Thetownend.com

80% => The Nevillew General Discussion Forum => Topic started by: BANGKOK RED on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 16:28:08



Title: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 16:28:08
Anybody up for a game?

I believe that the rules here are the same as in Blighty, although there may be some deviations. Bearing that in mind I'll start of with one of the old stalwarts.

Baker Street.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 16:31:33
Let's stick with the 221B rules

Tottenham Court Road


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Arriba on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 16:34:00
how do you play? is it london streets?


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 16:34:26
Oooh. Good comeback.

All I can think of now is:

Epping.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 16:38:44
Euston Square


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: THE FLASH on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 16:42:10
Cockfosters


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 16:43:28
Ohhhhh a strong Repost

East Acton


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 16:48:30
That is very unsporting of you Dave and you know it. You are well aware that there are those here who are not familiar with the rules and yet you have to respond with "East Acton". How very big of you.

Anyway, to get things back on track, I'll go with:

Oxford Street.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 16:49:42
Ohhhhh a strong Repost

East Acton

East Acton is an illegal move under the Jubilee convention ammendments section 4.b. Try again

edit: OK BR has allowed it. Tut.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 16:54:35
Queensway (closed until March 2006)


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 16:55:04
Go hard or go home

Marble Arch


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 16:58:55
There's always one that goes against the spirit of the game. For all we know, Dave will next come out with "Waterloo" or something.

I am going to go for Poplar though.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: LucienSanchez on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:00:22
The sneaky Poplar tactic eh? I can only counter that by invoking Law 27a of the Victoria Ammendments:

Bethnal Green.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Langers on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:01:12
how do you play? is it london streets?

I echo these words. How do you play?


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:01:18
Oh Alright

Chancery Lane

There, a nice easy one


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:02:31
Poplar is a poor one BR I thougt you might raise the ante.

Ickenham unless we are playing 1952 rules in which case I would go for Hillingdon.

You know whats next...its pretty obvious.....


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: pauld on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:04:04
Has to be our recent favourite. Putney Bridge


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:04:12
That's more like it Dave, is that a Gordon Phelps manouvre? Either way it should help those unfamiliar with the game to understand easier.

I will counter your Chancery lane with: Putney Bridge

**Edit. Paul D beat me to it, the sly fox.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:04:47
Oh no, two at once. What a faux-pas


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:05:12
Doubles!


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:08:31
Doubles!

After a case of Doubles, 82 rules indicate that we must next go with

Balham


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:10:20
I see your Balham, and I raise you an Ealing Broadway


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:10:34
A srtong comeback but its not........

Vauxhall

No NIDs


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:14:12
Ohhhhh thats a tricky one.

All i can come up with is Edgeware Road, but I'm not sure it's good enough


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Ardiles on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:14:42
South Wimbledon.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:15:26
Got me out of the mire with that one.

Very sporting Ardiles


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: donkey on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:15:40
If it's South Wimbledon, then were else but Paddington (or Marylebone - if using the Kirov amendment of '36)?


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:17:19
You could have gone with Beckton Donkey, but a good answer nonetheless.

Mansion House


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:27:23
Turn it hardcore....

Plaistow


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: wiggy on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:32:24
Too obvious.

Leyton Midland Road


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:36:29
A very shrewd move wiggy, very shrewd. But for my liking it takes us too close to the end and I am enjoying this game and would like it to last longer.

Therefore I am going to wind it back a bit and go with

Great Portland Street


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: pauld on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:41:22
A very shrewd move wiggy, very shrewd. But for my liking it takes us too close to the end and I am enjoying this game and would like it to last longer.

Therefore I am going to wind it back a bit and go with

Great Portland Street
Aha, more to this than one meets the eye, methinks. Canning Town


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: wiggy on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:45:53
Surely breaking the early accord on multiple jumps.

Elephant & Castle


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:46:48
Surely closed stations are invalid, according to the Distric treaty of '77?


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: pauld on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:50:49
Surely breaking the early accord on multiple jumps.

Elephant & Castle
Sorry, can I go Ongar instead?


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: donkey on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:51:56
And now for everyone's favourite night out, Seven Sisters.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: wiggy on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:55:13
Nice, always good to work a gag in there.

Arnos Grove


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:55:33
Surely closed stations are invalid, according to the Distric treaty of '77?

Not if you are using the well know 1952 rules.

I go for Green Park.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:57:18
There has been a great deal of debate on Arnos Grove to Green Park JJ, but if you are going to play that way then so am I:

Kenton.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: wiggy on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 17:59:36
I need to be leaving soon, so........

Dollis Hill

Get out of that if you can


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 18:00:11
Amersham

HAWHAW


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 18:12:07
I hit back with the daddy...

KILBURN!


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 18:15:37
That leaves it wide open, I like what you did there JJ.

Tower Hill



Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: sonicyouth on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 18:16:35
i don't understand


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: A Gent Orange on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 18:19:47


Tower Hill



Are laterals open? If they are Kensal Rise. If not, i'm screwed.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 18:24:41
Well, as Batch said previously we should stick with  221B rules. In which case yeah, Kensal Rise is acceptable-ish (It's a bit in the grey)

I think that Woodside Park is the appropriate retort.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 18:25:24
Laterals are fine, what about revision 2a.

If revisions are allowed I will chuck in the tangent of

Buckingham Palace....thats put the cat amongst the pigeons, if revision 2a is not allowed then I will go for a safe bet of Paddington.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 18:28:11
I am not familiar with revision 2a.

Is this a new amendment? Could somebody please enlighten me?


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: axs on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 18:29:55
I am not familiar with revision 2a.

Is this a new amendment? Could somebody please enlighten me?

2a is the inclusion of midweek laterals.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: donkey on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 18:30:03
It means that laterals are only allowed after three forward moves and cross step.  Therefore, Buck House is fine.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 18:33:34
Oh, THAT revision 2a.

In which case JJ's "Buckingham Palace" really does put the cat amongst the pigeons"

Snaresbrook


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 18:40:53
Ace I am glad about the confirmation as it opens up a whole can of badgers.

Moooooooooorgate....mind the gap.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Lumps on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 20:31:07
He he he, I'm going to take advantage of the Leeds match to sneak in and play a slightly questionable move of: Bank

Which if we're permitting the Helsinki variations gives the opportunity for multiple laterals and frees up moves right along to Gallions Reach or Cutty Sark (if we're prepared to go South of the river after dark).


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 20:44:34
You bitch.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 21:25:48
I am going for the old fave....

Victoria!


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: strooood on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 00:56:16
I'm glad I got here just in time to initiate a favoured manouevre... Caledonian Road.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Saxondale on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 07:58:50
Ah, that classic strooood.

Goodge street.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 08:24:05
Sloane Square.

Oh yes.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: land_of_bo on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 08:53:33
Then it must be South Kensington.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Saxondale on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 08:56:05
Due to the atlantic convention of 1968, I say Angel.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: tans on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 09:27:27
can someone explain what this is about?


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: PetsWinPrizes on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 09:44:33
Is it foolhardy or brave at this juncture to throw out 'West Hampstead'.?


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 09:50:17
 :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:

"West Hampstead". Brilliant stuff, that has made my day already.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Mexicano Rojo on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 09:58:38
eat dirt

new malden


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: ReadingRed on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 10:03:53
I'm amazed you've all missed what was staring you in the face. The Ealing Triumvirate.
I give you... Ealing Common.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 10:10:29
Ealing Common, pah thats a cheap cheap shot....

Hammersmith would be the obvious next play IMO


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: tans on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 10:11:46
im guesing as i dont know how to play

latimer road


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 10:12:45
Oh dear Tans.

Have you really never heard of the Newcastle monnington convention amendment of 87?


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: pauld on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 10:15:49
No, no, Latimer Road is allowable under the Watford Convention and in this position may open up whole sections into play. Beginners luck tans or do we have a hustler on our hands here?


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 10:16:19
Apparently not, don't worry though, I'll get us back on track with Elephant and Castle, which I think means that you skip a go BR.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: tans on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 10:21:10
No, no, Latimer Road is allowable under the Watford Convention and in this position may open up whole sections into play. Beginners luck tans or do we have a hustler on our hands here?

Never played, dont know the rules.

Beginners luck, ill give up


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 10:22:09
one for the Aussies among us, bred for bar work!

ʇɹnoɔ sןɹɐǝ


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Saxondale on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 10:48:31
Got to be back to cockfosters then.  Thats under hogans rule from 1984.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Mexicano Rojo on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 10:52:23
south coulsdon, i know its risk but fuck it


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: pauld on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 10:55:59
Well, that's me blocked then. Cheers, you git


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 10:57:31
Oh come on Paul, it's so obviously Tooting Bec


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: pauld on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 10:58:55
Damn you're right. I'm going to have that made into a T-shirt - "It's so obviously Tooting Bec".

Tooting Bec


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Saxondale on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 11:00:44
Well, that's me blocked then. Cheers, you git

Controversial!  Thats the biggest outburst of foul language in MC since Tim brooke taylor called Barry Cryer a nob gobbling cunt bucket chutney ferret in the 1982 final.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: pauld on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 11:02:20
Controversial!  Thats the biggest outburst of foul language in MC since Tim brooke taylor called Barry Cryer a nob gobbling cunt bucket chutney ferret in the 1982 final.
Yet who among us would gainsay him?


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Saxondale on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 11:03:28
Yet who among us would gainsay him?

Really didnt go far enough I thought.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 11:05:19
Controversial!  Thats the biggest outburst of foul language in MC since Tim brooke taylor called Barry Cryer a nob gobbling cunt bucket chutney ferret in the 1982 final.

And who would forget the punishment on that occasion- poor Brooke Taylor had to sing the words of Oops I did it Again to the tune of Shirley Bassey's Goldfinger. I demand something similar for the heathen Davis!


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 11:14:12
Singing Three Lions on a shirt to the tune of Minnie Ripperton's "Loving you" would surely be a fitting punishment.

Eat my Actown Town.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Samdy Gray on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 11:19:45
I will see that and raise you Canada Water. Stuff that one in your pipe and smoke it.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: pauld on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 11:23:39
I am contrite and have confiscated my own kazoo and swanee whistle as punishment. Is the Jubilee line in play?


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: magicroundabout on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 11:31:29
i can only guess what this is all about but having read the thread without a clue how to play i have still found it quite entertaining :)


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: PetsWinPrizes on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 11:48:30
I am contrite and have confiscated my own kazoo and swanee whistle as punishment. Is the Jubilee line in play?

It bloody well is, so I'm going ....

Stanmore.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: LucienSanchez on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 11:53:47
Touche. I will fittingly respond with Finsbury Park, and hope i'm not breaking the 1998 Amendment to Wagners Theorem of Parrallel Switching.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 12:03:23
Touche. I will fittingly respond with Finsbury Park, and hope i'm not breaking the 1998 Amendment to Wagners Theorem of Parrallel Switching.

From what I understand, that amendment is only applicable when Hendon Central has been played and so I think that you are OK there.

Warren Street


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 12:10:54
I'll whip that with a fine

Liverpool Street

Take that 4 in 1!


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 15:08:53
Upney


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: pauld on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 15:30:14
Upney
And they complain about my language!


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: ReadingRed on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 15:59:20
Upney
There's always someone who has to spoil it for everyone else, isn't there.
I guess that means we have to go back to Tooting Bec?


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Saxondale on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 16:00:45
Mornington Crescent!


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 16:02:37
WE HAVE A WINNER!!!!!


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Saxondale on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 16:03:36
Thank you, thank you.  Shall I start another one?


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: reeves4england on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 16:04:49
Well played gk, that was a great piece of opportunism to snatch the victory


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 16:08:17
Thank you, thank you.  Shall I start another one?

Why not, I did enjoy this one so let's have another.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: LucienSanchez on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 16:09:16
I never saw that coming. I'm a tad rusty...


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: wiggy on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 16:15:12
Foul I cry.

Mr GK Nash claimed a second Cockfosters under Hogans.

Only one repeat allowed per game and surely that went to Nemo's Elephant and Castle.

We need a convention to cover the difficulty of the multi-page forum format.

I propose the Turnips on Tour accord 2010 - but should it allow repeats of forever condemn thosw with poor memories to ignominy?


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 16:23:12
Ahah, my sneaky early repeat had the desired effect of luring an unsuspecting player!


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: land_of_bo on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 16:23:58
WE HAVE A WINNER!!!!!

North Finchley?


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Saxondale on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 16:27:46
Damn you and your vigilance wiggster.  I would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for you pesky etc etc.  

Thats back to tooting bec and 3 goes missed for me whilst I make up amusing titles of films for the residents of the townend.com.  Ladies and gentleman  I give you bring me the head of alfredo garjfwcia.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 16:29:02
We need to have a game of that, so badly it's not true.

The Prince and the PaulDper


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: wiggy on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 16:30:31
Go West, my son

Ickenham


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Saxondale on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 16:31:54
We need to have a game of that, so badly it's not true.

The Prince and the PaulDper

Tv programme / book but the reading red riding trilogy


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 16:38:53
Surrey Quays

(Didn't see that coming did ya?)


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: wiggy on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 16:40:16
Damn you and your vigilance wiggster.  I would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for you pesky etc etc.  

Thats back to tooting bec and 3 goes missed for me whilst I make up amusing titles of films for the residents of the townend.com.  Ladies and gentleman  I give you bring me the head of alfredo garjfwcia.

Bling me the head of Alfredo Garcia?


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: wiggy on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 16:43:55
Surrey Quays

(Didn't see that coming did ya?)

Well. if you are going down that line...

Rotherhithe


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: pauld on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 16:57:42
Bling me the head of Alfredo Garcia?
In honour of last night's most nationally overrated player - "The Beckford Files"


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: wiggy on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 17:02:59
In honour of last night's most nationally overrated player - "The Beckford Files"

Ha Ha

or The Beiderbeckford Tapes


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: pauld on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 17:07:24
"You only Shoot Twice" (and then only once on target)


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: reeves4england on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 20:21:04
Well. if you are going down that line...

Rotherhithe
Calm down! I'll bring it back down to earth with Embankment


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Lumps on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 21:23:27
Look I know its really late in the day to be mentioning this, although thinking back I don't remember it being an issue in the play so far, but are we playing Nautical Rules, (crossing the river only following the playing of a bridge, dock, or other water based name) or traditional? 

I know it narrows play a bit west of London Bridge (Waterloo isn't a crossing point and I don't care what Humph used to allow), but it is more challenging.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 21:25:52
I don't care what Humph used to allow)

Bastard.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: reeves4england on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 21:31:45
Look I know its really late in the day to be mentioning this, although thinking back I don't remember it being an issue in the play so far, but are we playing Nautical Rules, (crossing the river only following the playing of a bridge, dock, or other water based name) or traditional? 

I know it narrows play a bit west of London Bridge (Waterloo isn't a crossing point and I don't care what Humph used to allow), but it is more challenging.
I thought we were playing by the 1957 ammendment which alllowed multiple crossings under the guidance of a supervisory superior?


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Lumps on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 21:34:48
Bastard.

Look he's dead get over it.

Mind you talking of Humph can I take a moment to bore everyone with my one last remembered peice of Humph trivia.

There's some really famous black and white footage of people celebrating in Trafalger Square on VE day. Drunks jumping in the fountains people grabbing each other dancing like nuts ...and throughout it all there's some nutter blowing a trumpet for all he's worth...

...that's Humph

and while I'm here


Mansion House.....

stick that up your pipe


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: THE FLASH on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 21:35:23
Does the DLR count??


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: reeves4england on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 21:36:18
Does the DLR count??
Ahh, that old chestnut!


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Lumps on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 21:37:14
I thought we were playing by the 1957 ammendment which alllowed multiple crossings under the guidance of a supervisory superior?

I thought that variant was outlawed after the trouble at the 1962 Swiss open?


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Lumps on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 21:38:31
Does the DLR count??

I'm with Paxman "If it's on the Map it Fucking Counts!" Straight talking that Paxo even if he is a cheating cunt.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Saxondale on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 22:55:54
Chancery lane.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: reeves4england on Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 22:59:15
Going by the 4 minute rule, I feel quite restricted so I'm going for a pretty lame effort: Hammersmith


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: wiggy on Thursday, January 28, 2010, 00:06:38
Ooh - lots of possibilities from there. But spring will soon be in the air, and I claim the classic horticultural exemption.

Kew gardens


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: THE FLASH on Thursday, January 28, 2010, 00:08:30
Ooh - lots of possibilities from there. But spring will soon be in the air, and I claim the classic horticultural exemption.

Kew gardens

I would like a train Fuckew


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: donkey on Friday, January 29, 2010, 23:25:02
Ooh - lots of possibilities from there. But spring will soon be in the air, and I claim the classic horticultural exemption.

Kew gardens

I will bow to greater knowledge than mine, but I believe the the three quarter quick step of Kinshasa allows one move to Theydon Bois.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: reeves4england on Friday, January 29, 2010, 23:36:31
I will bow to greater knowledge than mine, but I believe the the three quarter quick step of Kinshasa allows one move to Theydon Bois.
A controversial move, but allowed under the Geneva Ammendment, despite the calls of numerous parties for a decision to the contrary.

I'm feeling adventurous, so I'll go for Hillingdon


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Arriba on Friday, January 29, 2010, 23:37:35
arsenal


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: ron dodgers on Saturday, January 30, 2010, 00:09:42
totteridge & whetstone
see what I did there?


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Lumps on Sunday, January 31, 2010, 13:13:47
Hey!

Cockfosters!


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: wiggy on Sunday, January 31, 2010, 13:31:44
Earls Court


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Bogus Dave on Sunday, January 31, 2010, 13:33:59
High Holborn


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: tans on Sunday, January 31, 2010, 14:08:57
Russell Square


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: reeves4england on Sunday, January 31, 2010, 14:18:34
Heathrow Terminals 1,2,3

HA! Work your way out of that one!


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Simon Pieman on Sunday, January 31, 2010, 15:08:24
Unfortunatley you leave me no choice but to go to Stamford Brook, which I am loathed to do.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: tans on Sunday, January 31, 2010, 15:55:51
West Brompton


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: pauld on Sunday, January 31, 2010, 17:57:16
Unfortunatley you leave me no choice but to go to Stamford Brook, which I am loathed to do.
^loath^. You may well be loathed, but that is a different matter


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Sunday, January 31, 2010, 20:06:35
Mornington Crescent.



Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Barry Scott on Sunday, January 31, 2010, 20:20:40
Dang you BR, well played. I was quietly lurking awaiting the opportunity and missed that one. As did PD it seems. Good game, good game.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: pauld on Monday, February 1, 2010, 00:47:57
Dang you BR, well played. I was quietly lurking awaiting the opportunity and missed that one. As did PD it seems. Good game, good game.
Indeed. Well played sir. I was too busy loathing Si Pie, a very distracting pastime


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Simon Pieman on Monday, February 1, 2010, 20:19:48
I've just been educated by a Scouser and not in burglary. The shame.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: nevillew on Monday, February 1, 2010, 21:00:44
^loath^. You may well be loathed, but that is a different matter

Can't you also use 'loth' ?


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: donkey on Tuesday, February 2, 2010, 19:19:42
Mornington Crescent.



A fine game, BR.  I feel you played in the spirit throughout (Budapest amendment spirit, of course), and deserved it.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Tuesday, February 2, 2010, 20:14:05
Heathrow Terminals 1,2,3

HA! Work your way out of that one!

Did you know that Heathrow Terminal Four, is one of only 3 tube stations whose name contains all 5 vowels? The others being South Ealing and Mansion House...



Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: reeves4england on Tuesday, February 2, 2010, 22:04:02
Did you know that Heathrow Terminal Four, is one of only 3 tube stations whose name contains all 5 vowels? The others being South Ealing and Mansion House...
Interesting, although isn't it technically "Heathrow Terminal 4", thus removing the "u"?


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, February 3, 2010, 18:13:15
Interesting, although isn't it technically "Heathrow Terminal 4", thus removing the "u"?

I was reliably informed it appears as four at the station...never been there so can't confirm.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: alanmayes on Wednesday, February 3, 2010, 18:24:33
For those of you unfamiliar with the game from the antedote to panel games, here's a reminder..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4w7EvDRBERg


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Wednesday, February 3, 2010, 18:45:11
My Steevey Weevey :)


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: donkey on Thursday, May 20, 2010, 18:13:15
To continue...

Wembley Park.

The end.


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Thursday, May 20, 2010, 18:14:18
How can you end at Wembley Park?


Title: Re: Mornington Crescent
Post by: donkey on Thursday, May 20, 2010, 18:17:42
How can you end at Wembley Park?

Because I'm implementing the Fitton directive, with Wilson variant.