Title: Twitter Post by: Luci on Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 19:23:20 Does anyone use this and what is the point of it exactly?
Isn't it basically the same as status updates on Facebook? I had a few invites for it but don't really see whats the point in it? Title: Re: Twitter Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 19:25:48 Yeah I think it's just like status updates / miniblog.
I think status updates on facebook are gay enough as it is. They're horrible attention seeking things. Title: Re: Twitter Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 19:40:12 My friend Ally wrote a bit of a rant on the subject of status changes. It amuses me somewhat.
Quote from: ally A Guide to the Twattery of Facebook Status Changes Any status change, however apparently innocent or innocuous, is, at its heart, an attention seeking, self important and pathetic attempt to assign meaning to one's life and should be treated with utter contempt. However, before deciding on whether the person should be deleted from your friend list, it is worth noting that each change falls into certain categories, varying in levels of twatishness. 1.) The 'I am doing something that nobody should give a toss about' status e.g. 'Mark is eating a delicious curry' Whilst this falls into the only 'mildly annoying' category, it should still be treated with contempt for the reason that the person assumes that anyone should actually give a shit that they are eating a curry, or about to get their hair cut, or about to jump out of the first floor window balls first because the chefs spunked into their food and gave them herpes. However, it is not grossly offensive because rather than displaying obnoxious levels of self-importance, it is more of a slightly depressing and pathetic muted death-yelp for attention. 2.) The 'I lead a more exciting, fulfilling, and sociable life than you' status e.g 'Rob is at Milan airport after a stressful week of work and looking forward to hitting the bars in Camden this weekend' Whilst on first appearances this type of status may appear to fit into category one, it is the deliberate subtle implications of such a change that elevate it to supertwatishness. Your friend is not simply stating that he is tired and looking forward to relaxing - he is forcing you to acknowledge that he has some kind of successful and important job and that to top it off, yes - he actually has a fucking awesome social life aswell. Treat with utter scorn. 3.) The 'I am an attention seeking drama queen and my emotional life is of great importance to everyone' status e.g 'Kelly is wondering whether she has made the right decision and hopes she will finally find some happiness' Such status changes are perhaps the most despicable out of all categories. First, because of the sensationalist tone, rather than hint that they would quite like some tosser to care, they actually demand a response. Rather than ignore them like the majority of subtle attention seeks, the close friends of this person must reply with a tone of caring inquisition. Instead of just thinking 'I wouldn't give a crap if you were vomiting with anxiety about the meaningless of your sorry existence' and cracking open the porn, the friend is forced to make up some shit and pretend they are losing sleep over the whole pathetic charade. 4.) The 'My love life needs to be visible to half the internet' status e.g. 'Julia is thinking why bother with men' Firstly, fuck off - its noboby's business but your own. Secondly, there are things you are not telling us in your stupid little soundbite - like the fact that getting drunk, acting like a slag, and getting your tits out to a passer by on the way home probably didn't help matters did it? But frame it on Facebook for 200 people to see and whilst he adopts the image of a shit on a shoe, you come across as a beacon of holiness. How would you like it if he changed his status to 'is still trying wash her puke off my best shirt'? Exactly, so shut your face. 5.) The 'something completely random, obscure, and incomprehensible' status e.g 'Brian is spinning his balls at the speed of light!' Similar to category 3 offence in that it annoyingly demands a response, but differs in the sense that the arrogance derives from the fact that it assumes that their friends can be fucked to inquire about the randomness, or worse pander to their ego by bothering to decode it. If you find yourself responding in a similarly obscure and witty manner, then all hope is lost. Title: Re: Twitter Post by: oxford_fan on Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 19:42:28 They're horrible attention seeking things. much like facebook on the whole? Title: Re: Twitter Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 20:11:57 is that your third edit of?
Yeah pretty much like facebook. Title: Re: Twitter Post by: oxford_fan on Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 20:22:50 Yep third. And for such a simple reply.
I'm always thinking of better things to say / better ways to say them, after the event has passed. On here is no different, but I have the benefit of the edit button. I did do an ace shout at some noisy people in the quiet carriage of the train earlier, though I had some thinking time to prepare for that one. Title: Re: Twitter Post by: Batch on Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 20:42:57 So that's what Twitter is all about. OK it's a bit sad to write them, but who actually reads them?
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: yeo on Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 20:55:31 Twitter is great its like legal stalking.I follow Johnathon Ross,Richard Bacon,Stephen Fry ,Philip Schofiled and a few other randoms.How else would I get to interact with such superstars? How else would I know Fry is stuck in a lift and the lift technicain will be 45 minutes or that Bacons Mum is thinking of buying a horrible Badger Ornament and be able to influence her not to? Its just a bit of fun.
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: Batch on Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 22:16:59 Oh right Celebs do it then. I thought it was just normal people.
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: yeo on Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 22:48:54 Normal people do it too.
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 22:56:50 YEah too right
https://twitter.com/flammableBen Title: Re: Twitter Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 23:10:06 why is nobody my twitter friend yet? You lot are rubbish.
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: yeo on Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 23:14:52 Ironic tweeting is fine :)
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: Danjackson10 on Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 23:22:36 never heard of this twitter thing
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: Danjackson10 on Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 23:23:12 link us to some celeb twitters
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: yeo on Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 23:24:14 just sign up and search them.
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: Barry Scott on Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 23:25:32 Re: Facebook status updates.
I put a status for the second time today - my first got me a warning from Facebook - i really felt like a twat doing it as well. Your post is correct Ben, or at least yourb friend's take on it is. I've got 2 mates whose status always makes me feel embarrassed to know them. I've got one who always posts things that make himself sound super important, when anyone who knows him, knows the opposite is true. And another who has a few quid, and by a few quid i mean seven figures. He's a bit of a tosspot, probably because he came into the money, but pretends he's a property developer, amongst other things. His staus updates are things like, "XXXX can't wait for his new DB9 to arrive" and "XXXX is spending Xmas and New Year in New York". He's a nice bloke though. :) Title: Re: Twitter Post by: yeo on Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 23:45:59 hahah its a cross between Whits and Bushey!!
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: Simon Pieman on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 00:30:49 If the status updates annoy you that much, you wouldn't login to facebook.
I can honestly say that facebook is as I expected, pointless. But then so is this forum in the grand scheme of things. That's what actually makes it quite entertaining. I reckon quite a few people on here will be on this Tritter thing before too long. Must say I've never heard of it until today. It sounds even more pointless than facebook too, so I'll think I'll avoid it for as long as possible. Title: Re: Twitter Post by: LucienSanchez on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 09:02:04 Twitter is great its like legal stalking.I follow Johnathon Ross,Richard Bacon,Stephen Fry ,Philip Schofiled and a few other randoms.How else would I get to interact with such superstars? How else would I know Fry is stuck in a lift and the lift technicain will be 45 minutes or that Bacons Mum is thinking of buying a horrible Badger Ornament and be able to influence her not to? Its just a bit of fun. Having seen Bacon on Something For The Weekend the last few weeks, i've now decided he's one of the funniest blokes on TV. Very subtle and witty. Title: Re: Twitter Post by: herthab on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 09:47:30 As someone who uses Facebook to stay in touch with people I hardly ever see, due to distance, I think it's a good communication tool.
This sniffy attitude of Ben's, his boyfriend and OF is pathetic. If you don't like Facebook, don't go on it. You sound like a bunch of whiny cunts. Title: Re: Twitter Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 09:52:24 Yeah like how would I let the whole world know I passed my ETM course otherwise?
Its like the too cool for school people telling you would you should and shouldt like- I have come to the conclusion I will never be cool so will just do as I like I thought Bens friends thing was quite amusing Title: Re: Twitter Post by: flammableBen on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 10:00:33 As someone who uses Facebook to stay in touch with people I hardly ever see, due to distance, I think it's a good communication tool. This sniffy attitude of Ben's, his boyfriend and OF is pathetic. If you don't like Facebook, don't go on it. You sound like a bunch of whiny cunts. hahaha Oh no someone critisised my precious facebook and my silly facebook changes I'm going to cry in a corner. Who's a whiny little cunt now? I too use facebook to keep in touch with people I don't have much contact with otherwise - generally old uni mates. Doesn't mean that constant status changes aren't gay. It's only a bit of fun hertha. Title: Re: Twitter Post by: herthab on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 10:09:59 hahaha Oh no someone critisised my precious facebook and my silly facebook changes I'm going to cry in a corner. Who's a whiny little cunt now? I too use facebook to keep in touch with people I don't have much contact with otherwise - generally old uni mates. Doesn't mean that constant status changes aren't gay. It's only a bit of fun hertha. I'm going to update my facebook status in a minute, 'Steve Is Upset That Ben Thinks He's A Whiny Little Cunt'. Title: Re: Twitter Post by: BANGKOK RED on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 10:23:06 A friend from the U.K. tracked me down through facebook before coming here once, so it has its uses.
Aides from that I don't bother much and I don't like that chat thing, it's all a bit too much socialising to me. Title: Re: Twitter Post by: yeo on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 10:25:24 I mainly use Facebook to play Scrabble and not talk to people I havent seen for ages whilst also keeping an eye on their lives cos im quite nosey.
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: yeo on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 10:27:19 It also saves me having to ring my Mum.
Oh and I found out my granddad died via Facebook(i only met him twice) Title: Re: Twitter Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 10:32:23 Poeples mums on Facebook - is that really a good thing??
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: flammableBen on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 10:33:19 I won't add my mum as a friend.
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: herthab on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 10:37:01 My ex is a friend on facebook, which is cool as we're still friends. But last week I got a message on there from her mum. Her mum is 83.
From what I remember of her she couldn't even use the video recorder! Title: Re: Twitter Post by: Bob's Orange on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 10:38:14 I won't add my mum as a friend. I wish I fucking hadn't!! She comments on almost every picture/blog I put on Facebook and always in a really cringeworthy way that only mum's seem to be able to pull off! I couldn't really not add her though as she lives in the States and I don't see her much. Title: Re: Twitter Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 10:40:04 luckily my mum can bearly text!
saying that shes not even text me back to congratulate me on passing my ETM course I feel like an orphan :D Title: Re: Twitter Post by: LucienSanchez on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 11:06:24 luckily my mum can bearly text! saying that shes not even text me back to congratulate me on passing my ETM course I feel like an orphan :D Go for it, they could do with the love... Title: Re: Twitter Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 11:09:23 You are full of wrong!
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: yeo on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 12:47:32 My Mums alright really, though she does keep commenting on Tatoos which I find disturbing ( I think her husbands son runs a shop or something) Id like to point out that my Mum doesnt actually have any tatoos...I dont think she does anyway..
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: Luci on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 12:49:44 My boyfriends dad is addicted to it - constantly adding photos and updating his status bless him.
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: land_of_bo on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 13:03:33 I delete people who update their status too often or continually post links to "news" stories and such like. I even removed the wall application so I don't have to receive the same shitty joke or video 70 times a week.
Thinking about it, I should just delete my account and be done with it! Title: Re: Twitter Post by: Miss Angry on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 13:04:28 My dad is on it, lucky for me my mum isnt otherwise she would argue with me for having my dad as a "friend"
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: land_of_bo on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 13:04:41 Oh, and if I was to delete my account am I allowed to have a status of "...is leaving fuckbook for good" for a few days first?
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 13:07:45 My Mums alright really, though she does keep commenting on Tatoos which I find disturbing ( I think her husbands son runs a shop or something) Id like to point out that my Mum doesnt actually have any tatoos...I dont think she does anyway.. oooooh I wish your mum was my friend! Title: Re: Twitter Post by: oxford_fan on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 13:31:26 As someone who uses Facebook to stay in touch with people I hardly ever see, due to distance, I think it's a good communication tool. This sniffy attitude of Ben's, his boyfriend and OF is pathetic. If you don't like Facebook, don't go on it. You sound like a bunch of whiny cunts. I appreciate facebook as a communication tool. It has almost completely taken over from email for me, is great for keeping in contact with old uni mates/cousins on the other side of the world, and makes arranging nights out and other get-togethers much easier. But along with that you also get all the unavoidable superflous bollocks which people put on there, mostly about themselves. Status changes are the pinnacle of the bollocks. Though from time-to-time they can be amusing. Title: Re: Twitter Post by: flammableBen on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 13:41:19 Inappropriate group invitations are a bit of an odd one. I've never invited people to a group before, does it just default to sending it out to everyone of your friends?
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: oxford_fan on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 13:49:39 there's probably a check box for 'all', but you can select individuals too.
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: yeo on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 14:01:08 I find group invites a bit annoying.Stuff like "ban peados fom facebook" whats the point? what are they trying to achieve by making these groups .As far as im aware being a peado is illegal anyway making a Facebook group wont make it more so...
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: Mexicano Rojo on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 14:03:03 im going to start a ban jamies from facebook
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 14:04:21 Im gunna start a group to ban Mex from perving on my friends ;)
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: A Gent Orange on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 14:18:36 I've decided to follow Ben, via Twitter, not in real life. That would be the only way that it could actually be more dull.
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: tans on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 14:27:42 Ive just signed up to this to see what its all about.
I dont have a fucking clue :) Title: Re: Twitter Post by: Mexicano Rojo on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 14:30:33 Im gunna start a group to ban Mex from perving on my friends ;) a restraining order will do it Title: Re: Twitter Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 14:40:25 Janes applied for one ;)
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: Sussex on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 14:58:23 I dont have a fucking clue :) Same as, I don't know what the fuck everyone's going on about. Title: Re: Twitter Post by: Luci on Monday, April 13, 2009, 18:10:34 I've just signed up to this, might make for some amusement and so I can see what all the fuss is about, my first person to follow = Jeff Stelling, oh yes!
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: Simon Pieman on Monday, April 13, 2009, 18:12:31 I've decided there is a reason there is twit in the title
Title: Re: Twitter Post by: michael on Monday, April 13, 2009, 18:38:58 I am not on Twitter, but that doesn't stop me from checking up on Lily Allen most days
http://twitter.com/lilyroseallen She is on tour at the moment, but keeping us updated on what she is up to :) |