Thetownend.com

25% => Players => Topic started by: DV on Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 17:01:34



Title: Alex Revell
Post by: DV on Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 17:01:34
....released by Southend.




































Signed by Wycombe...


Title: Re: Alex Revell
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 17:11:32
Good luck to him. He worked hard even if he didn't improve our attack.


Title: Re: Alex Revell
Post by: Langers on Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 17:14:45
They really didnt like him did they...

Wish him the best of luck, always gave 100%


Title: Re: Alex Revell
Post by: blinkpip on Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 17:54:43
After all that and he wasn't allowed to play in the FA Cup. I'm glad Morrison didn't extend loan.


Title: Re: Alex Revell
Post by: adje on Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 18:06:03
Another player that will undoubtedly come back to haunt us


Title: Re: Alex Revell
Post by: Mexicano Rojo on Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 18:09:59
maybe as a crap ghost but that would be about it.


Title: Re: Alex Revell
Post by: leefer on Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 18:12:19
He was good at Brentford...good luck to him.


Title: Re: Alex Revell
Post by: DV on Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 18:13:48
Another player that will undoubtedly come back to haunt us

Only if we miss the play offs by one goal which he should have scored at Carlisle.


Title: Re: Alex Revell
Post by: adje on Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 18:23:45
maybe as a crap ghost but that would be about it.


like Thorpe Cureton and Monkhouse?


Title: Re: Alex Revell
Post by: Mexicano Rojo on Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 18:37:15
no i meant like some of the ones in scooby doo or most haunted


Title: Re: Alex Revell
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 19:45:37
He was good at Brentford...good luck to him.

He was. That was his best game in a Town shirt by a long way though. We saw what he was capable off but sadly he couldn't produce it on a regular basis. It's weird how him and Hutchinson were both good that day.


Title: Re: Alex Revell
Post by: adje on Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 19:58:01
no i meant like some of the ones in scooby doo or most haunted

"pesky kids"


Title: Re: Alex Revell
Post by: Spencer_White on Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 20:16:43

like Thorpe Cureton and Monkhouse?

Thorpe? He played for Grimsby at the CG about 12 months after we released him and he was absolutely awful. We should have beaten them about 8 nil that day.

Cureton just haunted us whilst he was at the CG.

Pleased he fixed himself up with a club, but doesnt he fall foul of the FIFA 2 clubs in season rule? Or does that not apply to lower leagues?


Title: Re: Alex Revell
Post by: Simon Pieman on Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 20:18:22
I think that's if a player registers with another club.


Title: Re: Alex Revell
Post by: jonny72 on Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 20:34:40
I think that's if a player registers with another club.

I think that's right, the FIFA rule says a player can only be registered with 2 clubs a season - nothing at all about how many they can play for, just how many they can be registered with. And a loan doesn't affect a players registration.


Title: Re: Alex Revell
Post by: adje on Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 22:17:35
Thorpe? He played for Grimsby at the CG about 12 months after we released him and he was absolutely awful. We should have beaten them about 8 nil that day.

Cureton just haunted us whilst he was at the CG.

Pleased he fixed himself up with a club, but doesnt he fall foul of the FIFA 2 clubs in season rule? Or does that not apply to lower leagues?

I seem to remember Thorpe winning a dodgy penalty for Colchester resulting in a 1-0 defeat for us and  Cureton-didnt he score the winning penalty for Norwich as recently as a few weeks ago?


Title: Re: Alex Revell
Post by: Simon Pieman on Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 22:24:23
So we should keep a bunch of shit players so they don't play against us, but remain absolutely shit? I like your thinking.


Title: Re: Alex Revell
Post by: adje on Wednesday, January 13, 2010, 19:18:56
didn't say we should keep them-just saying players have a habit of doing well against former clubs.


Title: Re: Alex Revell
Post by: lambourn red on Friday, January 15, 2010, 08:24:01
I think that's right, the FIFA rule says a player can only be registered with 2 clubs a season - nothing at all about how many they can play for, just how many they can be registered with. And a loan doesn't affect a players registration.

"They thought they had signed striker Alex Revell from Southend United only to be told by the Football League that they can’t because he has already represented two clubs this season" from the Bucks Free Press looks like Revell is going back to Southend whther he likes it or not


Title: Re: Alex Revell
Post by: Batch on Friday, January 15, 2010, 08:26:26
looks like Revell is going back to Southend whther he likes it or not

Depends whether his release by Southend was dependant on,  or separate from his signing for Wycombe. He may well find himself clubless, hope not.


Title: Re: Alex Revell
Post by: jonny72 on Friday, January 15, 2010, 15:03:22
Looks like I was wrong and loan periods do count towards the two club rule.

It was a problem when Liverpool wanted to sign Mascherano on loan from West Ham, they couldn't initially as he had played for Corinthians that season as well. They let it through in the end and changed the rules to take in to account leagues with seasons that over lap.

Hope it works out for him. Pretty bloody stupid rule really, especially the counting of loan periods.


Title: Re: Alex Revell
Post by: chrisser on Friday, January 15, 2010, 15:28:56
I think that emergency loans (up to 93 days) don't count towards the 2 club maximum but 'long term' loans such as we took Revell on do.  Remember when we were trying to sign Cox permanently from Reading and Northampton were after him too - they had a problem because he had already played for us and Reading that season and could only take him on emergency loan.  So the solution for Revell is to stay on Southend's books but be loaned out temporarily.  The rule is still stupid though...