|
Title: Proctor - Not right for Parkin Post by: McLovin on Monday, March 7, 2005, 11:43:09 Proctor comes in, Parkin fails to score. I don't think it is purely coincidental.
Slabber (as rubbish as his finishing is) does all the donkey work so that Parkin can stay up top and fill the onion bag. Since Proctors arrival, Parkin has had to go looking more, and thus limits his chances in the middle. That's my opinion anyway. Anyone think the same or otherwise? Title: Proctor - Not right for Parkin Post by: Titch on Monday, March 7, 2005, 11:45:35 You may well be right! Proctor is quite similar to Parkin so therefore he does not really give Parkin the same feed off options!
Title: Proctor - Not right for Parkin Post by: Reg Smeeton on Monday, March 7, 2005, 11:52:08 When King was reputedly thinking of bringing in another striker for Slabber, I did question as whether even King could be that stupid given that we were on a decent run since Slabber came in and Parkin was scoring for fun. Well I was wrong he could be.
Title: Proctor - Not right for Parkin Post by: STFCBird on Monday, March 7, 2005, 12:41:57 For once I agree with you David B, Parkin has been having to work for the ball back in midfield again, although mr slabber has not scored a goal for us I think he can hold the ball up a bit to give parkin chance to get into position and he has set him up a treat. I do think that once Jamie scores he will get the confidence to start banging em in.
Title: Proctor - Not right for Parkin Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Monday, March 7, 2005, 13:49:59 yeah i do agree with you there but i did think proctor was our best player on saturday! he was the only one who actually tried!
Title: Proctor - Not right for Parkin Post by: Piemonte on Monday, March 7, 2005, 14:00:01 I think SSP not scoring when playing with Proctor is coincidence.
Slabber is shit, Proctor looks a much better player to me. Title: Proctor - Not right for Parkin Post by: Simon Pieman on Monday, March 7, 2005, 14:02:09 I'm told Proctor is a lovely man and he and Parkin have loads in common. It is also rumoured that Proctor respects Parkin's feelings, so all in all I think Proctor is right for Parkin.
Title: Proctor - Not right for Parkin Post by: Piemonte on Monday, March 7, 2005, 14:03:13 Super Sam is a bit of a dreamboat :wink: :?
Title: Proctor - Not right for Parkin Post by: sonicyouth on Monday, March 7, 2005, 14:11:21 Proctor doesn't look a bad player, but he's nowhere near match fitness and I doubt he'll reach that before his loan is up. Slabber is shite.
Title: Proctor - Not right for Parkin Post by: McLovin on Monday, March 7, 2005, 16:43:38 Proctor has shown me nothing in all of his performances to suggest he is worth persevering with. We had a winning side, scoring goals, and then King changed it. Parkin hasnt looked like scoring since his arrival. I'd go as far as to say Parkin was our best midfielder of Saturday, such is the requirement for him to go looking for the ball when Proctor is in the side.
Title: Proctor - Not right for Parkin Post by: reeves4england on Monday, March 7, 2005, 16:51:53 Fallon is ideal for Parkin in some ways. Always looks for the pass when through on goal!
Roberts is the best player to sit alongside SSP because he has pace, moves wide and allows Parkin freedom in the middle. Shame he got a damn hernia really! Title: Proctor - Not right for Parkin Post by: Nils on Monday, March 7, 2005, 18:55:59 Roberts back soon I pray.
Title: Proctor - Not right for Parkin Post by: DMR on Monday, March 7, 2005, 20:45:00 Quote from: "reeves4england" Fallon is ideal for Parkin in some ways. Always looks for the pass when through on goal! Roberts is the best player to sit alongside SSP because he has pace, moves wide and allows Parkin freedom in the middle. Shame he got a damn hernia really! Part one- bollocks. Part two- yes, and Proctor is the striker who is most like CR. Parkin and Proctor looks fine to me Title: Proctor - Not right for Parkin Post by: Piemonte on Tuesday, March 8, 2005, 09:56:22 For the second time in 2 minutes I agree with Russell :shock:
|