Title: Mcgovern Post by: lambourn red on Saturday, August 9, 2008, 17:12:10 I know Cox got the official MOM but McGovern was MOM for me , that was by far his best game in a Swindon shirt today.
Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: Arriba on Saturday, August 9, 2008, 17:16:42 agree he was easily mom.i'd have picked paynter over cox too.
Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: Reg Smeeton on Saturday, August 9, 2008, 17:17:31 I know Cox got the official MOM but McGovern was MOM for me , that was by far his best game in a Swindon shirt today. Strange how different people see a different game, I thought he was OK today, kind of did a job, without ever really looking like taking hold of teh game. Cox though I thought was excellent, high work rate, brought others into the game and a threat on goal. Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: Luci on Saturday, August 9, 2008, 17:18:57 Strange how different people see a different game, I thought he was OK today, kind of did a job, without ever really looking like taking hold of teh game. Cox though I thought was excellent, high work rate, brought others into the game and a threat on goal. I agree. Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: wiggy on Saturday, August 9, 2008, 17:19:23 Cox was deffo MOM. He looked a cut above.
JP was OK, but for the amount of ball he had he could still do a bit better. Timlin had a good game IMO. Happy days. Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: leefer on Saturday, August 9, 2008, 17:22:43 Cox for me...JPM played well and agree with Red it was his best game for us,hes a good player and its about time he showed for us....oh and Cox missed abit of pre season and played with a broken hand....he was the bollox today and will score 20 easy this season.
Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: DV on Saturday, August 9, 2008, 17:26:05 Think everyone played well.
McGorvern was good in the first half but once we stopped playing in the second half after the third he never wanted to get past his man and just kept laying it back to Jack Smith. Decent enough game from JPM in my opinion, hopefully that'll keep the critics off his back for a week. Paytner was also bloody good today probably would have been my MotM if he hadnt gone off and played the full game. Stuff it, I'm going to be smug anyway but I did say in the pub before we left that Paynter would score from a JPM cross by those two have been getting stick [/smug] Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: leefer on Saturday, August 9, 2008, 17:40:33 Paynter looked fit as hell....ran Coxy close......could be a great double act.
Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Saturday, August 9, 2008, 19:18:00 Ed Hadwin said during the commentary that if Cox plays 40 odd games this season, he will score 20+ goals because he is f****** good.
And he will. Simple really 8) *He didn't actually say f*** on the radio, that was just my interpretation ;) Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Saturday, August 9, 2008, 19:20:02 Paynter looked fit as hell....ran Coxy close......could be a great double act. I'm glad Paynter did well as I've never really understood all the stick he's taken. Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: dell boy on Saturday, August 9, 2008, 19:26:25 Strange how different people see a different game, I thought he was OK today, kind of did a job, without ever really looking like taking hold of teh game. Cox though I thought was excellent, high work rate, brought others into the game and a threat on goal. I would say that was spot on Reg.# Cox was awesome for me today. Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: suttonred on Saturday, August 9, 2008, 19:27:55 No one played poorly, best for me in order were Nalis, Cox, Paynter,JPM. Nobody seems to have mentioned Nalis, but he never missed a pass all game. Cox is going to be a nightmare for defenders if he stays fit, thought they were both 9/10's
Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: dell boy on Saturday, August 9, 2008, 19:29:09 No one played poorly, best for me in order were Nalis, Cox, Paynter,JPM. Nobody seems to have mentioned Nalis, but he never missed a pass all game. Cox is going to be a nightmare for defenders if he stays fit, thought they were both 9/10's Nails has a touch of class, he took a time to get on the pace of the game, but some of those touches, just pure class. Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: Nemo on Saturday, August 9, 2008, 19:30:30 Nallis seems to be a posesssion magnet, kept the ball well and got the ball well, like Hewlett but good.
Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: Bogus Dave on Saturday, August 9, 2008, 19:31:41 nalis was awesome at times. Especially in the first half - Chips it over the defender to paynter, paynter nods it back to him and a first time pass to play in cox. Wonderfull
Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: Rich Pullen on Saturday, August 9, 2008, 19:32:46 His composure and general ability stood out by a mile in the games I saw Nalis play at Plymouth despite all the young whippersnappers around him - he is a most welcome addition.
Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: michael on Saturday, August 9, 2008, 20:29:53 I was very impressed with Nalis, especially after his poor showing v Plymouth youths.
JPM seemed to be permanently marked to me. Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Saturday, August 9, 2008, 21:21:05 JPM and Nalis both played well. Cox and Paynter were superb as well. Was most impressed by the fact we didn't have to rely on Macca all the time though great stuff. He had space second half and if we had used it a bit more we may have got more.
Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: Tails on Sunday, August 10, 2008, 10:48:26 Going forward yes he was good, but he drifts infield so often when the opposition attacks it does my head in as it leaves a huge gap.
Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: leefer on Sunday, August 10, 2008, 10:58:59 Know what you mean Tails...but its obvious to me that JPM has to be used in a more attacking role,he cant be used as a defensive midfielder,anyway he scored one and it was his cross for Paynter to score so we cant really grumble about him can we!!
Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: Peter Venkman on Sunday, August 10, 2008, 11:02:55 Strange how different people see a different game, I thought he was OK today, kind of did a job, without ever really looking like taking hold of the game. Cox though I thought was excellent, high work rate, brought others into the game and a threat on goal. I agree Reg, from up in the Arkells I thought no one on the pitch was anywhere near Cox for MOM, yes there were some good performances but Cox was head and shoulders better than anyone on the pitch. JPM for me was just average, drifting in and out of the game, never took his man on when he easily could, his crossing was pretty hit and miss as well, I admit I have only seen him play 5 times but if thats his best performance in a town shirt then he is the weakest link for me. Nalis on the other hand was awesome and will be class at this level his vision and awareness of his team mates got better and better as the game went on. Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: janaage on Sunday, August 10, 2008, 11:17:32 Timlin pushed Cox for MOM imo, the lad looks to be in great shape, really benefitted from a first team pre season. Nalis was very good too, awkward looking player but he gets the ball and does the simple stuff. Timlin and Nalis put in some cracking tackles too. Which was fantasticv.
Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: jayohaitchenn on Sunday, August 10, 2008, 13:52:09 He scored one and set up another... What more does he have to do to get the fans on his side? I thought he was the best player on the pitch for the first 60 mins.
Having said that, I don't think i could choose our best player today. Cox, Paynter, Ifil, Nalis, Timlin, Macca and JPM were all superb. Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: axs on Sunday, August 10, 2008, 14:16:00 fucking hell, you're alive.
Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Sunday, August 10, 2008, 16:20:18 Going forward yes he was good, but he drifts infield so often when the opposition attacks it does my head in as it leaves a huge gap. So does Jack Smith tbh. Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: Leggett on Sunday, August 10, 2008, 16:51:51 jayohaitchenn, last seen by me dry-humping his missus on the dance floor in the furnarse to a band called Durera :D
p.s JPM played well for about 50/60mins, then stopped trying to take on his man. Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: Spencer_White on Sunday, August 10, 2008, 16:57:38 He had a good game. We'll see how he is when teams get their tactics right and mark McNamee out of the game. Then the pressure will be on to deliver threatening balls every time.
Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: JPC82 on Sunday, August 10, 2008, 16:58:44 He had a good game. We'll see how he is when teams get their tactics right and mark McNamee out of the game. Then the pressure will be on to deliver threatening balls every time. Anthony McNamee not Mark Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: DMR on Sunday, August 10, 2008, 18:10:03 JPM looked sound, mind you, he was due after a season of right fucking tripe.
Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: Nemo on Sunday, August 10, 2008, 18:12:47 Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: adje on Sunday, August 10, 2008, 18:16:37 JPM owes us big time this season in my opinion
Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: JPC82 on Sunday, August 10, 2008, 18:42:27 Whooooooooosh! yeah good 1 you pleb, i was waiting for spencers reaction Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: Samdy Gray on Sunday, August 10, 2008, 18:44:59 Haha, pleb. I don't think anyone's used that word since about 1997.
Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: JPC82 on Sunday, August 10, 2008, 18:47:40 Haha, pleb. I don't think anyone's used that word since about 1997. im bringing it back in justin timberlake styleeeeeeeeeeee Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: Samdy Gray on Sunday, August 10, 2008, 18:53:47 I don't think you've thought that one through.
Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: the goat on Sunday, August 10, 2008, 20:16:59 get off his back he is one of our better players
Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: mrOG on Monday, August 11, 2008, 07:18:45 JPM is a luxury player, IMO. Granted, he had a good game in parts on Saturday, with his cross for the goal and his goal (being in the right place at the right time). However his general positioning is awful, as he keeps drifting infield when the opposition have the ball, leaving 2-on-1s down our right a lot of the time. The time he spent discussing/debating/arguing with Nalis about who should be picking up who is a bit disturbing for a professional player. Even on a Sunday morning, the basics are simple - that you either mark someone throughout the game or if you go zonal, then stick in the zone and pick up the player that comes into it.
Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: nevillew on Monday, August 11, 2008, 09:41:21 Timlin ws MOM for me and worked well with Nalis.
JPM had a good game but it all got a bit close quarter and fiddly with Jack Smith in the second half and I thought we lost a bit of threat. Definitely an improvement on the end of last season though. Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: LucienSanchez on Monday, August 11, 2008, 10:01:09 McGovern was better than last season. But after his goal, he looked like he was content to walk hand in hand with Jack Smith which was slightly annoying. Good cross for BP's goal.
Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: Peter Venkman on Monday, August 11, 2008, 10:02:30 JPM is a luxury player, IMO. Granted, he had a good game in parts on Saturday, with his cross for the goal and his goal (being in the right place at the right time). However his general positioning is awful, as he keeps drifting infield when the opposition have the ball, leaving 2-on-1s down our right a lot of the time. The time he spent discussing/debating/arguing with Nalis about who should be picking up who is a bit disturbing for a professional player. Even on a Sunday morning, the basics are simple - that you either mark someone throughout the game or if you go zonal, then stick in the zone and pick up the player that comes into it. I have to say I pretty much agree with most of that, it was disturbing to see him arguing with Nalis in front of the Arkells so often. All I want from JPM is to stay out wide and not drift inside as much leaving the right wing with no one on it for switching sides during attacks, and to actually take his player on, as when he actually did take the left back on he had the beating of him. Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: ron dodgers on Monday, August 11, 2008, 11:54:19 JPM is a luxury player, IMO. Granted, he had a good game in parts on Saturday, with his cross for the goal and his goal (being in the right place at the right time). However his general positioning is awful, as he keeps drifting infield when the opposition have the ball, leaving 2-on-1s down our right a lot of the time. The time he spent discussing/debating/arguing with Nalis about who should be picking up who is a bit disturbing for a professional player. Even on a Sunday morning, the basics are simple - that you either mark someone throughout the game or if you go zonal, then stick in the zone and pick up the player that comes into it. How the fuck would you know you failed sicknote centre-half scrotum sucker! Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: lambourn red on Monday, August 11, 2008, 15:05:52 Strange how different people see a different game, I thought he was OK today, kind of did a job, without ever really looking like taking hold of teh game. Cox though I thought was excellent, high work rate, brought others into the game and a threat on goal. Looks like who ever picks team of the week saw it the sameway as me , like you say everybody reads the game differently http://www.swindontownfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10341~1363458,00.html Title: Re: Mcgovern Post by: mrOG on Tuesday, August 12, 2008, 12:14:24 How the fuck would you know you failed sicknote centre-half scrotum sucker! Classic well thought out response as always, Ron :D |