Title: Pook Post by: hansgruber on Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 17:21:53 Apparently young Mr Pook is our most improved player of the year, according to the poll on thisisstfc. Does that mean he's miles less shit than he was?
Title: Pook Post by: Bushey Boy on Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 17:23:33 oh fuck off! has to be ifil?
Title: Pook Post by: hansgruber on Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 17:23:54 That's what I'd have thought
Title: Pook Post by: DV on Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 17:26:21 Hmmm maybe it is Pook
While Ifil is much improved on last season, we've seen Ifil play quality before when we had him on loan in our play off season. Ifil wasnt shit last year, he just under performed Pook was total gash last season and had 0 stand out games, this season he's had quite a few decent performances are 1 or 2 really good performances. Title: Pook Post by: Arriba on Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 17:31:29 ifil for me.he was absolutely awful last season,his improvement this term has been brilliant.
pook struggled badly too last season,he has improved a great deal aswell,but ifil just shades it imo Title: Pook Post by: Hexagon on Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 17:51:00 When i voted on that Jack smith was winning by quite a bit.
Maybe someone has been doing a bit of voting for Pook..... Title: Pook Post by: stfc_steve on Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 19:00:20 Yes ifil has been good this season but you have to look at how pook has improved this last year and a bit.
Title: Pook Post by: Simon Pieman on Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 20:02:15 I firmly believe Ifil has helped us win games. Pook hasn't been as influential.
Title: Pook Post by: swindon-chap on Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 20:37:24 Ifil makes much more of a contribution than Pook. Against Boston i would rather see Weston and Timlin in the midfield.
Title: Pook Post by: mattboyslim on Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 20:39:01 Quote from: "swindon-chap" Ifil makes much more of a contribution than Pook. Against Boston i would rather see Weston and Timlin in the midfield. Seconded! Title: Pook Post by: glos_robin on Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 21:15:33 Quote from: "mattboyslim" Quote from: "swindon-chap" Ifil makes much more of a contribution than Pook. Against Boston i would rather see Weston and Timlin in the midfield. Seconded! I agree as well Title: Pook Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Wednesday, January 17, 2007, 10:04:36 He always gets stick but I don't think Pook is a bad player, not the worst we have
Title: Pook Post by: my-velocity on Wednesday, January 17, 2007, 11:42:44 Pooks 21 and still shite, should just get rid of him and get someone who can actually play football.
Title: Pook Post by: herthab on Wednesday, January 17, 2007, 11:49:29 Quote from: "stfcbeckett" Pooks 21 and still shite, should just get rid of him and get someone who can actually play football. Thought he did ok against Wrexham. He's not in the same class as Weston or Timlin, but shite? Nope. Title: Pook Post by: Rich Pullen on Wednesday, January 17, 2007, 12:02:01 Pook is the new "Duke" as he can't do anything ---- I don't rate him that highly on the basis from what I've seen but he's not the worst STFC player I've seen by far.
The biggest shame of it all is that he's a product of the Youth set-up. What I do believe is that if was truly that bad Sturrock wouldn't have him at the club - like what happened with Onibuje. Title: Pook Post by: Northern Red on Wednesday, January 17, 2007, 12:27:26 I'd say:
1. Jack Smith 2. Lukas 3. Nicholas Title: Pook Post by: herthab on Wednesday, January 17, 2007, 12:34:51 Quote from: "Northern Red" I'd say: 1. Jack Smith 2. Lukas 3. Nicholas In relation to what? Title: Pook Post by: DV on Wednesday, January 17, 2007, 13:14:47 Quote from: "RichPullen" Pook is the new "Duke" as he can't do anything ---- I don't rate him that highly on the basis from what I've seen but he's not the worst STFC player I've seen by far. The biggest shame of it all is that he's a product of the Youth set-up. What I do believe is that if was truly that bad Sturrock wouldn't have him at the club - like what happened with Onibuje. ..and how many times has he actually featured under Sturrock? twice...and that was only due to injuries to Evans & Weston plus the suspension of Timlin. If we had enough depth in the middle of the park, then I believe Sturrock would have shipped him out Title: Pook Post by: Rich Pullen on Wednesday, January 17, 2007, 13:16:16 Quote from: "DV85" Quote from: "RichPullen" Pook is the new "Duke" as he can't do anything ---- I don't rate him that highly on the basis from what I've seen but he's not the worst STFC player I've seen by far. The biggest shame of it all is that he's a product of the Youth set-up. What I do believe is that if was truly that bad Sturrock wouldn't have him at the club - like what happened with Onibuje. ..and how many times has he actually featured under Sturrock? twice...and that was only due to injuries to Evans & Weston plus the suspension of Timlin. If we had enough depth in the middle of the park, then I believe Sturrock would have shipped him out True. He's been more ruthless with his strikers than with his midfield... All of this shows how bad Whalley is though. :wink: Title: Pook Post by: ronnie21 on Saturday, January 20, 2007, 17:59:19 MOM today :king:
Title: Pook Post by: Fred Elliot on Saturday, January 20, 2007, 18:31:22 Quote from: "ronnie21" MOM today :king: I spoke to Bushey at the final whistle and he endorsed that view !! :shock: Title: Pook Post by: DMR on Saturday, January 20, 2007, 18:36:23 One performance doesn't change the fact that he's shit, 10-12 solid games on the trot will. He's got one, maybe 2 on reflection now under his belt in the last 2 weeks.
Title: Pook Post by: Fred Elliot on Saturday, January 20, 2007, 18:38:06 Just be happy Dave !!!!!!!
For once ! 8) Title: Pook Post by: reeves4england on Saturday, January 20, 2007, 20:03:40 Quote from: "dave_m_russell" One performance doesn't change the fact that he's shit, 10-12 solid games on the trot will. He's got one, maybe 2 on reflection now under his belt in the last 2 weeks. Who has managed that recently?!Roberts? No Peacock? No Weston? No Ifil? No Williams? No Only Phil Smith has been consistently good recently, so i think it is harsh to say Pook must play well so often to be considered Title: Pook Post by: DV on Saturday, January 20, 2007, 20:18:26 Ifils been solid all season for starters
Zaaboub and Timlin have barely put a foot wrong Williams only had a bad game and made a mistake when he was manager Title: Pook Post by: swindon-chap on Saturday, January 20, 2007, 21:34:13 Quote from: "reeves4england" Quote from: "dave_m_russell" One performance doesn't change the fact that he's shit, 10-12 solid games on the trot will. He's got one, maybe 2 on reflection now under his belt in the last 2 weeks. Who has managed that recently?!Roberts? No Peacock? No Weston? No Ifil? No Williams? No Like DV85 said, ifil has had a great season, consistent throughout. Title: Pook Post by: herthab on Saturday, January 20, 2007, 22:14:39 Last few games, Pook has improved.
Today he was definitely MOM. Sturrock has improved Shakes, why not Pook? Title: Pook Post by: red macca on Saturday, January 20, 2007, 22:18:18 Fuck sake give the lad some credit .we are all quick enough to say when he has been shit
I was quite interested by his interveiw after seems to know he has to improve but fair play he seems to be improving Title: Pook Post by: DV on Saturday, January 20, 2007, 22:24:10 Quote from: "red macca" Fuck sake give the lad some credit .we are all quick enough to say when he has been shit I was quite interested by his interveiw after seems to know he has to improve but fair play he seems to be improving but doesnt he sound about 12 and shit scared when being interviewed!!!!!! By all accounts he played well, I cant judge because I wasnt there Title: Pook Post by: red macca on Saturday, January 20, 2007, 22:30:20 Quote from: "DV85" Quote from: "red macca" Fuck sake give the lad some credit .we are all quick enough to say when he has been shit I was quite interested by his interveiw after seems to know he has to improve but fair play he seems to be improving but doesnt he sound about 12 and shit scared when being interviewed!!!!!! By all accounts he played well, I cant judge because I wasnt there Title: Pook Post by: Fred Elliot on Saturday, January 20, 2007, 22:33:15 Quote from: "red macca" Fuck sake give the lad some credit .we are all quick enough to say when he has been shit I was quite interested by his interveiw after seems to know he has to improve but fair play he seems to be improving What Macca said If anything dont it make the midfield more combative for "the shirt" ? I like it ! Title: Pook Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Saturday, January 20, 2007, 22:34:36 Pook was MOTM today - FACT!
Title: Pook Post by: herthab on Saturday, January 20, 2007, 22:36:59 Quote from: "Fred Elliot" Quote from: "red macca" Fuck sake give the lad some credit .we are all quick enough to say when he has been shit I was quite interested by his interveiw after seems to know he has to improve but fair play he seems to be improving What Macca said If anything dont it make the midfield more combative for "the shirt" ? I like it ! Fucking hell Fred! I know you don't like the board, but they do let the players have a shirt each! Title: Pook Post by: Fred Elliot on Saturday, January 20, 2007, 23:23:08 :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:
This IS STFC you know ! Title: Pook Post by: Fred Elliot on Saturday, January 20, 2007, 23:24:51 Quote from: "herthab" Quote from: "Fred Elliot" Quote from: "red macca" Fuck sake give the lad some credit .we are all quick enough to say when he has been shit I was quite interested by his interveiw after seems to know he has to improve but fair play he seems to be improving What Macca said If anything dont it make the midfield more combative for "the shirt" ? I like it ! Fucking hell Fred! I know you don't like the board, but they do let the players have a shirt each! Got nothing against them personally, as I don't know them personally. But I think the club has a better future with BP and fans representation mate Title: Pook Post by: herthab on Saturday, January 20, 2007, 23:28:29 So do I.
Lets hope it goes the way we want. Title: Pook Post by: lebowski on Sunday, January 21, 2007, 00:21:27 Quote from: "OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR" Pook was MOTM today - FACT! speaking of facts, did you know that sean bean is responsible for more on screen deaths than chuck norris, steven seagal and sylvestor stallone? because if you didnt, then you do now. Title: Pook Post by: Sussex on Sunday, January 21, 2007, 00:30:27 Quote from: "lebowski" Quote from: "OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR" Pook was MOTM today - FACT! speaking of facts, did you know that sean bean is responsible for more on screen deaths than chuck norris, steven seagal and sylvestor stallone? because if you didnt, then you do now. lebowski, are you ok? :D Title: Pook Post by: lebowski on Sunday, January 21, 2007, 00:33:56 i can get you figures if you want them.
Title: Pook Post by: Fred Elliot on Sunday, January 21, 2007, 00:43:03 Quote from: "lebowski" Quote from: "OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR" Pook was MOTM today - FACT! speaking of facts, did you know that sean bean is responsible for more on screen deaths than chuck norris, steven seagal and sylvestor stallone? because if you didnt, then you do now. Fuck..................don't tell my mrs that !!!!! Title: Pook Post by: DMR on Sunday, January 21, 2007, 01:36:43 Quote from: "DV85" Quote from: "red macca" Fuck sake give the lad some credit .we are all quick enough to say when he has been shit I was quite interested by his interveiw after seems to know he has to improve but fair play he seems to be improving but doesnt he sound about 12 and shit scared when being interviewed!!!!!! By all accounts he played well, I cant judge because I wasnt there i didn't not give him credit, clearly he did well toay. however, certain people and you are one of the worst macca, make him out to be the next stevie gerrard. Title: Pook Post by: yeo on Sunday, January 21, 2007, 02:06:19 He is better than Gerrard 8)
Title: Pook Post by: Whits on Sunday, January 21, 2007, 11:13:24 Quote from: "lebowski" i can get you figures if you want them. gone on then, its quite important Title: Pook Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, January 21, 2007, 11:27:40 Just saw his goal against Boston - cracker !
NMH Title: Pook Post by: Scot Munroe on Sunday, January 21, 2007, 11:48:01 Quote from: "Nomoreheroes" Just saw his goal against Boston - cracker ! NMH It was a very good strike. Title: Pook Post by: ronnie21 on Sunday, January 21, 2007, 12:49:41 Quote from: "red macca" Quote from: "DV85" Quote from: "red macca" Fuck sake give the lad some credit .we are all quick enough to say when he has been shit I was quite interested by his interveiw after seems to know he has to improve but fair play he seems to be improving but doesnt he sound about 12 and shit scared when being interviewed!!!!!! By all accounts he played well, I cant judge because I wasnt there Title: Pook Post by: sonic youth on Sunday, January 21, 2007, 13:22:07 I doubt Pook gives a flying fuck what fans think, let alone a bunch of nerds on the internet.
Title: Pook Post by: Spencer_White on Sunday, January 21, 2007, 13:34:24 Pook played 3 or 4 excellent cross field balls today. Ran box to box and finnished magnificently.
I was one of his biggest critics last year, and he was a big part of us being relegated. But fair is fair, the boy done good. Title: Pook Post by: fatbury on Sunday, January 21, 2007, 21:37:32 Pook is so lame - even lamer than me, so my sources say.
Title: Pook Post by: Piemonte on Monday, January 22, 2007, 09:07:56 Just hope he keeps it up, hes put in a few quality performances before then quickly gone back to being crap / mediocore. Shakes is the same
Title: Pook Post by: fatbury on Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 12:26:40 I see Sturrock is bigging up the R O C K (Pook!) after his recent performances in the paper today
Extract follows "MICHAEL Pook insists he is quite happy to go ‘unnoticed’ in Town’s promotion drive but Paul Sturrock feels it is time the fans cut the Swindonian ‘some slack’. The youngster’s tireless work in the centre of the park has been highlighted by the Town boss as his team head for their game in hand at Rochdale tonight. Sturrock, who will be able to call on Jerel Ifil before his ban kicks in at Hereford, said: “Michael has got a lot of things to learn in the game. “I don’t think he’s a fans’ favourite but again he does all good things for a manager. “He’s got a long throw that can influence the game. He’s always there or thereabouts and wins his tackles and headers. “I would hope the fans would cut him a bit of slack now.” Pook’s only concern is making sure that he carries out his instructions to the best of his ability. He said: “I’m getting to know what I’m good at now and I just try and do what the manager and and the coaching staff tell me. “If that means I go unnoticed I don’t mind going unnoticed. As long as they’re happy and telling me I’m doing the right things.” The next challenge is to take advantage of a potentially crucial game in hand at Rochdale this evening. The Haydon Wick youngster said: “It’s going to be a tough game. They won as well on Saturday so they’ll be confident. “But three points would push us right up there and give us the best chance for automatic promotion. “We want to get as far clear of fourth spot as possible. “If we keep going it’s in our hands now. If we win all our games we’re going to go straight up. That’s a great position to be in.” It is all a far cry from 12 months ago when Pook was part of a team sliding towards the drop. He said: “Look at my first season, relegation. It’s gone from one end to the other.” So what makes the difference in Pook’s eyes? He said: “It’s all confidence in football. “Last year if we scored a goal we’d sit back and do everything to keep it. This year we’ll score one and look to score two or three. That’s purely down to confidence.” While Pook’s midfield industry is aiding the promotion push, the youngster is looking forward to his two attacking colleagues giving Rochdale some grief. He said: “Barry Corr and Lukas Jutkiewicz give the centre halves of the other teams so much trouble because the pair of them win the vast majority of their headers. Barry seems to pop up in the right place at the right time for us and he’s scored two goals in two games. You can’t ask for more than that.” bigging Pook up" ... quite right too after he helped start the move for the winning goal Saturday As we said in our section of the stadium on Saturday - that goal was all about Michael Pook! :beers: Title: Pook Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 12:36:58 I think it's clear that maybe Sturrock is eyeing up to get Everton to take Pook off our hands as part of their payment for the Lucas deal.
Title: Pook Post by: fatbury on Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 12:56:01 is that what your sauces are telling you? :soapy tit wank:
Title: Pook Post by: juddie on Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 13:33:55 I'm gonna back track on this one, and agree with Sturrock. We all know Pook's not going to control games, we all know he's not a match winner - but with Evans injured he's worked his bollocks off. He gets all over the pitch, puts tackles in and he can spray a pass - ok so he gives the ball away as well but with timlin and weston out of form, I say Pook has done ok. And for me to say that, having lambasted him last year, he must have improved a tad.
I thought he was ok against Shrewsbury. I also think that if Evans was fit he probably wouldn't get a game. But he has and we're still third, so credit where credit is due - he has done his job. Re: Ifil - not most improved... He was a good player anyway and in this division, a player of his calibre should look head and shoulders above everyone else. Contender for player of year yes, not most improved. I'd vote Jack Smith, but applaud Pook on his efforts. Discuss. Title: Pook Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 13:43:19 for me the most improved is defo Jack Smith, he was poor last season
Title: Pook Post by: Bennett on Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 15:12:55 i don't really think that strongly about pook anymore, i just hate fatbury
Title: Pook Post by: DV on Wednesday, April 4, 2007, 11:24:27 he was rubbish last night!
|