Thetownend.com

Swindon Town boss Maurice Malpas says he wants Lee Peacock and Miguel Comminges to extend their current deals at the club.

Read more... (http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/sport1/hi/football/teams/s/swindon_town/7207539.stm)

Good!

Good!

Peacock? Really? That's hardly progressive...

well, it obviously is...

of course we should be looking to keep the pair of them.

Peacock is average in this division at best. Progressive, promotion-chasing teams would be after better...

Spot on, sometimes i wish the bloke was a cunt so people would start judging him on his ability,

i judge him on abilty and what he brings to the side.i have slated him before to be fair.
but i think he would be a decent squad member even if we went up.maybe not a week in week out player but worth a year imo

I agree arriba as a squad player yes and even what he brings for morale etc, but if we are aiming for promotion this year or next then we need better, Defence is ok, keeper is ok,with cox and others we can score goals so that leaves only one position that seems to cause us a problem imo

During our last league 1 play off season would you have selected Peacock (or Roberts) in our first team?  Would they have added anything?

LP is a squad player, but not regular first teamer.  Robbo is neither nowadays.  he needs a new challenge elsewhere.

peacocks had a couple of good years to his credit. i take your point janagge and agree to a point.
but i think apart from our forwards that year, our team is better now.

i think we will see a few exit the door at the seasons end.but we dont need to cull a few of them.both the minge and peacock are 2 to hang onto imo

i don't care what peacock is like as a person, my opinion is based solely on his performances in a town shirt and i think he's one of our better players.

Fully agree on that. He's certainly better than Pook in CM, as proved last week against Forest.

Peacock is class

In centre midfield yes and whys that ? pook and adams thats why biatch

no, in the whole side.

his work ethic is second to none and he's effective at breaking up play, putting pressure on the opposition, he's strong in the tackle and wins the ball and uses it well.

But imo Easton is better at that and we don’t need to of them, squad player yes

I have spoken now take it in sonic

i'd rather have easton and peacock in the middle rather than easton and a.n. attackingmidfielder who invariably runs hot and cold and provides nothing defensively

Peacock is class great leader and good in the air !

So was the Douglas Bader doesn't mean he's any good with a football though.

Peacock is better than average and does alot of work for the team. In the games he's missed injured we've lost all but one of them - coincidence...not he adds alot of steal to the midfield and he wins shit loads in the air.

He's played shit loads of games in this division, at the top end of this of division and he's even had seasons in the Championship



Peacock is a better midfielder than Matthew Hewlett. Strong, more effort, more energy, better distribution,  better in the tackle, better in the air, better leader, more vocal etc etc I could go on.

Also, whilst we were in the play offs you also have to remember that Peacock was playing for the Bristol City team that finished above us and narrowly missed out on automatic promotion - on more than one occasion



no, we do need the two of them.....makes it harder to get past our midfield.....the creativity and the forward attacking play should come from the wings.