Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: nuddy on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 09:40:23 Rovers approached Swindon late last week with a view to sharing the ground: Western Daily Press today.
http://www.westerndailypress.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=146243&command=displayContent&sourceNode=145928&contentPK=20176461&folderPk=100269&pNodeId=145803 Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: sonic youth on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 09:57:41 fitton out!
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: lebowski on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 10:03:34 If we'd accepted this first time around I could have seen Fulham play at the County Ground this season :(
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: STFC Bart on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 10:07:42 In a word "NO WAY"
The issues still remain- this hsould not even be considered Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: fatbury on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 10:12:11 it would all depend on the financial renumeration .... if they pay enough to cover the potential damage to the stadium by Rovers fans and extra pitch maintenance money
it would have to be a big sum ... no one would just say no straight off ... you have to examine it .. Fitton knows what he is doing and Im sure he will make the right decision Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: janaage on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 10:12:12 Not after the way their moron fans behave everytime they come to town. Defo no for me. We are losing revenue because of those knob jockeys, the police have over reacted since the flying chair match, why because of the gash heads.
Local residents would not be happy about this surely. They were all moaning about the police shutting a couple of roads after the last match they were hear. Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Ardiles on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 10:42:48 I'm torn.
On one hand, my memories of the Inn on the Green incident are still quite fresh. I never want to witness anything like that again. On the other, I don't want to tar all Rovers fans with the same brush. Have to say that I also find myself a little less in opposition to the idea now that I know the proceeds of such an arrangement would not be heading to Newbury. Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: stfctownenda on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 10:51:10 Not this again :x I have already sent the Western Press my comments, I would really hope Mr Fitton and Co have more sense than to get involved in any groundshare with Rovers it would be madness to think its a good idea.
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Batch on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 11:00:30 Quote from: "Ardiles" On one hand, my memories of the Inn on the Green incident are still quite fresh. I never want to witness anything like that again. On the other, I don't want to tar all Rovers fans with the same brush. Most Rovers fans are ordinary, decent people (OK a bit of a contradiction in terms). But there is always the potential for a few of the nuckle draggers to screw things up. It's a shame to tar them all with the same brush. But no thanks. For exactly the same reasons as last time. Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 11:11:19 Its irrelevant how much money we get . We have our own moron minority as do rovers and it will be mayhem every week at the ground .
Fitton & co are doing a rebuilding job and trying to get the Swindon public to embrace the club again and by sharing the ground I cant see how it will happen . Local residents will oppose it Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: pauld on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 11:37:48 Leaving aside the possibility of actual violence, local residents and businesses made it pretty clear last time they would be opposed due to the disruption that would be caused by the not just the increased traffic but also likely police measures due to the potential for violence.
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Melksham Red on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 12:18:19 Don't be fooled, most Rovers fans are scum. They have got a big hooligan problem. They are quite old skool, as in even their shirters have a tendancy to cause trouble. We don't want them anywhere near our club.
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: STFC Bart on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 12:28:18 totally agree
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: tans on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 12:32:36 Rovers can fuck right off.
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: pauld on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 13:22:23 And its worth noting before we all get too overexcited about this that this is just really Wovers have asked the question and our board have discussed it. Which is a long way off from entertaining the idea seriously. An early and public no would be reassuring though, to the town as well as the fans. Maybe a statement from the club along the lines of what tans said above would sum it up nicely? :D
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: tans on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 13:25:07 :mrgreen:
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Power to people on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 13:52:57 To be honest though we now have a board that will make decision for the right reason's rather than they can see a quick buck to be had.
I can;t see it being accepted, the board are trying to re-build the reputation of this club and it could only take a few minor scuffles with Wovers to destroy it. Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Summerof69 on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 18:18:20 Don't want Wovers here...End of.
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 18:54:15 Protests anyone? :wink:
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: yeo on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 18:55:56 Im not bothered either way
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: StrattonBornetc on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 19:56:09 Why don't they ground share with Cardiff City ?
The same distance in terms of travel and the same links via the M4 and Rail. Police better equipped to deal with their fans and other visiting supporters based on previous experience, slightly larger ground and Cardiff probably need the money more than us now. Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Fred Elliot on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 20:49:14 it would be a worse bloodbath than them coming here
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Power to people on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 20:58:35 Quote from: "Fred Elliot" it would be a worse bloodbath than them coming here Exatly what I was thinking - could you imagine Wovers & Cardiff supporters getting together, probably the worst riots and killing sprees that football would have seen for a long time. Maybe they can ground share with Swindon Supermarine, I'm sure Puffett & Hunt will welcome them :soapy tit wank: Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: StrattonBornetc on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 21:38:11 Quote from: "Power to people" Quote from: "Fred Elliot" it would be a worse bloodbath than them coming here Exatly what I was thinking - could you imagine Wovers & Cardiff supporters getting together, probably the worst riots and killing sprees that football would have seen for a long time. Maybe they can ground share with Swindon Supermarine, I'm sure Puffett & Hunt will welcome them :soapy tit wank: Why don't they ground share with Newport County - It is even nearer than Cardiff and I am sure that they would be welcomed back with open arms !! You might have to be a bit older for this one ! :mrgreen: Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: herthab on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 21:46:41 Fuck em.
Supporters don't want em. Town doesn't want em. Maybe if their fans weren't such a complete load of cunts it would be different (And yes, I know I'm generalising) But they are cunts and I, for one, don't want the scummy fuckers anywhere near the CG. Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 21:55:42 Apprantly they can groundshare at Mangotsfield at put temporary seating for 6000 people there or something.
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: EB1 on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 22:01:44 Yeovil? same distance as Cheltenham.
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: redbullzeye on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 22:22:22 Quote from: "herthab" Fuck em. Supporters don't want em. Town doesn't want em. Maybe if their fans weren't such a complete load of cunts it would be different (And yes, I know I'm generalising) But they are cunts and I, for one, don't want the scummy fuckers anywhere near the CG. I agree! Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: axs on Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 23:31:46 thirded.
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Ralphy on Wednesday, March 19, 2008, 07:28:52 Abit further along the M4 but fuck them, I think Reading is the best option.
Rovers can never groundshare with us, City or Cardiff. Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: land_of_bo on Wednesday, March 19, 2008, 08:28:59 WDP reports Yeovil this morning.
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: lebowski on Wednesday, March 19, 2008, 09:30:04 Adver reports that Nick Watkins has effectively priced Rovers out of it.
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: pauld on Wednesday, March 19, 2008, 09:42:20 Quote from: "lebowski" Adver reports that Nick Watkins has effectively priced Rovers out of it. As power to the people pointed out yesterday, they're not daft the new guys :D Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: flammableBen on Wednesday, March 19, 2008, 09:44:10 Quote from: "pauld" Quote from: "lebowski" Adver reports that Nick Watkins has effectively priced Rovers out of it. As power to the people pointed out yesterday, they're not daft the new guys :D The evidence of which football club they decided to take over might suggest otherwise. Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Wednesday, March 19, 2008, 10:11:34 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/s/swansea_city/7304057.stm
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: fatbury on Wednesday, March 19, 2008, 10:16:09 I knew that the current board would ask for full compensation figures ... that scared Rovers off :)
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: lebowski on Wednesday, March 19, 2008, 10:51:10 Quote from: "Dachauer" http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/s/swansea_city/7304057.stm Surprise surprise, Danny Coles was involved again! Not the first time he's suffered facial injuries this season, you'd think he'd be less keen to get involved in the naughty stuff when he keeps on getting hurt?! Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Colin Todd on Wednesday, March 19, 2008, 10:54:08 I'd forgotten about that. :D Good work Barry Corrs elbow
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Wednesday, March 19, 2008, 12:34:46 Quote from: "lebowski" Adver reports that Nick Watkins has effectively priced Rovers out of it. Good. It had to be a good deal for us if we were to even think about it tbh. Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Arriba on Wednesday, March 19, 2008, 15:05:38 rovers are now are biggest rivals.for that reason alone they can fuck off. and the pitch issues are another reason to tell em to do one!
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Summerof69 on Wednesday, March 19, 2008, 16:24:57 And since Leeds look like they are going to screw up...would we want them at the CG twice next season.
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: pumbaa on Wednesday, March 19, 2008, 21:15:30 Quote from: "Batch" Quote from: "Ardiles" On one hand, my memories of the Inn on the Green incident are still quite fresh. I never want to witness anything like that again. On the other, I don't want to tar all Rovers fans with the same brush. Most Rovers fans are ordinary, decent people (OK a bit of a contradiction in terms). But there is always the potential for a few of the nuckle draggers to screw things up. It's a shame to tar them all with the same brush. But no thanks. For exactly the same reasons as last time. I work in Bristol and know a lot of Rovers and City fans, and on the whole, most are decent, normal human beings. It really is terribly unfair to tar every Rovers fan as a hooligan. Rightly, those involved in the incidents at the CG and the Inn on the Green are tagged as being violent scumbags, but frankly they are small minority of the fanbase. I was chatting about this subject with a Rovers fan today. He didn't really know what was happening, but we did both agree we'd like to torch Ashton Gate :soapy tit wank: However I agree with the majority on here that it would be a really bad idea to let this happen. Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: lebowski on Thursday, March 20, 2008, 08:57:05 The latest news is that the developers for Rovers new stadium have pulled out (Cowling Construction, their shirt sponsors).
So, not only have they still not secured a venue to play next season, but they still don't have anyone to build their new stadium either. Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Thursday, March 20, 2008, 09:22:59 The thing is with Rovers it has been all talk with regards their stadium redevelopment for years and years now. They keep forgeting the one major problem - they don't have the money to pay for it
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: pauld on Thursday, March 20, 2008, 09:25:14 Rovers chairman in new groundshare appeal:
http://www.unl.edu/scarlet/images/2007/20070419sign.jpg Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: lebowski on Thursday, March 20, 2008, 09:25:49 Poor Rovers. I feel sorry for them now.
Maybe we should let them come here and we can all be friends. Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Summerof69 on Thursday, March 20, 2008, 11:22:12 I think the fact that City won't share with them sums it up. If your local rivals know how bad their fans are...why the hell should anyone else share their ground with Wovers.
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Luci on Thursday, March 20, 2008, 11:27:36 I see Cheltenham are worrying about lack of revenue if Rovers don't share with them. Realistically Cheltenham are the only club that will have them anyway so doubt they've got much to worry about.
I'll be mightily pissed off if they come anywhere near our ground. Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: flammableBen on Thursday, March 20, 2008, 11:30:49 Quote from: "Summerof69" I think the fact that City won't share with them sums it up. If your local rivals know how bad their fans are...why the hell should anyone else share their ground with Wovers. I reckon theirs a huge leap of logic somewhere in that statement. :D Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Luci on Wednesday, April 2, 2008, 12:07:17 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/b/bristol_rovers/7318233.stm
Discussions apparently still ongoing. Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Batch on Wednesday, April 2, 2008, 12:10:06 Quote from: "STFCLady" http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/b/bristol_rovers/7318233.stm Discussions apparently still ongoing. And they can still fuck right off. Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Luci on Wednesday, April 2, 2008, 12:11:34 Agreed.
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Wednesday, April 2, 2008, 12:38:37 Tbh though if they did come here they'd being paying us shit loads. Nick Watkins has already made that clear.
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: reeves4england on Wednesday, April 2, 2008, 12:48:01 Quote from: "Iffy's Onion Bhaji" Tbh though if they did come here they'd being paying us shit loads. Nick Watkins has already made that clear. I still think it would be a bad idea though. The damage to the pitch, to the stadium, to the club's reputation...not forgetting the poor owners of the Queen's Tap!! Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Wednesday, April 2, 2008, 12:55:55 I bet the Rovers players want to share with us - most of them live in 'Nam
They go in the tanning shop and hog all the sunbeds :twisted: Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Power to people on Wednesday, April 2, 2008, 13:11:18 As I've said before I would trust the current regime to do the correct thing they are not daft and will look after our own requirments first and foremost.
Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Wednesday, April 2, 2008, 17:15:46 Quote from: "Jamiesfuturewife" I bet the Rovers players want to share with us - most of them live in 'Nam They go in the tanning shop and hog all the sunbeds :twisted: Bunch of gays. Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Wednesday, April 2, 2008, 17:16:37 Quote from: "reeves4england" Quote from: "Iffy's Onion Bhaji" Tbh though if they did come here they'd being paying us shit loads. Nick Watkins has already made that clear. I still think it would be a bad idea though. The damage to the pitch, to the stadium, to the club's reputation...not forgetting the poor owners of the Queen's Tap!! Agree with that. And i still don't think it will happen. But if it does we must get the benefit of such a deal. Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: pumbaa on Wednesday, April 2, 2008, 17:43:45 Quote from: "Jamiesfuturewife" I bet the Rovers players want to share with us - most of them live in 'Nam They go in the tanning shop and hog all the sunbeds :twisted: There's a tanning shop in fucking Chippenham???????? What has the world come to :roll: Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, April 2, 2008, 17:56:01 Quote from: "Jamiesfuturewife" I bet the Rovers players want to share with us - most of them live in 'Nam They go in the tanning shop and hog all the sunbeds :twisted: Once upon a time I wouldn't have believed you...with todays poofy players, I could imagine it being true. Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Thursday, April 3, 2008, 08:38:26 Quote from: "pumbaa" Quote from: "Jamiesfuturewife" I bet the Rovers players want to share with us - most of them live in 'Nam They go in the tanning shop and hog all the sunbeds :twisted: There's a tanning shop in fucking Chippenham???????? What has the world come to :roll: Its been there years!!! like actual decades - Ive been using it since I was at school! - Anyway the only reason I knew they were footballers is that they came in in full Rovers training gear and flip flops - Only footballers wear flip flops in winter Title: Rovers ground share back on the agenda? Post by: donkey on Thursday, April 3, 2008, 11:55:27 Quote from: "Jamiesfuturewife" I bet the Rovers players want to share with us - most of them live in 'Nam They go in the tanning shop and hog all the sunbeds :twisted: Orange is the new tan. |