|
Title: Scott Murray Post by: Fred Elliot on Saturday, May 19, 2007, 17:16:26 Next week ?
Title: Scott Murray Post by: Spud on Saturday, May 19, 2007, 17:19:17 WHAT!? :evil:
Title: Scott Murray Post by: DV on Saturday, May 19, 2007, 17:20:07 to cheltenham
Title: Scott Murray Post by: blinkpip on Saturday, May 19, 2007, 17:32:29 It say's on a City site that he will be offered a new contract.
Title: Scott Murray Post by: Samdy Gray on Saturday, May 19, 2007, 17:55:09 Wank wank wank :D
Title: Scott Murray Post by: Fred Elliot on Saturday, May 19, 2007, 17:56:00 Lets see
Title: Scott Murray Post by: Samdy Gray on Saturday, May 19, 2007, 18:47:43 I've been on OTIB, apparently City haven't offere him a new contract yet because he hasn't proved his fitness after coming back from injury. Rovers are also interested.
Title: Scott Murray Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Saturday, May 19, 2007, 18:50:14 Scott Murray :wanker:
Not another city reject surely Title: Scott Murray Post by: Samdy Gray on Saturday, May 19, 2007, 18:51:15 I hate to admit it, but he'd be a very good signing.
Title: Scott Murray Post by: DV on Saturday, May 19, 2007, 18:52:57 Quote from: "sam_stfc" I hate to admit it, but he'd be a very good signing. 3 years ago.... Title: Scott Murray Post by: Samdy Gray on Saturday, May 19, 2007, 18:56:17 Quote from: "DV85" Quote from: "sam_stfc" I hate to admit it, but he'd be a very good signing. 3 years ago.... He's better than Pook Title: Scott Murray Post by: Reg Smeeton on Saturday, May 19, 2007, 19:00:55 Quote from: "sam_stfc" Quote from: "DV85" Quote from: "sam_stfc" I hate to admit it, but he'd be a very good signing. 3 years ago.... He's better than Pook Utter bag of shite....Pook is much better. I don't believe for a minute that Sturrock is interested. Title: Scott Murray Post by: Chubbs on Saturday, May 19, 2007, 19:02:08 Quote from: "Reg Smeeton" Quote from: "sam_stfc" Quote from: "DV85" Quote from: "sam_stfc" I hate to admit it, but he'd be a very good signing. 3 years ago.... He's better than Pook Utter bag of shite....Pook is much better. I don't believe for a minute that Sturrock is interested. Utter pook....bag of shite is much better. Title: Scott Murray Post by: sonic youth on Saturday, May 19, 2007, 19:13:18 somehow I don't see Murray fitting into Sturrock's work ethic
Title: Scott Murray Post by: Rich Pullen on Saturday, May 19, 2007, 20:21:47 So much debate through 2 words - Good work Fred!
I joked to my friend that we'd probably go in for him now they were up ---- I-WAS-JOKING. Title: Scott Murray Post by: blinkpip on Saturday, May 19, 2007, 21:20:17 Quote from: "Fred Elliot" Lets see Did you make this up Fred? Title: Scott Murray Post by: Samdy Gray on Saturday, May 19, 2007, 21:21:33 Quote from: "blinkpip" Quote from: "Fred Elliot" Lets see Did you make this up Fred? No he didn't Title: Scott Murray Post by: strooood on Saturday, May 19, 2007, 21:28:13 i think he's quality, i'd have him, why not?
combative right winger, rapid, with a good cross and scores goals. :shrug: Title: Scott Murray Post by: Samdy Gray on Saturday, May 19, 2007, 21:29:26 Quote from: "strooood" i think he's quality, i'd have him, why not? combative right winger, rapid, with a good cross and scores goals. :shrug: Exactly. Title: Scott Murray Post by: Rich Pullen on Saturday, May 19, 2007, 21:30:52 There's always been a bit of banter between Murray and STFC fans... But he always reacted in the appropriate joking way.
But he's old and injury prone now... and a City legend. No thanks. Title: Scott Murray Post by: bigbobjoylove on Saturday, May 19, 2007, 21:31:57 Would this mean Roberts being released or hoping Shakes moves on?
Title: Scott Murray Post by: STFC Village on Saturday, May 19, 2007, 21:52:06 I thought Shakes had been released?
Title: Scott Murray Post by: herthab on Saturday, May 19, 2007, 22:05:26 I've got a grudging respect for Murray, the way he handles the shit we give him is top notch.
Tbh, I trust in Sturrocks judgment. If he thinks Murray could do a job for us, that's good enough for me. But it could just be that Freds on a wind up :wink: Title: Scott Murray Post by: Razzledazzle on Sunday, May 20, 2007, 00:20:02 I cannot see murray wanting to come to us but who knows.....
Title: Scott Murray Post by: Give us an S on Sunday, May 20, 2007, 09:48:10 Not a chance he will sign for us.
Title: Scott Murray Post by: reeves4england on Sunday, May 20, 2007, 09:51:14 Quote from: "herthab" I've got a grudging respect for Murray, the way he handles the shit we give him is top notch. Couldn't agree more. Don't particularly like the guy but fair play to him for the way he's handled it for the past 10 years or whatever it's been while he was at City, Reading and City again!Tbh, I trust in Sturrocks judgment. If he thinks Murray could do a job for us, that's good enough for me. But it could just be that Freds on a wind up :wink: Would be a decent signing for League 1 as much as I hate to say it. Don't think he would set the Championship alight - he's failed there once before Title: Scott Murray Post by: Arriba on Sunday, May 20, 2007, 09:51:37 dv's right.he used to to good.went to reading,did fuck all,and has done fuck all since returning to shitty.
no thanks! Title: Scott Murray Post by: lebowski on Sunday, May 20, 2007, 11:51:47 i agree.
plus, he cant cross for shit. Title: Scott Murray Post by: Simon Pieman on Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:17:58 scott murray would be mint
Title: Scott Murray Post by: magic8ball on Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:26:35 Quote from: "simon pieman" scott murray would be mint Like these? http://smartpei.typepad.com/robert_patersons_weblog/murray%20mints.jpg Title: Scott Murray Post by: Bennett on Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:29:50 i would prefer to see ricky shakes stay than us get scott murray
Title: Scott Murray Post by: Simon Pieman on Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:35:20 Quote from: "magic8ball" Quote from: "simon pieman" scott murray would be mint Like these? http://smartpei.typepad.com/robert_patersons_weblog/murray%20mints.jpg glad someone got my awful humour. Not fussed about Murray really. Would be decent for competition, but given our budget I'd say no. Title: Scott Murray Post by: reeves4england on Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:36:00 Quote from: "bennett" i would prefer to see ricky shakes stay than us get scott murray Muray got 9 goals this season, not bad for a winger really...Title: Scott Murray Post by: sonic youth on Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:37:15 i'd rather we signed trebor.
Title: Scott Murray Post by: Bennett on Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:38:03 Quote from: "reeves4england" Quote from: "bennett" i would prefer to see ricky shakes stay than us get scott murray Muray got 9 goals this season, not bad for a winger really...not at all... i'd still rather see ricky back here though Title: Scott Murray Post by: Ralphy on Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:39:42 I can't stand Scott Murray.
Cunt of the highest order. Title: Scott Murray Post by: Simon Pieman on Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:40:56 Quote from: "Ralphy" I can't stand Scott Murray. Cunt of the highest order. I guess it confirms the theory of opposites attracting :D Title: Scott Murray Post by: Ralphy on Sunday, May 20, 2007, 12:43:46 Very good Si.
Title: Scott Murray Post by: Mark Hanrahan on Sunday, May 20, 2007, 20:04:32 Quote from: "DV85" Quote from: "sam_stfc" I hate to admit it, but he'd be a very good signing. 3 years ago.... Nah - that lad still has a bit of quality about him. Makes sense with him being just down the road. Alright he's a proper sh1tbag but getting him on a free is good business. Title: Scott Murray Post by: Spud on Sunday, May 20, 2007, 21:20:00 Quote from: "Ralphy" I can't stand Scott Murray. Cunt of the highest order. :nod: Title: Scott Murray Post by: neville w on Monday, May 21, 2007, 11:01:14 Quote from: "simon pieman" Quote from: "magic8ball" Quote from: "simon pieman" scott murray would be mint Like these? http://smartpei.typepad.com/robert_patersons_weblog/murray%20mints.jpg glad someone got my awful humour. Not fussed about Murray really. Would be decent for competition, but given our budget I'd say no. I've heard Everton are interested ? Title: Scott Murray Post by: stfctownenda on Tuesday, May 22, 2007, 08:29:15 Found this from a couple of weeks back so think it would be very unlikely hes coming here:
http://www.bcfc.co.uk/page/WTPSDetail/0,,10327~1022720,00.html Title: Scott Murray Post by: red macca on Tuesday, May 22, 2007, 08:39:17 He has been offered a contract to stay...but if its only a year and at the age of 32 that may not be good enough who knows..
He scored 9 goals from the wing this year and i dont think we are in a position not to take a look at that sort of player. would i be right in saying peacock not included are midfield did not score 9 goals between them last year Title: Scott Murray Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, May 22, 2007, 08:50:13 Quote from: "red macca" He has been offered a contract to stay...but if its only a year and at the age of 32 that may not be good enough who knows.. He scored 9 goals from the wing this year and i dont think we are in a position not to take a look at that sort of player. would i be right in saying peacock not included are midfield did not score 9 goals between them last year Zaaboub - 1 Shakes - 2 Brown - 2 Monkhouse - 2 Evans - 4 Pook - 2 Weston - 1 Timlin - 1 Thats 15 all together, 14 of which are league goals. So no, you'd be wrong Title: Scott Murray Post by: red macca on Tuesday, May 22, 2007, 08:57:04 Quote from: "swindon town dave" Quote from: "red macca" He has been offered a contract to stay...but if its only a year and at the age of 32 that may not be good enough who knows.. He scored 9 goals from the wing this year and i dont think we are in a position not to take a look at that sort of player. would i be right in saying peacock not included are midfield did not score 9 goals between them last year Zaaboub - 1 Shakes - 2 Brown - 2 Monkhouse - 2 Evans - 4 Pook - 2 Weston - 1 Timlin - 1 Thats 15 all together, 14 of which are league goals. So no, you'd be wrong Zaaboub - 1 Shakes - 2- gone Brown - 2-gone Monkhouse - 2-gone Evans - 4-??? Pook - 2 Weston - 1 -gone Timlin - 1-gone That 4 or 7 depending on evans Im right :D Title: Scott Murray Post by: reeves4england on Tuesday, May 22, 2007, 09:05:09 Quote from: "red macca" Quote from: "swindon town dave" Quote from: "red macca" He has been offered a contract to stay...but if its only a year and at the age of 32 that may not be good enough who knows.. He scored 9 goals from the wing this year and i dont think we are in a position not to take a look at that sort of player. would i be right in saying peacock not included are midfield did not score 9 goals between them last year Zaaboub - 1 Shakes - 2 Brown - 2 Monkhouse - 2 Evans - 4 Pook - 2 Weston - 1 Timlin - 1 Thats 15 all together, 14 of which are league goals. So no, you'd be wrong Zaaboub - 1 Shakes - 2- gone Brown - 2-gone Monkhouse - 2-gone Evans - 4-??? Pook - 2 Weston - 1 -gone Timlin - 1-gone That 4 or 7 depending on evans Im right :D Roberts and Peacock also got goals whilst playing in midfield Title: Scott Murray Post by: red macca on Tuesday, May 22, 2007, 09:09:28 Meh thats rubbish..ok then change it to wingers
I win :wink: Title: Scott Murray Post by: McLovin on Tuesday, May 22, 2007, 09:20:06 We all hate Murray because he's a bit good and caused us problems over the years. I'd have him here.
Title: Scott Murray Post by: fatbury on Tuesday, May 22, 2007, 10:30:55 Not sure how old he is now but hes a top player at League 1 level and we do need a good right winger to supplement Roberts
|