|
Title: World Transfer Record Post by: michael on Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 20:01:48 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transfer_(football)#Highest_transfer_fees
Once again Wikipedia proves itself to be the most reliable website on the web, telling us that Zizou cost €76m, compared to Kaka at €65m. Haven't seen that reported anywhere else. Title: Re: World Transfer Record Post by: Lash_sumthin on Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 20:04:40 its the highest in pounds due to move in exchange rate which i believe most have made clear, certainly the ones ive read anyway
Title: Re: World Transfer Record Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 20:05:30 In english pounds its Kaka in euro its Zidane.
Title: Re: World Transfer Record Post by: michael on Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 20:06:41 Who is it in Thai Baht? Anyone know?
Title: Re: World Transfer Record Post by: Mexicano Rojo on Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 20:09:49 what about mexican pesos?
Title: Re: World Transfer Record Post by: Saxondale on Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 20:12:58 And how about in the Tongan Pa'Anga? King media slut? You must know.
Title: Re: World Transfer Record Post by: Panda Paws on Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 20:59:53 Wikipedia would be right in this case, as others have said if comparing like with like, Zizou was more, but in sterling Kaka is worth more because of the shit exchange rate now
Title: Re: World Transfer Record Post by: Batch on Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 21:21:45 It isn't actually a world record fee. Fricken lying jurnos. The deals were done in Euros, the pound values then and now are irrelevant.
Title: Re: World Transfer Record Post by: Doore on Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 21:23:45 It isn't actually a world record fee. Fricken lying jurnos. The deals were done in Euros, the pound values then and now are irrelevant. Couldn't agree more - sales figures matter more to the tabloid press than the small matter of facts. Zidane cost more than Kaka. [Rafa impression]: FACT. |