Thetownend.com

25% => Players => Topic started by: michael on Saturday, March 7, 2009, 08:59:41



Title: Razak
Post by: michael on Saturday, March 7, 2009, 08:59:41
Described as a "live-wire", and also a "headless chicken", in my opinion the dividing line between the two is very faint and vague. Regardless, I would really like to see this man play in a Swindon shirt.

What would you estimate the chances of me ever seeing this happen are?


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: herthab on Saturday, March 7, 2009, 09:04:45
The bloke's a legend!

Seriously though, a lot of people who saw his reserve game thought he had something. When he came on as sub against Huddersfield, I think he was trying way too hard.

Knows where the goal is, good in the air, imposing, if DW can work on his rashness we could see him in the side again this season.

If not, he'll be gone in the summer.


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: Samdy Gray on Saturday, March 7, 2009, 10:26:13
Seriously though, a lot of people who saw his reserve game thought he had something. When he came on as sub against Huddersfield*, I think he was trying way too hard.

*Oldham.


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: Leggett on Saturday, March 7, 2009, 10:30:12
Maybe he'll get more of a shout now the striker-come-midfielder-come-striker-come-sicknote peacock is out?


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: Samdy Gray on Saturday, March 7, 2009, 10:30:42
I hope so. He's the only target man we've got.


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: janaage on Saturday, March 7, 2009, 10:46:04
Maybe he'll get more of a shout now the striker-come-midfielder-come-striker-come-sicknote peacock is out?

Leggett should that not be

The striker-come-midfielder-come-striker-come-midfielder-come-sicknote Peacock..?

I don't know what i expect from today's match, I have an overwhelming sense of doom after the last 2 home matches but there's always that little spark of optimism deep within my soul, it's just letting that spark turn into a flaming fire, usually a few pints pre match gets the fire burning nicely.  Unfortunately our players seem to act as firemen, as after about 15 minutes the fire of optimism has been prett much extinguished.

Come on you reds.


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: axs on Saturday, March 7, 2009, 10:47:34
Leggett should that not be

The striker-come-midfielder-come-striker-come-midfielder-come-sicknote Peacock..?

I don't know what i expect from today's match, I have an overwhelming sense of doom after the last 2 home matches but there's always that little spark of optimism deep within my soul, it's just letting that spark turn into a flaming fire, usually a few pints pre match gets the fire burning nicely.  Unfortunately our players seem to act as firemen, as after about 15 minutes the fire of optimism has been prett much extinguished.

Come on you reds.

Should be 'cum', and that's not a rude joke.


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: Leggett on Saturday, March 7, 2009, 10:52:24
I wasn't sure andy, so to avoid any embarrassment I went with the safe option! :P


Oh I forgot to add a 'come-carthorse' on the end.


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: axs on Saturday, March 7, 2009, 10:57:35
You're not allowed to call me andy, it's cliquey.


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: Samdy Gray on Saturday, March 7, 2009, 10:58:58
 ::) Silly James!


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: adje on Saturday, March 7, 2009, 11:15:52
Razak would last 20 minutes, top!


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: Anteater on Saturday, March 7, 2009, 11:33:41
Then have him on the bench and bring him on for the last 20 minutes ! (probably 15 minutes more usefulness than BP...IMO of course !)


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: adje on Saturday, March 7, 2009, 11:35:53
If you brought him on as sub he'd be so fired up he'd probably only last 10!Believe me the man's a headcase.Entertaining thought but!


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: Bennett on Sunday, March 8, 2009, 11:09:21
i thought at the end we should've replaced morrison with razak and just gone for it. paynter was getting a bit of luck so it would've been nice to see if razak could've won a bit more/killed o'hanlon


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: herthab on Sunday, March 8, 2009, 11:57:15
*Oldham.

Thanks for the correction Sam.

They're all beginning to merge together now.............


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: Berniman on Sunday, March 8, 2009, 16:57:47
I was hoping he would get a run out yesterday once they went down to 10.  3 up front and go for it!


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: Spencer_White on Sunday, March 8, 2009, 17:12:58
Bring on the French man!!!!

We have a long history of hard trying french semi pro's. Cuevero, Ruster, Sabin, Miguel and now the Mike Tyson of France, Hamdy Razak!


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: nevillew on Sunday, March 8, 2009, 18:02:53
Darras ?


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: PHIL!!!! on Sunday, March 8, 2009, 18:19:45
Bring on the French man!!!!

We have a long history of hard trying french semi pro's. Cuevero, Ruster, Sabin, Miguel and now the Mike Tyson of France, Hamdy Razak!
I wonder where Ruster is now? Didn't he leave us because his former club hadn't officially released him, so we'd have to pay compensation to play him?

I'd have loved to see Razak play yesterday! It would have been an ideal time to bring him on (Once they'd gone down to 10 men), as we had nothin to lose.


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: sonicyouth on Sunday, March 8, 2009, 20:13:54
i will keep attending games this season solely to see razak play.


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: flammableBen on Sunday, March 8, 2009, 20:15:16
I was hoping he'd come on and not only break O'Hanlon's legs, but actually rape him in the face.


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: Rich Pullen on Sunday, March 8, 2009, 20:17:53
He's a striker. We need more goals, he has to be an serious option for selection.


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: THE FLASH on Sunday, March 8, 2009, 20:19:24
Its getting near that shit or bust moment!


I say throw him on and batter em!


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: Spencer_White on Sunday, March 8, 2009, 20:21:21
I was hoping he'd come on and not only break O'Hanlon's legs, but actually rape him in the face.


classic

:Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Anyone who wasnt at Oldham could be a tad dissapointed when they see this bloke play!


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: Sippo on Sunday, March 8, 2009, 20:38:36
rape him in the face.

I don't even want to know how he'd do that!!


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: santasdead on Monday, March 9, 2009, 00:24:10
Anyone who wasnt at Oldham could be a tad dissapointed when they see this bloke play!

And on the other hand,anyone who was at oldham may be shocked to find he has improved his footballing skills and doesn't just run round like a 12 year old trying to knock everyone out.

This is what im hoping has happened,although i recon ive only one chance left to see if this is the case,and that is next week at leeds... where,unless cox or paynter get are injured,he won't play. :cry:


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: Kinky Tom on Monday, March 9, 2009, 00:52:50
Is this the quickest route to cult status ever at Swindon?


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Monday, March 9, 2009, 07:35:49
Is this the quickest route to cult status ever at Swindon?

I'd say Fola Onion Bhaji was quicker what with having a comedy nmae and his own song.


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Monday, March 9, 2009, 08:08:27
Who was the fella who ate raw meat? He achieved cult status without ever actually playing for us... Having said that I can't remember his name.


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: Hexagon on Monday, March 9, 2009, 10:29:09
Who was the fella who ate raw meat? He achieved cult status without ever actually playing for us... Having said that I can't remember his name.
Claude Gnakpa?


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Monday, March 9, 2009, 10:46:48
Claude Gnakpa?

Yes him, thanks. I heart Claude.


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: nevillew on Monday, March 9, 2009, 11:50:03
Yes him, thanks. I heart Claude.

You think 'raw meat' and it sound like he's a hard case.   "Steak Tartare" doesn't have the same ring about it really.


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: A Gent Orange on Monday, March 9, 2009, 11:58:37
You think 'raw meat' and it sound like he's a hard case.   "Steak Tartare" doesn't have the same ring about it really.

Is beef carpaccio more manly?


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Monday, March 9, 2009, 12:07:02
I imagine him as taking bites out of a still live animal.


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: sonicyouth on Monday, March 9, 2009, 13:03:21
or sean o'hanlon's face


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: nevillew on Monday, March 9, 2009, 13:09:48
or sean o'hanlon's face

Pre or post rape ?


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: nevillew on Monday, March 9, 2009, 13:10:38
Is beef carpaccio more manly?

More thinly, I think.


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: Kinky Tom on Monday, March 9, 2009, 13:20:00
Pre or post rape ?

During, that would be the ultimate 'we'll show you' move.


Title: Re: Razak
Post by: Barry Scott on Monday, March 9, 2009, 15:43:47
Is beef carpaccio more manly?

I used to love Carpaccio, especially with Bresaola. Therefore if he ate Carpaccio he'd not be hard, he'd be in my little woolly woofter club.