Thetownend.com

25% => The Boardroom => Topic started by: devonshire_red on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 21:49:04



Title: We need Luc
Post by: devonshire_red on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 21:49:04
Luc Nijholt is my hero, always was as a boy and still is pretty much, I prey to god at night that he will come and save OUR and HIS ex club from relegation, his work in the netherlands says it all, he is the best manager we could expect and we should act quickly to ensure another team don't snap him up, I think he could easily already be managing a SPL or Championship club. Its a oppurtunity we cannot miss out on! COME BACK SUPER LUC!

Im sure you all pretty much agree with me on this one, oh and hi to you all, my first official post on the forum!


Title: We need Luc
Post by: axs on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 21:49:40
i disagree.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Red81 on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 21:51:28
Welcome to the tef.

You pray to god at night that he will save us?  :D


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 21:52:05
Luc would be an interesting appointment, which I would certainly have no problem with.

I don't think we need to act that quickly though, he applied when Wise left and hasn't exactly turned down floods of bids from England since.

However, if there's no club, there's no manager, so lets get the takeover sorted first eh.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: axs on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 21:52:12
oh, and welcome. :D


Title: We need Luc
Post by: devonshire_red on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 21:57:10
Quote from: "Nemo"
Luc would be an interesting appointment, which I would certainly have no problem with.

I don't think we need to act that quickly though, he applied when Wise left and hasn't exactly turned down floods of bids from England since.

However, if there's no club, there's no manager, so lets get the takeover sorted first eh.


Spot on, im so suprised Nijholt isnt manager of a huge club, uefa or champions league style. I feel once Mcghee takes Scotland job then Luc will take over at Motherwell, afterall he helped them win the cup! Nijholt would be even better than Sturrock.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: jimbob on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 22:09:08
Welcome

Think he'd have been snapped up by now by a better dutch side if he had that much about him.

don't be clouded by your judgement of him as an ex-player (fuck me that was patronising sorry)

Think he'd be the old 'breath of fresh air' and wouldn't mind seeing him here but it depends on fitton's speculative nature (which if fitton takes over at STFC then on a scale of 1-10, you would have to say he's a huge risk taker and say 10.....ssshh)

If he's looking more local/proven/cautious, then i don't think he's gonna look much further than cot-ril imo

Who knows, maybe the way Holloway has started at Leicester and given mandaric track record, I wouldn't be surprised if he was back on the market soon  :shock:


Title: We need Luc
Post by: devonshire_red on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 22:15:46
No, im writing a letter on behalf of myself and this forum to Luc Nijholt asking him to contact the Swindon Advert and get himself on the back page again declaring his hunger for the job. Is that okay if I mention that some people on this forum would like him to come back? Regards


Title: We need Luc
Post by: jimbob on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 22:18:25
Quote from: "devonshire_red"
No, im writing a letter on behalf of myself and this forum to Luc Nijholt asking him to contact the Swindon Advert and get himself on the back page again declaring his hunger for the job. Is that okay if I mention that some people on this forum would like him to come back? Regards


sorry but  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:

are you toni in disguise?!


Title: We need Luc
Post by: axs on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 22:19:13
at least look up the results of that poll or something.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: devonshire_red on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 22:19:44
Toni? Am I missing something?


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Bennett on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 22:21:11
yes i rather hope you are


Title: We need Luc
Post by: devonshire_red on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 22:28:03
Do you not agree that someone like Luc has the balls to stand up to the board and tell them whats what!? We all know Sturrock could have done more and spoke to the board but all he wanted was his £250,000 salary and his son on the books, besides Luc would kick these players into touch and make us a fearsome side like Stormvogels Telstar who herald from the very rough and dangerous IJmuiden (Yes I worked there last year and was mugged by a gang of hooded Dutch youths. I have already contacted the club and sent them a recomendation on who I believe has the abilty, desire and the heart to be our new leader.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: jimbob on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 22:29:22
Quote from: "devonshire_red"
Toni? Am I missing something?


think ur in for a rough ride devonshire  :roll:


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Bennett on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 22:30:35
for the record i'd love luc to be our new manager. i can't see it happening or him being that successful...

still some guys with crazy long names would be ACE


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Sussex on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 22:31:19
Hello devonshire_red. Please don't mention my name in your letter.

Welcome though. Have fun!  :)


Title: We need Luc
Post by: lebowski on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 22:33:39
i didn't really want luc to be manager but the more i read what devon red has to say on the matter the more i am coming round to his or her way of thinking

 :mrgreen:


Title: We need Luc
Post by: devonshire_red on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 22:39:50
We need a team that plays like the old Wimbledon, someone needs to give Diamandis and all the sods in the boardroom a stern word. Someone needs to tell these players that they will be ex footballers if they dont start playing with 100% dedication, how can anyone be inspired by a manager that has not played for the club and has a burning passion for it a real hunger to see it do well? If the club is to crash and burn i'd expect nothing more than Luc to be at the steering wheel because Luc wants it, give the man a chance, I will be at the next game with about 10 or so likeminded town fans with a huge ''Luc for STFC'' banner, come and say hi, might even arrange for a petition of support to aid the cause, Regards


Title: We need Luc
Post by: jimbob on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 22:44:11
Quote from: "devonshire_red"
We need a team that plays like the old Wimbledon, someone needs to give Diamandis and all the sods in the boardroom a stern word. Someone needs to tell these players that they will be ex footballers if they dont start playing with 100% dedication, how can anyone be inspired by a manager that has not played for the club and has a burning passion for it a real hunger to see it do well? If the club is to crash and burn i'd expect nothing more than Luc to be at the steering wheel because Luc wants it, give the man a chance, I will be at the next game with about 10 or so likeminded town fans with a huge ''Luc for STFC'' banner, come and say hi, might even arrange for a petition of support to aid the cause, Regards


  :nono: :nuts:  :lol2:


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Bennett on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 22:47:58
ladies and gents we have a new cult hero

arise devonshire_red for the position that some greater power has chosen for you!


Title: We need Luc
Post by: jimbob on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 22:48:26
anyone else hear on SSN, Mad-dog is set for a return to Brentford following Butchers departure??

(weren't those 2 characters in Snatch along with Bricktop?!)


Title: We need Luc
Post by: devonshire_red on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 22:50:25
Thanks guys, was only a opinion.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: redbullzeye on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 22:58:16
Welcome Devonshire but a couple of points - I don't want us to play like Wimbledon although I can see where you're coming from as you like Luc! There was always that tremendous couple of seconds before he made contact in the tackle, when we all knew what was coming apart from the poor sod who was about to get it.  Secondly, whatever Diamandis thinks should be irrelevant as hopefully he will have jogged on in the near future.  Personally I would like to see an manager that knows the english league and has experience of getting out of divisions like we're in.  I think alot of why we were promoted last year was down to Sturrock having been there before.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Bennett on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 22:59:34
i love you sentiment devonshire_red, i just don't think it would work here.

imagine cedric van der gun (SP) playing up top for us though...


Title: We need Luc
Post by: returnofthereds on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 23:02:34
Only passing on what I have been told but Ling has already been lined up by Fitton if the deal gets sorted.The friend that told me knows someone who works at the club.Sorry Luc fans !


Title: We need Luc
Post by: devonshire_red on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 23:39:11
Not a chance, trust me Luc can be manager with enough support. Dtand up and be counted Luc supporters.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: tans on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 23:43:43
Luc was my father.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: STFC Village on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 00:03:50
Quote from: "devonshire_red"
If the club is to crash and burn i'd expect nothing more than Luc to be at the steering wheel
:D


Title: We need Luc
Post by: reeves4england on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 00:40:05
I'm certainly not against getting Luc on board. I think it would bring fans together, give the players a kick up the backside, and perhaps being a few "dormant" fans back to the CG. Not sure if it's the right solution or not but the idea certainly has potential


Title: We need Luc
Post by: wheretherealredsare on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 08:13:54
He'd have to change his name to Nijfitton though. Don't want any nasty smells hanging around.

And not keep saying "for sure", or have his hair in dreadlocks.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Foggy on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 08:45:11
Trust your feelings luc


Title: We need Luc
Post by: janaage on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 08:54:16
WTF you're writing a letter on behalf of yourself and THIS FORUM???


Title: We need Luc
Post by: wheretherealredsare on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 08:58:19
Perhaps he meant thisis forum, so that it would be taken more seriously? :scribe:


Title: We need Luc
Post by: pauld on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 09:01:56
I've just had this arrive in my inbox and been asked to forward it on:

Quote
Dear devonshire_red,

Although I am a collection of PHP scripts, SQL statements and HTML I'm more than capable of writing my own letters, ta. So please don't write on my behalf or I'll write to the CSA on your behalf.

Thanks

The Townend.com forum


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Mexicano Rojo on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 09:03:51
im going to write to sandy grey on our behalf saying we all want to go down on her. any objections?


Title: We need Luc
Post by: neville w on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 09:07:30
Does Luc know we have a non schmoking stadium now ?


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Barry Scott on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 09:10:11
Quote from: "devonshire_red"
We need a team that plays like the old Wimbledon, someone needs to give Diamandis and all the sods in the boardroom a stern word. Someone needs to tell these players that they will be ex footballers if they dont start playing with 100% dedication, how can anyone be inspired by a manager that has not played for the club and has a burning passion for it a real hunger to see it do well? If the club is to crash and burn i'd expect nothing more than Luc to be at the steering wheel because Luc wants it, give the man a chance, I will be at the next game with about 10 or so likeminded town fans with a huge ''Luc for STFC'' banner, come and say hi, might even arrange for a petition of support to aid the cause, Regards



Sorry to say it but you seem a touch deluded.  

Just a couple of points.

1. No manager will be appointed until the takeover goes through, therefore, there will be no Diamandis to tell off or there will probably be no club for Luc to work with.

2. Since when does a manager sort the boardroom issues out?

3. If you want to play like the old Wimbledon then maybe we should have someone from the old Wimbledon. Dirty Sanchez, Wise, Bassett or Kinnear?  :?


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Tails on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 09:28:44
Quote from: "returnofthereds"
Only passing on what I have been told but Ling has already been lined up by Fitton if the deal gets sorted.The friend that told me knows someone who works at the club.Sorry Luc fans !


You think Ling will come?

Why not have both... Luc and Ling. What a combo!


Title: We need Luc
Post by: janaage on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 09:28:45
Does anyone object if I go to my team Christmas do on this forum's behalf on Friday, it's not going to be anything amazing, just a sit down meal and a few drinks.  Then "we'll" be getting this forum off home, probably in a cab.

If we could all chip in a couple of quid each, that should cover it.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 09:35:55
I'd rather have Ling or Allen instead of Luc


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Mexicano Rojo on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 09:36:11
dear sandy,

i am writng on behalf of over 2000 members of the TEF. We would like to offer you an orgasmic experience. A 10 minute session of cunnilingus with each and every member of the forum. imagine! you would be left like an octopus' sponge.

i look forward to your reply

mex


Title: We need Luc
Post by: janaage on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 09:47:20
Mex are you writing on behalf of the active "members" or the non posting lurkers too?  I think you should clarify.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Mexicano Rojo on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 09:50:07
maybe the lurkers can just watch?


Title: We need Luc
Post by: WorcesterRed on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 09:50:44
Quote from: "i was once mexico red"
dear sandy,

i am writng on behalf of over 2000 members of the TEF. We would like to offer you an orgasmic experience. A 10 minute session of cunnilingus with each and every member of the forum. imagine! you would be left like an octopus' sponge.

i look forward to your reply

mex

 :chunder:  :chunder:  :chunder:  :chunder:  :chunder:  :chunder:  :chunder:  :chunder:  :chunder:  :chunder:  :chunder:
 :nono:  :nono:  :nono:  :nono:  :nono:  :nono:  :nono:  :nono:  :nono:  :nono:


Title: We need Luc
Post by: wheretherealredsare on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 10:15:52
Quote from: "i was once mexico red"
dear sandy,

i am writng on behalf of over 2000 members of the TEF. We would like to offer you an orgasmic experience. A 10 minute session of cunnilingus with each and every member of the forum. imagine! you would be left like an octopus' sponge.

i look forward to your reply

mex


Could be difficult to orgasmise, cunnilogistically speaking. 2000 x 10 minutes equates to 9 weeks, 2 days, 4 hours and 20 minutes based on a standard 5 day working week of 8 hour days (less 1 hour for lunch), and assuminge no weekend working. Also, is such a service VAT exempt?

It may be possible to get advice on this from the intended recipient, but somehow I think this problem has got her licked.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Tails on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 10:17:06
Do the female members get a go on her husband?? He's a right looker.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: neville w on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 11:36:01
Quote from: "i was once mexico red"
dear sandy,

i am writng on behalf of over 2000 members of the TEF. We would like to offer you an orgasmic experience. A 10 minute session of cunnilingus with each and every member of the forum. imagine! you would be left like an octopus' sponge.

i look forward to your reply

mex


I see nothing in it for me  "I'm out" (In a dragon, rather than a gay way)


Title: We need Luc
Post by: red macca on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 12:21:56
Quote from: "i was once mexico red"
dear sandy,

i am writng on behalf of over 2000 members of the TEF. We would like to offer you an orgasmic experience. A 10 minute session of cunnilingus with each and every member of the forum. imagine! you would be left like an octopus' sponge.

i look forward to your reply

mex
I refuse to touch her again . That was the first time i ever  experienced painful warts


Title: We need Luc
Post by: devonshire_red on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 12:22:34
Great i've managed to get in contact with Luc, I obtained his personal email and sent him a message, whats better is the reply. He has put in application, he has also spoken to the club and been informed that he will need to wait a few weeks while the takeover demises or completes. He has also been in contact with Fitton and if the takeover should complete he will indeed be invited for talks with Fitton and the investors.

Its not a lost cause yet, Fitton must see something in Luc!


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Arriba on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 13:31:18
i dont want niholjt.he wants to get into the english game and just because he had a couple of seasons here sees us as a way to get into the english game.
cotterill or mad dog over him any day.or bring back lou macari


Title: We need Luc
Post by: STFC Bart on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 13:34:03
Cotterill or ling for me


Title: We need Luc
Post by: janaage on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 13:43:11
No to Nijholt!!


Title: We need Luc
Post by: yeo on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 13:52:16
Id be happy with the geezer if when interviewed he's considered best man for the job.Im not sure about Cotterill he seems boring,a formularic personalityless yes man.(Ive no idea what Im basing this on)Allens a cock and would split the fan base,im not sure if i like him for being a cock or hate him because of it at the moment.I think Ling would struggle here,not so long ago he was hated by Orient fans,I guess that just shows how fickle football can be.

Id like to think Fitton will find someone exciting with a bit of expierence that nobody has thought of and as ive said before someone who realsie the size of the job both on and off the field


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Tails on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 14:02:15
Orient fans are worse than us though. They call for Lings head when they don't win! He's the best manager they've had for years!


Title: We need Luc
Post by: janaage on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 14:11:49
Same as Northampton and now Forest fans with Colin C, you just can't please some people.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Tails on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 14:31:39
Forest I can understand, they still think they're a big club.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: tans on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 15:06:27
Ling in!!!!!!!


Title: We need Luc
Post by: returnofthereds on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 15:59:51
Told u last night, Ling is the man coming in.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Tails on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 16:26:10
Sauce?


Title: We need Luc
Post by: figgis on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 17:18:11
mourinho is looking for a job. :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Title: We need Luc
Post by: stfc_steve on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 18:13:37
Quote from: "figgis"
mourinho is looking for a job. :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Its not funny, hes coming here  :|


Title: We need Luc
Post by: pumbaa on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 18:33:41
Quote from: "stfc_steve"
Quote from: "figgis"
mourinho is looking for a job. :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Its not funny, hes coming here  :|


If BEST were still on the scene, that would be a great conspiracy theory/rumour, but as it is -stfc_steve OUT!!!!

 :wink:


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Simon Pieman on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 23:26:05
I reckon that STFCLady would be a shit manager.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: tans on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 23:55:06
better than looking at a fat prick though.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Simon Pieman on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 23:57:14
You'd have to ask her about that.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: flammableBen on Thursday, December 13, 2007, 00:32:43
Quote from: "Si Pie"
I reckon that STFCLady would be a shit manager.


I could have sworn that I'd already posted something like that. My internet must have broked. Or maybe I was dreaming. Is dreaming about the tef wrong? Is dreaming about Lady wrong?


Title: We need Luc
Post by: devonshire_red on Monday, December 17, 2007, 00:50:40
Luc spoke to Fitton yesterday, Fitton took time out to speak with Luc while on holiday. I would bet my life savings on luc becoming manager.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Monday, December 17, 2007, 07:46:31
Quote from: "devonshire_red"
Luc spoke to Fitton yesterday, Fitton took time out to speak with Luc while on holiday. I would bet my life savings on luc becoming manager.


I bet he has done the same with other potential managers.
For what its worth I don't think Luc will get the job, Fitton siad he wanted somebody experienced


Title: We need Luc
Post by: janaage on Monday, December 17, 2007, 07:49:54
This infatuation with Luc is a little worrying.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: SwindonTartanArmy on Monday, December 17, 2007, 09:16:10
Quote from: "Dachauer"
Quote from: "devonshire_red"
Luc spoke to Fitton yesterday, Fitton took time out to speak with Luc while on holiday. I would bet my life savings on luc becoming manager.


I bet he has done the same with other potential managers.
For what its worth I don't think Luc will get the job, Fitton siad he wanted somebody experienced
How is Luc Nijholt not experienced? :?


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Peter Venkman on Monday, December 17, 2007, 09:22:27
Luc does as you say have experience but from what Andrew Fitton was saying in an interview he wanted somebody with a lot of experience...which to my mind actually counts out everyone that has been linked with the job so far..with the exception of the obviously pie in the sky calls for Hoddles return.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Ardiles on Monday, December 17, 2007, 09:22:37
What irritates me is the obsession with signing up former players.  Why?!  If Nijholt hadn't played for us nearly 15 years ago he would be just another Dutch manager managing a Dutch side that no one had heard of.  But because he scored a belter in the home game against Man United in 1994 he's suddenly a contender for our manager's job.

Makes no sense at all.  I'm sure Luc's managerial record is fine, but I hope we cast the net a little wider than Nijholt, Ling and Hoddle (all of whom were great players, btw).


Title: We need Luc
Post by: McLovin on Monday, December 17, 2007, 09:32:12
We're getting Ling.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: janaage on Monday, December 17, 2007, 09:34:53
"Nijholt, Ling and Hoddle (all of whom were great players, btw)."

Can't agree with that statement, Hoddle was a great yes, Ling was a very good player for us.  Nijholt was alright he did a job, but was no where near greatness, imo.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: SwindonTartanArmy on Monday, December 17, 2007, 09:42:41
Quote from: "Ardiles"
What irritates me is the obsession with signing up former players.  Why?!  If Nijholt hadn't played for us nearly 15 years ago he would be just another Dutch manager managing a Dutch side that no one had heard of.  But because he scored a belter in the home game against Man United in 1994 he's suddenly a contender for our manager's job.

Makes no sense at all.  I'm sure Luc's managerial record is fine, but I hope we cast the net a little wider than Nijholt, Ling and Hoddle (all of whom were great players, btw).
Difference is, Nijholt has been involved at the top level in Holland. Including running one of the best youth systems in the country and assisting one of the best managers in the world in the UEFA cup final.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Ardiles on Monday, December 17, 2007, 09:49:36
Quote from: "janaage"
"Nijholt, Ling and Hoddle (all of whom were great players, btw)."

Can't agree with that statement, Hoddle was a great yes, Ling was a very good player for us.  Nijholt was alright he did a job, but was no where near greatness, imo.


OK...agreed.  I wasn't using 'great' as in Cruyff being a great, or Gielgud.  I meant he was quite good for us and played at a high level.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: janaage on Monday, December 17, 2007, 09:50:14
I agree with that statement.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Monday, December 17, 2007, 10:02:13
Don't know who will be manager to be honest,

All though I am confident the Martin Ling will have been watching the takeover developments rather closely, and I suspect a few more managers will have been.

After all, any club with a premiership history, with a good squad in place and transfer funds available would be tempting to a fair few experienced managers out there. In todays transfer environment being able to purchase the players that you want could be a novelty to many.

I reckon that quite a few surprising names might come into the fold within the next few days, provided that the takeover goes through of course.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: janaage on Monday, December 17, 2007, 10:09:11
"with a good squad in place"

I disagree with this statement.

I honestly don't think we have a decent squad.  I was thinking about this this morning (couldn't sleep).  I was pondering IF the takeover goes ahead I wonder which players will be out the door.  

Surely if this consortium has a few bob behind them they'll be looking at strengthening our rather weak squad.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Monday, December 17, 2007, 10:14:12
Quote from: "janaage"
"with a good squad in place"

I disagree with this statement.

I honestly don't think we have a decent squad.  I was thinking about this this morning (couldn't sleep).  I was pondering IF the takeover goes ahead I wonder which players will be out the door.  

Surely if this consortium has a few bob behind them they'll be looking at strengthening our rather weak squad.


I'd heard differently, especially when we where playing well. Although of course considering my location I can't confess to know better then anyboday else.

That aside though, transfer funds being available will still make us very attractive to quite a few managers out there!


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Bogus Dave on Monday, December 17, 2007, 10:16:15
our fuly fit first 11 is good. but center midfield apart, we have absolutley no back-up cover should we get injuries or  suspension, which explaisn why we're so shit at the moment


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Barry Scott on Monday, December 17, 2007, 10:21:21
Quote from: "janaage"

I honestly don't think we have a decent squad.


A while ago i would have disagreed with you, but i've also started to lean this way recently.

Sturrock didn't really get any superb players. Most blow hot and cold, alot, and at best just average. I do feel we have quite a strong squad (in terms of depth), but there's a lot of very average players making up the numbers.

Amusingly, some of our strongest players, in my eyes, were here before Sturrock even came in: Peacock, Roberts, Smith, Smith, Pook, Ifil, Vincent, Brezovan... Some were also involved in the relegation.  :?


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Luci on Monday, December 17, 2007, 10:28:54
Quote from: "Si Pie"
I reckon that STFCLady would be a shit manager.


I think I'd tend to agree!

Personally I'd prefer Ling to Nijholt but I'll support 100% whoever is appointed until I have a reason not to.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Simon Pieman on Monday, December 17, 2007, 14:24:43
I'd forgotten I'd even written that. I think I might be turning into a bit of an internet bully  :mrgreen:


Title: We need Luc
Post by: devonshire_red on Monday, December 17, 2007, 15:33:01
LUC! LUC! LUC!


Title: We need Luc
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Monday, December 17, 2007, 15:43:31
Quote from: "devonshire_red"
LUC! LUC! LUC!


Are you really Luc Nijholt or somefink?


Title: We need Luc
Post by: STFC4LIFE on Monday, December 17, 2007, 15:57:23
I personaly don't want him.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: sonic youth on Monday, December 17, 2007, 17:09:56
Quote from: "SwindonTartanArmy"
Quote from: "Ardiles"
What irritates me is the obsession with signing up former players.  Why?!  If Nijholt hadn't played for us nearly 15 years ago he would be just another Dutch manager managing a Dutch side that no one had heard of.  But because he scored a belter in the home game against Man United in 1994 he's suddenly a contender for our manager's job.

Makes no sense at all.  I'm sure Luc's managerial record is fine, but I hope we cast the net a little wider than Nijholt, Ling and Hoddle (all of whom were great players, btw).
Difference is, Nijholt has been involved at the top level in Holland. Including running one of the best youth systems in the country and assisting one of the best managers in the world in the UEFA cup final.


word. spot on my friend!

ling would be my ideal choice but nijholt would be a very good appointment in my opinion.


Title: We need Luc
Post by: Barry Scott on Monday, December 17, 2007, 17:26:00
Quote from: "BANGKOK RED"
Quote from: "devonshire_red"
LUC! LUC! LUC!


Are you really Luc Nijholt or somefink?


He is to the "We need Luc" thread, what OneAndrewFitton is to the Boardroom section. I think they're stuck in these comfort zones they exclusively post in. Come outside, it's nice and warm Devonshire_red. :D


Title: We need Luc
Post by: flammableBen on Monday, December 17, 2007, 17:59:12
Quote from: "devonshire_red"
LUC! LUC! LUC!


If get him and he's shit you know it's going to be your fault?


Title: We need Luc
Post by: donkey on Monday, December 17, 2007, 22:02:32
What I liked about Ling is after taking Orient up, he had a look at his squad, decided most were not up to the job and shipped them out.  A ruthless streak in a manager is good...

But, we need to be taken over first (sorry to put a downer on it, but it's not gone through yet, and until it does, I'm not celebrating :cry: )