Title: McNamee Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 08:25:29 Going to be a big season for him season.Didn't really perform as we thought he would after impressing so much at the begining of the season.
His work rate towards the end of the season was very good though and he improved alot under wilson, just get the impression if he has a bad season then he could end up just knocking around club to club for a while. Title: Re: McNamee Post by: Phil_S on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 08:30:10 I reckon he's a confidence player, & needs the encouragement & praise from the manager(much the same as Chritian Roberts did) He didn't get that from MM.
Title: Re: McNamee Post by: Kinky Tom on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 08:30:24 With a better defence and (hopefully) a better CM pairing he should be able to play his own game a bit more - bit like Lee Holmes could do when we had him.
Hopefully... Title: Re: McNamee Post by: Tails on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 08:43:36 I thought he was excellent as soon as we signed Kanu. He's the best player we have and one that on his day would be fit to grace the Premier league. If he was consistent, he wouldn't be here!
Title: Re: McNamee Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 08:44:45 Agree about Kanu Tails, seemed he was being allowed tp get on and play without being doubled up on.
Title: Re: McNamee Post by: suttonred on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 09:40:24 I thought that was one of the things that went unnoticed by many, as when HRK came in teams couldn't double up on both wingers, one or both would have space, if we could get an attack minded CM with those two, we would hardly need to worry about who was upfront as we would be pulling defences all over the place.
Title: Re: McNamee Post by: leefer on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 11:36:47 Big season for him...i was prefering Edwards towards the seasons end..reckon Edwards could suprise a few teams next year if getting a place.
Title: Re: McNamee Post by: leefer on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 11:58:29 Read Marshall on above post!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..its the heat.
Title: Re: McNamee Post by: Arriba on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 11:59:00 talented yes.but a luxury player.if we are going at teams then he's a valuable asset.when we are struggling, then he's a waste of a player on the park.
alot depends on the players around him too.in a good side he'd thrive i reckon.but will he have players of quality around him? Title: Re: McNamee Post by: Kinky Tom on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 11:59:21 Thought that's what you meant.
Title: Re: McNamee Post by: Peter Venkman on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 12:00:45 I like the look of Marshall, hes eager and certainly not a lot worse than Macca was towards the end of last season.
If he can provide delivery he could be a little star. Title: Re: McNamee Post by: Arriba on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 12:04:59 i'll have to beg to differ over marshall.imo he's a headless chicken who isn't good enough for us
Title: Re: McNamee Post by: Peter Venkman on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 12:17:18 Differing opinions is what makes football what it is Arriba :) if we all thought the same then Carlton Palmer or Geoff Thomas would never have got a game for England let alone in the top division!
Title: Re: McNamee Post by: Spy on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 12:22:01 Can't believe people are arguing Marshall is better than Macca. Or are you just saying he has the potential to be better?
Title: Re: McNamee Post by: leefer on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 12:27:01 Not arguing...Maccas had plenty of chances..he cant score for toffee,and his only threat is his crossing,hence why teams double up on him to stop his crosses coming in...Marshall has shown that he canbeat players and for me if his crossing starts to match Maccas hes going to be a very good player....its also highly embarrasing watch a player who does stepovers but dosnt deliver enough....away from home he should be our trump card,i hope he is..but i got my doubts.
Title: Re: McNamee Post by: Arriba on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 12:29:15 i agree with you leefer.but he's still much better than marshall.
Title: Re: McNamee Post by: leefer on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 12:31:07 Think your in the majority aribba on this one.....but i got a feeling Marshall will do well next season.
Title: Re: McNamee Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 13:38:30 Macca is similar to a lot of league one wingers. He plays well one week and poorly the next and is inconsistant. On his day he's very good though. Worth having in the team. If he's not performing then stick him on the bench.
Title: Re: McNamee Post by: Batch on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 13:40:57 certainly not a lot worse than Macca was towards the end of last season. If he can provide delivery he could be a little star. Bloody hell, is it April 1st. Title: Re: McNamee Post by: Berniman on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 13:41:23 talented yes.but a luxury player.if we are going at teams then he's a valuable asset.when we are struggling, then he's a waste of a player on the park. alot depends on the players around him too.in a good side he'd thrive i reckon.but will he have players of quality around him? Totally agree! Title: Re: McNamee Post by: Spy on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 14:11:28 Leefer - yes Macca isn't a goalscorer but I he can beat players. That much is proven. Even when theres 2 players on him he quite often comes away with the ball and puts in the cross.
Yes he has been inconsistent and that is his main fault but to suggest Marshall can beat players and Macca can't is bollocks. Or did I get the wrong end of the stick with what you were saying? Also, how many goals has Marshall scored? Title: Re: McNamee Post by: Peter Venkman on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 14:40:38 I can't see Macnamee being first choice winger this season, I dont think DW rates him as highly as most Town fans do.
Hes OK but the point I was saying about Marshall is that he has potential, if he realises that with us or his attitude doesn't improve (allegedly) then he will be gone. I think his pace will unsettle a lot of defences though if given a few games to get his confidence up, I have seen him in 4 reserve games (yes I know they are reserves) but hes looked lively and can use both feet. I still would like him to come good, but then I hope Malpas would come good too and was wrong there! Title: Re: McNamee Post by: jayohaitchenn on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 14:52:24 Use both feet? He can't cross with either you mean :D
Title: Re: McNamee Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 15:32:49 Can someone tell me how many of Cox's goals MacNamee set up last season?
I agree with arriba's view of him. If we had a striker that camped himself on the 6 yard line then I think Macca would set up a lot more goals and therefore look more effective. Title: Re: McNamee Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 15:41:21 Akifenwa type you mean
Title: Re: McNamee Post by: Peter Venkman on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 15:45:30 Heaven forbid we sit a huge lump on the edge of the box and lump balls forward to him to win in the box ala Cambridge Utd and Dion Dublin in the early 90's.
Title: Re: McNamee Post by: leefer on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 15:49:42 Leefer - yes Macca isn't a goalscorer but I he can beat players. That much is proven. Even when theres 2 players on him he quite often comes away with the ball and puts in the cross. Yes he has been inconsistent and that is his main fault but to suggest Marshall can beat players and Macca can't is bollocks. Or did I get the wrong end of the stick with what you were saying? Also, how many goals has Marshall scored? Two in 62 is a piss poor return for an attacking player like Macca...thats his record here...Marshall has only played 6 full matches....Mcmanee has this season to prove himself or he could end up non lge very soon...i dont rate him....and his floaty corners are shit too....that said if his potential is finally found i could have Macca rammed down my big mouth...now thats not a thaught to have just before eating my tea. Title: Re: McNamee Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 15:58:11 Heaven forbid we sit a huge lump on the edge of the box and lump balls forward to him to win in the box ala Cambridge Utd and Dion Dublin in the early 90's. No, not that style. The same style we're playing really, but with more end product. We do get the ball in the box, but 9 times out of 10 it goes to nobody. Paynter's scored a couple from crosses, but if you look at another decent League One striker like Lambert, then we don't score enough goals from crosses. We need a real 'poacher' (Tony Thorpe, anyone ::)) to nab a few goals from crosses. Title: Re: McNamee Post by: Peter Venkman on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 16:04:05 I get your point Sam we do need someone like Parkin and Mooney up front to capitalise on crosses into the box and get their heads/feet onto them, I just really don't want us to be a long ball team, even if it creates moderate success.
I just had visions after your last comment on crossing from Macca of us hoofing the ball into the box for it to be won by a cart horse :) Title: Re: McNamee Post by: LucienSanchez on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 16:15:05 I think Macca's good cross:poor cross ratio, and good game:bad game ratio are poor.
Title: Re: McNamee Post by: Arch Stanton on Friday, July 3, 2009, 07:33:12 I think this is why Barry Corr's injuries were my biggest disappointment of last year, because he was the 'big' striker in the box that could head in McNamee's crosses, he was also capable of playing the poacher and scuffing the ball in from the six yard line.....
|