|
Title: why dont we be all cosmopolitan and chelsea like Post by: strooood on Friday, March 18, 2005, 21:23:48 ................................................evans(cech)
.....jenkins(ferreira)..........ifil(terry)....................heywood(gallas)...............duke(bridge) ..............................................o'hanlon(makelele) ..........................miglioranzi(lampard)........smith(cole) ....................igoe(robben)..................................roberts(duff) .............................................parkin(drogba) we might aswell give it a bash :D Title: why dont we be all cosmopolitan and chelsea like Post by: DMR on Friday, March 18, 2005, 21:27:18 O'Hanlon's been in that role around Xmas and it didn't really work IMO
Like it Dex, but not for me. Too complicated and reliant on good players doing a disciplined job. Title: why dont we be all cosmopolitan and chelsea like Post by: strooood on Friday, March 18, 2005, 22:07:34 basically dave its o'hanlon or hewlett :beers
Title: why dont we be all cosmopolitan and chelsea like Post by: Reg Smeeton on Saturday, March 19, 2005, 00:01:45 If you want cosmopolitan then Bolton are your team......there was a point in the cup tie on Sunday when if Sam had brought off Nolan and brought on Pedersen, they would have had 11 different nationalities on the pitch, which I'm sure would be unique.
Title: why dont we be all cosmopolitan and chelsea like Post by: Whits on Saturday, March 19, 2005, 00:31:01 i liked o'hanlon in midfield against bornmuff, thought he bossed the midfield :twisted: could be the next gravason :D
Title: why dont we be all cosmopolitan and chelsea like Post by: DV on Saturday, March 19, 2005, 19:05:17 Parkin cant play up top on his own, and two you have supporting him....well one of them is pure shite!!!
We need to stick with 4-4-2.... |