Thetownend.com

80% => The Nevillew General Discussion Forum => Topic started by: Barry Scott on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 00:23:28



Title: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: Barry Scott on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 00:23:28
For fucks sake, here we go again. Freedom once again getting stamped out in the name of the preventing the masses of terrorism we live through on a daily basis. I might have to become a terrorist at this rate. Pathetic.

Quote from: The BBC
Rules forcing internet companies to keep details of every e-mail sent in the UK are a waste of money and an attack on civil liberties, say critics.

From March all internet service providers (ISPs) will by law have to keep information about every e-mail sent or received in the UK for a year.

Human rights group Liberty says it is worried what will happen next.

The Home Office insists the data, which does not include e-mails' content, is vital for crime and terror inquiries.

Some three billion e-mails are thought to be sent each day in the UK.

Safe keeping

Shami Chakrabarti, director of Liberty, said ISPs already kept the information on a voluntary basis.

"The thing we have to worry about is what happens next because the government is already mooting plans not just to leave this stuff with the providers but to create a central government database where they hold all the information.

"I'm afraid we just don't trust any government or any organisation to keep that much very sensitive information about us all and to keep it safe."

Critics of the new rules also include an association of internet service providers and computer experts.

Dr Richard Clayton, a security researcher at the University of Cambridge's computer lab, said the money could have been better spent.

He said:"There's going to be a record of every single e-mail which arrived addressed to you and all the e-mails you sent out via your ISP.

"That, of course, includes all the spam.

"I'd have liked to see more bobbies on an electronic beat investigating internet crimes.

"There are much better things to do to spend our billions on than snooping on everybody in the country just on the off-chance that they're a criminal."

The new rules are due to come into force on 15 March, as part of a European Commission directive which could affect every ISP in the country.

The firms will have to store the information and make it available to any public body which makes a lawful request, which could include police, local councils and health authorities.

To help set up the system the government may end up paying ISPs between £25m and £70m.

The rules already apply to telephone companies, which routinely hold much of the data for billing.

The Earl of Northesk, a Conservative peer on the House of Lords science and technology committee, said it meant anyone's movements could be traced 24 hours a day.

"This degree of storage is equivalent to having access to every second, every minute, every hour of your life," he said.

"People have to worry about the scale, the virtuality of your life being exposed to about 500 public authorities.

"Under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, privacy is a fundamental right... it is important to protect the principle of privacy because once you've lost it, it's very difficult to recover."

The Home Office said the data was a vital tool for investigation and intelligence gathering.

"It will allow investigators to identify suspects, examine their contacts, establish relationships between conspirators and place them in a specific location at a certain time.

"Implementing the EC directive will enable UK law enforcement to benefit fully from historical communications data in increasingly complex investigations and will enhance our national security."

'Better things'

But the industry itself has concerns about how the new rules will work.

Malcolm Hutty, from LINX (London Internet Exchange), a membership association for ISPs, said: "The position as to what the ISPs are to do is not clear."

He said on paper the law applied to all companies, but the Home Office has been saying informally that small ISPs would be exempt.

He said they were now left "in limbo", fearful of legal action if at some time in the future as the company became bigger, they were then expected to collect the data.

Reports have suggested the government has even bigger plans for data retention called the Interception Modernisation Programme.

It could involve one central database, gathering details on every text sent, e-mail sent, phone call made and website visited.

Consultation on the plans is due to begin later this year.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7819230.stm


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: tans on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 00:31:30
so what happens to porn emails then?


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: Bennett on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 07:32:21
tans, they print them out and keep them in a file


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 08:21:19
The really odd thing is that they can't see email contents, only the titles, sender and recipient. So unless Al-Queda start sending messages with the title "RE: Parliament Bomb Plot" I can't see it being much use.


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 08:22:46
Whats the big deal? If you are not doing anything wrong there's nothing to worry about surely?


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: Batch on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 09:40:25
The really odd thing is that they can't see email contents, only the titles, sender and recipient. So unless Al-Queda start sending messages with the title "RE: Parliament Bomb Plot" I can't see it being much use.
It'll provide a historic record of who is emailing who though, so I guess the though is that anyone associated with a suspect can be pulled in for questioning. I imagine email contents are already monitored to find suspects.

In essence I guess it isn't any different from telephone records.


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: THE FLASH on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 10:59:34
I left a company a few years back after falling out with a manager...resigned and gave three months notice.
He asked me to come into work (as i was home based) and leave my laptop in the office for security reasons...
That night my hard disc somehow stopped working......


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: Gazza's Fat Mate on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 11:34:32
Whats the big deal? If you are not doing anything wrong there's nothing to worry about surely?

You and people like you are the reason we are sleeping walking into a police state. The reason it matters is that do you turst the goverment to only use it for those comit crime?

Those in power do all they can to control and keep power. That is way goverment after goverment has surpressed the rights of the public eg you are now not alound to protest outside parliment without the permission of the state. So if the state don't like what you have to stay they can fuck you off.

The police have the power and use the power to detain protesters without chagre if they suspect "disorder" this power has been used for example against those protesting at the arms fair in docklands. Up to 100 protesters were held  in an under pass using the terrisom act they were held without charge for 6 hours, photographed etc then reasled one by one.

As this is a footy fourm perhaps it is worth while pointing out the abuse of the state agaisnt football fans I would refer you to the cunts at GMP who shipped off a pub full of stoke shirters because they decided they were thugs. Most of us have been filnmed searched abused by police at football in the name of up holding the law. How many of use have ever done anything wrong.

The fact is the state don't want people to think for themselves they want everyone to belive what they say without question and not question there actions even if they are wrong. To do this they are using fear of mulsim, war, gobal warming to scare people and use this fear to pass ever more resctive laws but of course if you have done nothing wrong whats the problem untill of course just having your own thoughts or being different is wrong. We are on a slippery slope and the sooner we wake up the better.


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: Mexicano Rojo on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 11:47:42
youve quoted that off the net havent you :)

No spelling mistakes gave you away.


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: Barry Scott on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 11:56:47
You and people like you are the reason we are sleeping walking into a police state. The reason it matters is that do you turst the goverment to only use it for those comit crime?

Those in power do all they can to control and keep power. That is way goverment after goverment has surpressed the rights of the public eg you are now not alound to protest outside parliment without the permission of the state. So if the state don't like what you have to stay they can fuck you off.

The police have the power and use the power to detain protesters without chagre if they suspect "disorder" this power has been used for example against those protesting at the arms fair in docklands. Up to 100 protesters were held  in an under pass using the terrisom act they were held without charge for 6 hours, photographed etc then reasled one by one.

As this is a footy fourm perhaps it is worth while pointing out the abuse of the state agaisnt football fans I would refer you to the cunts at GMP who shipped off a pub full of stoke shirters because they decided they were thugs. Most of us have been filnmed searched abused by police at football in the name of up holding the law. How many of use have ever done anything wrong.

The fact is the state don't want people to think for themselves they want everyone to belive what they say without question and not question there actions even if they are wrong. To do this they are using fear of mulsim, war, gobal warming to scare people and use this fear to pass ever more resctive laws but of course if you have done nothing wrong whats the problem untill of course just having your own thoughts or being different is wrong. We are on a slippery slope and the sooner we wake up the better.

:clap:


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: axs on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 13:10:31
youve quoted that off the net havent you :)

No spelling mistakes gave you away.

 :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:

I assume that was irony.


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 13:22:13
You and people like you are the reason we are sleeping walking into a police state. The reason it matters is that do you turst the goverment to only use it for those comit crime?

Those in power do all they can to control and keep power. That is way goverment after goverment has surpressed the rights of the public eg you are now not alound to protest outside parliment without the permission of the state. So if the state don't like what you have to stay they can fuck you off.

The police have the power and use the power to detain protesters without chagre if they suspect "disorder" this power has been used for example against those protesting at the arms fair in docklands. Up to 100 protesters were held  in an under pass using the terrisom act they were held without charge for 6 hours, photographed etc then reasled one by one.

As this is a footy fourm perhaps it is worth while pointing out the abuse of the state agaisnt football fans I would refer you to the cunts at GMP who shipped off a pub full of stoke shirters because they decided they were thugs. Most of us have been filnmed searched abused by police at football in the name of up holding the law. How many of use have ever done anything wrong.

The fact is the state don't want people to think for themselves they want everyone to belive what they say without question and not question there actions even if they are wrong. To do this they are using fear of mulsim, war, gobal warming to scare people and use this fear to pass ever more resctive laws but of course if you have done nothing wrong whats the problem untill of course just having your own thoughts or being different is wrong. We are on a slippery slope and the sooner we wake up the better.
Sorry, but I think you are talking bollocks, which, of course you are entitled to do.


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: adje on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 18:23:07
Im definitely with GFM on this-the perverted fear of ,er..almost everything subdues the masses and keeps people exactly where the authorities want them.Some people are deluded if they think that their "innocence" is all that matters


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: leefer on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 20:12:08
But the point is there is nothing any of us can do to change it....so although i dont like it..i have to lump it,i think its staggering i pay £120 per month council tax on top of all our other taxes,i think its wrong we pay for our prescriptions,when in Scotland and Wales they dont,i think theres hundreds of reasons why we should be pissed off,big brother has helped track down alot of criminals and may act as a deterent in cases(cctv).
The police have alot of power to wealdbut i side on the basis that if your law abiding(even though you think the laws are wrong) then you are in no trouble regarding a so called police state,in relation to other countrys we are very privelidged........its just a shame weve all got to pay through our noses to make it like that.


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: Ironside on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 20:16:12
But the point is there is nothing any of us can do to change it....so although i dont like it..i have to lump it,i think its staggering i pay £120 per month council tax on top of all our other taxes,i think its wrong we pay for our prescriptions,when in Scotland and Wales they dont,i think theres hundreds of reasons why we should be pissed off,big brother has helped track down alot of criminals and may act as a deterent in cases(cctv).
The police have alot of power to wealdbut i side on the basis that if your law abiding(even though you think the laws are wrong) then you are in no trouble regarding a so called police state,in relation to other countrys we are very privelidged........its just a shame weve all got to pay through our noses to make it like that.

Use your vote while you still can.  The'yll ban that if they get in again.


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: leefer on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 20:26:19
But Labour won last time with less than half the voting percentage...i didnt vote Labour nor did millions of others...if you support say the green party what does your vote get you.....correct absolute Zilch,so for me personaly it wouldnt matter if i didnt get a vote because voting for governments has never really helped me,saying that even though we are a very tranquil nation relatively speaking i dont think we would stand for our votes being taken away.


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: Ironside on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 20:52:54
Jeremy Clarkson as a better claim to be PM than McBroon,  at least he has actually had people vote for him to PM, even it was a mickey mouse internet poll or something.

I take your point about voting though but just proves that our "democracy" is nothing more than an illusion at the moment.


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 21:21:15
Meh!!!

They are trying to do their fucking job. "Police state"!!!!! Fuck that, again they are doing their job, which is to police. What would we do without a police force? We would end up policing ourselves that's what, and so who would you rather have policing the neighbourhood, your next door neighbours or an organised and equipped force that will respond to a telephone call?

What would you prefer, a country like the UK where the authorities actually try to do their job or a country like Thailand where the police consider their job to be one of extorting as much money from the populace as possible. "What's that? You got robbed Mr. Red?, well the best thing you could do is to file a police report, it will only cost 2,000 baht"

I am digressing here..... You may or may not be aware that the departure lounges or whatever in some UK and other countries airports actually stop and check individual males who are travelling to this part of the world. Obviously they are looking out for the Gary Glitters of this world.

And on a local thai forum the PC brigade are out: "Oh my god, it is an invasion of my privacy"........ "Oh my god it's profiling"............... FUCK OFF!!!!!!!!!! These cops at the airport have actually caught pedo's with dodgy images of young kids, possibly/probably saving some kid(s) from abuse, and yet people still have a bitch about it. I have a little girl myself and so I am more than happy for the coppers to be looking over her. They could invade the privacy of my luggage all they fucking well like, the only time that I may protest is if I am due for a meeting in which case I would say "Hurry up a bit gov."

Now what are the supposed to do against terrorists? Just go in and wipe them out?

They don't really know where they (the terrorists) are do they, nor whom they are or what they are planning. All that they can do is try gather as much intelligence as they can to try to stop innocent people from being killed. They are just trying to pre-empt an attack which may kill may civilians, and it ain't exactly an easy job for them is it?

If you where to ask the families of 9/11 or Mumbai what they that of this kind of thing, something that may have possibly lead to the attacks being thwarted what do you think their opinion would be? And what would YOUR opinion be should you be involved such a thing?

I did have (Lots) more to to say but I have had too much to drink.

But I will end with, I know that the old bill can be cocks at times. But if they are trying to do things such as stopping terrorist's and Pedo's from their evil deads, then what does it matter that they had to check your bag or look out for references to bombs or whatever from your hotmail account.

Brothers, Brothers. We should not be fighting amongst ourselves, we should be fighting the common enemy.







Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 21:36:14
Oh, and after just having scanned through the article:

Quote
Human rights group Liberty


Too drunk to research myself, but a stab in the dark tells me that this is the type of group the believe that Pedo's have the (Human) right to live and work next to kids.

I may stand to be corrected but if I am correct then these type of people REALLY get under my skin.

What about peoples rights NOT to be bombed or kids rights NOT to be raped?

"Oh but they might know my hotmail account"

FFS!


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: Ironside on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 21:38:56
BR, The point is that its basically death by a thousand cuts.  
Government today bring in a law, with I'm sure, the best intentions. The next government might not.


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: dell boy on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 21:42:36
BR top post


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: Ironside on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 21:57:14
Who polices the police?


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 21:57:43
BR, The point is that its basically death by a thousand cuts.  
Government today bring in a law, with I'm sure, the best intentions. The next government might not.

Does it make it wrong to bring in that law in the first place though Ironside?


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 22:03:00
Who polices the police?

I guess that we do Ironside. If that got out of hand a good riot or to would set them straight.

I have been in Thailand long enough to appreciate that the UK is democratic enough that the people can sort their own problems out. Here, they rely upon the Army and the Monarchy.


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 22:17:15
One last word before I go to bed.

For me this sums up this whole thread.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExWfh6sGyso


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 22:32:04
BR: That is the most eloquent amd spot on p*ssed up rant I have seen for a long while. I salute you! :1st: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy:


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 22:48:28
I'm terrified. I find myself agreeing with Ironside daily.


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: Anteater on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 23:13:58
I'm Brionside and so is my wife !


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: suttonred on Saturday, January 10, 2009, 23:20:45
Maybe i'm a bit pissed, but i have read the whole thread and dont have a fucking clue what is going on,help!


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: Gazza's Fat Mate on Sunday, January 11, 2009, 13:15:37
Who is this common emeny?

If we carry on the way we are going all civil libirtes will go but thats okay because if you have done nothing wrong you don't need them. Once they are gone then the right to choice will soon go as well and what you do will be dicated by the state.


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: michael on Sunday, January 11, 2009, 14:32:37
As I have learnt from watching The Wire, the Baddies will avoid detection by the authorities by using "burner" email addresses, probably at internet cafes, which will make them almost impossible to monitor.

Perhaps I could act as a consultant on this particular project.


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: Gazza's Fat Mate on Sunday, January 11, 2009, 16:08:18
As I have learnt from watching The Wire, the Baddies will avoid detection by the authorities by using "burner" email addresses, probably at internet cafes, which will make them almost impossible to monitor.

it's not real it's called a tv program.


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: Anteater on Sunday, January 11, 2009, 19:18:28
Bit more of 'big bruv' bedding down.....not that 'we' will do anything about it !


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: Barry Scott on Sunday, January 11, 2009, 19:57:29
it's not real it's called a tv program.

:chuckle:



Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: Lumps on Monday, January 12, 2009, 11:15:58
I don't think I've ever agreed with every word of a post by GFM before.

I'm slightly concerned.


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: Phil_S on Monday, January 12, 2009, 11:37:52
The problem is not so much the passing of the laws, but the way they are then used for all sorts of other reasons. I have a fundamental believe that career politicians are bad for the country. They leve in their own little world, have no experience of life & ditch any principles they may have in order to stay in power.
It seems to me that they pass laws now for the sake of it, & don't spend the time making sure that the laws they pass are good laws, even then most are now super ceeded by Eupropen laws made up by Quangos & imposed by faceless buearocrats.




Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: Lumps on Monday, January 12, 2009, 12:13:05
As for BR's rant, it pushes all the buttons these fucking cunts that want to run every aspect of our lives always push.

"We've got to be able to read every e-mail that ever gets sent 'cause of paedo's and terrorists"
"We've got to have the freedom to jail people without charge for up to 3 months to protect our freedom from terrorists"

It's always the same fucking hate figures and scare stories.

And the objections to the frankly facile "if you've nothing to hide you've nothing to fear" argument are fucking obvious. As GFM and Ironside have both posted (fuck I never expected to be typing that) the intentions of this government may be perfectly benign, but once powers are on the statute books its really fucking hard to get them off again, and future governments might not be as "liberal". (God help us all if we end up with a more authoritarian bunch than this load of cunts mind).

Remember three things:

1) The prevention of terrorism act introduced first in 1973 had the words (temporary provisions) in parenthesis in the title and thirty five years later those powers have if anything been extended
2) The number of arrests under the prevention of terrorism act, in all it's incarnations since 1973 absolutely dwarfs the number of people that have actually gone on to be charged with any terrorist offences. It's at a ratio of 10:1 or greater. That's not because they've failed to charge a whole load of terrorists, but because the act has been used to arrest and hold a range of people that the state consider to be trouble that have no connection whatsoever with what you might consider terrorism.
3) What's the most high profile use of the financial powers in the 2001 Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act that you can remember? Don't know? Well it was used to freeze the estimated £4 billion of British financial assets in Landsbanki the parent bank of Icesave the Icelandic bank that went tit's up late last year taking whole load of Brit savings with it. Any hint of terrorism there? Any hint of judicial control of the use of an act specifically designed for anti-terror purposes for another purpose altogether? Was there fuck.

So what the hell makes anyone think that legislation introduced now which we're told is for a specific purpose and aimed at targeted individuals won't at some stage in the future get used against the rest of us?

As we discussed a week or so ago in another thread Hitler came to power in Germany on the basis of temporary emergency legislation brought in to counter "a terrorist threat". Within the year the powers he was granted to be used against pretty fictional "communist revolutionary terrorists" (in an era when Stalin had very little interest in exporting socialism overseas) had been turned on all of the communist party, then the socialist party, then trade union activists, before they went on to anyone that didn't conform to the party's ideal, the disabled, the jews, the homosexuals, the romanies.

So, having found myself on the same side as Ironside, GFM and David Davies in a political debate, I might as well go the whole hog and close with a quote from an 18th century Whig, Edmund Burke

"The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedients, and by parts"

Fuck I'm agreeing with the founder of modern conservatism. What the hell's next.


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: Ironside on Monday, January 12, 2009, 12:54:00
Very well said Lumpy.


Title: Re: Talk about taking serious fucking liberties!
Post by: donkey on Tuesday, January 13, 2009, 20:43:04
A couple of quotes by Thomas Jefferson:

Liberty is to the collective body, what health is to every individual body. Without health no pleasure can be tasted by man; without liberty, no happiness can be enjoyed by society.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

A quote from a mates t-shirt: Guy Fawkes - the only man to enter parliament with honest intentions.

Finally, if I may, a long quote from Proudhoun:

To be GOVERNED is to be watched, inspected, spied upon, directed, law-driven, numbered, regulated, enrolled, indoctrinated, preached at, controlled, checked, estimated, valued, censured, commanded, by creatures who have neither the right nor the wisdom nor the virtue to do so.

To be GOVERNED is to be at every operation, at every transaction noted, registered, counted, taxed, stamped, measured, numbered, assessed, licensed, authorized, admonished, prevented, forbidden, reformed, corrected, punished. It is, under pretext of public utility, and in the name of the general interest, to be placed under contribution, drilled, fleeced, exploited, monopolized, extorted from, squeezed, hoaxed, robbed; then at the slightest resistance, the first word of complaint, to be repressed, fined, vilified, harassed, hunted down, abused, clubbed, disarmed, bound, choked, imprisoned, judged, condemned, shot, deported, sacrificed, sold, betrayed, and to crown all, mocked, ridiculed, derided, outraged, dishonoured. That is government; that is its justice; that is its morality.

When Saturday Comes has an interesting piece on the Police's use of Section 27 of the 2006 Violent Crime Reduction Act to detain football fans, and escort them half way across the country.

Be careful just what liberties you're prepared to give up, once gone, you don't get them back.