Title: Harry Arter Post by: STFC_Gazza on Friday, December 18, 2009, 10:53:46 Looks like our first target for January, (sorry cant see another thread)
WOKING will expect at least £30,000 for midfielder Harry Arter when Swindon call back for the midfield talent in January..... http://www.wokinginformer.co.uk/woking-sport/woking-football/woking-fc/2009/12/17/woking-want-30k-from-swindon-for-harry-arter-86289-25417044/ Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: suttonred on Friday, December 18, 2009, 10:56:29 Cant go wrong for 30k
Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: Sippo on Friday, December 18, 2009, 11:01:25 One for the future. Won't touch the first team yet me thinks.
Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Friday, December 18, 2009, 13:57:32 I do believe he can play behind the strikers or out wide so he will give us another option. I don't think he'll go straight into the team but then again I said the same about Austin and it didn't take him long. If the talent is there then why not?
Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: jonny72 on Friday, December 18, 2009, 14:04:45 Was he that good when he played against us then? I gave the game a miss so didn't see him.
Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: A Gent Orange on Friday, December 18, 2009, 18:00:23 What a great report that is from their local paper. The language is like English but different. 'Officially flatbatted'?
Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: reeves4england on Friday, December 18, 2009, 18:05:09 Was he that good when he played against us then? I gave the game a miss so didn't see him. The Woking commentators were creaming themselves over him for the full 90 minutes. In other words, I have no idea.Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: michael on Friday, December 18, 2009, 21:08:18 This kid is League 1 standard at least.
A good find. Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: Doore on Friday, December 18, 2009, 21:37:57 This kid is League 1 standard at least. A good find. Have you seen him then? Sounds promising. Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: leefer on Friday, December 18, 2009, 21:43:12 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EZWO_FE0NM
Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: Simon Pieman on Friday, December 18, 2009, 21:58:07 I can tell the commentator finds football exciting.
Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: Sippo on Friday, December 18, 2009, 21:59:41 This kid is League 1 standard at least. A good find. if that is the case, and the board are serious about promotion then surely we should be aiming for championship level players? I haven't seen him play, but he's still young so who knows. Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: Samdy Gray on Friday, December 18, 2009, 22:01:39 I think you missed the 'at least' bit Sippo.
Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: Spencer_White on Saturday, December 19, 2009, 08:48:14 Harry Arter is our friend,
is our friend, is our friend, Harry Arter is our friend, He ...........? (he hates Reading?). :soapy tit wank: Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: Tails on Saturday, December 19, 2009, 09:18:52 They were all creaming themselves over him but from what I saw he wasn't great, certainly no better than what we have. To be fair though, Woking were terrible so maybe he'd be better with the likes of JD.
Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: bigbobjoylove on Wednesday, May 19, 2010, 16:51:44 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/eng_conf/8692865.stm
Off to Boremuff. Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: Crispy on Wednesday, May 19, 2010, 16:58:10 Wernt we looking at him?
Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, May 19, 2010, 17:03:11 Yes he came on trial after the fa cup game.
Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Wednesday, May 19, 2010, 17:10:53 Wernt we looking at him? Yes we were, hence the reason for this thread in the first place ::) Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: Frigby Daser on Wednesday, May 19, 2010, 18:15:42 As we took Charlie from under Bournemouth's nose, I suppose we can let them have this one. Assume Danny has said no to him if we're not following it up.
Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, May 19, 2010, 18:40:05 As we took Charlie from under Bournemouth's nose, I suppose we can let them have this one. Assume Danny has said no to him if we're not following it up. I recon that too. Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: leefer on Wednesday, May 19, 2010, 18:43:48 We will be looking at bigger fish me thinks....good player but Championship?
Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Wednesday, May 19, 2010, 21:25:53 If we went up i know people wouldn't agree but i would love to go for that Nicky Bailley believe it or not.
Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Wednesday, May 19, 2010, 21:43:16 If we went up i know people wouldn't agree but i would love to go for that Nicky Bailley believe it or not. I'd had that very same thought. Tremendous player. Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: strooood on Wednesday, May 19, 2010, 23:53:50 Yep me too. Honestly think that he's one of the top three midfielders in the division. Would be great alongside Douglas when we lose Ferry.
Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: Bogus Dave on Wednesday, May 19, 2010, 23:57:44 Yeah but he's a nasty little cunt
Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: DV on Thursday, May 20, 2010, 04:30:35 As long as he's not our penalty taker
Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Thursday, May 20, 2010, 05:57:32 Yeah but he's a nasty little cunt You say that like it's a bad thing ??? Any way, people wouldn't see him as an NLC if he played for us, he would become 'whole hearted and fully committed' Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: herthab on Thursday, May 20, 2010, 06:12:18 You say that like it's a bad thing ??? Any way, people wouldn't see him as an NLC if he played for us, he would become 'whole hearted and fully committed' Nah, he'd still be a nasty little cunt. But he'd be our Nasty Little Cunt. Big difference! Title: Re: Harry Arter Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Thursday, May 20, 2010, 08:13:07 Yep me too. Honestly think that he's one of the top three midfielders in the division. Would be great alongside Douglas when we lose Ferry. I dunno Strood about Ferry he seems to love it here wouldn't be suprised if he stayed. |