|
Title: Shakes Today Post by: Luci on Tuesday, January 30, 2007, 22:01:24 Can someone just clarify if he was taken off as he picked up a knock or just one of Sturrocks substitution choices?
Sounded like he was going ok/crossing well thats all! Title: Shakes Today Post by: Luci on Tuesday, January 30, 2007, 22:06:46 so 14 people had read this and no-one knows? :?
Title: Shakes Today Post by: Fred Elliot on Tuesday, January 30, 2007, 22:08:22 Dont know
but he has been class recently so let's hope so Title: Shakes Today Post by: lebowski on Tuesday, January 30, 2007, 22:11:15 from the bits of his interview that i could understand, sturrock snr said about nicholas being concussed but no mention of shakes, and then about making loads of tactical changes, so the evidence, my dear watson, points to a tactical change.
Title: Shakes Today Post by: Fred Elliot on Tuesday, January 30, 2007, 22:14:00 Quote from: "lebowski" from the bits of his interview that i could understand, sturrock snr said about nicholas being concussed but no mention of shakes, and then about making loads of tactical changes, so the evidence, my dear watson, points to a tactical change. the bloke is ingeneous Title: Shakes Today Post by: lebowski on Tuesday, January 30, 2007, 22:15:38 but then, it did sound like he was playing well...
Title: Shakes Today Post by: Bennett on Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 00:16:02 he was playing well. and then we decided to take off the only outlet we had and put an attacking player (peacock) on the only player (hyde) that could pass for pboro.
it was very strange indeed. Title: Shakes Today Post by: DV on Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 12:35:43 no idea why sturrock took Ricky off he wasnt playing too badly, yet he left the totally useless Roberts on the pitch for the full 90
Title: Shakes Today Post by: red macca on Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 13:37:11 Quote from: "DV85" no idea why sturrock took Ricky off he wasnt playing too badly, yet he left the totally useless Roberts on the pitch for the full 90 who crossed the ball for peacock to flick on? |