Thetownend.com

25% => Other Football Stuff => Topic started by: magicroundabout on Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:05:20



Title: Tevez saga again
Post by: magicroundabout on Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:05:20
http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11095_2664984,00.html

fucking someone buy Sheffield UTD a new dummie and change the story book. this is getting tedious now.

I reckon we should sue Liverpool for beating us 5.0 in our premiership season cos it helped us get relegated.  :roll:


Title: Tevez saga again
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:08:44
I can't see how they're going to get anywhere with that. I think it's time for them to STFU and concentrate on getting promoted back to the Premiership.


Title: Tevez saga again
Post by: genf_stfc on Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:39:35
sheffield should really just shut up, its getting embarrassing.  some lawyers will get rich out of this though.

noticed something interesting on a few boards (so probably not completely unbiased...) about when watford signed steve kabba from sheffield utd in january - apparently there was a clause in his contract, inserted by sheffield,  that said that watford could not select him to play against utd. incidentally sheffield won when they then played watford.

i'm sure this kabba chap is not quite in the same class as tevez - but it still sounds a bit like double standards to me.  mind you, didn't we have something similar when we signed robbo from city ?


Title: Tevez saga again
Post by: tans on Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:56:35
any team that cant beat wigan at home is a bunch of cunts imo


Title: Tevez saga again
Post by: Give us an S on Thursday, August 16, 2007, 11:51:17
This is silly now. They must be wasting a fortune on all this.

They fucked up last game. End of. I hope they go down again!


Title: Tevez saga again
Post by: Simon Pieman on Thursday, August 16, 2007, 12:43:46
Yup Genf, I pointed that out a while back too. Apparently it's against the Premiership rules to have such a clause.