|
Title: Peacock Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Thursday, April 17, 2008, 12:08:13 In todays Adver he has said that Malpas would prefer him to play up front as he wants better ball players(which is fair enough) yet peacock would prefer to play midfeld(again fair enough).
Now in my opinion he is not good enough as a striker and Malpas does not rate him as a midfielder so if that is the case could someone explain why we are offering him a new contract :? Title: Peacock Post by: Arriba on Thursday, April 17, 2008, 12:11:07 the most ironic thing i thought was the fact he wants the ball on the deck. when his biggest threat and strongest attribute is attacking headers.
Title: Peacock Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Thursday, April 17, 2008, 12:12:46 Dont get me wrong Arriba im not having a pop at the bloke but i just cant get my head around the point of a new contract.I agree his best attributes is his aerial threat.Maybe we should try him at centre half
Title: Peacock Post by: Simon Pieman on Thursday, April 17, 2008, 12:13:09 Peacock probably realises we play better with the ball on the floor, than hoofing it up in the hope he can get a knock down every time.
Work it wide to the wings, get the crosses in and that's when the big guy up front becomes dangerous. Title: Re: Peacock Post by: neville w on Thursday, April 17, 2008, 12:13:46 Quote from: "Don Rogers Shop" In todays Adver he has said that Malpas would prefer him to play up front as he wants better ball players(which is fair enough) yet peacock would prefer to play midfeld(again fair enough). Now in my opinion he is not good enough as a striker and Malpas does not rate him as a midfielder so if that is the case could someone explain why we are offering him a new contract :? Pretty sure it was offered and signed some time ago, but I may be wrong. Title: Peacock Post by: Arriba on Thursday, April 17, 2008, 12:14:12 lets be honest.the peacock interviews change all the time.
all they do is prove that interviews mostly are bollocks. Title: Re: Peacock Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Thursday, April 17, 2008, 12:14:32 Quote from: "neville w" Quote from: "Don Rogers Shop" In todays Adver he has said that Malpas would prefer him to play up front as he wants better ball players(which is fair enough) yet peacock would prefer to play midfeld(again fair enough). Now in my opinion he is not good enough as a striker and Malpas does not rate him as a midfielder so if that is the case could someone explain why we are offering him a new contract :? Pretty sure it was offered and signed some time ago, but I may be wrong. Title: Re: Peacock Post by: DV on Thursday, April 17, 2008, 13:30:12 Quote from: "Don Rogers Shop" In todays Adver he has said that Malpas would prefer him to play up front as he wants better ball players(which is fair enough) yet peacock would prefer to play midfeld(again fair enough). Now in my opinion he is not good enough as a striker and Malpas does not rate him as a midfielder so if that is the case could someone explain why we are offering him a new contract :? because Malpas doesnt have a clue! I'd start Paynter upfront ahead of Peacock! Title: Peacock Post by: broomfield on Thursday, April 17, 2008, 13:56:12 Pretty sure it was offered and signed some time ago, but I may be wrong.
Peacs finally signed his contract about three weeks ago.... Title: Peacock Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Thursday, April 17, 2008, 14:18:32 Great
|