|
Title: Top Scorer may be missing Post by: returnofthereds on Thursday, February 1, 2007, 12:39:10 Just read on a Hartlepool site that Barker may be out on Saturday.
Fingers crossed eh !! :soapy tit wank: :soapy tit wank: Title: Top Scorer may be missing Post by: adje on Thursday, February 1, 2007, 12:45:11 Andy Shithouse is bound to score
Title: Top Scorer may be missing Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Thursday, February 1, 2007, 14:41:11 probably! but im sure they wont have it easy with our defence
Title: Top Scorer may be missing Post by: Northern Red on Thursday, February 1, 2007, 14:45:45 Quote from: "adje" Andy Shithouse is bound to score We might regret not putting in a "can't play against us this season" clause. It was common sense surely, they were our rivals for promotion! Title: Top Scorer may be missing Post by: adje on Thursday, February 1, 2007, 15:06:42 Quote from: "Northern Red" Quote from: "adje" Andy Shithouse is bound to score We might regret not putting in a "can't play against us this season" clause. It was common sense surely, they were our rivals for promotion! We never do things like that to others but others do like things unto us Title: Top Scorer may be missing Post by: stfc11 on Thursday, February 1, 2007, 18:44:04 apparently they tried to..but couldn't put the 'can't play against us this season' clause in the deal
Title: Top Scorer may be missing Post by: janaage on Thursday, February 1, 2007, 18:49:05 City managed it (in Roberts deal).
Title: Top Scorer may be missing Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, February 1, 2007, 19:46:23 Quote from: "Northern Red" Quote from: "adje" Andy Shithouse is bound to score We might regret not putting in a "can't play against us this season" clause. It was common sense surely, they were our rivals for promotion! Two schools of thought ; 1. Fuck me he was good and I am scared that he is going to come back and haunt us ! OR 2. Sturrock obviously does not rate him and is very confident that our midfield and back four can cope with him adequately, so by putting a clause like that in means that Sturrock is concerned about his capabilities. Make what of that what you will. But...................... hey , Im a bit dim Title: Top Scorer may be missing Post by: Scot Munroe on Thursday, February 1, 2007, 20:19:20 Quote from: "Fred Elliot" Quote from: "Northern Red" Quote from: "adje" Andy Shithouse is bound to score We might regret not putting in a "can't play against us this season" clause. It was common sense surely, they were our rivals for promotion! Two schools of thought ; 1. Fuck me he was good and I am scared that he is going to come back and haunt us ! OR 2. Sturrock obviously does not rate him and is very confident that our midfield and back four can cope with him adequately, so by putting a clause like that in means that Sturrock is concerned about his capabilities. Make what of that what you will. But...................... hey , Im a bit dim no your not dim, bit of a wanker maybe. I hope no one decides to Boo Monkhouse because he does not deserve that. I thought he played well for us while he was here. Title: Top Scorer may be missing Post by: Luci on Thursday, February 1, 2007, 22:30:27 Don't worry! Monkey won't score! I'm going to look so stupid if he does. The team know his style of play so chances are he won't be given much space to do much anyhow!
I'd like to see one of our players get a hat-trick Saturday, about time surely. Title: Top Scorer may be missing Post by: DV on Thursday, February 1, 2007, 22:32:03 Barker is suspended
Monkhouse will play a blinder... Title: Top Scorer may be missing Post by: Luci on Thursday, February 1, 2007, 22:34:36 Quote from: "DV85" Barker is suspended Monkhouse will play a blinder... :groan1: Stop tempting fate DV. Title: Top Scorer may be missing Post by: STFC_Chris on Thursday, February 1, 2007, 22:40:44 Quote from: "STFCLady" Don't worry! Monkey won't score! I'm going to look so stupid if he does. The team know his style of play so chances are he won't be given much space to do much anyhow! I'd like to see one of our players get a hat-trick Saturday, about time surely. Parkin must have been the last, he scored three against Wrexham a couple of years back, feels like it's been much longer though. I'd settle for another scrappy 1-0 against the Monkey Hangers. :grin: Title: Top Scorer may be missing Post by: Tails on Thursday, February 1, 2007, 22:48:36 Quote from: "STFCLady" Quote from: "DV85" Barker is suspended Monkhouse will play a blinder... :groan1: Stop tempting fate DV. You know he will though, might show the few Swindon fans who didn't rate him how good he actually is (Rather he didnt!). I'd rather have Zaaboub obviously, but I thought some of the stick Monkhouse got was completely unfair, he's a very good player. Title: Top Scorer may be missing Post by: Luci on Thursday, February 1, 2007, 22:49:45 Monkhouse was ok. Nothing special IMO.
Title: Top Scorer may be missing Post by: stfc11 on Thursday, February 1, 2007, 23:10:16 when i read this i agreed with Surrock's decision to let Monkhouse go, because i must be honest i thought he would be a big loss.
"He said: “You have to look at the pro’s and cons of the situation. “I’ve looked at his track record of games played in eight years and he’s played 75 games or so. " Atleast they tried to get the clause in the contract!! "“The paperwork isn’t quite tied up but that (Monkhouse not featuring in the forthcoming clash) will be one of the clauses we’ll be attempting to put in the contract.”" Title: Top Scorer may be missing Post by: Amir on Friday, February 2, 2007, 01:03:09 Quote "“The paperwork isn’t quite tied up but that (Monkhouse not featuring in the forthcoming clash) will be one of the clauses we’ll be attempting to put in the contract.”" I thought that was quite a strange comment at the time. After everything was pretty much agreed we tried to stick that clause in as well... HUFC: So everything's agreed then? STFC: Yeah, well, no, well, sort of.....how about we say you can't play him against us? HUFC: No. STFC: Oh go on, be a sport. HUFC: Errr, no. |