Thetownend.com

in and around the leeds side, will no doubt play at some point tomorrow.

hope the cocky little fucker has a shocker.

He'll probably score. And we'll lose. It's a forgone conclusion already really. The only fixture on the calender this season that i have 0% confidence in us getting something out of the game. I'm glad we can get it out the way tomorrow!

I'm more confident about this than a visit to somewhere like Bournemouth, the players should relish the opportunity to get one over on Wise and the chance that they could be one of the only teams this season to take anythiong from there, they'd be much more likely to not turn up at Bournemouth.

:ontopic:

this is about curtis weston, the cocky little fucker.

I thought Weston was a good player. Good luck for him, but not tomorrow.

cocky little fucker.

Fucking little cocker.

cucking fittle locker!

I thought he was one of our most gifted players last year.  He has talent and Wise knows that

He was pretty 'meh when he played, although he did score against Roverrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrs.

i rated him personally, but clearly not luggys cuppa...ah well (couldn't access the shoulder shrug which was more appropriate)

Weston > Pook

FACT!

I rated him. I also rate Simon Cox.

Both are cocky little fuckers though.

i think after the barnet game he was as good as out of the club in luggy's eyes

good call-he's more fussed bout havin technically gifted wide players in the side than anyone who can open a can of beans/soup/tuna and/or land the ball on a sixpence/farthing/twopence/new five pence piece with his left/right peg in the centre of the park/pitch/lawn/playing field

and no, i don't know why i'm using lots of //////////////

I'm hungover, and that post has made my brain hurt... :(

perhaps if he had spent more time playing and less fathering children out of wedlock....

Weston was exciting at times, but purely because he could run at people occasionally, people get all misty eyed about him and remember him as some kind of poor-man's Riquelme. His passing was poor and he didn't get back enough. Imo he was a greedy cunt who left his team mates to clear up after him.

I remember one game where all he did of note was run at the opposition defence a few times, go for some hollywood balls and missed placed more passes than Hewlett. People then think he's god? He was a liability.

It's about a team effort and if he couldn't put in the work where it was needed he shouldn't be here.

Pook is a far more industrious and valuable team player, hence why he plays for us and not that fucking Bigtime glory boy.

True! It could of been anyones child though!

He may not have been God, but he did show a degree of potential far beyond most of our squad.  Whether people like it or not, an attacking midfielder who has a bit of pace, can beat players and be moulded on the passing front far outweighs having someone whose only real attribute is having "a good engine".  Mix an Easton style player and Weston in central midfield and I think you'd have a good partnership.  Weston worked well with Evans I thought, but was clearly not going to play under Sturrock so would have gradually festered before dropping out of league football if he'd stayed on.

Is he injured...as I see he did not even make the subs bench ?