Title: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: STFC Bart on Monday, November 26, 2007, 19:45:13 For the past 4 months according to a mesage from a Plymouth fan on the thisis forum
Title: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: herthab on Monday, November 26, 2007, 19:46:18 Bart.
Fuck off. Thank you. Title: Re: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: jimbob on Monday, November 26, 2007, 19:47:00 Quote from: "STFC Bart" For the past 4 months according to a mesage from a Plymouth fan on the thisis forum you really think he'd have stuck around for this long :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: Title: Re: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: reeves4england on Monday, November 26, 2007, 19:47:47 Quote from: "STFC Bart" For the past 4 months according to a mesage from a Plymouth fan on the thisis forum Bart. Don't be a dick. That's almost 100% guaranteed to not be true considering-the source -the circumstances -the fact that Sturrock is/was still here Title: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: flammableBen on Monday, November 26, 2007, 19:50:23 If I cared about what was posted on thisis then I would be on there at the moment and not on here.
Shouldn't really rise to Bart. I'm sure if we all stopped reacting then he'd get bored soon enough. Title: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: BANGKOK RED on Monday, November 26, 2007, 20:06:48 A bit on a post on the thisis form the other day, when some bright spark saying that Hoddle is a shit manager because he has been sacked 3 times made me react. I felt like cyber-lumping the bloke.
I still browse it though, but only because that bape chappie and duke of banbury seem to know what they are talking. Both have been oddly absent today. Hmmmm. Title: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: Batch on Monday, November 26, 2007, 20:13:45 Banbury posted the 'what do you think of Coterill' post.
Bape must be travelling to Devon tonight :) Title: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: STFC Bart on Monday, November 26, 2007, 20:18:12 greeng4309 wrote:
Rumours and I mean only rumours coming out from Argyle forums is that Sturrock hasn't been paid for the past four months and under the agreement of his contract he could have walked for nothing. Sturrock asked Argyle to come up with some form of compensation, quoted to be around 120k to help Swindon out. Might explain why your board were willing to let Sturrock talk to Argyle Title: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: blinkpip on Monday, November 26, 2007, 20:18:41 I know it's Bart, but with are board, anything is possible.
Title: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: DV on Monday, November 26, 2007, 20:25:12 and this random bloke from plymouth would know this how....exactly....?
Title: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: jimbob on Monday, November 26, 2007, 20:28:19 didn't muff get £225k for holloway??
we've gotta be asking £150k minimum oh, i forgot, i didn't believe the rumour :? Title: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: STFC_Chris on Monday, November 26, 2007, 20:28:21 I suspect this is complete bollocks, if he hadn't been paid for four months he's hardly going to be interested in "helping them out" is he? :roll:
Title: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: STFC_Gazzza on Monday, November 26, 2007, 20:30:50 Quote from: "STFC_Chris" I suspect this is complete bollocks, if he hadn't been paid for four months he's hardly going to be interested in "helping them out" is he? :roll: spot on. Title: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: redbullzeye on Monday, November 26, 2007, 20:51:23 Quote from: "STFC_Chris" I suspect this is complete bollocks, if he hadn't been paid for four months he's hardly going to be interested in "helping them out" is he? :roll: Plymouth fans have called Holloway a judas for walking out but now feel hypocrites for accepting Sturrock back at our expense. Cue someone to invent a story like "he hasn't been paid for x months" and then it makes it alright. I didn't think Luggy was so rich he could take 4 months of no pay in his stride :shock: Who would pay for the crates of superior white wine? Title: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Monday, November 26, 2007, 23:06:45 Tbh i wouldn't be surprised if he wasn't paid for 4 months. He must have been on a lot more than the players and we struggled to pay them. With the Best deal dragging on and then the Fitton deal i reckon it's quite possible.
Title: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: reeves4england on Monday, November 26, 2007, 23:10:38 Quote from: "Iffy's Onion Bhaji" Tbh i wouldn't be surprised if he wasn't paid for 4 months. He must have been on a lot more than the players and we struggled to pay them. With the Best deal dragging on and then the Fitton deal i reckon it's quite possible. Surely he wouldn't have hung around just hoping though? I'd tell them where they could stick their job well before 4 MONTHS was upTitle: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: yeo on Monday, November 26, 2007, 23:11:45 I think its entirely possible.
Title: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Monday, November 26, 2007, 23:16:14 Quote from: "reeves4england" Quote from: "Iffy's Onion Bhaji" Tbh i wouldn't be surprised if he wasn't paid for 4 months. He must have been on a lot more than the players and we struggled to pay them. With the Best deal dragging on and then the Fitton deal i reckon it's quite possible. Surely he wouldn't have hung around just hoping though? I'd tell them where they could stick their job well before 4 MONTHS was upYes but he was hanging around in the hope a takeover was completed wasn't he? He might have been told by Best and Fitton that when a deal was completed he would be payed for the months that were missed as well. Then to top it off we get this embargo. No wonder he left. He couldn't even do his job properly because he had so many restrictions and he might not of even got paid for it either. He wouldn't have just walked. Why do that? You'll be out of a job for no reason. He was obviously waiting for the first offer to come in. And low and behold guess who it is. Plymouth. He must have jumped with excitement when he heard they were interested. Title: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: flammableBen on Monday, November 26, 2007, 23:17:42 It's possible. But the point of the tef is that it's not thisisstfc. If people are going to start new threads all the time saying some random 'moth fan said this on thisis, then what's the point? I understand when there are a few reliable sources on there. Fuck knows I don't read it. But a random plymouth fan? What?
Title: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: yeo on Monday, November 26, 2007, 23:23:53 Im getting a bit bored of the whole "this isn't thisis" line .People should be able to post what they want here be it rehashed rumours from other sites or bonafiding facts straight from the horses mouth.If its not of interest to you dont reply it will soon drop out of site.
Title: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: axs on Monday, November 26, 2007, 23:24:09 http://www.debenhams.com/images/products/xlg/20070615_15201051566060_XLG.JPG
i got bored. Title: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: flammableBen on Monday, November 26, 2007, 23:33:22 Quote from: "Oevil red" Im getting a bit bored of the whole "this isn't thisis" line .People should be able to post what they want here be it rehashed rumours from other sites or bonafiding facts straight from the horses mouth.If its not of interest to you dont reply it will soon drop out of site. If there hadn't already been about 20 threads started with the same subject already started today then it probably wouldn't have bothered me; it's an interesting bit of rumour even if that's all it is. But there was enough threads still being read and cycling replies that it was unnecessary for another new thread. Lot's of people had new bits of gossip going about the last few days and not everybody had the arrogance just to start a new thread without seeing if there bit of news was already being discussed. Good god I'm becoming Sonic. If this is like some sort of soul exchange then he's not going to last long without a bottle of red wine. Title: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: sonic youth on Monday, November 26, 2007, 23:46:39 this must be why my nose just started bleeding
Title: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: flammableBen on Monday, November 26, 2007, 23:48:00 You'd get laid more if you could look at beautiful women without blood spurting from your nose.
Title: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: axs on Monday, November 26, 2007, 23:48:57 sorry, didn't mean to cause a drama.
Title: Sturrock has not been paid Post by: Lumps on Tuesday, November 27, 2007, 07:46:29 Can I point out that if the sweaty hadn't been paid for four months his employer would have been in breach of contract, and he would thereofore have been free to talk to Argyle without any of that tedious asking for permission bollocks.
Didn't happen that way did it. So it's clearly bollocks. Also, we've heard rumours every time the club have had trouble paying the wage bill, and we've known when they managed to come up with the money to cover it. I can't see why Luggy's wages wouldn't have been included within those arrangements same as everybody elses. |