Title: THISISSTFC Post by: The_Plagiarist on Wednesday, March 7, 2007, 09:35:55 I hear the king of all stfc fora has been shut down again due to defamatory comments posted by a certain "independant" councillor... :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: Fred Elliot on Wednesday, March 7, 2007, 09:37:25 expand ???
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Wednesday, March 7, 2007, 10:30:39 :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Wednesday, March 7, 2007, 10:31:17 by the way if that means they are all going to flock to this one then im running a mile
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: Frasier3 on Wednesday, March 7, 2007, 10:31:43 The forum was down late last night but there doesn't seem to be a problem now. That said there have been no posts on the "management" thread since about 7pm last night which is unusual.
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Wednesday, March 7, 2007, 11:06:56 Quote from: "Rich" by the way if that means they are all going to flock to this one then im running a mile I can't believe you would say such a horrible thing about such esteemed contributors as 'Chicken Tits' and 'Penhill' 8) Title: THISISSTFC Post by: ronnie21 on Wednesday, March 7, 2007, 19:39:01 The TISTFC site is definitely being monitored and censored! Free speech for everybody, unless of course you happen to run STFC - or not run it as the word takes you! :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: WorcesterRed on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 10:43:00 Anybody know any more about the thisis forum?
Seems to have been unreliable over the last couple of days and you can't access it at all now. Does anyone really believe that the club has had a word with the adver and it's been taken down completely **he says, sounding naive ** :gay: Title: THISISSTFC Post by: pauld on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 10:55:40 Nah, their database has gone pop - a lot of the error messages over the last few days have been related to insufficent resources to service database requests, and now it's saying:
Quote Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][TCP/IP Sockets]SQL Server does not exist or access denied. As a software developer myself, I can state with some authority that trying to connect to a database that doesn't exist is going to cause you problems :D Title: THISISSTFC Post by: Simon Pieman on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 11:01:58 I think the club didn't foresee the kind of reaction that we're seeing now, before or after the fans' forum. Whilst it's been a bit of a disaster for them, they now have no choice but all out war on the 'rebels' so it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if thisis is closed for 'maintenance' whilst posts are removed etc.
It's one of the reasons why I personally want the Trust to back direct action (which thus far they have understandably not backed). I think the war between 'us and them' was started long ago and I now don't see anything the Board does publicly as being constructive - on the contrary I think they have been very clever to get away without attacking the 'rebels'. But now the Board don't have a choice but to attack and without the numbers on our side (which in all honesty is the only way we will win), the Board will win. That's my view and interpretation of events anyway. I could of course be talking more tripe than fatbury. Title: THISISSTFC Post by: WorcesterRed on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 11:03:12 Quote from: "pauld" Nah, their database has gone pop - a lot of the error messages over the last few days have been related to insufficent resources to service database requests, and now it's saying: Quote Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][TCP/IP Sockets]SQL Server does not exist or access denied. As a software developer myself, I can state with some authority that trying to connect to a database that doesn't exist is going to cause you problems :D Paul - not sure if you're reply is tongue in cheek or not. I'm also a database developer and whilst they could have displayed a nice friendly error message stating 'forums are no longer available or something similar', in the past, when they have had to delete something quickly (presumably at the behest of STFC), the database has just not been available for a couple of hours and the error messages currently being experienced have been displayed. I am therefore wondering if this is something more permanent as there seems to have been a problem for a couple of days now and whilst I don't know the platform that they are using, you would expect the adver to be using a far more professional hosting service and not some two-bit database platform that falls over and renders half the site being inoperative for a couple of days. This sort of issue should not be arising on a web site in 2007!! :nono: Title: THISISSTFC Post by: WorcesterRed on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 11:04:34 On a slightly separate note, I hadn't noticed anything out of the ordinary in terms of direct insults on the thisis form before these problems occurred anyway - it's all rather puzzling.
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 11:06:58 Even Dellboy had 3 posts removed yesterday
That HAS to be saying something Title: THISISSTFC Post by: Simon Pieman on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 11:12:05 To put it this way. If I were in the Board's shoes (thankfully I'm not) I think I would be doing the same. It makes sense to go on the attack whilst the numbers are down and try and break things up before it gets out of hand.
The Board of old probably wouldn't go to the lengths that the Board are now. I'm certain new influences have made them a bit more clever with the public. Title: THISISSTFC Post by: pauld on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 11:25:26 Quote from: "WorcesterRed" Quote from: "pauld" Nah, their database has gone pop - a lot of the error messages over the last few days have been related to insufficent resources to service database requests, and now it's saying: Quote Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][TCP/IP Sockets]SQL Server does not exist or access denied. As a software developer myself, I can state with some authority that trying to connect to a database that doesn't exist is going to cause you problems :D Paul - not sure if you're reply is tongue in cheek or not. I'm also a database developer and whilst they could have displayed a nice friendly error message stating 'forums are no longer available or something similar', in the past, when they have had to delete something quickly (presumably at the behest of STFC), the database has just not been available for a couple of hours and the error messages currently being experienced have been displayed. I am therefore wondering if this is something more permanent as there seems to have been a problem for a couple of days now and whilst I don't know the platform that they are using, you would expect the adver to be using a far more professional hosting service and not some two-bit database platform that falls over and renders half the site being inoperative for a couple of days. This sort of issue should not be arising on a web site in 2007!! :nono: Er, it was a bit tongue-in-cheek - but equally just as the database shouldn't just go pop at random and render the whole site unstable for several days as you say nor should it be necessary to take the database offline just to remove a few posts/threads if that is what is going on. Even the most basic of web forum software allows you to remove posts without taking the database down. Maybe I put too much weight on the "out of resources" messages I was seeing earlier this week which looked like a classic failure to clean up connection resources properly (e.g. in boilerplaye code in a header script), leading to a gradual degradation in performance as the connections get tied up one by one, till finally it goes pop because no more connections are available. But like you say, that's a pretty "My First ASP script" error to be making that you wouldn't expect to see on a web forum these days. Although they do seem to be using SQL Server, so "two-bit database platform" probably sums it up! Maybe we could join forces and offer the Adver some consultancy on making their website a bit more stable. Title: THISISSTFC Post by: WorcesterRed on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 11:41:47 Quote from: "pauld" Maybe we could join forces and offer the Adver some consultancy on making their website a bit more stable. :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: That's the point, is it unstable, or has it been 'withdrawn'. I just can't believe that it is the former...... Title: THISISSTFC Post by: pauld on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 11:49:06 What, you mean they've actually pulled it under pressure, but rather than admit that, they're making it look like the scripts the site runs on are a bit ropey?
Sounds a bit convoluted tbh, surely more likely the forum scripts were developed or customised inhouse some years ago, the guys who originally wrote it have left and and no-ones gone near the tangle of spaghetti code since. So when they do run into problems like this no-one knows how to fix it. Seriously, I reckon we could sort this out for them in a couple of hours - for a few grand in consultancy fees, natch. Title: THISISSTFC Post by: WorcesterRed on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 12:18:23 Quote from: "pauld" What, you mean they've actually pulled it under pressure, but rather than admit that, they're making it look like the scripts the site runs on are a bit ropey? Sounds a bit convoluted tbh, surely more likely the forum scripts were developed or customised inhouse some years ago, the guys who originally wrote it have left and and no-ones gone near the tangle of spaghetti code since. So when they do run into problems like this no-one knows how to fix it. Seriously, I reckon we could sort this out for them in a couple of hours - for a few grand in consultancy fees, natch. Don't mean that they're making it look like the scripts the site runs on are a bit ropey but am simply querying why the site is not working and whether or not this is in fact down to maintenance problems, or whether the forum has been withdrawn.....and if so, why? Got any contacts at the adver?!! My background is in SQL Server/ASP development, though have not had much experience of administering a pre-written forum! Would seem stange to me how a professional entity like the adver would run a SQL/ASP web site, without in-house support - would you not agree? At the very least, without in-house support, you'd expect them to be outsourcing the support? Perhaps someone is looking at it as we speak - the error message on the bottom of the home page has gone and the error message when you click on the forum link has changed so who knows? :shrug: Title: THISISSTFC Post by: pauld on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 12:43:36 Heh, if their security's as ropey as their scripts, maybe we could hack in and fix it for them? :D
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: The_Plagiarist on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 13:16:13 Geeks :P
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: SwindonTartanArmy on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 13:20:45 Quote from: "pauld" Heh, if their security's as ropey as their scripts, maybe we could hack in and fix it for them? :D Hack in and post naughty words about the board while you are at it! :soapy tit wank:Title: THISISSTFC Post by: WorcesterRed on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 13:42:50 Quote from: "The_Plagiarist" Geeks :P :nono: :lol2: Title: THISISSTFC Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 13:46:53 Pauld and Worcester Red on the pull:
http://www.cmukgb.org/images/activities/mystery/geeks.jpg 8) Title: THISISSTFC Post by: The_Plagiarist on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 14:27:31 There are only 10 types of people in this world.
Those that understand binary, and those that don't. :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: (one for the Geeks there) Title: THISISSTFC Post by: WorcesterRed on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 14:30:21 Quote from: "OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR" Pauld and Worcester Red on the pull: http://www.cmukgb.org/images/activities/mystery/geeks.jpg 8) ....class - I'll give you that one..... I'm the one of the left by the way. :clap: Title: THISISSTFC Post by: janaage on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 14:39:05 Quote from: "The_Plagiarist" There are only 10 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and those that don't. :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: (one for the Geeks there) I don't understand binary, but I got the joke! I like it. Title: THISISSTFC Post by: WorcesterRed on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 14:43:47 Quote from: "janaage" Quote from: "The_Plagiarist" There are only 10 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and those that don't. :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: (one for the Geeks there) I don't understand binary, but I got the joke! I like it. You don't understand binary? It's quite simple. The binary numeral system, or base-2 number system, is a numeral system that represents numeric values using two symbols, usually 0 and 1. More specifically, the usual base-2 system is a positional notation with a radix of 2 Basics really.... :nod: Title: THISISSTFC Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 14:49:41 Quote from: "WorcesterRed" Quote from: "janaage" Quote from: "The_Plagiarist" There are only 10 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and those that don't. :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: (one for the Geeks there) I don't understand binary, but I got the joke! I like it. You don't understand binary? It's quite simple. The binary numeral system, or base-2 number system, is a numeral system that represents numeric values using two symbols, usually 0 and 1. More specifically, the usual base-2 system is a positional notation with a radix of 2 Basics really.... :nod: :shock: Do I have to do anything? :shock: Title: THISISSTFC Post by: janaage on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 15:00:11 Quote from: "WorcesterRed" Quote from: "janaage" Quote from: "The_Plagiarist" There are only 10 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and those that don't. :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: (one for the Geeks there) I don't understand binary, but I got the joke! I like it. You don't understand binary? It's quite simple. The binary numeral system, or base-2 number system, is a numeral system that represents numeric values using two symbols, usually 0 and 1. More specifically, the usual base-2 system is a positional notation with a radix of 2 Basics really.... :nod: To be honest I've never really come across them, never had a need to learn. suddenly my life seems incomplete. Title: THISISSTFC Post by: WorcesterRed on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 15:02:45 Quote from: "janaage" Quote from: "WorcesterRed" Quote from: "janaage" Quote from: "The_Plagiarist" There are only 10 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and those that don't. :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: (one for the Geeks there) I don't understand binary, but I got the joke! I like it. You don't understand binary? It's quite simple. The binary numeral system, or base-2 number system, is a numeral system that represents numeric values using two symbols, usually 0 and 1. More specifically, the usual base-2 system is a positional notation with a radix of 2 Basics really.... :nod: To be honest I've never really come across them, never had a need to learn. suddenly my life seems incomplete. ....Was only joking - that was copied directly from wikipedia....... :shhh Title: THISISSTFC Post by: pauld on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 15:24:16 Quote from: "OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR" Pauld and Worcester Red on the pull: http://www.cmukgb.org/images/activities/mystery/geeks.jpg 8) :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: You're just jealous, that's all :mrgreen: Title: THISISSTFC Post by: @MacPhlea on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 16:20:17 Ref the database....
They've either a) followed STFC's lead and not paid there bills and hence been disconnected b) had their database confiscated by the thought police c) purposely entered the wrong DB connection string to throw up a 500 error and shut the site down and make it look like neither of the above are true My money is on C - why? Because from past experience both the forum and Thisis website run from the same DB - if the forum is down through DB issues you usually can't access the news stories because they are database driven and this isn't the case at the moment which indicates they have purposely taken down the forum to do so cleaning up by throwing a 500 error Title: THISISSTFC Post by: WorcesterRed on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 16:37:23 Quote from: "triseros" Ref the database.... They've either a) followed STFC's lead and not paid there bills and hence been disconnected b) had their database confiscated by the thought police c) purposely entered the wrong DB connection string to throw up a 500 error and shut the site down and make it look like neither of the above are true My money is on C - why? Because from past experience both the forum and Thisis website run from the same DB - if the forum is down through DB issues you usually can't access the news stories because they are database driven and this isn't the case at the moment which indicates they have purposely taken down the forum to do so cleaning up by throwing a 500 error You'd have thought that the least that they could do (whether or not it's deliberate or not) would be to display a user-friendly message don't you think. Hardly looks good/professioanl on the adver's part does it. Imagine any other 'professional' website just letting database error messages be displayed without doing something about it. :nuts: Title: THISISSTFC Post by: blinkpip on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 17:03:32 Ok women, I emailed them and found out.
The response Hiya We are experiencing problems with our forum servers at the moment, so I've taken it off the front page listings as it was causing the rest of the site to fail. Should be back up soon, sorry for any inconvience caused. Who was right? Title: THISISSTFC Post by: @MacPhlea on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 17:05:07 Quote from: "blinkpip" Ok women, I emailed them and found out. The response Hiya We are experiencing problems with our forum servers at the moment, so I've taken it off the front page listings as it was causing the rest of the site to fail. Should be back up soon, sorry for any inconvience caused. Who was right? Me! Title: THISISSTFC Post by: pauld on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 17:05:47 I emailed Bart and he told me it was a big conspiracy because they're all in bed with the board
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 17:06:20 I think the server needs oiling me !
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: ronnie21 on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 18:07:32 Quote from: "pauld" What, you mean they've actually pulled it under pressure, but rather than admit that, they're making it look like the scripts the site runs on are a bit ropey? "a few grand in concultancy fees" - have you just come in from the Newbury School of Business! On the other hand I am sure Mikey D. will fork out for your consultancy if you ask nicely! :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:Sounds a bit convoluted tbh, surely more likely the forum scripts were developed or customised inhouse some years ago, the guys who originally wrote it have left and and no-ones gone near the tangle of spaghetti code since. So when they do run into problems like this no-one knows how to fix it. Seriously, I reckon we could sort this out for them in a couple of hours - for a few grand in consultancy fees, natch. Title: THISISSTFC Post by: Sippo on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 18:15:22 Quote from: "pauld" I emailed Bart and he told me it was a big conspiracy because they're all in bed with the board I got the exact same response from fatbury! :P Title: THISISSTFC Post by: pauld on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 19:22:30 Quote from: "ronnie21" Quote from: "pauld" What, you mean they've actually pulled it under pressure, but rather than admit that, they're making it look like the scripts the site runs on are a bit ropey? "a few grand in concultancy fees" - have you just come in from the Newbury School of Business! Sounds a bit convoluted tbh, surely more likely the forum scripts were developed or customised inhouse some years ago, the guys who originally wrote it have left and and no-ones gone near the tangle of spaghetti code since. So when they do run into problems like this no-one knows how to fix it. Seriously, I reckon we could sort this out for them in a couple of hours - for a few grand in consultancy fees, natch. Wasn't being wholly serious, but having started the sentence with the word "Seriously" I realise does somewhat undermine that. Doh! It's been a long week :D Title: THISISSTFC Post by: ronnie21 on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 20:43:19 Quote from: "pauld" Quote from: "ronnie21" Quote from: "pauld" What, you mean they've actually pulled it under pressure, but rather than admit that, they're making it look like the scripts the site runs on are a bit ropey? "a few grand in concultancy fees" - have you just come in from the Newbury School of Business! Sounds a bit convoluted tbh, surely more likely the forum scripts were developed or customised inhouse some years ago, the guys who originally wrote it have left and and no-ones gone near the tangle of spaghetti code since. So when they do run into problems like this no-one knows how to fix it. Seriously, I reckon we could sort this out for them in a couple of hours - for a few grand in consultancy fees, natch. Wasn't being wholly serious, but having started the sentence with the word "Seriously" I realise does somewhat undermine that. Doh! It's been a long week :D Title: THISISSTFC Post by: ronnie21 on Friday, March 9, 2007, 12:08:50 Just tried to get on TISTFC and it is refusing me access! I may be banned or are they still having "problems"!! This board will stop at nothing!
"More money out there than you can shake a stick at" Show us the colour of the money then Holt! Title: THISISSTFC Post by: Ardiles on Friday, March 9, 2007, 12:16:51 It's been off line for days. I doubt Maverick knows what to do with himself.
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: SwindonTartanArmy on Friday, March 9, 2007, 12:54:42 Quote from: "WorcesterRed" Quote from: "janaage" Quote from: "The_Plagiarist" There are only 10 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and those that don't. :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: (one for the Geeks there) I don't understand binary, but I got the joke! I like it. You don't understand binary? It's quite simple. The binary numeral system, or base-2 number system, is a numeral system that represents numeric values using two symbols, usually 0 and 1. More specifically, the usual base-2 system is a positional notation with a radix of 2 Basics really.... :nod: Title: THISISSTFC Post by: herthab on Friday, March 9, 2007, 12:55:50 Geek humour................................
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: WorcesterRed on Friday, March 9, 2007, 13:06:41 Quote from: "herthab" Geek humour................................ .....rather tongue in cheek humour than geek humour thanks...... ...as qualified by a supplemental post. :shock: Title: THISISSTFC Post by: herthab on Friday, March 9, 2007, 13:10:01 Sorry if I touched a nerve there :wink:
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: WorcesterRed on Friday, March 9, 2007, 13:12:11 Quote from: "herthab" Sorry if I touched a nerve there :wink: ....don't want people to get the wrong impression and think I'm the resident TEF geek!! :oops: Title: THISISSTFC Post by: herthab on Friday, March 9, 2007, 13:13:33 There's more geeks on here than you can shake a stick at!
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: WorcesterRed on Friday, March 9, 2007, 13:17:28 Quote from: "herthab" There's more geeks on here than you can shake a stick at! ....sounds like a Bob Holt statement - are you Bob Holt in disguise? :omg2: Title: THISISSTFC Post by: pauld on Friday, March 9, 2007, 13:19:03 Having a geek on a forum is, in many ways, a lot like buying a house .....
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: herthab on Friday, March 9, 2007, 13:23:51 there are no geeks on this forum..............................
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: The_Plagiarist on Friday, March 9, 2007, 14:23:44 Quote from: "WorcesterRed" Quote from: "herthab" Sorry if I touched a nerve there :wink: ....don't want people to get the wrong impression and think I'm the resident TEF geek!! :oops: Too late for that Geek boy! :mrgreen: Title: THISISSTFC Post by: WorcesterRed on Friday, March 9, 2007, 14:46:19 Quote from: "The_Plagiarist" Quote from: "WorcesterRed" Quote from: "herthab" Sorry if I touched a nerve there :wink: ....don't want people to get the wrong impression and think I'm the resident TEF geek!! :oops: Too late for that Geek boy! :mrgreen: :oops: :oops: Title: THISISSTFC Post by: ronnie21 on Friday, March 9, 2007, 14:54:35 Quote from: "pauld" Having a geek on a forum is, in many ways, a lot like buying a house ..... :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:Title: THISISSTFC Post by: Spencer_White on Friday, March 9, 2007, 19:48:23 I think it would be a good idea for them to close that forum.
Its been a hideout for some absolute retards (like Martin Score) for a long time now. Title: THISISSTFC Post by: Fred Elliot on Friday, March 9, 2007, 21:22:00 Quote from: "Spencer_White" I think it would be a good idea for them to close that forum. Its been a hideout for some absolute retards (like Martin Score) for a long time now. Fuck that Spence Keep all the Mongo's in one place is what I say Title: THISISSTFC Post by: sonic youth on Friday, March 9, 2007, 23:26:20 Who the fuck is Martin Score?
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: DV on Friday, March 9, 2007, 23:31:41 i wonder....j1m?
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: millom red on Friday, March 9, 2007, 23:37:44 Good old J1mmy the German...i miss him....not.
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: sonic youth on Friday, March 9, 2007, 23:38:25 Oh yes.
I don't think he's on here, so we're safe for now. Title: THISISSTFC Post by: Spencer_White on Saturday, March 10, 2007, 07:46:19 The only way to get him to fuck off was to use his real name.
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: pauld on Saturday, March 10, 2007, 11:26:48 Quote from: "Spencer_White" The only way to get him to fuck off was to use his real name. Nah, that's Rumpelstiltskin you're thinking of Title: THISISSTFC Post by: Batch on Monday, March 12, 2007, 13:48:37 praise be(!), it's back.
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: ronnie21 on Monday, March 12, 2007, 14:00:02 Quote from: "Batch" praise be(!), it's back. And they are still censoring anything they do not think the board will like! A guy from Oxford asked what the protest were about and I submitted an analogy of us and Barnet comparing respective match day gates and prices. I also said there was a consortium ready, willing and able to take over yet this board had backed away from their big talk of walking away when an offer was made. I asked the question why if they were still losing £750,000 per season. It disappeared within 45 minutes of going on! :evil:Title: THISISSTFC Post by: Fred Elliot on Monday, March 12, 2007, 14:03:05 FFS
:twisted: Title: THISISSTFC Post by: mattboyslim on Monday, March 12, 2007, 14:06:36 Well that's a victory for freedom of speech adn freedom of the press isn't it.
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: Summerof69 on Monday, March 12, 2007, 14:34:59 Quote from: "ronnie21" Quote from: "Batch" praise be(!), it's back. And they are still censoring anything they do not think the board will like! A guy from Oxford asked what the protest were about and I submitted an analogy of us and Barnet comparing respective match day gates and prices. I also said there was a consortium ready, willing and able to take over yet this board had backed away from their big talk of walking away when an offer was made. I asked the question why if they were still losing £750,000 per season. It disappeared within 45 minutes of going on! :evil:They are obviously scared of the truth. TIME FOR CHANGE......TIME FOR POWER !!!!! Title: THISISSTFC Post by: neville w on Monday, March 12, 2007, 14:55:20 Quote from: "herthab" Geek humour................................ More like Geek Tragedy Title: THISISSTFC Post by: eldene red on Monday, March 12, 2007, 16:44:51 Quote from: "ronnie21" Quote from: "Batch" praise be(!), it's back. And they are still censoring anything they do not think the board will like! A guy from Oxford asked what the protest were about and I submitted an analogy of us and Barnet comparing respective match day gates and prices. I also said there was a consortium ready, willing and able to take over yet this board had backed away from their big talk of walking away when an offer was made. I asked the question why if they were still losing £750,000 per season. It disappeared within 45 minutes of going on! :evil:Title: THISISSTFC Post by: ronnie21 on Monday, March 12, 2007, 18:34:58 You are right Eldene, I e-mailed and asked why it had been taken off when I didn't point the finger at anybody in particular and wasn't offensive. Never got a reply but as you rightly say, it's back! :surrender:
Title: THISISSTFC Post by: millom red on Tuesday, March 13, 2007, 00:43:13 Quote from: "ronnie21" Quote from: "Batch" praise be(!), it's back. And they are still censoring anything they do not think the board will like! A guy from Oxford asked what the protest were about and I submitted an analogy of us and Barnet comparing respective match day gates and prices. I also said there was a consortium ready, willing and able to take over yet this board had backed away from their big talk of walking away when an offer was made. I asked the question why if they were still losing £750,000 per season. It disappeared within 45 minutes of going on! :evil:Try this lot if you aint happy. http://www.pcc.org.uk And post an open letter to the editor on thisis saying that if this unreasonable pulling of posts continues, you will take the matter further with other media watchdogs and will take the matter up with your mp. Its getting fuckin silly now. Millom |