Title: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: STFC_Gazza on Monday, January 19, 2009, 17:14:56 Am I the only person who think's Blair Sturrock is under-rated. He gets called shit all the time, he may not score loads but the way he plays the channels and his energy DOES add something to the team in my opinion. I think Sturrock is one of our most under-rated players. I think the guy needs more credit.
Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: axs on Monday, January 19, 2009, 17:18:00 Good brain, works hard, can pick a pass, but can't shoot for toffee.
Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: Flea on Monday, January 19, 2009, 17:18:53 I agree. To be fair he always puts the effort in when he plays.
Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: DV on Monday, January 19, 2009, 17:19:48 If we played 3 up front he'd be the perfect player to have as one of the two wide forwards, if that makes sense.
Seen as McNamee hasnt done much and is our only left winger then we could always try Blair on the wing, at least that way when he's working the channels we will still have strikers in the box. Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: Ardiles on Monday, January 19, 2009, 17:22:29 He's not a natural goalscorer, but his effort and application always impress me. Fans at our level are always complaining when players don't look as if they want to be there, so I'll always cut Blair some slack. Sadly, I don't think he is good enough to be a part of the long term set up with us.
Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: axs on Monday, January 19, 2009, 17:22:34 And he can tackle a bit and win the odd header.
Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: janaage on Monday, January 19, 2009, 17:32:24 Am I the only person who think's Blair Sturrock is under-rated. He gets called shit all the time, he may not score loads but the way he plays the channels and his energy DOES add something to the team in my opinion. I think Sturrock is one of our most under-rated players. I think the guy needs more credit. Completely agree Gary, Sturrock is a decent player, struggles to win the fans over due to the famous dad situation. Decent enough bloke to chat to too. Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: chalkies_shorts on Monday, January 19, 2009, 17:46:29 Am I the only person who think's Blair Sturrock is under-rated. He gets called shit all the time, he may not score loads but the way he plays the channels and his energy DOES add something to the team in my opinion. I think Sturrock is one of our most under-rated players. I think the guy needs more credit. Agree. Is certainly one of our most intelligent players not that its much of an achievement. He gives us another option running the channels. Also gives 100% effort. Tow big problems though - not a natural finisher and has a distinct lack of pace. Would be a good player to play in the hole behind the front 1 or 2 if Paynter wasn't playing so far back. Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: Lumps on Monday, January 19, 2009, 18:28:59 Agree. Is certainly one of our most intelligent players not that its much of an achievement. He gives us another option running the channels. Also gives 100% effort. Tow big problems though - not a natural finisher and has a distinct lack of pace. Would be a good player to play in the hole behind the front 1 or 2 if Paynter wasn't playing so far back. Basically he's a Lidl own brand Andy Mutch, thank fuck we didn't pay £200,000 for him. Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: dell boy on Monday, January 19, 2009, 19:25:38 When Sturrock plays (not very often) he is playing for his right to be in the squad. Attitude and effort changes when you believe you are an automatic choice because there really is no other option but to play you even though you are playing crap every week, so insteps Sturrock for his cameos and you think wow he's really pretty good.
Sturrock is a very average player, in a very unmotivated, shit team, when a player like Sturrock stands out then you know you are in big trouble. Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Monday, January 19, 2009, 19:35:51 Problem imo is he works the channells, cox paynter drop to deep our midfield never enter the box and our wingers never attack the back post. We have too many players who play outside the box and need a box player who has the touch of a rapist but scores from crosses. Akinfenwa would be that type of player
Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: Simon Pieman on Monday, January 19, 2009, 19:39:32 Sturrock is an average player, with poor shooting ability.
However, his work ethic and the way he plays the game is exactly what we're missing now - well in the midfield anyway. Perhaps move him back there. It's worked for Peacock ;) Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: RobertT on Monday, January 19, 2009, 21:38:26 Coming off the bench is probably his level, whatever his cranial abilities. If only he could give his brain to Ifil.
Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: Batch on Monday, January 19, 2009, 21:47:32 I often thought the same about Nalis brain in Pooks body. He'd be half decent then.
I think you may be onto something we'd half the wage bill and improve the squad. Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: RobertT on Monday, January 19, 2009, 21:51:39 Hmm, McGovern could take on Marshall's legs. Peacock could have Barry Corr's, he's seems alright from the waist down to be fair and he won't need them for football. Byrne and Aljofree could morph into one the foulest mouthed humans alive.
Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: adje on Monday, January 19, 2009, 22:12:18 When Sturrock plays (not very often) he is playing for his right to be in the squad. Attitude and effort changes when you believe you are an automatic choice because there really is no other option but to play you even though you are playing crap every week, so insteps Sturrock for his cameos and you think wow he's really pretty good. Sturrock is a very average player, in a very unmotivated, shit team, when a player like Sturrock stands out then you know you are in big trouble. I would like to associate myself with those remarks Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: overthehill on Tuesday, January 20, 2009, 09:04:20 Why is it that "channels" is always associated with the name Blair Sturrock.
I would much prefer to see "goals". Where the fuck are the channels anyway. Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: Berniman on Tuesday, January 20, 2009, 09:07:05 I would like to associate myself with those remarks Me too. Decent player at Lge 2 level, average at this, along with 80% of our squad. Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: donkey on Tuesday, January 20, 2009, 17:57:02 Me too. Decent player at Lge 2 level, average at this, along with 80% of our squad. As this site says...80% bollocks! Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: Ironside on Tuesday, January 20, 2009, 18:21:20 Hmm, McGovern could take on Marshall's legs. Peacock could have Barry Corr's, he's seems alright from the waist down to be fair and he won't need them for football. Byrne and Aljofree could morph into one the foulest mouthed humans alive. Perhaps we should sign Victor Frankenstein as our new "physio"? Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, January 20, 2009, 18:47:39 As this site says...80% bollocks! It's the 25% football we're struggling with at the moment. Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: Tails on Tuesday, January 20, 2009, 20:59:49 Works the channels well and has a very good footballing brain. Doesn't have the pace or shooting ability to match unfortunately.
Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: adje on Tuesday, January 20, 2009, 21:05:10 Perhaps he ought to sign for Dover?
Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: axs on Tuesday, January 20, 2009, 21:49:38 Perhaps he ought to sign for Dover? I'm calling that - someone made a dover / channel joke earlier. Denied. Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: adje on Tuesday, January 20, 2009, 22:08:48 Damn you axs!
Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: axs on Tuesday, January 20, 2009, 22:39:46 Damn you axs! I'm like an eagle that went to specsavers. Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: Crozzer on Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 01:23:49 Did very well in a 4:3:3 set up (Kettering?). Stick him on the wing, or stick him up front to chase the opposing back four in away games. Then, make him the next manager after D.W. Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: nevillew on Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 07:43:25 I'm calling that - someone made a dover / channel joke earlier. Denied. Thanks for pointing out the plagiarism, axs. Shame on you Adje. Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: horlock07 on Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 12:57:12 Problem imo is he works the channells, cox paynter drop to deep our midfield never enter the box and our wingers never attack the back post. We have too many players who play outside the box and need a box player who has the touch of a rapist but scores from crosses. Akinfenwa would be that type of player Spot on, I honestly think this is one of major problems. Our midfield seem to neither protect the back 4 or push forward to support the front two -actually not really clear what they do! We always end up with either the ball being pumped up to the front two who lay off into the area behind them and the defence just pick it up or they end up dropping so deep that we actually play with no one up front and the strikers look knackered after 70 mins! Perhaps Blair would be a solution behind the front two at least in the short term? Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: Bennett on Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 17:24:11 player spotting- blair listing to music wandering about in house of fraser this lunch time
Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 17:25:57 player spotting- blair listing to music wandering about in house of fraser this lunch time Presumably he'd been on the piss hence the inability to keep upright. Title: Re: Blair Sturrock ... Post by: adje on Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 18:41:16 Thanks for pointing out the plagiarism, axs. Shame on you Adje. Didn't see it -honest! |