Title: Curtis Weston Post by: tans on Sunday, January 4, 2009, 16:26:21 Still shit...
Title: Re: Curtis Weston Post by: Crozzer on Sunday, January 4, 2009, 16:30:20 Did not follow Sturrock's orders at Barnet, and the rest is history. Title: Re: Curtis Weston Post by: Chubbs on Sunday, January 4, 2009, 16:35:47 not as shit as curtis davies
Title: Re: Curtis Weston Post by: tans on Sunday, January 4, 2009, 16:37:01 Adam Miller seems to be having a bad game!
Title: Re: Curtis Weston Post by: JPC82 on Sunday, January 4, 2009, 16:38:12 not as shit as curtis davies hes class, been in the england squad a few times hasnt he? Title: Re: Curtis Weston Post by: DMR on Sunday, January 4, 2009, 16:40:33 You're having a giggle aren't you JPC? He's always terrible when I see him play.
Title: Re: Curtis Weston Post by: JPC82 on Sunday, January 4, 2009, 16:42:41 You're having a giggle aren't you JPC? He's always terrible when I see him play. no i rate him, Villa seem to be on tv every week so seen him quite a bit, he seems more solid alongside Laursen though, Zat Knight is poor Title: Re: Curtis Weston Post by: Chubbs on Sunday, January 4, 2009, 16:46:15 hes class, been in the england squad a few times hasnt he? haha. davies is shocking, he's just a lump, he's not no mobility whatsoever Title: Re: Curtis Weston Post by: DV on Sunday, January 4, 2009, 16:49:51 are people getting Knight and Davies mixed up?
Title: Re: Curtis Weston Post by: JPC82 on Sunday, January 4, 2009, 16:50:28 are people getting Knight and Davies mixed up? Davies is class, Knight is shite Title: Re: Curtis Weston Post by: DV on Sunday, January 4, 2009, 16:52:05 thats what I meant. Davies a big nonmobile lump, thats Knight?
Although I dont think Davies is anything that special. Title: Re: Curtis Weston Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Sunday, January 4, 2009, 17:02:52 3rd in the prem league. Yeah well shit players
Title: Re: Curtis Weston Post by: Chubbs on Sunday, January 4, 2009, 17:19:37 thats what I meant. Davies a big nonmobile lump, thats Knight? Although I dont think Davies is anything that special. they look the same :-) Title: Re: Curtis Weston Post by: Arriba on Sunday, January 4, 2009, 18:10:54 curtis davies is a decent player
Title: Re: Curtis Weston Post by: cib on Sunday, January 4, 2009, 18:20:38 haha. davies is shocking, he's just a lump, he's not no mobility whatsoever He's much better than Knight, and like someone said alongside Laursen they're a very good pairing. He's not any worse than any of the other overpaid English centre backs at present Title: Re: Curtis Weston Post by: cib on Sunday, January 4, 2009, 18:21:41 But Curtis Weston is still shit, probably hoping Dennis will take him up north
Title: Re: Curtis Weston Post by: dell boy on Sunday, January 4, 2009, 18:37:22 I thought Weston had a reasonable game.
Gillingham played superbly to a man, must have watched a different game. Title: Re: Curtis Weston Post by: adje on Sunday, January 4, 2009, 19:08:17 It just depresses me watching games like that in the knowledge that we could never put in a performance like Gillingscum's today against top opposition,and I'll tell you what I think-none of our "midfield maestros"would have played anywhere near as well as Weston did.Sad
Title: Re: Curtis Weston Post by: leefer on Sunday, January 4, 2009, 19:33:25 Got to agree...they played with a passion missing from our team.
Title: Re: Curtis Weston Post by: Rich Pullen on Sunday, January 4, 2009, 21:16:09 There was a big article about him in the Independent (I think, read a rogue copy on the train) on Saturday. I'd wish him luck, but I dislike Gillingham.....
|