Mornington Crescent. Round 2. Post by: tans on Tuesday, February 2, 2010, 19:58:09 Eastcote
Title: Re: Mornington Crescent. Round 2. Post by: Mexicano Rojo on Tuesday, February 2, 2010, 20:08:33 what the fuck you on about tans?
Title: Re: Mornington Crescent. Round 2. Post by: donkey on Tuesday, February 2, 2010, 20:09:50 what the fuck you on about tans? What??!!! It's a fair move. Abuse won't help. Unless you invoke the Hugenot Charter. But you know the perils involved with that, I'm sure. Title: Re: Mornington Crescent. Round 2. Post by: Mexicano Rojo on Tuesday, February 2, 2010, 20:36:21 I thought we were playing at a certain level not fucking beginners. if thats the case sod it Paddington is that easy enough for you?
Title: Re: Mornington Crescent. Round 2. Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, February 2, 2010, 20:44:39 mornington crescent
hahahahahhaHAHAHAHHAHAHAHhahahhAhahaha i win Title: Re: Mornington Crescent. Round 2. Post by: Saxondale on Tuesday, February 2, 2010, 20:45:19 Ok you fuckers, if its going to sweary mornington fucking crescent, sweary mornington fucking crescent it is.
Pimli - cunting - co. Title: Re: Mornington Crescent. Round 2. Post by: BANGKOK RED on Tuesday, February 2, 2010, 20:50:44 mornington crescent hahahahahhaHAHAHAHHAHAHAHhahahhAhahaha i win Ahhhhh. The folly of youth! Title: Re: Mornington Crescent. Round 2. Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, February 2, 2010, 20:59:32 Jealous much?
Title: Re: Mornington Crescent. Round 2. Post by: Talk Talk on Tuesday, February 2, 2010, 21:32:06 Pathetic Dave. Absolutely woeful.
Anyway you should know that under the Turnchapel ruling you can't declare it within 20 moves of the opening. Title: Re: Mornington Crescent. Round 2. Post by: reeves4england on Tuesday, February 2, 2010, 21:56:47 Dave, you make me sick. Pulling stunts like that is what is ruining this country, and is throwing the international reputation of Mornington Crescent into a pitiful hole
Title: Re: Mornington Crescent. Round 2. Post by: Talk Talk on Tuesday, February 2, 2010, 22:05:53 I have invoked a Jurisdiction Council Plenum on the Stovold web site and the decision is that Dave has breached the Original Rules (plus Turnchapel) and his penalty is two fold:
- No further participation in this round. - He has to start any future rounds at Osterley for a period of three months. That will teach him. I hate amateurs. Title: Re: Mornington Crescent. Round 2. Post by: reeves4england on Wednesday, February 3, 2010, 12:23:56 - He has to start any future rounds at Osterley for a period of three months. :DTitle: Re: Mornington Crescent. Round 2. Post by: pauld on Wednesday, February 3, 2010, 13:00:43 Ok you fuckers, if its going to sweary mornington fucking crescent, sweary mornington fucking crescent it is. :D Mornington Crescent meets The Thick of It chaired by Humph TuckerPimli - cunting - co. Title: Re: Mornington Crescent. Round 2. Post by: alanmayes on Wednesday, February 3, 2010, 18:05:55 Humph and the double entendre's with Samantha,simply irreplaceable! ;)
Title: Re: Mornington Crescent. Round 2. Post by: BANGKOK RED on Thursday, February 4, 2010, 17:57:16 Kings----Fucking----Cross.
'Ave it. Title: Re: Mornington Crescent. Round 2. Post by: donkey on Thursday, February 4, 2010, 19:59:08 Alright slag...White flange City.
Title: Re: Mornington Crescent. Round 2. Post by: A Gent Orange on Friday, February 5, 2010, 09:32:17 God this is tense. It's like Rushton vs Cryer in 79. Or perhaps even Brooke-Taylor vs Hardy a few years back.
Title: Re: Mornington Crescent. Round 2. Post by: reeves4england on Friday, February 5, 2010, 17:20:43 I see we have some serious pros on here. I'm slightly at a loss as where to go from this point. The 1975 Pentagon ruling on horizontal strategy wipes out most of the otherwise legitimate moves, and to go South from this point would naturally violate the terms of the Sao Paolo declaration.
It'll have to be Great Portland Street. Title: Re: Mornington Crescent. Round 2. Post by: pauld on Friday, February 5, 2010, 17:22:39 A smart move, executed with no little panache, if you don't mind me saying so
Title: Re: Mornington Crescent. Round 2. Post by: wiggy on Friday, February 5, 2010, 18:35:42 Ho hum. 3 lines in one, and makes me think of things made of stone, for some reason. Therefore I shall move things along to........
Barbican |