|
Title: Curtis Weston Post by: DMR on Saturday, February 17, 2007, 17:34:05 Please put him back in, Timlin started decently in his first few games but is shite.
That is all. Title: Curtis Weston Post by: Spud on Saturday, February 17, 2007, 17:34:49 I'd sooner that cunt Pook was dropped.
Title: Curtis Weston Post by: Scot Munroe on Saturday, February 17, 2007, 17:36:07 Quote from: "Spuddy_STFC" I'd sooner that cunt Pook was dropped. I agree why is he in the side. He was bollocks today. Title: Curtis Weston Post by: DMR on Saturday, February 17, 2007, 17:37:30 At least he had a bit of energy and will throw himself about. Timlin's soft.
Title: Curtis Weston Post by: DV on Saturday, February 17, 2007, 17:38:33 I'd rather they were both dropped...but we dont have enough options...
Title: Curtis Weston Post by: Arriba on Saturday, February 17, 2007, 17:52:02 agree, weston should return to the side.
pook struggled today Title: Curtis Weston Post by: flammableBen on Saturday, February 17, 2007, 18:02:00 Code: ###################################################################### Title: Curtis Weston Post by: kevjoycreed on Saturday, February 17, 2007, 19:47:35 How long till Evo's fit again?
Think him and Weston are by far the best central pairing we have got. Title: Curtis Weston Post by: Scot Munroe on Saturday, February 17, 2007, 19:52:09 about 5-6 weeks. Sooner Evans is back the better.
Title: Curtis Weston Post by: reeves4england on Saturday, February 17, 2007, 21:57:47 Quote from: "flammableBen" Code: ###################################################################### Title: Curtis Weston Post by: Fred Elliot on Saturday, February 17, 2007, 23:27:44 WTF is that ?
Title: Curtis Weston Post by: STFC Village on Saturday, February 17, 2007, 23:31:34 http://www.thetownend.com/forum/images/avatars/gallery/STFC/Players/weston4.jpg
Title: Curtis Weston Post by: Fred Elliot on Saturday, February 17, 2007, 23:33:30 Oh yes..................of course it is !
silly me :wink: Title: Curtis Weston Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Sunday, February 18, 2007, 09:51:08 i think Weston will be gong at the end of the season
Title: Curtis Weston Post by: Reg Smeeton on Sunday, February 18, 2007, 09:54:50 Quote from: "Rich" i think Weston will be gong at the end of the season I'd imagine most of our players will be going at the end of the season....assuming we've still got a club. Think Sturrock will want to build his own team. Title: Curtis Weston Post by: herthab on Sunday, February 18, 2007, 10:11:06 Thought Timlin was quality first half.
Didn't do much in the second, but then who did? If Sturrock wants to get rid of most of the players, why is he trying to tie them down with new contracts? Title: Curtis Weston Post by: Reg Smeeton on Sunday, February 18, 2007, 10:13:17 Quote from: "herthab" Thought Timlin was quality first half. Didn't do much in the second, but then who did? If Sturrock wants to get rid of most of the players, why is he trying to tie them down with new contracts? Its all gone a bit quiet on that front....I suspect because of Luggy's insistence on players moving. Title: Curtis Weston Post by: Power to people on Sunday, February 18, 2007, 11:14:57 Has Weston upset Luggy ?
Is that why he won't play him ?? Title: Curtis Weston Post by: Bogus Dave on Sunday, February 18, 2007, 11:17:16 Weston has to start on tuesday. Pooks used up his 9 lives
Title: Curtis Weston Post by: Chubbs on Sunday, February 18, 2007, 12:01:23 9 lives? thats being a bit kind.
Title: Curtis Weston Post by: JOHNNY REEVES on Sunday, February 18, 2007, 19:41:13 it took pook 1 minute to give away a dangerous freekick yesterday,and what about that shot in the secound half, at best he should be a benchwarmer.
Title: Curtis Weston Post by: fatbury on Tuesday, March 6, 2007, 14:07:34 Sturrock is basically slagging him off today .. saying "he has an idea of playing central midfield that is well away from how he sees central midfielders playing"
Im sorry Mr Sturrock but Curtis Weston IS and REMAINS (Paul Evans apart!) our BEST central midfielder .. the fact is that when he plays he wins tackles - wins headers - shows flair - maybe lacks goals but as he isnt getting a run of games he can hardly shine. Its my belief as he is a top earner Sturrock is just looking to offload one of our better players who may command a fee to "please" the board - much as he did with Monky. THE BRING BACK CURTIS CAMPAIGN BEGINS TODAY! Title: Curtis Weston Post by: Piemonte on Tuesday, March 6, 2007, 14:36:37 Oh dear oh dear Fatbury. I'm going to ignore the board related jibberish there.
He's lost form, possibly as his "mentor" wise left. But he was one of the worst at Barnet and thats saying something. I agree that when hes on his game hes a good player and deserves to be in the side. but he needs to start showing his potential in training and reserve games otherwise he simply dosnt deserve to be in the team on merit currently. Title: Curtis Weston Post by: stfctownenda on Tuesday, March 6, 2007, 14:43:39 Main thing about Curtis is he gives us something different I would be far more inclined to play him at home and Pook or Noubisse away.
At home when we need to have a go at teams his running terrifies the opposition and none of our centre mid's even come close to the attacking threat he provides. Where as away when our defence need bit more protection you can play 2 more negative players Timlin and either Pook or Noubisse. Think Sturrock probably doesn't like him as he attacks too much but at home I don't think thats a weakness we need to get back to putting the opposition on the back foot. Title: Curtis Weston Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Tuesday, March 6, 2007, 15:49:32 i think he'll start saturday now
Title: Curtis Weston Post by: DV on Tuesday, March 6, 2007, 15:53:20 what sturrock appears to be saying to me anyway, is he doesnt play like a central midfielder....more like a winger.
So I wouldnt be surprised to see him start wide right :shock: Title: Curtis Weston Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Tuesday, March 6, 2007, 15:55:30 i agree DV! when he first came here Wise said he could play wide right anyway. so id like to see him tried out wide
Title: Curtis Weston Post by: Sharky on Tuesday, March 6, 2007, 15:58:52 i'd like to see it too.....but I doubt it will happen i'm afraid.
Title: Curtis Weston Post by: Scot Munroe on Tuesday, March 6, 2007, 17:30:23 he played wide right for a couple of games earler this season to accomdate Ince in the centre of midfield.
Title: Curtis Weston Post by: blinkpip on Tuesday, March 6, 2007, 17:37:16 I think he'll join the whalley group to be honest. Hope not, but I can't see a future for him after Sturrock rant. But he's not the only player not playing to their position.
Title: Curtis Weston Post by: RobertT on Tuesday, March 6, 2007, 18:07:45 What Sturrock is basically saying is he wouldn't have liked McLoughlin or Ling but would play a midfield of McLaren and Nijholt. He just doesn't fancy...fancy players. Personally I like one of each. This is why Evans and Weston looked quite tasty at this level, yet Pook and Timlin looks a little, err, uninspired at times.
Title: Curtis Weston Post by: Northern Red on Wednesday, March 7, 2007, 13:20:28 He's not looked anything special since he's been here.
Someone who is surviving on reputation alone. Give him a chance after the Stockport Shambles, but be prepared to get rid of him again if he puts in a Roberts-esque performance. Title: Curtis Weston Post by: Lumps on Wednesday, March 7, 2007, 14:03:02 Quote from: "RobertT" What Sturrock is basically saying is he wouldn't have liked McLoughlin or Ling but would play a midfield of McLaren and Nijholt. He just doesn't fancy...fancy players. Personally I like one of each. This is why Evans and Weston looked quite tasty at this level, yet Pook and Timlin looks a little, err, uninspired at times. I think it's fairly clear that Luggy likes an old fashioned 442, with the ball being moved from the midfield to attack mainly in wide areas and the central midifeld players basically being grafters. This would be fine if we had Shaun Wright-Phillips and Ryan Giggs in the side, but works less well with a scowling chav standing with his hands on his hips on the right flank, and a random assortment of full backs, central midfielders, right wingers... or anyone else that hasn't had a go there yet, on the left. It's all very well wanting the team to play a crossing game, but you do actually need players that can cross for it to work. Title: Curtis Weston Post by: red macca on Wednesday, March 7, 2007, 15:28:41 Quote from: "Lumps" Quote from: "RobertT" What Sturrock is basically saying is he wouldn't have liked McLoughlin or Ling but would play a midfield of McLaren and Nijholt. He just doesn't fancy...fancy players. Personally I like one of each. This is why Evans and Weston looked quite tasty at this level, yet Pook and Timlin looks a little, err, uninspired at times. I think it's fairly clear that Luggy likes an old fashioned 442, with the ball being moved from the midfield to attack mainly in wide areas and the central midifeld players basically being grafters. This would be fine if we had Shaun Wright-Phillips and Ryan Giggs in the side, but works less well with a scowling chav standing with his hands on his hips on the right flank, and a random assortment of full backs, central midfielders, right wingers... or anyone else that hasn't had a go there yet, on the left. It's all very well wanting the team to play a crossing game, but you do actually need players that can cross for it to work. Title: Curtis Weston Post by: DV on Wednesday, March 7, 2007, 19:43:30 I'd say Shaun Wright-Phillips was better than Ricky Shakes, feel free to disagree macca....but your fucking wrong! 8)
Title: Curtis Weston Post by: red macca on Wednesday, March 7, 2007, 21:40:22 I just thought he could of used a better example than swp :D
Title: Curtis Weston Post by: DV on Wednesday, March 7, 2007, 21:44:53 maybe he thought SWP had similiar dancing skills?
Title: Curtis Weston Post by: yeo on Thursday, March 8, 2007, 01:15:09 Sturrocks a bit of a cock really isnt he.
|