Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: Power to people on Thursday, January 24, 2008, 14:14:18 So IF we do not manage to sign Simon Cox do we have the players that can score enough goals to reach the play-off's ?
I think we do need another proven striker, while I think Corr will get goals at some stage a decision is going to be made on his back injury and he may be out of action for a while and I don't think we can rely on the others to consistently hit the back of the net. I think we need to let Reading know we need an answer as we only have next week until the window for long term loans or perm deals closes and if we can't get Cox Malpas will need a couple of days to get someone else that is proven at this level...permanently hopefully Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: Luci on Thursday, January 24, 2008, 14:16:42 We still have Moses, Paynter, Blair and Corr and even Mohamed.
I'm not too worried about that to be honest. Im more concerned about CM should we lose Peacock or Easton. Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: STFCBird on Thursday, January 24, 2008, 14:35:40 Mr Fitton said something about Cox last night, basically we'd love to have him but Reading asking stupid money.
Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, January 24, 2008, 14:44:55 I've got a feeling Ashikodi will come good for us.
Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: Colin Todd on Thursday, January 24, 2008, 14:54:29 Quote from: "STFCLady" We still have Moses, Paynter, Blair and Corr and even Mohamed. I'm not too worried about that to be honest. Im more concerned about CM should we lose Peacock or Easton. I'd be more worried, because only 1 of those strikers is a genuine goal threat as far as I'm concerned - Barry Corr - and he has a bad back. (I'll discount Moses from that as I've not seen much of him) Blair & paynter have had their moments, but they've also had some really dire games as well. Neither has a good goals to games ratio for us. 3 of Paynters came against the worst team performance I have ever seen Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: Arriba on Thursday, January 24, 2008, 15:16:29 if we fail to land cox,i'd like to see the funds spent on another target that malpas has hopefully lined up as a second choice.maybe someone from north of the border?
Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: sonic youth on Thursday, January 24, 2008, 15:22:24 wot arriba sed
if we don't get cox, it would be foolish not to look elsewhere. in fact i'd be a little concerned if we weren't already looking elsewhere! Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: jayohaitchenn on Thursday, January 24, 2008, 15:32:27 If we can't get Cox, i don't want nobody baby, If we can't get Cox ohhh woah oh!
Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: DMR on Thursday, January 24, 2008, 18:03:17 Quote from: "sonic youth" wot arriba sed if we don't get cox, it would be foolish not to look elsewhere. in fact i'd be a little concerned if we weren't already looking elsewhere! word. corr's fitness is unproven, paynter's shit and sturrock's hardly prolific. Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: DV on Thursday, January 24, 2008, 18:10:09 In a word a yes.
Corr and Paynter are good enough to get the goals. Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: DV on Thursday, January 24, 2008, 18:11:00 also, I reckon if we dont sign Cox we'll go in for Fleetwood....
Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: STFC_Gazzza on Thursday, January 24, 2008, 18:23:00 Quote from: "DV" also, I reckon if we dont sign Cox we'll go in for Fleetwood.... Fleetwood is waiting until his contract expires in the Summer. Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: Marston Red on Thursday, January 24, 2008, 18:26:56 If we don't get Cox during the transfer window there's no panic as we can still get a loan signing in if required.
I'd rather we didn't panic buy someone in on a long term deal (e.g. 2 years for Arrieta) and then find out they were crap. Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: newmarket red on Thursday, January 24, 2008, 19:26:39 I think if cox doesn't sign we need to try an attract someone else before the window closes without cox i fear the goals will be hard to come by.
Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: leefer on Thursday, January 24, 2008, 19:58:32 It was obvious to anyone at Barnet that we need some srikers,ime sure Cox wouldve won us the game with the chances we created.
Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: leefer on Thursday, January 24, 2008, 19:58:46 It was obvious to anyone at Barnet that we need some srikers,ime sure Cox wouldve won us the game with the chances we created.
Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: strooood on Thursday, January 24, 2008, 20:54:08 Quote from: "jayohaitchenn" If we can't get Cox, i don't want nobody baby, If we can't get Cox ohhh woah oh! :mrgreen: when paynter finally settles and gets his confidence back, he'll be prolific. i agree with lady, CM is more worrying. Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: Power to people on Friday, January 25, 2008, 08:45:33 Quote from: "Marston Red" If we don't get Cox during the transfer window there's no panic as we can still get a loan signing in if required. I'd rather we didn't panic buy someone in on a long term deal (e.g. 2 years for Arrieta) and then find out they were crap. But we can only get short term loans (3 months at most) and of course IF we made it to the play-off's said striker may not be eligeble, so we need to be looking long term. I suspect Reading will wait until 11.59pm on Friday to decide, I think it is wrong if a club makes an offer to make them wait a month for a response.....at least give a reply of perhaps yes we will accept unless in between times a better offer comes in but we will be waiting until x time to make a final decision. Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: STFC Bart on Friday, January 25, 2008, 09:43:29 Really hope we get Cox. Cant the plastics even come back and say yes/no/we are waiting till end Jan. Smacks of arrogance to me.
Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: janaage on Friday, January 25, 2008, 09:46:32 Good business sense more like Bart, you can't blame them for holding out.
Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: thedarkprince on Friday, January 25, 2008, 12:20:12 I agree with Stroood, I reckon Paynter will get goals once he's given a run and gets his confidence back.
No need to rush ny signings just because the transfer window's closing... Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: janaage on Friday, January 25, 2008, 12:23:42 The only problem I have with Peacock is during our last League 1 play off season I wouldn't have had him (or Roberts) anywhere near our team, as he wasn't good enough.
We're supposed to be building a play off chasing squad and I'm not sure if having a player like Peacock in the first team really adds that much. Having said that I think he'll make a decent squad man, but not week in week out first teamer, so can see why MM wants to offer him an extended deal. Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: Tails on Friday, January 25, 2008, 12:52:49 Even though him and Roberts played regularly in a team who finished 2 places above us and in all honesty should have won the final?
Hmmm OK then. Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: jayohaitchenn on Friday, January 25, 2008, 13:54:34 Quote from: "Tails" Even though him and Roberts played regularly in a team who finished 2 places above us and in all honesty should have won the final? Hmmm OK then. Expertly put sir. Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: lebowski on Friday, January 25, 2008, 14:09:57 not in midfield though was it?
Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: Tails on Friday, January 25, 2008, 15:42:05 Peacock rather than Hewlett? Yes please.
Roberts rather than Igoe? Difficult, but I prefer Roberts. Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: dell boy on Friday, January 25, 2008, 15:47:30 In Cox you have a striker who is good enough for The Championship and a side looking to go to the next stage, for us to have any chance of finishing in the play-offs we need Cox or a player of his calibre upfront.
Paynter has had plenty of chances and scored only about 7 this season, 3 in one match, dont know how some of you can come close to comparing them in quality and finishing. Paynter has been around the houses and will not improve any further than his standard at present. Cox is hungry for success, young and sticks the ball in the back of the net. Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: STFC Bart on Friday, January 25, 2008, 16:22:13 Fitton show some ambition and go out and get Cox
Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: stfctownenda on Friday, January 25, 2008, 16:49:37 Quote from: "STFC Bart" Fitton show some ambition and go out and get Cox Bid already made :roll: Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: thepeoplesgame on Friday, January 25, 2008, 17:03:33 Quote from: "dell boy" In Cox you have a striker who is good enough for The Championship and a side looking to go to the next stage, for us to have any chance of finishing in the play-offs we need Cox or a player of his calibre upfront. Paynter has had plenty of chances and scored only about 7 this season, 3 in one match, dont know how some of you can come close to comparing them in quality and finishing. Paynter has been around the houses and will not improve any further than his standard at present. Cox is hungry for success, young and sticks the ball in the back of the net. Agreed. Paynter had a woeful second half at Barnet and I'd have taken him off for Corr rather than Sturrock personally. We'd be playing Rovers tomorrow if we'd had Cox on the pitch on Tuesday. Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: janaage on Friday, January 25, 2008, 17:08:10 Quote from: "Tails" Even though him and Roberts played regularly in a team who finished 2 places above us and in all honesty should have won the final? Hmmm OK then. I think if you ask city fans why they didn't go up that year they'd blame a couple of weak links. I can honestly say that season Roberts and Peacock would not have been a welcome addition to our squad. How some can criticise Igoe's input that year is beyond me. Howard and Igoe ran certain sides ragged that year, Sheff Wed, Hull to name a couple. The next season wasn;t so good, but our play off year some of our players were superb. Roberts and Peacock have never come close to that kind of form. Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: DV on Friday, January 25, 2008, 17:10:24 If we'd had Peacock in midfield instead of Matty Hewlett we probably would have finished bloody second!!!
Our play off side had a very weak links itself..... Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: reeves4england on Friday, January 25, 2008, 17:11:49 Quote from: "leefer" It was obvious to anyone at Barnet that we need some srikers,ime sure Cox wouldve won us the game with the chances we created. Would that have been the case with Corr and Ashikodi up front and an on form Christian Roberts on the wing? I doubt it to be honestTitle: IF we don't get Cox Post by: janaage on Friday, January 25, 2008, 17:21:50 Just goes to show that when you have a half decent midfield creating chances and a couple of fella's up front who know how to finish you have every chance of doing well in a loeague like this.
Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: DV on Friday, January 25, 2008, 17:24:07 Quote from: "janaage" Just goes to show that when you have a half decent midfield creating chances and a couple of fella's up front who know how to finish you have every chance of doing well in a loeague like this. no way, are you sure? scoring goals wins games. I've heard it all now. Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: janaage on Friday, January 25, 2008, 17:28:17 Oh do fuck off DV.
Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: Arriba on Friday, January 25, 2008, 17:37:47 igoe was better druing that play off season than roberts has been full stop.
Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: sonic youth on Friday, January 25, 2008, 18:19:24 more consistent as well. on his day igoe would rip the opposition to shreds, great player to watch - that side with migs, igoe and howard in the midfield and parkin up front was guaranteed fun.
zaaboub reminds me a little of howard in some respects, frustratingly inconsistent, simular build and a tendency to vanish during games Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: reeves4england on Friday, January 25, 2008, 18:32:36 Quote from: "sonic youth" more consistent as well. on his day igoe would rip the opposition to shreds, great player to watch - that side with migs, igoe and howard in the midfield and parkin up front was guaranteed fun. I'd say Howard was better on his day thoughzaaboub reminds me a little of howard in some respects, frustratingly inconsistent, simular build and a tendency to vanish during games Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: sonic youth on Friday, January 25, 2008, 18:43:08 definitely, scored goals too which zaaboub doesn't!
i think spencer has said it many times before but king handled howard wrongly. he's excelled at barnsley but king couldn't get the best out of him here Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: Tails on Friday, January 25, 2008, 19:49:30 Howard was miles better than Zaaboub.
Igoe was good, but no better than Roberts. He was just as inconsistent. I just don't get the slating of Roberts as he's been excellent this season. Title: IF we don't get Cox Post by: DV on Friday, January 25, 2008, 20:31:18 Quote from: "sonic youth" definitely, scored goals too which zaaboub doesn't! i think spencer has said it many times before but king handled howard wrongly. he's excelled at barnsley but king couldn't get the best out of him here King would have never got the best out of Howard, because being at Swindon meant he still lived in Southampton. Moving up north saved his career! |