Thetownend.com

25% => The Boardroom => Topic started by: sonic youth on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 15:29:09



Title: so...
Post by: sonic youth on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 15:29:09
have we paid the CVA yet?

in fact; what the fuck is going on? i've heard nothing in the past week about the cva, investment, consortium(s), bill power - nothing. is this the end for the fan's consortium? i genuinely cannot see any progress being made now.


Title: so...
Post by: Arriba on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 15:31:48
and is bill power going to demand his 1.2mil back now?


Title: so...
Post by: Ardiles on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 15:39:26
I just want to know if Sandy is still going to be in charge of the VAT.


Title: so...
Post by: OneAndrewFitton on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 15:40:13
No doubt with the news that the new owners will be taking over within the next 7 days this is the end for bill power and the fans consortium, in my opinion the new owners will pay him off just to get rid of him, that's what i think will happen.

Also if the new owners are having 75% of the club i think carson, bowden, holt, gray, lambert etc will be out of a job, they will bring their own people in, only diamandis will stay and he won't be running the show anymore.


Title: so...
Post by: dell boy on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 15:45:50
Quote from: "OneBillPower"
No doubt with the news that the new owners will be taking over within the next 7 days this is the end for bill power and the fans consortium, in my opinion the new owners will pay him off just to get rid of him, that's what i think will happen.

Also if the new owners are having 75% of the club i think carson, bowden, holt, gray, lambert etc will be out of a job, they will bring their own people in, only diamandis will stay and he won't be running the show anymore.

I thought the new owners was a Consortium?
Made up of Mike Diamandis, Sir Seaton and Mystery Foreign Investor - and if that is the case he will still be be there.


Title: so...
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 15:46:53
Quote from: "dell boy"
Quote from: "OneBillPower"
No doubt with the news that the new owners will be taking over within the next 7 days this is the end for bill power and the fans consortium, in my opinion the new owners will pay him off just to get rid of him, that's what i think will happen.

Also if the new owners are having 75% of the club i think carson, bowden, holt, gray, lambert etc will be out of a job, they will bring their own people in, only diamandis will stay and he won't be running the show anymore.

I thought the new owners was a Consortium?
Made up of Mike Diamandis, Sir Seaton and Mystery Foreign Investor - and if that is the case he will still be firmly at reins.


if seaton has only got 25% of the club it cuts down his clout considerably. Diamandis is nothing without Seatons stake.


Title: so...
Post by: Ralphy on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 15:47:32
We're doomed.


Title: so...
Post by: OneAndrewFitton on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 15:48:26
Well i all know is that the new owners want 75% which means they would be running things, i'm not totally sure about diamandis, hopefully he will be in the background and not running things, just wish these new owners would come out and say who they are, i'm sure we will find out soon.


Title: so...
Post by: dell boy on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 15:48:46
Quote from: "jayohaitchenn"
Quote from: "dell boy"
Quote from: "OneBillPower"
No doubt with the news that the new owners will be taking over within the next 7 days this is the end for bill power and the fans consortium, in my opinion the new owners will pay him off just to get rid of him, that's what i think will happen.

Also if the new owners are having 75% of the club i think carson, bowden, holt, gray, lambert etc will be out of a job, they will bring their own people in, only diamandis will stay and he won't be running the show anymore.

I thought the new owners was a Consortium?
Made up of Mike Diamandis, Sir Seaton and Mystery Foreign Investor - and if that is the case he will still be firmly at reins.


if seaton has only got 25% of the club it cuts down his clout considerably. Diamandis is nothing without Seatons stake.


I read it that Sir Seaton has 25% and The Consortium 75%, the Consortium includes Sir Seaton.


Title: so...
Post by: OneAndrewFitton on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 15:50:40
Well maybe not dell boy, maybe the consortium doesn't include seton wills.


Title: so...
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 15:53:46
Interesting, i read it like this:

The consortium will own 100% of the club

The new boys will own 75% of the club

Sir Seaton Wills will own 25% of the club

Or am i being thick?


Title: so...
Post by: Ardiles on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 15:54:27
Quote from: "OneBillPower"
Well i all know is that the new owners want 75% which means they would be running things, i'm not totally sure about diamandis, hopefully he will be in the background and not running things, just wish these new owners would come out and say who they are, i'm sure we will find out soon.


The best scenario would see Diamandis demoted to Tea Boy (where he can do no harm), but I'm not optimistic.


Title: so...
Post by: sonic youth on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 16:00:35
so long as the wills family and diamandis leave, i'll be happy.

where does it say the new consortium will be in place within seven days?

more to the point, why are people not putting pressure on the club to name the people behind the consortium - they placed demands on the fan's consortium; so why so secretive?


Title: so...
Post by: flammableBen on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 16:02:37
Quote from: "jayohaitchenn"
Interesting, i read it like this:

The consortium will own 100% of the club

The new boys will own 75% of the club

Sir Seaton Wills will own 25% of the club

Or am i being thick?


That's how I see it.

I'm bring optimistic about all this, it's hard because I think we've all (rightfully) got into a bit of a habit of negativity over the last few years. I'm going to break it, not that it will make any difference, and will probably just make me feel worse when everything goes wrong again. But I've decided and optimism it is.

Maybe if we all think happy thoughts everything will turn out ace.


Title: so...
Post by: OneAndrewFitton on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 16:03:08
The wills family and diamandis arnt leaving, they will still be there but won't be running things by the sounds of it.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/wiltshire/content/articles/2007/07/11/stfc_110707_feature.shtml


Title: so...
Post by: Power to people on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 16:10:39
Does that mean that Diamandis could go bust as we all know without stfc dunwoody would not be able to keep going all those consultancy fee's and employee's of their's we have to pay.


Title: so...
Post by: OneAndrewFitton on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 16:12:15
Well obviously that would be a very good thing but i doubt it.


Title: so...
Post by: pumbaa on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 16:21:08
Quote from: "sonic youth"
more to the point, why are people not putting pressure on the club to name the people behind the consortium - they placed demands on the fan's consortium; so why so secretive?


It has surprised me too how little formal concern has been expressed. I was thinking of writing another letter to the Adver on the issue.

What other suggestions do people have?


Title: so...
Post by: sonic youth on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 16:21:49
i don't give a flying fuck about what happens to diamandis.


Title: so...
Post by: Arriba on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 16:24:05
i want to know why the board were so desperate for the fans consortium and bill power not to get control?
if i was bill power i'd go public and dish the dirt


Title: so...
Post by: STFC_Manc on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 16:55:49
sorry I think I have missed some thing, where does it say about the new consortium having 100% or etc?  confused!


Title: so...
Post by: Frigby Daser on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 17:00:44
Wills will just be protecting against a scenariolike Brady/Donegan et al....so should the new lot scarper, he can at least have some influence over the future of the club and drip feed it again...waiting for another chance to come along like this one may be...

I see it as a fallback protection

But without knowing the exact dynamics of the shareholdings, personal relationships, job responsibilities and decision-making, it's difficult to tell anything


Title: so...
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 17:01:11
Quote from: "OneBillPower"
The wills family and diamandis arnt leaving, they will still be there but won't be running things by the sounds of it.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/wiltshire/content/articles/2007/07/11/stfc_110707_feature.shtml


Where does that article say Diamandis is staying? Nowhere. Why is everyone jumping to conclusions? The way i see it is that with the new owner holding 75% there is no role for Diamandis. He isn't a shareholder and he isn't a member of the board. So what would be the point in him staying?


Title: so...
Post by: Samdy Gray on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 17:05:06
Quote from: "Rich"
He isn't a shareholder and he isn't a member of the board. So what would be the point in him staying?


Nail. Head. Hit.


Title: so...
Post by: Spud on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 17:42:34
What i don't understand is, the fact that the Wills family wanted out a few months back but now they seem to be back in control as part of this new BS takeover.

Oh and we haven't heard anything about the CVA as they're probably trying to just forget about it and hope it disappears.


Title: so...
Post by: lebowski on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 17:47:45
somewhere (i dont remember where) it was stated that the new consortium consists of the new investor, sir seton wills, and mike diamandes.

so in summary, he's here to stay.


Title: so...
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 17:54:23
Quote from: "Rich"

Where does that article say Diamandis is staying? Nowhere. Why is everyone jumping to conclusions? The way i see it is that with the new owner holding 75% there is no role for Diamandis. He isn't a shareholder and he isn't a member of the board. So what would be the point in him staying?


At the club fans forum Diamandis was introduced as a shareholder. Quite whether that was of the holding company or of the football club who knows, presumably the former.


Title: so...
Post by: yeo on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 17:54:34
I think its being kept quiet because they know we will disapprove.Again ive nothing to base this on except natural pesimism.


Title: so...
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 18:05:31
Quote from: "flammableBen"
Quote from: "jayohaitchenn"
Interesting, i read it like this:

The consortium will own 100% of the club

The new boys will own 75% of the club

Sir Seaton Wills will own 25% of the club

Or am i being thick?


That's how I see it.

I'm bring optimistic about all this, it's hard because I think we've all (rightfully) got into a bit of a habit of negativity over the last few years. I'm going to break it, not that it will make any difference, and will probably just make me feel worse when everything goes wrong again. But I've decided and optimism it is.

Maybe if we all think happy thoughts everything will turn out ace.


    You're going to be one disappointed bunny FB......


Title: so...
Post by: flammableBen on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 18:10:23
Quote from: "Reg Smeeton"
Quote from: "flammableBen"
Quote from: "jayohaitchenn"
Interesting, i read it like this:

The consortium will own 100% of the club

The new boys will own 75% of the club

Sir Seaton Wills will own 25% of the club

Or am i being thick?


That's how I see it.

I'm bring optimistic about all this, it's hard because I think we've all (rightfully) got into a bit of a habit of negativity over the last few years. I'm going to break it, not that it will make any difference, and will probably just make me feel worse when everything goes wrong again. But I've decided and optimism it is.

Maybe if we all think happy thoughts everything will turn out ace.


    You're going to be one disappointed bunny FB......


Something has gotta go good sometime.  Like karma. Although thinking about the cuntish status of most of our fans. We probably deserve all the shit we get.....

No, you aren't bringing me down Mr. Reg. I won't let you do it. Optimism is the way forward. New consortium will come in with millions of £ of investment whilst simultaneously packing up Mr D and co's burning briefcases of fire.

Happy days.


Title: so...
Post by: pauld on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 18:16:15
As things stand, the Holding Co owns a little over 70% of the shares of the football club. Shares in the Holding Co used to stand at:

J Wills: 66%
Mysterious bloke holding shares through nominee account: 33%

Since they rejigged the shareholding to make out Bill Power had bought shares, the listing sent to Companies House now says the holding is as follows

J Wills: 51%
Mysterious bloke holding shares through nominee account: 24%
Bill and Phil: 25%

(or roughly in those proportions anyway). Obviously

Which would mean that the "New Consortium" cannot take 75% of the football club or (without conceding that they owe Bill Power £1.2m) the holding co. What they can do is take 75% of J Wills plus mysterious bloke's interest in the holding co, leaving James and MB 25% of their original shareholding or, more likely, set up a new holding co which they will split 75-25. What would be interesting to see then would be whether the board sell or give that new holding co the 70% shares in the football club directly, essentially leaving the old holding co as a shell or whether they sell the new holding co their stake in the old holding co, so that the new holding co controls the football club that way. Either way is potentially fraught with legal problems while the status of Bill's money is still in dispute and the board try to maintain the stance that he has shares in the holding co. They could end up blowing their own sale out of the water, if they're not careful with this.


Title: so...
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 18:27:14
Quote from: "flammableBen"
Quote from: "Reg Smeeton"
Quote from: "flammableBen"
Quote from: "jayohaitchenn"
Interesting, i read it like this:

The consortium will own 100% of the club

The new boys will own 75% of the club

Sir Seaton Wills will own 25% of the club

Or am i being thick?


That's how I see it.

I'm bring optimistic about all this, it's hard because I think we've all (rightfully) got into a bit of a habit of negativity over the last few years. I'm going to break it, not that it will make any difference, and will probably just make me feel worse when everything goes wrong again. But I've decided and optimism it is.

Maybe if we all think happy thoughts everything will turn out ace.


    You're going to be one disappointed bunny FB......


Something has gotta go good sometime.  Like karma. Although thinking about the cuntish status of most of our fans. We probably deserve all the shit we get.....

No, you aren't bringing me down Mr. Reg. I won't let you do it. Optimism is the way forward. New consortium will come in with millions of £ of investment whilst simultaneously packing up Mr D and co's burning briefcases of fire.

Happy days.


   I did optimism with the Fan's Consortium.....

   I feel like Laocoon with his warning about Greeks bearing gifts.....but he got scoffed by a bunch of serpents,  a fate I'd rather avoid.


Title: so...
Post by: flammableBen on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 18:49:38
Move to Ireland Reg, you'll be safe there.


Title: so...
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 19:02:30
Quote from: "flammableBen"
Move to Ireland Reg, you'll be safe there.


  Its a thought....I once walked up Croagh  Patrick.....from whence the eponymous saint banished ophidians from Hibernia, perhaps that will save me.


Title: so...
Post by: newmarket red on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 19:10:27
Quote from: "sonic youth"
i don't give a flying fuck about what happens to diamandis.
Me neither just want to know whos fucking taking over the club.And when is sturrock going to sign us a non injured striker who can score goals.


Title: so...
Post by: newmarket red on Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 19:12:23
Quote from: "lebowski"
somewhere (i dont remember where) it was stated that the new consortium consists of the new investor, sir seton wills, and mike diamandes.

so in summary, he's here to stay.
Your right except james instead of sir seton.


Title: so...
Post by: Phil_S on Thursday, July 12, 2007, 09:42:25
Quote from: "pauld"
As things stand, the Holding Co owns a little over 70% of the shares of the football club. Shares in the Holding Co used to stand at:

J Wills: 66%
Mysterious bloke holding shares through nominee account: 33%

Since they rejigged the shareholding to make out Bill Power had bought shares, the listing sent to Companies House now says the holding is as follows

J Wills: 51%
Mysterious bloke holding shares through nominee account: 24%
Bill and Phil: 25%

(or roughly in those proportions anyway). Obviously

Which would mean that the "New Consortium" cannot take 75% of the football club or (without conceding that they owe Bill Power £1.2m) the holding co. What they can do is take 75% of J Wills plus mysterious bloke's interest in the holding co, leaving James and MB 25% of their original shareholding or, more likely, set up a new holding co which they will split 75-25. What would be interesting to see then would be whether the board sell or give that new holding co the 70% shares in the football club directly, essentially leaving the old holding co as a shell or whether they sell the new holding co their stake in the old holding co, so that the new holding co controls the football club that way. Either way is potentially fraught with legal problems while the status of Bill's money is still in dispute and the board try to maintain the stance that he has shares in the holding co. They could end up blowing their own sale out of the water, if they're not careful with this.


That's the key to the whole thing I think. They did say something about a new company shortly after they announced the take over.
This along with the CVA non payment thing, again is typically suspicious, particularly when you have to view the whole thing with a sceptical slant. (Due to the boards past history).
I would like to say what I think of them, but have already been threatened with a ban from this is for stating my opinion.


Title: so...
Post by: tans on Thursday, July 12, 2007, 09:59:28
who threatened to ban you?


Title: so...
Post by: horlock07 on Thursday, July 12, 2007, 11:52:31
I hope to be proven wrong but I see it this way:

This is merely some form of financial/company re-jigging going on.

The mysterious investor probably doesnt exist or if he does he is greek from the newbury area, I would suspect that any perceived investment is paper based and wont involve cash.

We are all doomed!


Title: so...
Post by: red macca on Thursday, July 12, 2007, 12:26:19
Quote from: "horlock07"
I hope to be proven wrong but I see it this way:

This is merely some form of financial/company re-jigging going on.

The mysterious investor probably doesnt exist or if he does he is greek from the newbury area, I would suspect that any perceived investment is paper based and wont involve cash.

We are all doomed!
i think your wrong


Title: so...
Post by: Colin Todd on Thursday, July 12, 2007, 12:27:10
Quote from: "red macca"
Quote from: "horlock07"
I hope to be proven wrong but I see it this way:

This is merely some form of financial/company re-jigging going on.

The mysterious investor probably doesnt exist or if he does he is greek from the newbury area, I would suspect that any perceived investment is paper based and wont involve cash.

We are all doomed!
i think your wrong


So do I


Title: so...
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Thursday, July 12, 2007, 12:28:54
Quote from: "Colin Todd"
Quote from: "red macca"
Quote from: "horlock07"
I hope to be proven wrong but I see it this way:

This is merely some form of financial/company re-jigging going on.

The mysterious investor probably doesnt exist or if he does he is greek from the newbury area, I would suspect that any perceived investment is paper based and wont involve cash.

We are all doomed!
i think your wrong


So do I


me too


Title: so...
Post by: glos_robin on Thursday, July 12, 2007, 12:52:44
I think nobody has a clue whats going on myself included  :(


Title: so...
Post by: Bogus Dave on Thursday, July 12, 2007, 15:47:01
Quote from: "glos_robin"
I think nobody has a clue whats going on myself included  :(


The frustrating thing is that neither does anyone else, but they right lots of words pretending they do, and end up repeating themselves. Then we end up with threads that say nothing new, but just involve people working themselves up, and scaring everybody into thinking that this is somehow the worst thing to happen.

The fact of the matter is, we know very little of what is going on, and untill we do its probably best that people stop pretending they know whats-what, and making assumptions. Everything will work out well in the end, just believe.


Title: so...
Post by: Phil_S on Thursday, July 12, 2007, 16:39:53
Quote from: "tans"
who threatened to ban you?


I had an e-mail from the editor of this is. They had a complaint apparently.
I had to ask them wht I had posted that was deemed "offensive".
To their credit they did send be a copy, & I guess calling certain people liars & cheats, could have been expressed differently :jaw2:


Title: so...
Post by: RobertT on Thursday, July 12, 2007, 16:56:35
Quote from: "Phil_S"
Quote from: "tans"
who threatened to ban you?


I had an e-mail from the editor of this is. They had a complaint apparently.
I had to ask them wht I had posted that was deemed "offensive".
To their credit they did send be a copy, & I guess calling certain people liars & cheats, could have been expressed differently :jaw2:


but you can't post the word cunts on thisis


Title: so...
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, July 12, 2007, 17:47:55
Quote from: "Phil_S"
Quote from: "tans"
who threatened to ban you?


 I guess calling certain people liars & cheats, could have been expressed differently :jaw2:


   What, like cheats and liars ?


Title: so...
Post by: tans on Thursday, July 12, 2007, 18:48:01
Quote from: "Phil_S"
Quote from: "tans"
who threatened to ban you?


I had an e-mail from the editor of this is. They had a complaint apparently.
I had to ask them wht I had posted that was deemed "offensive".
To their credit they did send be a copy, & I guess calling certain people liars & cheats, could have been expressed differently :jaw2:


whares the free speech, which is what a forum is? was it racist?


Title: so...
Post by: tans on Thursday, July 12, 2007, 18:53:20
ah didnt read the above posts regarding what was said  :groan1:


Title: so...
Post by: Mexicano Rojo on Thursday, July 12, 2007, 20:59:03
the current board are cheats and liars.


Title: so...
Post by: tans on Thursday, July 12, 2007, 21:56:25
right you are mex


Title: so...
Post by: ron dodgers on Thursday, July 12, 2007, 22:38:56
and they are cheetahs and lions


Title: so...
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, July 12, 2007, 22:40:42
Quote from: "ron dodgers"
and they are cheetahs and lions


  This would fit in with the Nigerian model......Ben in.


Title: so...
Post by: Phil_S on Friday, July 13, 2007, 13:30:13
Quote from: "RobertT"
Quote from: "Phil_S"
Quote from: "tans"
who threatened to ban you?


I had an e-mail from the editor of this is. They had a complaint apparently.
I had to ask them wht I had posted that was deemed "offensive".
To their credit they did send be a copy, & I guess calling certain people liars & cheats, could have been expressed differently :jaw2:


but you can't post the word cunts on thisis

That fits too.
I wasn't going to argue with them, but they said if they printed Cheats & liars about the board in the adver, they would be in court.
So apparently telling the shareholders that the CVA was taken care off last year, & telling the local residents that 80 % of the fans wanted bristol to share, & taking bill P's 1.2 million like they did doesn't count.


Title: so...
Post by: Roddy_Radiation on Friday, July 13, 2007, 19:04:43
Quote from: "Reg Smeeton"


  This would fit in with the Nigerian model......Ben in.


To go?