Thetownend.com

25% => Players => Topic started by: lebowski on Saturday, December 30, 2006, 18:09:30



Title: timlin's goal
Post by: lebowski on Saturday, December 30, 2006, 18:09:30
started off towards the corner flag before a massive gust of wind took it into the net.

sweet strike though, should shoot more often.


Title: Re: timlin's goal
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Saturday, December 30, 2006, 19:24:01
Quote from: "lebowski"

sweet strike though


Even though it was originally headed for the corner flag???

WTF :shock:


Title: timlin's goal
Post by: DV on Saturday, December 30, 2006, 19:38:52
if anyone has deserved a goal recently, its been Timlin....sign him up!


Title: Re: timlin's goal
Post by: reeves4england on Sunday, December 31, 2006, 00:07:14
Quote from: "OOH!  SHAUN TAYLOR"
Quote from: "lebowski"

sweet strike though


Even though it was originally headed for the corner flag???

WTF :shock:
Contradiction of the year award goes to....


Title: timlin's goal
Post by: Whits on Sunday, December 31, 2006, 00:52:08
he won man of the match though


Title: Re: timlin's goal
Post by: millom red on Sunday, December 31, 2006, 15:27:26
Quote from: "reeves4england"
Quote from: "OOH!  SHAUN TAYLOR"
Quote from: "lebowski"

sweet strike though


Even though it was originally headed for the corner flag???

WTF :shock:
Contradiction of the year award goes to....


 :mrgreen:  :mrgreen:


Title: timlin's goal
Post by: lebowski on Sunday, December 31, 2006, 15:31:00
turns out it was deflected too! taxi for lebowski!

does anyone think we could possibly sign timlin? he's the kind of player sturrock would love to sign (in that he's more than good enough to compete in league 1)


Title: timlin's goal
Post by: reeves4england on Sunday, December 31, 2006, 15:45:37
Quote from: "lebowski"
turns out it was deflected too! taxi for lebowski!

does anyone think we could possibly sign timlin? he's the kind of player sturrock would love to sign (in that he's more than good enough to compete in league 1)
Which is why the answer is no