|
Title: Best XI: Central defenders 1 Post by: sonic youth on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 11:58:49 Cast your vote.
One vote per person, the two players with the most votes are inducted into the Best XI. Title: Best XI: Central defenders 1 Post by: Melksham Red on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 12:07:00 Alan Reeves? WTF!
Title: Best XI: Central defenders 1 Post by: janaage on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 12:11:54 Effin hell if Reeves gets in then I don't think I'll bother with the rest of these. Fucking stupid shout.
This vote is flawed, there should be one vote per position ie 2 votes for 2 centre halves. Sonic you tosser. Title: Best XI: Central defenders 1 Post by: flammableBen on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 12:13:35 hahaha knew people would get pissed off with the limitations of the voting system. I don't know why you bother mr youth.
Title: Best XI: Central defenders 1 Post by: jayohaitchenn on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 12:13:36 I voted Jerel, culverhouse was a close second.
Title: Best XI: Central defenders 1 Post by: BANGKOK RED on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 12:24:55 Does this one vote thing mean that we can only vote for one striker when we get to it?
Title: Best XI: Central defenders 1 Post by: janaage on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 12:27:54 Yes, why?? Because SY has recently taken a GNVQ in "how to be a complete and utter tosser".
Title: Best XI: Central defenders 1 Post by: BANGKOK RED on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 12:32:56 I am abstaining as I don't feel as though my one vote will be a fair reflection of my opinion, and as janaage says, Sonic is a complete tosser!
Title: Best XI: Central defenders 1 Post by: Samdy Gray on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 12:48:57 No, Sonic is not a complete tosser.
The phpBB forum software is a complete tosser for only allowing one vote per person. Title: Best XI: Central defenders 1 Post by: sonic youth on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 12:57:35 keep fishing you jock cunt
Title: Best XI: Central defenders 1 Post by: janaage on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 12:59:40 Quote from: "sonic youth" keep fishing you jock cunt Ha ha!!! It took long enough, shame Sam was the one to bite instead of you, but it was worth it!! Ha ha Sam you tosser!!! Like I give a monkeys about an internet vote!!! Title: Best XI: Central defenders 1 Post by: sonic youth on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 13:01:44 GNVQ's are for chavs anyway
fair point though, whilst i might be a tosser/twat/cunt/wanker the voting system on phpbb is shite. i did think about doing two votes but it's time consuming and lame Title: Best XI: Central defenders 1 Post by: Colin Todd on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 13:22:10 it would make more sense having 2 votes, how hard can it be?
Centre back 1 Centre back 2 Title: Best XI: Central defenders 1 Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 13:23:32 Quote from: "Melksham Red" Alan Reeves? WTF! I nominated him :mrgreen: Title: Best XI: Central defenders 1 Post by: sonic youth on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 13:25:11 Quote from: "Colin Todd" it would make more sense having 2 votes, how hard can it be? it's easy just didn't think people would want to vote twice!Centre back 1 Centre back 2 Title: Best XI: Central defenders 1 Post by: Colin Todd on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 13:33:57 Quote from: "sonic youth" Quote from: "Colin Todd" it would make more sense having 2 votes, how hard can it be? it's easy just didn't think people would want to vote twice!Centre back 1 Centre back 2 you thought wrong, doing it this way dosnt make any sense! Title: Best XI: Central defenders 1 Post by: Arriba on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 13:54:57 tim parkin was miles better than reeeeeevvveeeees.calderwood wins at a canter though imo.
Title: Best XI: Central defenders 1 Post by: Samdy Gray on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 14:39:49 Quote from: "janaage" Ha ha Sam you tosser!!! Cheers Jock. :( Title: Best XI: Central defenders 1 Post by: janaage on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 14:53:39 :wink:
Title: Best XI: Central defenders 1 Post by: Bogus Dave on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 14:59:04 what would happen in this scenario
first poll: player "x" - 20% player "y" - 25% - player y wins Player "z" - 10% Second Poll: Player "x" - 25% Player "y " - 5% Player "z" - 30% - player z wins then player x gets the most votes overall, but isn't in the team. the one poll-position way was better Title: Best XI: Central defenders 1 Post by: flammableBen on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 15:03:54 THat's what I said somewhere dave. Just add both up and take first and second.
Title: Best XI: Central defenders 1 Post by: BANGKOK RED on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 15:20:54 Quote from: "STFC dave" what would happen in this scenario first poll: player "x" - 20% player "y" - 25% - player y wins Player "z" - 10% Second Poll: Player "x" - 25% Player "y " - 5% Player "z" - 30% - player z wins then player x gets the most votes overall, but isn't in the team. the one poll-position way was better It's beginning to look like Calderwood and Taylor anyway, so it won't really matter. Although for the CM positions and strikers I would recommend first voting for one player, and when all votes are in then vote for the second (With the previous winner excluded from the vote of course) And as redbullzeye has suggested for the fullbacks, when it comes to the wingers, everybody vote for a right winger and a left winger. |