Thetownend.com

25% => Players => Topic started by: stfc_steve on Saturday, November 10, 2007, 19:48:40



Title: Pook
Post by: stfc_steve on Saturday, November 10, 2007, 19:48:40
Many on this forum might argue that league 2 is the only level he can play at but today i thought he played total class, spread the ball, and passed out wide to open up the play.
In my eyes much better than Adams, and looked the better out of the two central midfielders (Easton)

What do you think?


Title: Pook
Post by: Samdy Gray on Saturday, November 10, 2007, 19:50:46
We played a league two team though...

(Although, in all fairness Pook looked very good today. My MOTM.)


Title: Pook
Post by: Arriba on Saturday, November 10, 2007, 19:51:43
didn't go today, but have always said he's not given the credit he deserves.has his flaws but gives his all, and is better than credited by too many of our fans.


Title: Pook
Post by: Samdy Gray on Saturday, November 10, 2007, 19:53:57
I thought he looked like he was playing for his place in the team. Did exactly what a central midfielder should - tackled, passed the ball well, kept it simple when he needed to and made a couple of decent cross field passes.


Title: Pook
Post by: sonic youth on Saturday, November 10, 2007, 20:11:08
all he needed was to score a goal and he'd have put in the perfect all-round performance.

absolutely brilliant, can't begin to say how impressed i was with him today. wycombe certainly weren't a shit team either (except up front)


Title: Pook
Post by: tans on Saturday, November 10, 2007, 20:18:28
Him and Easton next week then?


Title: Pook
Post by: axs on Saturday, November 10, 2007, 22:19:54
pook was MOM for me, Tozer did OK but he's not about to replace Jerel. Easton had a few nice touches but had an average game. Zaboub looks ok going forward and put in a couple of tackles but I still worry about his defensive capabilities against decent strikers.


Title: Pook
Post by: fatbury on Saturday, November 10, 2007, 22:43:03
Pook was quality today ... hope he gets a good run in the team now and the crowd give him the support he deserves


Title: Pook
Post by: tans on Saturday, November 10, 2007, 22:46:37
Are you ging to be supporting him next Saturday Fatters?


Title: Pook
Post by: reeves4england on Saturday, November 10, 2007, 22:50:03
Quote from: "tans"
Are you ging to be supporting him next Saturday Fatters?
I know I will. Nearly faultless today.


Title: Pook
Post by: tans on Saturday, November 10, 2007, 22:52:48
I wasnt there so cant comment, but from what Ive read looks like he played out of his skin today. Bet Sturrock changes the midfield next week though...


Title: Pook
Post by: yeo on Sunday, November 11, 2007, 00:30:33
Yes Pooks ace innit.

He used to be my favourite until I heard Phil Smith on todays commentry.

Ed-"Swindon look like they are playing 4-3-3"

P.Smith "Dunno ,no point asking me" 8)


Title: Pook
Post by: tans on Sunday, November 11, 2007, 00:33:58
:Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Title: Pook
Post by: Simon Pieman on Sunday, November 11, 2007, 00:40:02
He probably won't start against Leeds. Just a hunch.


Title: Pook
Post by: tans on Sunday, November 11, 2007, 00:43:20
Thats what im thinking.


Title: Pook
Post by: Simon Pieman on Sunday, November 11, 2007, 00:45:01
When I say 'probably' and 'hunch', I mean near certain. Not saying he shouldn't start though.


Title: Pook
Post by: tans on Sunday, November 11, 2007, 00:47:57
Fucking Blair better not play i tell thee


Title: Pook
Post by: Simon Pieman on Sunday, November 11, 2007, 00:49:40
Why would he?


Title: Pook
Post by: juddie on Sunday, November 11, 2007, 00:49:42
I've hammered pooky in the past but today he was my MOM. awesome.


Title: Pook
Post by: reeves4england on Sunday, November 11, 2007, 09:47:32
To be honest I'd change the midfield for Leeds. With Commingues and Peacock on the wings we'll get torn apart!

Based on performances at Wycombe I'd go for

Roberts - Pook - Easton - Zaboub

I'd also be tempted to start with Barry Corr again because he was close to being my MOTM yesterday. I said I'd like to see Corr and Paynter and it worked very well. Won't be complaining if Cox comes back in though


Title: Pook
Post by: Red81 on Sunday, November 11, 2007, 10:35:26
Quote from: "Oevil red"
Yes Pooks ace innit.

He used to be my favourite until I heard Phil Smith on todays commentry.

Ed-"Swindon look like they are playing 4-3-3"

P.Smith "Dunno ,no point asking me" 8)
:soapy tit wank:  Legend.


Title: Pook
Post by: sonic youth on Sunday, November 11, 2007, 11:36:02
zaaboub should continue at left-back, at least until vincent's fit...


Title: Pook
Post by: Frigby Daser on Sunday, November 11, 2007, 12:30:14
4-5-1 against Leeds I reckon

Brez
Smith Ifil Aljofree Zaaboub
Cox Pook Easton Peacock McGovern/Roberts
Corr/Paynter

Paynter/Corr
McGovern/Roberts
Adams


Title: Pook
Post by: herthab on Sunday, November 11, 2007, 12:39:33
Sturrock will play a 4.4.2.

Cox and Paynter upfront.


Title: Pook
Post by: fatbury on Sunday, November 11, 2007, 15:09:08
why wouldnt he start next week??? more likely that Easton or Peacock would be dropped than him after that performance


Title: Pook
Post by: reeves4england on Sunday, November 11, 2007, 15:40:54
Quote from: "fatbury"
why wouldnt he start next week??? more likely that Easton or Peacock would be dropped than him after that performance
Like I say, I think Peacock will be on the bench with Pook and Easton in the centre. And after yesterday that would be the right decision imo


Title: Pook
Post by: kevjoycreed on Sunday, November 11, 2007, 16:46:01
Pook definatley surprised me yesterday, his performance was all but faultless. Deserves to keep his place for the trip to Leeds.
I'd like to see:
J Smith, Aljofree, Ifil (or Blackburn if unfit), Zaboub
McGovern, Pook, Easton, Roberts
Corr and Paynter.


Title: Pook
Post by: Power to people on Sunday, November 11, 2007, 16:59:15
I think Peacock will keep his place as Sturrock raves about his work rate and how good he is in the air, but he is no good out wide it should be the centre or the bench for him.

I'd also be surprised if Jack Smith walked straight back in, Commingues has done ok in his absence and it may make him even better knowing Smith is chomping at the bit for his place back.


Title: Pook
Post by: McLovin on Monday, November 12, 2007, 09:17:08
Peacock will never be dropped.

I have no idea why though.


Title: Pook
Post by: kevjoycreed on Monday, November 12, 2007, 09:51:06
Quote from: "McLovin"
Peacock will never be dropped.

I have no idea why though.


Rumour has it he's reserve goalie and seeing as we don't have a goalie on the bench he needs to fit in somewhere incase Brez got injured.


Title: Pook
Post by: Colin Todd on Monday, November 12, 2007, 09:56:43
Quote from: "kevjoycreed"
Quote from: "McLovin"
Peacock will never be dropped.

I have no idea why though.


Rumour has it he's reserve goalie and seeing as we don't have a goalie on the bench he needs to fit in somewhere incase Brez got injured.



A. Bollocks
B. Couldnt that be on the bench?


Title: Pook
Post by: janaage on Monday, November 12, 2007, 10:06:55
Pook plays better away than he does at home.  Probably something to do with the amount of knobjockey's who get on his back as soon as he makes a mistake at the CG.


Title: Pook
Post by: Tails on Monday, November 12, 2007, 10:39:35
Peacock will be handy against Leeds I think, and is probably more likely to start than Pook. I really do hope we have McGovern and Roberts on either wing though, no idea why but I can see Roberts really causing some damage at Elland Road.


Title: Pook
Post by: sonic youth on Monday, November 12, 2007, 12:23:20
Quote from: "janaage"
Pook plays better away than he does at home.  Probably something to do with the amount of knobjockey's who get on his back as soon as he makes a mistake at the CG.


he made one poor pass on saturday and gave the ball away, the moan from our fans was nearly as loud as the roar when we scored our second.

there are a lot of our fans who are just waiting for pook to fuck up.


Title: Pook
Post by: Fred Elliot on Monday, November 12, 2007, 12:49:47
I thought he was ace


Title: Pook
Post by: Samdy Gray on Monday, November 12, 2007, 12:51:53
I'm actually beginning to like him as a footballer.

But IMO as a person he's still a cock.


Title: Pook
Post by: JOHNNY REEVES on Sunday, December 16, 2007, 20:59:48
just seen a program about christmas turkeys and thought i saw pooky.


Title: Pook
Post by: flammableBen on Sunday, December 16, 2007, 21:13:53
Pook is off to Chelsea for £20million.


Title: Pook
Post by: DV on Sunday, December 16, 2007, 21:58:36
Quote from: "McLovin"
Peacock will never be dropped.

I have no idea why though.


we've done bloody brilliant without him though havent we....


Title: Pook
Post by: adje on Monday, December 17, 2007, 00:07:51
Pook is a fucking disgrace-how he ever became a professional footballer is beyond me-they wont even have to wash his kit this week.blokes a total wanker-he's my biggest hate figure since Gurney


Title: Pook
Post by: STFC4LIFE on Monday, December 17, 2007, 00:16:03
Quote from: "adje"
Pook is a fucking disgrace-how he ever became a professional footballer is beyond me-they wont even have to wash his kit this week.blokes a total wanker-he's my biggest hate figure since Gurney

That's harsh, I liked Gurney.
We miss someone like him imo. He's better than Blackburn aswell, i'd even have him centre mid again instead of Pook.


Title: Pook
Post by: fatbury on Monday, December 17, 2007, 09:46:38
Sturrock is preparing a bid for Pook ...


Title: Pook
Post by: Mister Lorenzo on Monday, December 17, 2007, 09:50:07
Quote

Sturrock is preparing a bid for Pook ...


Thank fuck for that.........
If this happens and the takeover goes through, then all my Christmas's will have come at once.


Title: Pook
Post by: Barry Scott on Monday, December 17, 2007, 10:08:11
Pook is good. People are cunts about him. I swear some people just watch him in a match and nothing else. They love to see him miss a pass or fuck something up, it's truly pathetic. If we have a bad game, Pook will be singled out, when often not being the worst. Even when he plays well he gets slated, i've even heard people saying "ffs pook" and the like when he's not even the one that made the bad pass. The poor kid can't do any right.

Pook deserves a lot better than the treatment he gets with us and it will probably be good for him and his career if he could get a move away from us.

Despite the fact that i feel we need him and he is one of the more valuable members of the squad, i'd like to see him move on and excel just to show our fans that he isn't that bad.

I feel sorry for him and would love it if he gave the crowd a wanker sign if he were to go. The sad truth is he won't ever be given anything but disrespect by our fans and that's a real shame.


Title: Pook
Post by: axs on Monday, December 17, 2007, 10:47:16
good post Mr Scott. He gets a lot more shit than he deserves, especially this season, he's had a few performances where he was certainly in the best three on the pitch.


Title: Pook
Post by: Samdy Gray on Monday, December 17, 2007, 11:25:51
I think Barry Scott is the TEF version of Michael Pook.

Some people think he's a cunt, but I think he's an alright bloke. Most of the time he's just your regular poster. Now and again he'll have a moment of inspiration and post some amazing rant, then other times he'll post a load of bollocks.


Title: Pook
Post by: adje on Monday, December 17, 2007, 12:00:19
Quote from: "Barry Scott"
Pook is good. People are cunts about him. I swear some people just watch him in a match and nothing else. They love to see him miss a pass or fuck something up, it's truly pathetic. If we have a bad game, Pook will be singled out, when often not being the worst. Even when he plays well he gets slated, i've even heard people saying "ffs pook" and the like when he's not even the one that made the bad pass. The poor kid can't do any right.

Pook deserves a lot better than the treatment he gets with us and it will probably be good for him and his career if he could get a move away from us.

Despite the fact that i feel we need him and he is one of the more valuable members of the squad, i'd like to see him move on and excel just to show our fans that he isn't that bad.

I feel sorry for him and would love it if he gave the crowd a wanker sign if he were to go. The sad truth is he won't ever be given anything but disrespect by our fans and that's a real shame.



I appreciate your opinion but Pook is technically not good.Also,I would like nothing more than for him to be good but he just isn't.I dont see how he is one of the more valuable members of the club-Sturrock had him as a bit-part player,nothing more nothing less.If he gives me a wanker sign he'll get one straight back at him.I've also heard that as a bloke,he's a bit of a twat allegedly and  like you,I would like to see him move on,sadly I dont think that will happen.That's just my opinion,of course.


Title: Pook
Post by: red macca on Monday, December 17, 2007, 12:06:53
Quote from: "Barry Scott"
Pook is good. People are cunts about him. I swear some people just watch him in a match and nothing else. They love to see him miss a pass or fuck something up, it's truly pathetic. If we have a bad game, Pook will be singled out, when often not being the worst. Even when he plays well he gets slated, i've even heard people saying "ffs pook" and the like when he's not even the one that made the bad pass. The poor kid can't do any right.

Pook deserves a lot better than the treatment he gets with us and it will probably be good for him and his career if he could get a move away from us.

Despite the fact that i feel we need him and he is one of the more valuable members of the squad, i'd like to see him move on and excel just to show our fans that he isn't that bad.

I feel sorry for him and would love it if he gave the crowd a wanker sign if he were to go. The sad truth is he won't ever be given anything but disrespect by our fans and that's a real shame.
Barry i had the lovely pleasure of meeting him i said well played and his response was Do you think i give a fuck what you think.On that basis i believe he is a cunt


Title: Pook
Post by: axs on Monday, December 17, 2007, 12:08:42
probably thought you were being sarcastic.


Title: Pook
Post by: Barry Scott on Monday, December 17, 2007, 12:21:59
Quote from: "Samdy Gray"
I think Barry Scott is the TEF version of Michael Pook.

Some people think he's a cunt, but I think he's an alright bloke. Most of the time he's just your regular poster. Now and again he'll have a moment of inspiration and post some amazing rant, then other times he'll post a load of bollocks.


:D Good post.

One question though. Does that mean fatbury wants a go on me?  :?

Quote from: "red macca"
Barry i had the lovely pleasure of meeting him i said well played and his response was Do you think i give a fuck what you think.On that basis i believe he is a cunt


If anyone had spoken to me like that, i'd think they're a cunt too. As i say, i wasn't waving fingers, just generalising. He gets a rough deal, but in your instance, you'd have every right to kick the cunt in the teeth.


Title: Pook
Post by: sonic youth on Monday, December 17, 2007, 16:34:23
i don't give a shit if he's the nicest bloke on earth or a total and utter cunt. judging purely on his performances on the pitch this season, he's played well and has been one of more consistent players.


Title: Pook
Post by: Colin Todd on Monday, December 17, 2007, 16:48:31
If someone could learn him how to compose himself, look up then find a red shirt 95% of the time he's be a good player.

For all his physical excertions its pretty fucking annoying when he hooks the ball in the air over his head to no-one


Title: Pook
Post by: DV on Monday, December 17, 2007, 18:28:59
lets not beat around the bush. Pook is shit. I swear people just stick up for him to be different!

He's actual footballing ability is zero. His passing and distribution is awful. So is his touch and vision.

He'll hussle and bussle and do a decent job of it dont get me wrong


BUT...


If we're accepting Pook as a decent midfield option for STFC then it shows just how far we've fallen.


Title: Pook
Post by: Bogus Dave on Monday, December 17, 2007, 18:32:00
WERE LEAGUE 1


Title: Pook
Post by: DV on Monday, December 17, 2007, 18:34:11
...and Paul bloody Evans is playing in League Two


Title: Pook
Post by: Bogus Dave on Monday, December 17, 2007, 18:35:48
evans is old and always injured


pook is young and not injured. that explains that


Title: Pook
Post by: STFC4LIFE on Monday, December 17, 2007, 18:37:52
Quote from: "STFC dave"
evans is old and always injured


pook is young and not injured. that explains that

I hope you realise DV is now gonna prove you wrong by pointing out how many games Paul Evans has played this season
:D


Title: Pook
Post by: Bogus Dave on Monday, December 17, 2007, 18:39:02
or send a plague of locusts to rain down upon my head for disagreeing with him  :D


Title: Pook
Post by: DV on Monday, December 17, 2007, 18:43:20
Quote from: "STFC dave"
evans is old and always injured


pook is young and not injured. that explains that


Ah, of course I forgot these days midfielders are judged on how many games they play and not how good they actually are!

Regardless of his age and missing the odd game injured. He is a better play than Pook and always will be.

He certainly missed tooooo many games for us last season, but that doesnt make him any less of a player.

Plus, he played 17 games last season for us and has played 17 games already this season. He hasnt scored yet though!


Title: Pook
Post by: Bogus Dave on Monday, December 17, 2007, 18:47:59
why keep him if he's not going to play though. maradona will always be a better player than pook, despite fatbury saying otherwise, but you wouldn't want him now would you.


Title: Pook
Post by: DV on Monday, December 17, 2007, 18:51:22
but Paul Evans (who im just using as an example) still playing professional football

and damn right I'd rather have Maradona in midfield instead of Pook!