Thetownend.com

25% => The Boardroom => Topic started by: STFC_Gazza on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 08:36:10



Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 08:36:10
Sturrock in todays adver says he doesn't believe any takeover will benefit the club, doest see where all the stuff about the board comes from etc Wants everyone to work together for the future etc

it does say a takeover would not benefit the club AT THIS TIME.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 08:40:56
Ofcourse anything that can take the club forward is good with me. Power obviously has the money and the know how at QPR. We need an american on the board though so we can have half time cheerleaders . (Obviously not girls from Swindon as most are minging)


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: fatbury on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 08:41:59
I find his comments a little worrying as Luggy is obviously firmly backing the board

Now considering how pathetic this board is - well Ill leave you to draw your own conclusions! :-))(


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 08:43:54
Quote from: "fatbury"
I find his comments a little worrying as Luggy is obviously firmly backing the board

Now considering how pathetic this board is - well Ill leave you to draw your own conclusions! :-))(


Sturrock says he wants stability and has been through the political stuff before, now given the problems recently I dont know if you say that is stability but...


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Ardiles on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 08:45:11
With respect, Mr Sturrock (if, indeed, that is what you said) - what the arse would you know?  You've only been at the club 5 minutes.

If you had had to endure 5 years of lies, misinformation, stagnation & incompetence you wouldn't be making a statement like that.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: janaage on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 09:09:34
Ardiles, that's my take on it, with all due respect to Mr Sturrock, the fine football manager that he is, he has only been here for a month or so.  I doubt whether he has even seen the takeover offer, plan, or whether he is aware of Mr Power's credentials.

This is merely a "tow the party line" statement, as any employee would be expected to do.

Pinch of salt is how I've taken it.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Summerof69 on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 09:11:27
Fully agree with Janaage.

It's a tow the party line statement, nothing more, as he cannot slag off this current board...at this moment anyway.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: cavpete on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 09:15:51
I Would agree if a new board comes along and wont invest in the club. But who in there right mind, would spend x amount of pounds on a club that needs investing into and wont put a single penny in. Whoever takes over should have the club at interest and sort the crap out, then start thinking about making money.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Batch on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 09:20:05
Much as a like the appointment of Sturrock, he would do well to keep his stick beak out of things and get on with doing the job he is paid to do.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 09:21:01
Quote from: "Batch"
Much as a like the appointment of Sturrock, he would do well to keep his stick beak out of things and get on with doing the job he is paid to do.


absolutely. He is the manager not the board.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: pauld on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 09:21:05
Spot on Ardiles and jan - if you read the article it's all "I've been told" and "They've said". He's just been fed the same lies and BS we've had to swallow for the past 5 years, they're his employers, why wouldn't he go with that? Bit of a shame the numpties are dragging a popular manager into a shit-fight with the fans, but we always knew they'd start getting dirty. Bring on the orange revolution!


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: janaage on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 09:22:00
I wonder if they'll make him re-paint his office -  :wink:


This could be class!!!!


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 09:50:32
Quote from: "Batch"
Much as a like the appointment of Sturrock, he would do well to keep his stick beak out of things and get on with doing the job he is paid to do.


absolutely. He is the manager not the board.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Frasier3 on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 10:10:16
Perhaps someone from the FC should arrange a meeting with him.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: magic8ball on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 10:19:26
I find this whole thing quite interesting.

We've seen it all very, very recently, with Dennis Wise. He was quoted as saying "I met a very nice man called Mike (Diamandis)" and a few months later, he left the club with rumours rife that he fell out with somebody at the club, most likely that nice man called Mike!

The board must have appeared stable, and they must have appeared to have the clubs best interests at heart when Wise joined, or he probably would've turned us down.

Now Sturrock appears to be in the exact same position. He likes the current board. Presumably they've spun him various yarns about how much they're behind the club, and want to take us forward. They can talk as much as they like about the current stadium plans, but we've only ever had one serious crack at the whole thing. It was turned down and its all been dead on that front up until now. What have they done about the stadium redevelopment over the last 18 months? Fuck all, thats what. Its been ignored, and we were told at one point that this club would not survive without a new stadium.

If Power does come in with the consortium, PS will be quite happy I'm sure. We'll have fan representative on the board, and the club can unite as a whole.

I for one cannot wait.

 :sorry:


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: janaage on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 10:45:55
As my scottish manager says at work "This is greeeeeeeet".

Can't wait til it's all over and we have the board we want at the helm.  I wonder what PS will say then.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Frigby Daser on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 10:49:16
To be honest, having Sturrock behind the board is a massive blow - he's not just supporting them, he's ctaegorically stating that he doesn't see that a takeover is of benefit - and he wouldn't have said that had the board not indicated that that is their view too.

I love it how the Adver is plastered with soundbites from Starnes, Butler and Bowden - with not ONE mention of how they intend to pay the CVA, or fund January transfers, or why they lied at an AGM, or why their story has changed in press releases from week-to-week-to the next bloody week.

If you're reading Luggy, please take time to hear the other side of the argument. We wouldn't shit stir unless there was something to genuinely worry about - we're the ones who'll be here long after everyone else has gone after all.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Frigby Daser on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 10:49:29
Double post


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Sharky on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 10:56:03
Quote from: "magic8ball"
Presumably they've spun him various yarns about how much they're behind the club, and want to take us forward.


With all due respect to all of you that have taken an active role in helping mount a takeover bid, and to the those of you who merely log on to this site to jump the bandwagon....you lot are becoming more and more childish as the days go on.

Now dont get me wrong I dont defend some of the lies and cover ups we have endured over the years, but in all fairness there is one simple fact and that is that no matter how good, bad or inadequate the board and their current staff are at their job.....it is still their job, they still get paid and as such their wages and dividends etc are on the line if they mess it up as they have been so they have no interest in intentionally fucking it up!!!

You lot seem to think that slagging them off at every opportunity or attempt to try and do things right is justified because of past experiences....do you honestly believe that Diamandis and Co sit in their office with our Profit and Loss accounts pinned to the wall and have a sword fight to piss all over them???

It takes a special breed of one dimentional hypocrits to dictate how things should be done when the full facts are not known and I feel that this forum and the club in general have done a very good job of breeding such people in some of you!

I mean come on, have you never heard one of the many derivations of the story of the boy that continually called and pranked the police and emergency services when nothing was wrong....and then one day when something was really wrong, they did not believe him despite it being a real emergency?!?!?!

Who is to say that the board dont have some good plans for a stadium redevelopment (as they suggest they have several further ones) and who is to say that they dont know what they are doing when you have not been in their shoes with the obstacles they have had to face (merely think you can handle it as you have experience in similar fields).

At the end of the day there will only ever be one outcome out of all of this that would be beneficial to the club and thats unity and investment in my view as opposed to take overs and oustings!  

We get yo-yo'd around the leagues every year cause of our inability to get a good manager to stay and now we have one we should be uniting to help our club.  

Now if some of you believe that Bill Power and the consortium are the way forward then fine I salute you for your bravery in taking on such a challenge....but for god sake stop slagging of the current regime like your 10 years old and get on with the shed loads of work you have to do, as there is no productivity to slagging matches.

I for one am available to be convinced but at present I only see a half finished article.

To the rest of you i urge you to please either back the board, back the consortium or sit quietly on the fence, but the one singular thing that carries through all of these is that there is NO BENEFIT WHATSOEVER in acting like spoilt upset children about the way we have been treated, get over it and do something about it (other than moan and whine like a 10 year old girl)

Cue barage of abusive reply's as that is the level of this forum these days.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Arriba on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 11:03:55
lie after lie.contradiction after contradiction.cover up after cover up.threat after threat.

thats enough for me to say the current lot aint up to it.(i may be wrong but i doubt it)i dont need to know everything to realise that,i know enough to make that judgement.
i think the alternative seems a better way forward for stfc


interesting post though sharky,and sturrocks opinions make the whole episode even more interesting now


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: janaage on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 11:04:10
Moonie, I really don't see it as a blow, what else could Mr Sturrock come out and say?  

"Roll on the revolution, let's get these ***** out of here, especially that greek bloke, proper ******* he is".  

They are his employers he cannot be seen to take the side of the rebels, and he has to be seen as backing the people who gave him a job.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: STFC Village on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 11:16:04
Quote from: "Sharky"
Who is to say that the board dont have some good plans for a stadium redevelopment
Didn't they say that they wanted to move the club out of Swindon, yesterday?


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: magic8ball on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 11:22:32
Quote from: "Sharky"
Quote from: "magic8ball"
Presumably they've spun him various yarns about how much they're behind the club, and want to take us forward.


With all due respect to all of you that have taken an active role in helping mount a takeover bid, and to the those of you who merely log on to this site to jump the bandwagon....you lot are becoming more and more childish as the days go on.

Now dont get me wrong I dont defend some of the lies and cover ups we have endured over the years, but in all fairness there is one simple fact and that is that no matter how good, bad or inadequate the board and their current staff are at their job.....it is still their job, they still get paid and as such their wages and dividends etc are on the line if they mess it up as they have been so they have no interest in intentionally fucking it up!!!

You lot seem to think that slagging them off at every opportunity or attempt to try and do things right is justified because of past experiences....do you honestly believe that Diamandis and Co sit in their office with our Profit and Loss accounts pinned to the wall and have a sword fight to piss all over them???

It takes a special breed of one dimentional hypocrits to dictate how things should be done when the full facts are not known and I feel that this forum and the club in general have done a very good job of breeding such people in some of you!

I mean come on, have you never heard one of the many derivations of the story of the boy that continually called and pranked the police and emergency services when nothing was wrong....and then one day when something was really wrong, they did not believe him despite it being a real emergency?!?!?!

Who is to say that the board dont have some good plans for a stadium redevelopment (as they suggest they have several further ones) and who is to say that they dont know what they are doing when you have not been in their shoes with the obstacles they have had to face (merely think you can handle it as you have experience in similar fields).

At the end of the day there will only ever be one outcome out of all of this that would be beneficial to the club and thats unity and investment in my view as opposed to take overs and oustings!  

We get yo-yo'd around the leagues every year cause of our inability to get a good manager to stay and now we have one we should be uniting to help our club.  

Now if some of you believe that Bill Power and the consortium are the way forward then fine I salute you for your bravery in taking on such a challenge....but for god sake stop slagging of the current regime like your 10 years old and get on with the shed loads of work you have to do, as there is no productivity to slagging matches.

I for one am available to be convinced but at present I only see a half finished article.

To the rest of you i urge you to please either back the board, back the consortium or sit quietly on the fence, but the one singular thing that carries through all of these is that there is NO BENEFIT WHATSOEVER in acting like spoilt upset children about the way we have been treated, get over it and do something about it (other than moan and whine like a 10 year old girl)

Cue barage of abusive reply's as that is the level of this forum these days.


I really cannot believe that after all these years, you can possibly come out in support of the current regime who are in charge of our beloved football club.

It is entirely irresponsible to quote 'unknown obstacles' as reasons for their ineptness, of which we have seen a barrel-full.

The fact is, there are 92 teams in the football league. Each team is run in a similar way with a board of directors, CEO and various other members of staff. Income that is generated for each team varies, and this would appear to have a direct relation with success.

Currently, our average attendance is the highest in League 2, and if we were in League 1 with the same average attendace, it would be the 9th highest. Even if we were in the Championship, it would be higher than Colchester's current average.

My point is, that this club should not be plying their trade in League 2. You can't blame our situation on the fact that we've haven't had good managers in recent seasons. Who do you think appoints these managers in the first place? Who appointed Andy King, again after his first debacle as manager?

I think the fact that we currenly have a decent manager in charge has added fuel to the flames for many supporters. At last, we seem to have added a very important piece to the jigsaw. Can you imagine how well we could do with a new team in charge? SSW has already stated that without stadium developments, he does not possess the moolah to take this club forward, but merely keep its head bobbing above water (of which I am truly grateful to the man), but his continuing association with somebody who has been investigated for various irregularities (i don't know enough about that so I wont go into it) quite frankly worries the hell out of me.

At the end of the day, as you quite clearly stated, the current board are paid to do what they are doing. Unfortunately, they are their own bosses. They aren't accountable to anybody, except maybe us. The fans. I'm afraid that its been going on for so long, and now, we actually have what appears to be a very attractive offer almost in place, we'd be crazy not to back it. And nobody else is going to get the current lot out, so its up to us. I guess you won't be wearing orange on Saturday?

And finally (sorry about all this), this is a discussion forum, designed to ignite debate. If reading peoples opinions (whiney or not) get on your nerves, then maybe take your business elsewhere?


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: RobertT on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 11:24:58
the local Councillors and residents who have not yet been consulted by the club probably!


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: magic8ball on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 11:26:06
I sounded a bit harsh then.

No offence intended.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: magicroundabout on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 11:30:35
sharky. are you a member of the board or something cos it seems only people closely connected to the board can't see past there blinkers that this take over would benefit the club.

Please inform us 10 year olds how the board have improved stfc over the last 5 years??

how they have missed payment after payment (cva/wages/VAT)

how we have sold Parkin, Fallon, Wise (compo), £1.2m investment from Power yet we still can't pay the fucking CVA.

Where's the money gone????

the current board are are about as useful as the cardboard cut outs on the stratton bank

get fucking rid asap.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: janaage on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 11:31:35
Why do so many people not believe that Mr Wilkes and co do not know the facts.

I agree with Sharky that the childish personal comments have no place in these debates, but to say that "the full facts" are not known by the fans consortium is crazy.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: STFC Bart on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 11:32:02
Here here

They are desperate to hang on, if Roman Abromovich came in they would not be interested.

It is because they have so much to hide....


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 11:39:55
Spin Spin Spin

Fuck me the Adver even rolled Willie out again !


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 11:42:41
Quote from: "STFC Bart"
Here here

They are desperate to hang on, if Roman Abromovich came in they would not be interested.

It is because they have so much to hide....


Absoloutly

And I think it's high time that some of the facts came out in to the public domain


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: magic8ball on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 11:45:04
Quote from: "Fred Elliot"
Spin Spin Spin

Fuck me the Adver even rolled Willie out again !


Any ideas why he hopes we are only now going places after he's been here for 5 years?

Whats he been doing all this time?

Presenting on BBC with Claire fucking Balding thats what.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 11:47:40
I know Magic

Fucking disgrace

It also goes to show that the Board has the Adver in their back pockets


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: magic8ball on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 11:48:33
That might explain the Sturrock story getting top billing anyway.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 11:52:00
The PR machine in full swing magic - pure spin mate


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: janaage on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 11:59:45
Quote from: "Fred Elliot"

It also goes to show that the Board has the Adver in their back pockets


To be honest I don't think that's the case.  From what I was hearing on Monday the Adver would be up for reporting the truth in the near future, rather than all this woolly rubbish.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Sharky on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 11:59:49
Quote from: "magic8ball"

I really cannot believe that after all these years, you can possibly come out in support of the current regime who are in charge of our beloved football club.

It is entirely irresponsible to quote 'unknown obstacles' as reasons for their ineptness, of which we have seen a barrel-full.

The fact is, there are 92 teams in the football league. Each team is run in a similar way with a board of directors, CEO and various other members of staff. Income that is generated for each team varies, and this would appear to have a direct relation with success.

Currently, our average attendance is the highest in League 2, and if we were in League 1 with the same average attendace, it would be the 9th highest. Even if we were in the Championship, it would be higher than Colchester's current average.

My point is, that this club should not be plying their trade in League 2. You can't blame our situation on the fact that we've haven't had good managers in recent seasons. Who do you think appoints these managers in the first place? Who appointed Andy King, again after his first debacle as manager?

I think the fact that we currenly have a decent manager in charge has added fuel to the flames for many supporters. At last, we seem to have added a very important piece to the jigsaw. Can you imagine how well we could do with a new team in charge? SSW has already stated that without stadium developments, he does not possess the moolah to take this club forward, but merely keep its head bobbing above water (of which I am truly grateful to the man), but his continuing association with somebody who has been investigated for various irregularities (i don't know enough about that so I wont go into it) quite frankly worries the hell out of me.

At the end of the day, as you quite clearly stated, the current board are paid to do what they are doing. Unfortunately, they are their own bosses. They aren't accountable to anybody, except maybe us. The fans. I'm afraid that its been going on for so long, and now, we actually have what appears to be a very attractive offer almost in place, we'd be crazy not to back it. And nobody else is going to get the current lot out, so its up to us. I guess you won't be wearing orange on Saturday?

And finally (sorry about all this), this is a discussion forum, designed to ignite debate. If reading peoples opinions (whiney or not) get on your nerves, then maybe take your business elsewhere?


Thanks for almost keeping you comments to a debate level as opposed to stooping into a slagging match but in fairness you missed my point.

I do not support the current regime any more than I support the idea of a succesful consortium bid being made.......my point is that whichever you believe in.... where is the need to act like a little girl, crying and moaning about the past years of hurt and lies!??!?!

Quote from: "magic8ball"
You can't blame our situation on the fact that we've haven't had good managers in recent seasons. Who do you think appoints these managers in the first place? Who appointed Andy King, again after his first debacle as manager?

I think the fact that we currenly have a decent manager in charge has added fuel to the flames for many supporters


?????  How has it added fuel to the flames .....fine they may have made soem crap appointments in the past but its still the same people that have now (TWICE if you count Wise) found good managers to take us forward!????

Surely this football club, like all the other 92 clubs is based on one major point......football!.....if the team play well whether there are 10 people or 20,000 watching then they will go up the leagues (case in point being colchester)

The finances behind the scenes to support that team are what the stumbling block with our club is at present, nothing to do with the management or squad who could be run on shoe string budget as many clubs have shown.

I agree that for progression up the leagues and for our team to do as I stated above, it is a massive boost to have the attendances behind them and the facilities and financial backing....but how many clubs have this problem?......its certainly not just us is it and we are not bottom of the footballing league we're on our way up one!!

I cant help but feel its a case of you can only make something out of the ingredients your given and as such if the consortium have the backing (as we are regularly told they do) then one can assume they would produce a better result with the better ingredients, but money does not make the club, football does!

People are losing their way at the minute and I fear that either with the current regime or the consortium or whoever in charge, we are losing sight of the short term goals too.....the more we disrupt what at present is a successful footballing season the more likely we are to fuck it up as PS has said in his statement asking for stability.

No one wants this club to go under and no one (including the board) are stupid enough to let it happen......I would never stand in the way of a better regime coming in, but at present I fail to see how disrupting a successful team by overhauling the whole board can help???

Surely the best option for our club in terms of stability and getting the most important part of the job done (GETTING OUT OF THIS LEAGUE) is to invest the required sum of money to clear the CVA and then start with the takeover talks???

I fear if things progress on the rocky road they have been with current relations, that our team and manager especially, will take a knocking and the season will be lost.

I'm all for short term sacrifice for long term gains and all that but I see no point in risking what is already on track to be a success this year???
IMO


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:00:12
I certainly refuse to believe the current board have turned a corner and have seen the light.

You can't run a business into the ground for five years, strip all it's assets and then suddenly decide to have another pop at being succesful. It just won't work.

The appointment of Boyd and Bowden is IMO just a ploy to make those narrow minded individuals who don't really know the ins and outs of the club believe the board are trying to take this club somewhere. There's too many nimbys supporting this club who don't understand the shit we're actually in. You could argue the board are speculating to accumulate, but there's no money to speculate with. Where are the wages coming from for these two?

Mr Sturrock would be wise to do what he does best, manage the FOOTBALL team. Leave the political crap to the board, however I feel they've already 'got to him'. Those nimbys I reffered to previously are band-wagon jumpers who probably have only really taken an interest in the club since the appointment of first Wise and now Sturrock. Of course they're going to listen to what Sturrock has to say. It's all spin to get the nimbys on side.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: STFC Village on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:02:57
Quote from: "sam_stfc"
There's too many nimbys supporting this club
:wtf:


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:10:09
Nimby = Clueless moron


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Sharky on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:16:00
Has anyone thought to do a credible poll of how many supporters feel that a boadroom overhaul via a takeover would be a good thing???

And by that I dont mean all the consortium members grouping up and saying we all agree.....I mean a full attendance vote of 5 or 6 thousand people????

I mean there are what 750 members of the trust.....even if twice this many think its the way forward.....as my maths goes thats still a minority isnt it???

Why not if the consortium are going to be so good at running things, release a full explanantion of how they intend to run things and ask the fans (all of them) to vote on who they'd want in charge? (preferrably without propoganda to cut the other options down with lies and half truths)

I wouldnt be surprised if , nimby's, numpty's or brains of britains the results were not so clean cut as the Trust seem to think it is.....not everyone agrees with the proposals, unfortunately only those involved in them seem to be ken to speak up......regardless ALL the fans are just as important to the clubs future!


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: STFC Village on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:16:39
NIMBY = Not In My Back Yard, ie the people who wanted a new stadium for STFC, when the proposals for Shaw Tip were first released, but didn't want it anywhere near them


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: magic8ball on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:17:13
I think basically, most fans at the moment are tired. Tired of the lies, mis-management, bewildering statements and stubborn attitudes of the current board.

There's the whole CVA situation. The fans were clearly told at the AGM that this situation was sorted, and as everybody knows, it was not.

I don't know a great deal about business, but we have appeared to have generated some significant income over the past few seasons. Starting with the Parkin money, the Bryan Adams concert, Fallon money, and Bill Power's money. Also, at the biginning of this season, season ticket sales were up, and merchandise sales were up. Therefore, you'd think they'd be able to handle a mere £100,000 vat payment. Again, I don't know the ins and outs, but thats the way it appears to me, and I'd imagine the average Town supporter. If this is not the case, the board need to tell us, in plain English why.

Onto current events. Several months ago, when the whole situation was starting to erupt, we went through a phase of getting regular club statements on the OS threatening us that SSW would pull out if we didn't stop having a go at the current board. As much as it isn't nice to be held to ransome like this, we know have a viable alternative to the current regime. They've made various statements about how quickly they would move aside if an alternative was available (statements made when no alternative was available) and now it is, we just see stalling tactics, and we hear that they aren't active looking to sell. All contradictions.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: stfctownenda on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:19:20
Sharkey I just cant understand how you can be impartial it has gone beyond that for the majority of fans.  I dont think stability is an argument, what worries me is these guys are out for themselves talk of moving our beloved club away from the town makes me angry and worried.  There is no argument, 1 week there telling us they have failed to make a CVA payment and are re-negotiating to delay the payment as there not in a position to pay it at the moment and then the next there employing 3 new people (Holt, Boyd and Bowden), so 3 new salaries that somehow we can now afford, including an expensive consultant from Reading, you want balanced discussion please explain this as I may be missing something?? is this the same board that also sacked/let go Linda Burrell as they couldnt afford her salary.  Sharkey come along to a trust meeting dont fear change, what these guys are trying to achieve is fantastic, these guys all love the club are all pulling together and have some great ideas, read the manifesto, read the ground plans this is not a bunch of cowboys they all have good knowledge and skills, plus Mike Wilks business knowhow and Phil Emmel & Bill Powers financial backing this consortium is going places.  This isnt the time for burying our heads in the sand for stability this is decision time either we want a club or we dont want, there is only one future and that is with the consortium and I for one am right behind those guys bring on the Orange Revolution  :beers:


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Sharky on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:28:23
Quote from: "stfctownenda"
1 week there telling us they have failed to make a CVA payment and are re-negotiating to delay the payment as there not in a position to pay it


Once more I struggle to understand how peoples words can be so misinterpreted and wonder if that is not why we are in the position we are now?

They never said that the COULD NOT make the payment, they always said they had the money but felt (After being advised by the Accreditor) that they could delay payment to be made with the final installment.....hence make interest on the £100K on account rather than through it at the problem.

If you have a deadline for something tobedone for tomorrow and you rush to get it done in time and then at the last minute you are told by the guy who the deadline is for that you can have until next week if you would like, would you hand in the first attempt regardless or would you not spend the next week trying to make what you did better seeing as you now have more time to do it??

I think the point really is that the situation should not have really arisen in the first place.....if there was no CVA to pay then there would likely be no takeover talks and no attempt to move the club forward....regardless they do have the £100K and probably now some interest, but the main point is how best to be able to pay the rest of the CVA.....

If the consortium is the way forward then so be it, but I dnt see the need to slag off the board when people can just get on with trying to provide a better alternative and leave the bickering to the kids.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:30:18
Quote from: "STFC Village"
NIMBY = Not In My Back Yard, ie the people who wanted a new stadium for STFC, when the proposals for Shaw Tip were first released, but didn't want it anywhere near them


Oops  :oops:

Got my terminology confused. I didn't mean nimby as in the way you said, I meant clueless moron.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: STFC Village on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:31:21
Quote from: "sam_stfc"
Quote from: "STFC Village"
NIMBY = Not In My Back Yard, ie the people who wanted a new stadium for STFC, when the proposals for Shaw Tip were first released, but didn't want it anywhere near them


Oops  :oops:

Got my terminology confused. I didn't mean nimby as in the way you said, I meant clueless moron.
What a NIMBY! :D


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: SwindonTartanArmy on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:31:23
Quote from: "stfctownenda"
Sharkey I just cant understand how you can be impartial it has gone beyond that for the majority of fans.  I dont think stability is an argument, what worries me is these guys are out for themselves talk of moving our beloved club away from the town makes me angry and worried.  There is no argument, 1 week there telling us they have failed to make a CVA payment and are re-negotiating to delay the payment as there not in a position to pay it at the moment and then the next there employing 3 new people (Holt, Boyd and Bowden), so 3 new salaries that somehow we can now afford, including an expensive consultant from Reading, you want balanced discussion please explain this as I may be missing something?? is this the same board that also sacked/let go Linda Burrell as they couldnt afford her salary.  Sharkey come along to a trust meeting dont fear change, what these guys are trying to achieve is fantastic, these guys all love the club are all pulling together and have some great ideas, read the manifesto, read the ground plans this is not a bunch of cowboys they all have good knowledge and skills, plus Mike Wilks business knowhow and Phil Emmel & Bill Powers financial backing this consortium is going places.  This isnt the time for burying our heads in the sand for stability this is decision time either we want a club or we dont want, there is only one future and that is with the consortium and I for one am right behind those guys bring on the Orange Revolution  :beers:


Spot on. PS Get back to work!


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: fatbury on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:31:55
We have to trust THE POWER! and pray he helps get us out of the current mess  :nod:


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Sharky on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:32:55
Aty present I dont back the consortium, nor do i back the board .....
I will back whomever appears to be able to show the rest of us fans that no little about the how deal, that they are the right ones to be backing.

at the minute all i see is a mimic of the party politics in this country with both so concerned to put a dampener on the other that they forget the real way to succeed is have good policies and plans and to show these to the public or fans so that they are supported.

I still await to be won over personally but at present I will continue to look towards my own course of action in trying to help the club.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: STFC Village on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:33:17
Quote from: "Sharky"
They never said that the COULD NOT make the payment, they always said they had the money but felt (After being advised by the Accreditor) that they could delay payment to be made with the final installment.....hence make interest on the £100K on account rather than through it at the problem.
What a load of old arse! IF YOU HAVE THE MONEY, PAY IT, YOU DON'T GAMBLE WITH THE CLUBS FUTURE!


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: stfctownenda on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:34:33
Quote from: "Sharky"
Quote from: "stfctownenda"
1 week there telling us they have failed to make a CVA payment and are re-negotiating to delay the payment as there not in a position to pay it


Once more I struggle to understand how peoples words can be so misinterpreted and wonder if that is not why we are in the position we are now?

They never said that the COULD NOT make the payment, they always said they had the money but felt (After being advised by the Accreditor) that they could delay payment to be made with the final installment.....hence make interest on the £100K on account rather than through it at the problem.

If you have a deadline for something tobedone for tomorrow and you rush to get it done in time and then at the last minute you are told by the guy who the deadline is for that you can have until next week if you would like, would you hand in the first attempt regardless or would you not spend the next week trying to make what you did better seeing as you now have more time to do it??

I think the point really is that the situation should not have really arisen in the first place.....if there was no CVA to pay then there would likely be no takeover talks and no attempt to move the club forward....regardless they do have the £100K and probably now some interest, but the main point is how best to be able to pay the rest of the CVA.....

If the consortium is the way forward then so be it, but I dnt see the need to slag off the board when people can just get on with trying to provide a better alternative and leave the bickering to the kids.


Is the money still in place to pay the CVA with the additional salaries on our board now?? are you aware that when you dont pay a CVA they are playing russian roulette with our club if even one creditor calls in a winding up order then we have no club, hows that for stability? how about tne mud slanging from the club your quick to criticise the people on here how about them constantly attacking the trust, you need to grasp the facts from both sides because from what I can tell you are only looking at it from one sides, why not do your research on the trust and consortiums proposals and come back with a constructive argument because the stability angle just isnt working for me.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Sharky on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:34:38
Quote from: "STFC Village"
Quote from: "Sharky"
They never said that the COULD NOT make the payment, they always said they had the money but felt (After being advised by the Accreditor) that they could delay payment to be made with the final installment.....hence make interest on the £100K on account rather than through it at the problem.
What a load of old arse! IF YOU HAVE THE MONEY, PAY IT, YOU DON'T GAMBLE WITH THE CLUBS FUTURE!


from what i understand the guy that told them they may be able to delay it works for the people we are paying so how is it a gamble......???


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Sharky on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:36:55
Quote from: "stfctownenda"
Quote from: "Sharky"
Quote from: "stfctownenda"
1 week there telling us they have failed to make a CVA payment and are re-negotiating to delay the payment as there not in a position to pay it


Once more I struggle to understand how peoples words can be so misinterpreted and wonder if that is not why we are in the position we are now?

They never said that the COULD NOT make the payment, they always said they had the money but felt (After being advised by the Accreditor) that they could delay payment to be made with the final installment.....hence make interest on the £100K on account rather than through it at the problem.

If you have a deadline for something tobedone for tomorrow and you rush to get it done in time and then at the last minute you are told by the guy who the deadline is for that you can have until next week if you would like, would you hand in the first attempt regardless or would you not spend the next week trying to make what you did better seeing as you now have more time to do it??

I think the point really is that the situation should not have really arisen in the first place.....if there was no CVA to pay then there would likely be no takeover talks and no attempt to move the club forward....regardless they do have the £100K and probably now some interest, but the main point is how best to be able to pay the rest of the CVA.....

If the consortium is the way forward then so be it, but I dnt see the need to slag off the board when people can just get on with trying to provide a better alternative and leave the bickering to the kids.


Is the money still in place to pay the CVA with the additional salaries on our board now?? are you aware that when you dont pay a CVA they are playing russian roulette with our club if even one creditor calls in a winding up order then we have no club, hows that for stability? how about tne mud slanging from the club your quick to criticise the people on here how about them constantly attacking the trust, you need to grasp the facts from both sides because from what I can tell you are only looking at it from one sides, why not do your research on the trust and consortiums proposals and come back with a constructive argument because the stability angle just isnt working for me.


I'm sorry you dont think I have taken this seriously from both angles but I assure you I have as its in my interest to do so....

I remain sceptical about both avenues and urge people to not forget that there are other alternatives to both the consortium or the current board.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: SwindonTartanArmy on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:40:46
Quote from: "Sharky"
Quote from: "STFC Village"
Quote from: "Sharky"
They never said that the COULD NOT make the payment, they always said they had the money but felt (After being advised by the Accreditor) that they could delay payment to be made with the final installment.....hence make interest on the £100K on account rather than through it at the problem.
What a load of old arse! IF YOU HAVE THE MONEY, PAY IT, YOU DON'T GAMBLE WITH THE CLUBS FUTURE!


from what i understand the guy that told them they may be able to delay it works for the people we are paying so how is it a gamble......???
BECUASE YOU SHOULDNT FUCK AROUND WITH PAYMENTS TO INLAND REVENUE OR CVA CREDITORS! :roll:


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: STFC Village on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:45:24
The only truth this board have told, is that they can't afford to pay the CVA. They're going to have to wait awhile 'til they build up that much interest on.... sweet fuck all


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: stfctownenda on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:46:13
Quote from: "Sharky"
Quote from: "stfctownenda"
Quote from: "Sharky"
Quote from: "stfctownenda"
1 week there telling us they have failed to make a CVA payment and are re-negotiating to delay the payment as there not in a position to pay it


Once more I struggle to understand how peoples words can be so misinterpreted and wonder if that is not why we are in the position we are now?

They never said that the COULD NOT make the payment, they always said they had the money but felt (After being advised by the Accreditor) that they could delay payment to be made with the final installment.....hence make interest on the £100K on account rather than through it at the problem.

If you have a deadline for something tobedone for tomorrow and you rush to get it done in time and then at the last minute you are told by the guy who the deadline is for that you can have until next week if you would like, would you hand in the first attempt regardless or would you not spend the next week trying to make what you did better seeing as you now have more time to do it??

I think the point really is that the situation should not have really arisen in the first place.....if there was no CVA to pay then there would likely be no takeover talks and no attempt to move the club forward....regardless they do have the £100K and probably now some interest, but the main point is how best to be able to pay the rest of the CVA.....

If the consortium is the way forward then so be it, but I dnt see the need to slag off the board when people can just get on with trying to provide a better alternative and leave the bickering to the kids.


Is the money still in place to pay the CVA with the additional salaries on our board now?? are you aware that when you dont pay a CVA they are playing russian roulette with our club if even one creditor calls in a winding up order then we have no club, hows that for stability? how about tne mud slanging from the club your quick to criticise the people on here how about them constantly attacking the trust, you need to grasp the facts from both sides because from what I can tell you are only looking at it from one sides, why not do your research on the trust and consortiums proposals and come back with a constructive argument because the stability angle just isnt working for me.


I'm sorry you dont think I have taken this seriously from both angles but I assure you I have as its in my interest to do so....

I remain sceptical about both avenues and urge people to not forget that there are other alternatives to both the consortium or the current board.


To simplify it we have Bill Power a guy who was involved in a plane crash and was so overwhelmed by the response of get well cards from Swindon fans after his plane crash he felt he owed yes OWED us to come back and take the football club forward on the other side we have the Wills family who feel we OWE them for there years of cashflow, I for one will not be held to ransom by them, they have taken us as far as they come its time for them to gracefully step aside and let us move on as a club, as I said yesterday the current regime must understand players, managers and even board members come and go fans are forever and we will not let them take out club  :evil:


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:49:56
Quote from: "Sharky"

I'm sorry you dont think I have taken this seriously from both angles but I assure you I have as its in my interest to do so....


So you're either associated with the board, the creditors or the administrator. Which is it?


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Arriba on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:57:29
one thing that does worry me slightly is that some members of the trust seem to know alot more than other supporters.
i dont think its a major issue at present but it could develop into one possibly?
surely fans will ask why they are entitiled to hold information from them when they are basically equals


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Roddy_Radiation on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 12:59:44
Quote

I would never stand in the way of a better regime coming in

Are you in a position to stand in the way, if so what position is that?

Quote

I remain sceptical about both avenues and urge people to not forget that there are other alternatives to both the consortium or the current board.

Can you tell me what these alternatives are?


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: red macca on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 13:01:09
Quote from: "arriba"
one thing that does worry me slightly is that some members of the trust seem to know alot more than other supporters.
i dont think its a major issue at present but it could develop into one possibly?
surely fans will ask why they are entitiled to hold information from them when they are basically equals
i do agree with that arriba.i must admit the nudge nudge wink wink does get to me a bit.When it was announced that it was bill power who was interested i was slighly pissed off about the amount of people who came out and  said thank fuck i can say something now etc

never mind though im sure they have the right reasons for not saying anything


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 13:10:41
Quote from: "red macca"
Quote from: "arriba"
one thing that does worry me slightly is that some members of the trust seem to know alot more than other supporters.
i dont think its a major issue at present but it could develop into one possibly?
surely fans will ask why they are entitiled to hold information from them when they are basically equals
i do agree with that arriba.i must admit the nudge nudge wink wink does get to me a bit.When it was announced that it was bill power who was interested i was slighly pissed off about the amount of people who came out and  said thank fuck i can say something now etc

never mind though im sure they have the right reasons for not saying anything


Dean

You know me and you know my motives are 100% for the benefit of the club.

I know it is frustrating hearing something that certain people already knew, but believe you me information will be made public to the fans but it must be done at a time that it will be beneficial.

I am sorry if some people think that this is all "nudge nudge - wink wink", it is certainly not intended to make the guys involved in the consortium sound elitist, its just that it would be very easy to unload all that is known into the public domain - only to be slagged off for being unprofessional and conducting business through the media.

Cant win sometimes mate !


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: red macca on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 13:12:30
Dont get me wrong i understand that your all in a position where you cant say anything all the time.

It was just the amount of people who actually knew that suprised me a little


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: SwindonTartanArmy on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 13:13:25
Quote from: "red macca"


never mind though im sure they have the right reasons for not saying anything
Because Bill Power asked them not to say anything?


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 13:18:29
Quote from: "red macca"
Dont get me wrong i understand that your all in a position where you cant say anything all the time.

It was just the amount of people who actually knew that suprised me a little


And you believe everyone who said that they knew ?

This is the internet Dean - it is full of Walter Mitty types


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: red macca on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 13:19:12
im saying the amount of numbers who did know though sta


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: red macca on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 13:20:38
Quote from: "Fred Elliot"
Quote from: "red macca"
Dont get me wrong i understand that your all in a position where you cant say anything all the time.

It was just the amount of people who actually knew that suprised me a little


And you believe everyone who said that they knew ?

This is the internet Dean - it is full of Walter Mitty types
suppose its a good point fred.I just thought it was about time i agreed with arriba


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 13:22:23
Fuck me thats a 1st

 :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: janaage on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 13:23:37
Can I just say that if you want to know what's going on, get yourself to a trust meeting, Mike Wilkes was very open and honest on Monday.

I found out a lot of stuff there, however, I do not feel comfortable repeating what Mike said, as I see it as it's his decision to publicise what he says.

So Arriba, Macca, go to the next meeting, open to members and non members, sometime in Jan I believe.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: red macca on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 13:24:45
Quote from: "janaage"
Can I just say that if you want to know what's going on, get yourself to a trust meeting, Mike Wilkes was very open and honest on Monday.

I found out a lot of stuff there, however, I do not feel comfortable repeating what Mike said, as I see it as it's his decision to publicise what he says.

So Arriba, Macca, go to the next meeting, open to members and non members, sometime in Jan I believe.
i will and i have joined the trust now.but i will just get sooo drunk i will fail to remember

i have problems


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 13:26:15
Quote from: "red macca"
Quote from: "janaage"
Can I just say that if you want to know what's going on, get yourself to a trust meeting, Mike Wilkes was very open and honest on Monday.

I found out a lot of stuff there, however, I do not feel comfortable repeating what Mike said, as I see it as it's his decision to publicise what he says.

So Arriba, Macca, go to the next meeting, open to members and non members, sometime in Jan I believe.
i will and i have joined the trust now.but i will just get sooo drunk i will fail to remember

i have problems


You can come with Millom mate


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: red macca on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 13:27:16
Good idea im short of people to talk to


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Arriba on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 13:29:06
i was playing devils advocate a little with my post but i have had conversations with people that have said exactly what i posted about lack of info ect.
i am a member of the trust but was unable to attend the meeting due to work commitments.

dont get me wrong as i wasn't having a go.but i honestly think it could become an issue with non trust members that are town fans


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: stfctownenda on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 13:30:13
Quote from: "red macca"
Good idea im short of people to talk to


You cant talk with Millom just prop yourself up in a seat next to him once hammered then fall asleep wake up light a fag only for everyone to shout its non smoking then just nod off again, priceless  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: mattboyslim on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 13:55:58
Having read the adver via this is, I'm wholly disheartened, it seems like the board have dug themselves in, with reinforcements, and by 'making the right noises' outwardly they will easily brainwash the average town fan who sees the adver as gospel, and who doesn't follow the trust.  I think most information is there to be had from the consortium except a few details which IMHO are not in the public domain, and I wouldn't expect to know.

I can apprecaite that many fans will follow the 'party line' put out by STFC, but in reality whilst the trust membership is reasonably small it's larger than any other fans group here and has more fans involved than the average takeover bid for a club.  Many hugely dedicated fans I know are really not concerend about off the pitch antics, they just go to every game irrespective of the chaos behind the scenes, it's always going to be hard to harness such apathy, which means the current regime will always appear to have people backing them. I just hope it ends peacefully because the longer it goes on the more likely it is to 'kick off'.

One little question though, would you rather the 'revoltuion' suceeded but sturrock left in the crossfire, or status quo remained, we got promoted but still had the propaganda machine that is newbury lurking behind us?  For me the takeover is as important as the football, so I'd take Mr Power et al coming in if it meant a future for the club whoever the manager is.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 13:58:08
If it comes to it, I trust Bill Power and Mark Devlin to find us another top class manager.

I really hope it doesn't come to that though.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Sharky on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 14:00:29
Quote from: "sam_stfc"
So you're either associated with the board, the creditors or the administrator. Which is it?


I'm not associated with any of these and it is very narrow minded given the current situation the club finds themselves in to assume these are the only parties with an interest.

Quote from: "Roddy_Radiation"

Can you tell me what these alternatives are?


Outside investment from an as yet un-named investor


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: janaage on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 14:01:37
Sturrock won't leave because of a change in the board room.  Matty seriously do you expect Sturrock to come out and back a takeover, publically going against his present employers.  it's a nothing story, do not be disheartened this should make us stick at it.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 14:05:31
Good post Matt, and very valid points.

At the end of the day though, the board has said that they cannot finance the CVA.

Come June next year we wont have a club - simple as that

The board were hoping to have the ground redevelopment in full swing by now and use that as security to borrow against, but to put it bluntly the plans that we submitted by them were nothing short of Primary School standard.

With the greatest resxpect to Sturrock, he needs to concentrate on the football affairs of the club, as he so publically requested to be left alone to do when he joined us.

I have posted elsewhere that this is a classic PR move by the goons at the CG to garner support from the "silent majority"

Mr Sturrock has been manouvered into this position and coersed into issueing this statement.

I feel sorry for him


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: STFC Village on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 14:07:02
Quote from: "Sharky"
Quote from: "Roddy_Radiation"
]
Can you tell me what these alternatives are?


Outside investment from an as yet un-named investor
You've either bought the boards bullshit, or you're deluded


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Sharky on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 14:09:07
Quote from: "STFC Village"
You've either bought the boards bullshit, or you're deluded


If I was Bill Gates or Richard Branson would you say the same thing to me?

Who said I was basing this potential alternative on anything the board have or have not said?


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: STFC Village on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 14:13:18
Quote from: "Sharky"
If I was Bill Gates or Richard Branson would you say the same thing to me?
Absolutely, there is no way you'd be investing in this club.

Quote from: "Sharky"
Who said I was basing this potential alternative on anything the board have or have not said?
If you are an ordinary fan, and not connected in any way with the board or peripherals, then what other sources do you have? If you've got something to say.... be my guest


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 14:19:37
Quote from: "Sharky"
Quote from: "sam_stfc"
So you're either associated with the board, the creditors or the administrator. Which is it?


I'm not associated with any of these and it is very narrow minded given the current situation the club finds themselves in to assume these are the only parties with an interest.


Well get your out from your arse, tell us who you are and stop playing the big 'I am'.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: stfctownenda on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 14:22:29
Quote from: "sam_stfc"
Quote from: "Sharky"
Quote from: "sam_stfc"
So you're either associated with the board, the creditors or the administrator. Which is it?


I'm not associated with any of these and it is very narrow minded given the current situation the club finds themselves in to assume these are the only parties with an interest.


Well get your out from your arse, tell us who you are and stop playing the big 'I am'.


 :nod:


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Sharky on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 14:25:48
Quote from: "STFC Village"
Quote from: "Sharky"
If I was Bill Gates or Richard Branson would you say the same thing to me?
Absolutely, there is no way you'd be investing in this club.

Quote from: "Sharky"
Who said I was basing this potential alternative on anything the board have or have not said?
If you are an ordinary fan, and not connected in any way with the board or peripherals, then what other sources do you have? If you've got something to say.... be my guest



Funnily enough I do not have to explain myself to you or any of the swindon town fans, but you do not know me, who i work for or what my interest is outside of being a fan so dont come at me so aggressively like you know something you dont.

If I was (for example) a potential investor or connected to one who had decided to get involved in the fans debate to see what interest they showed in receiving outside investment from a third party and what it truely was the fans wanted to happen to the club, then people such as yourself are the ones that would put me off the idea of helping with the "nothing anyone else says is valid or worthy of a debate" attitude.

Only time will tell if another investor wishes to declare their interest in taking the club forward...you know no more than any other swindon fan


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Sharky on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 14:28:22
Quote from: "sam_stfc"

Well get your out from your arse, tell us who you are and stop playing the big 'I am'.


I have not claimed to be anyone have I!
You guys are incredibly fickle arent you....I merely denied that I have any link with the board, CVA, consortium, Trust and yet you take that as I am claiming to be someone???

No wonder the board find it hard to please some of you as you make thingss up in your little minds....

I could be a nobody, I could be a somebody, unless I want to tell you, which I dont, then its none of your business is it!


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: stfctownenda on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 14:32:30
If you throw in questions like I am not in a position where I can get involved, you leaving inuendos that you may be someone Sharkey at the moment you are contradicting yourself more than the board statements  :shock:


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 14:34:28
That's exactly what I'm on about. You come on here harping 'I could be this, I could be that'.

Face it, you have different views and opinions about the club/current board to the majority of us on here and I certainly don't think you're an ordinary fan. You act just like the board, no transparency at all.

And you seem like you're trying to cover something up.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: STFC Village on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 14:34:35
Quote from: "Sharky"
Funnily enough I do not have to explain myself to you or any of the swindon town fans, but you do not know me, who i work for or what my interest is outside of being a fan so dont come at me so aggressively like you know something you dont.
Aggressive?! I didn't swear or anything, just fed up of you giving it the old "i know something you don't know" routine. Explain yourself and i'll give you creedance, until then, i'll treat you as a shit-stirrer.

Quote from: "Sharky"
If I was (for example) a potential investor or connected to one who had decided to get involved in the fans debate to see what interest they showed in receiving outside investment from a third party and what it truely was the fans wanted to happen to the club, then people such as yourself are the ones that would put me off the idea of helping with the "nothing anyone else says is valid or worthy of a debate" attitude.
Are you an investor? No. Because if you were, you sure as hell wouldn't be on here spouting BS.

Quote from: "Sharky"
Only time will tell if another investor wishes to declare their interest in taking the club forward...you know no more than any other swindon fan
Oh fuck off! All i know is of the concrete plans that Bill Power and the trust have proposed. Until, i know of anyone else's plans for serious investment, then i shall stand corrected. Until then, i shan't be taking your say so


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Sharky on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 14:36:05
Quote from: "stfctownenda"
If you throw in questions like I am not in a position where I can get involved, you leaving inuendos that you may be someone Sharkey at the moment you are contradicting yourself more than the board statements  :shock:


In that case I apologise for my vague comments however if you were in my shoes you would appreciate where I am coming from...By all accounts however, if i was 11 years old I would not be in a position to get involved so my comments were never meant to lead towards any particular conclusion.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: cib on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 14:38:34
Quote from: "Sharky"
Quote from: "STFC Village"
Quote from: "Sharky"
If I was Bill Gates or Richard Branson would you say the same thing to me?
Absolutely, there is no way you'd be investing in this club.

Quote from: "Sharky"
Who said I was basing this potential alternative on anything the board have or have not said?
If you are an ordinary fan, and not connected in any way with the board or peripherals, then what other sources do you have? If you've got something to say.... be my guest



Funnily enough I do not have to explain myself to you or any of the swindon town fans, but you do not know me, who i work for or what my interest is outside of being a fan so dont come at me so aggressively like you know something you dont.

If I was (for example) a potential investor or connected to one who had decided to get involved in the fans debate to see what interest they showed in receiving outside investment from a third party and what it truely was the fans wanted to happen to the club, then people such as yourself are the ones that would put me off the idea of helping with the "nothing anyone else says is valid or worthy of a debate" attitude.

Only time will tell if another investor wishes to declare their interest in taking the club forward...you know no more than any other swindon fan


Do you not call this a debate? And what with this attitude?
the attitude you refer is totally predictable in light of the past 5 years with the current board,  the stagnation of the business of STFC and the backwards movement of the footballing side. fans want whats best for the club, and you have to accept that the majority of fans will have had enough of this regime now.
the consortium offers another opportunity for the club which is clearly embraced by fans, because its for the fans.

Sharkey earlier you mention an attendence poll or something along those line, stating 2 times the numberof trust members is still a minority. but you are estimating or putting a ball park figure on it. i for one do not know how many people support the consortium and orange revolution, and neither to you. so as you say stick to the facts


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: cib on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 14:40:55
plus all this 'you are acting like 11 year old girls' by being fickle and insulting members of the board, calling us hypocrits. whats more hypocritical about that?


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: SwindonTartanArmy on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 14:42:36
Quote from: "jayohaitchenn"
If it comes to it, I trust Bill Power and Mark Devlin to find us another top class manager.

I really hope it doesn't come to that though.
Id agree with that. Sturrock is great. but no one man is bigger than the club


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Sharky on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 14:43:14
Quote from: "cib"
Quote from: "Sharky"
Quote from: "STFC Village"
Quote from: "Sharky"
If I was Bill Gates or Richard Branson would you say the same thing to me?
Absolutely, there is no way you'd be investing in this club.

Quote from: "Sharky"
Who said I was basing this potential alternative on anything the board have or have not said?
If you are an ordinary fan, and not connected in any way with the board or peripherals, then what other sources do you have? If you've got something to say.... be my guest



Funnily enough I do not have to explain myself to you or any of the swindon town fans, but you do not know me, who i work for or what my interest is outside of being a fan so dont come at me so aggressively like you know something you dont.

If I was (for example) a potential investor or connected to one who had decided to get involved in the fans debate to see what interest they showed in receiving outside investment from a third party and what it truely was the fans wanted to happen to the club, then people such as yourself are the ones that would put me off the idea of helping with the "nothing anyone else says is valid or worthy of a debate" attitude.

Only time will tell if another investor wishes to declare their interest in taking the club forward...you know no more than any other swindon fan


Do you not call this a debate? And what with this attitude?
the attitude you refer is totally predictable in light of the past 5 years with the current board,  the stagnation of the business of STFC and the backwards movement of the footballing side. fans want whats best for the club, and you have to accept that the majority of fans will have had enough of this regime now.
the consortium offers another opportunity for the club which is clearly embraced by fans, because its for the fans.

Sharkey earlier you mention an attendence poll or something along those line, stating 2 times the numberof trust members is still a minority. but you are estimating or putting a ball park figure on it. i for one do not know how many people support the consortium and orange revolution, and neither to you. so as you say stick to the facts


The fact is 750 X 2 = 1500 and we have many more fans than 3000 so that is why I referred to it as a minority as an example.....Like I also said and you too corrected point out, we do not know the truth of how many support the trust or the current regime so maybe it might be an idea for someone to carry out such a poll and find out???


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: cib on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 14:45:44
Fair point and your maths seems sound,  but still makes the figure irrelevant, and as you say its just an idea which could be followed through


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 14:51:20
Quote from: "Sharky"

Like I also said and you too corrected point out, we do not know the truth of how many support the trust or the current regime so maybe it might be an idea for someone to carry out such a poll and find out???


Perhaps you should do it yourself seems as you like to think you're above us all.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: janaage on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 14:52:23
750 people have signed up to the TRUST.  750 is not the limit of support for the fans consortium ( I do believe although this is just speculation).

It may not happen this week or this month, or even in 6 matches, but one day the board will get the message that the board do not have the support of the majority of the fans.

And that's what the revolution is all about Comrade Sharky!!!

Viva la revolucion - let's get Newbury out of town eh?!?


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: RobertT on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 14:59:34
Sharkey, as far as I know the Fans Consortium would indeed be open to other people getting involved.

Posting on an 85% bollocks forum may give you some clue as the merits of using it as a sounding board though about invesment potential.  Plus you'll be getting people at their angriest on here.  If you were interested in investing via the Fans Consortium, then I would suggest approaching them and having a chat with them.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 15:03:18
Sort it out Rob, 80% bollocks :wink:


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: pumbaa on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 15:04:21
It never ceases to amaze me how these threads meander off topic to a degree.

Unfortunately, back to topic. IMHO Sturrock has been placed in an untenable position. At least twice that I know of (after the Morecambe & Walsall games), Ed Hadwin has sought his opinion regarding the off-the-field activities at the club - to be fair, Sturrock diplomatically dodged the question, as rightly he should.

The problem is that we as fans are keen to know his thoughts. And when he does publish 'his thoughts', we don't necessarily like them as he appears to be in full support of his current employer - who in the right mind would publically criticise the hand that feeds them one month into their tenure?

FWIW, this clearly stinks of propoganda from the current regime. Sturrock's position in this debate has been made untenable, in that I mean he was almost forced to make some statement to appease certain factions who were keen to know his opinion.

Classic catch 22 situation. I for one am taking with with a huge pinch of salt, and would like to put on record that Paul Sturrock has my full support regarding the on-field management of this club.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: RobertT on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 15:07:49
Quote from: "sam_stfc"
Sort it out Rob, 80% bollocks :wink:


That's just bollocks.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Sharky on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 15:08:23
Thank you Robert for your very valid points, It sounds like having listened on other topics to what seem to be the main players in the Trust, that perhaps coming to the next Trust/Consortium meeting would be beneficial to me as although I dont necessarily believe my potential input will sink in with the consortiums plans, I wont know until I have talked it through with the right people to get the full picture.

I give up with trying to explain myself to the people on here and look forward to meeting messrs Wilkes & Co at some point in the near future.

When is the next Trust/Consortium meeting so that either myself or my colleague may attend?


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: RobertT on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 15:10:05
I believe there is one on January 13th before the Wrexham game at a venue yet to be decided.

The parties involved though would more than likely agree to a seperate meeting and can normally be found on matchdays.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 15:10:22
Quote from: "coxernator"
It never ceases to amaze me how these threads meander off topic to a degree.

Unfortunately, back to topic. IMHO Sturrock has been placed in an untenable position. At least twice that I know of (after the Morecambe & Walsall games), Ed Hadwin has sought his opinion regarding the off-the-field activities at the club - to be fair, Sturrock diplomatically dodged the question, as rightly he should.

The problem is that we as fans are keen to know his thoughts. And when he does publish 'his thoughts', we don't necessarily like them as he appears to be in full support of his current employer - who in the right mind would publically criticise the hand that feeds them one month into their tenure?

FWIW, this clearly stinks of propoganda from the current regime. Sturrock's position in this debate has been made untenable, in that I mean he was almost forced to make some statement to appease certain factions who were keen to know his opinion.

Classic catch 22 situation. I for one am taking with with a huge pinch of salt, and would like to put on record that Paul Sturrock has my full support regarding the on-field management of this club.


Here bloody here

Like I said in a previous thread, he has been manouvered into this position and I for one feel slightly sorry for him


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: janaage on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 15:21:08
January 13th I think, but please don't go til February cos I'm on holiday in Jan and want to be at the meeting where you raise your issues with Mr Wilks.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 15:37:27
Quote from: "RobertT"
I believe there is one on January 13th before the Wrexham game at a venue yet to be decided.

The parties involved though would more than likely agree to a seperate meeting and can normally be found on matchdays.


We would be happy to Sharky

Pop in and see us


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Sharky on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 15:45:52
Thanks Robert,

I am sure that at first a general discussion will be the best course of action, either by attending the next consortium meeting in January or be it that we discuss things over a bovril and mars bar at the ground.

Either way I will look forward to hearing more detail about the intended actions of the consortium and look forward also to trying to find the best way to progress our own intentions, albeit I do not believe we will have a potential working relationship.

Regardless, my colleague's and I are of course open to further debate on perhaps more educated grounds outside of this site but will require a couple of weeks to be able to meet with the relevant people.

Look forward to seeing those of you who attend the consortum meetings at the next meet.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 15:56:13
So to be straight to the point Sharky, you're a potential investor?

I'm sure if you'd mentioned this before, many people (myself included) would have been a lot more welcoming.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Sharky on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 16:07:53
Quote from: "sam_stfc"
So to be straight to the point Sharky, you're a potential investor?

I'm sure if you'd mentioned this before, many people (myself included) would have been a lot more welcoming.


My apologies Sam if the way in which I have come across has not been ideal however it is not normally myself that uses this account but a friend of mine, furthermore I am not normally one for public speaking or debate.
Such things are normally left to more talented individuals.

See you all at the next meeting anyway.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: stfctownenda on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 16:36:51
Quote from: "Sharky"
Quote from: "sam_stfc"
So to be straight to the point Sharky, you're a potential investor?

I'm sure if you'd mentioned this before, many people (myself included) would have been a lot more welcoming.


My apologies Sam if the way in which I have come across has not been ideal however it is not normally myself that uses this account but a friend of mine, furthermore I am not normally one for public speaking or debate.
Such things are normally left to more talented individuals.

See you all at the next meeting anyway.


Sharkey nothing hear should by any mean deter you or your colleague, this site only shows just a small insight into how much we all care and love this club and what lengths we will go to keep it in business, I think meeting the consortium would be an excellent idea and I think you will be both surprised and impressed with how good they are, the orange revolution is only the start  :D


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: SwindonTartanArmy on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 17:13:41
Quote from: "stfctownenda"
Quote from: "Sharky"
Quote from: "sam_stfc"
So to be straight to the point Sharky, you're a potential investor?

I'm sure if you'd mentioned this before, many people (myself included) would have been a lot more welcoming.


My apologies Sam if the way in which I have come across has not been ideal however it is not normally myself that uses this account but a friend of mine, furthermore I am not normally one for public speaking or debate.
Such things are normally left to more talented individuals.

See you all at the next meeting anyway.


Sharkey nothing hear should by any mean deter you or your colleague, this site only shows just a small insight into how much we all care and love this club and what lengths we will go to keep it in business, I think meeting the consortium would be an excellent idea and I think you will be both surprised and impressed with how good they are, the orange revolution is only the start  :D

Have you been drinking?


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: stfctownenda on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 17:34:30
Quote from: "SwindonTartanArmy"
Quote from: "stfctownenda"
Quote from: "Sharky"
Quote from: "sam_stfc"
So to be straight to the point Sharky, you're a potential investor?

I'm sure if you'd mentioned this before, many people (myself included) would have been a lot more welcoming.


My apologies Sam if the way in which I have come across has not been ideal however it is not normally myself that uses this account but a friend of mine, furthermore I am not normally one for public speaking or debate.
Such things are normally left to more talented individuals.

See you all at the next meeting anyway.


Sharkey nothing hear should by any mean deter you or your colleague, this site only shows just a small insight into how much we all care and love this club and what lengths we will go to keep it in business, I think meeting the consortium would be an excellent idea and I think you will be both surprised and impressed with how good they are, the orange revolution is only the start  :D

Have you been drinking?


I wish, saving the boozing for later, Thursdays the official start to the weekend  :beers:


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: herthab on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 17:43:07
Quote from: "Sharky"
Thanks Robert,

I am sure that at first a general discussion will be the best course of action, either by attending the next consortium meeting in January or be it that we discuss things over a bovril and mars bar at the ground.

Either way I will look forward to hearing more detail about the intended actions of the consortium and look forward also to trying to find the best way to progress our own intentions, albeit I do not believe we will have a potential working relationship.

Regardless, my colleague's and I are of course open to further debate on perhaps more educated grounds outside of this site but will require a couple of weeks to be able to meet with the relevant people.

Look forward to seeing those of you who attend the consortium meetings at the next meet.


Call me a cynic, but if this guy is really a potential investor, why is he asking questions with regards to The Consortium, on a fans forum?

Sniff, sniff.........Is it cow?.........................


No.............................................................



It's BULLSHIT.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Bennett on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 17:43:07
Quote from: "Sharky"

Cue barage of abusive reply's as that is the level of this forum these days.



i'm confused, were you another "name" before? as you appear to have joined in october, about 7 weeks ago?


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Simon Pieman on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 17:48:14
Sturrock doesn't want to upset his new employers and at the moment I guess he doesn't have the beef with them Wisey did. This coupled with the fact that he may fear for his job if someone new takes over.

Either that or he's in on the whole thing and is going to make huge profits when the club moves out of town.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Sussex on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 17:51:03
Quote from: "Sharky"
I am not normally one for public speaking


Didn't Mike Diamandis say something very similar in his statement a few months ago?

Go digging kids.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 17:55:41
Quote from: "Sussex Red"
Quote from: "Sharky"
I am not normally one for public speaking


Didn't Mike Diamandis say something very similar in his statement a few months ago?

Go digging kids.



 :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Bennett on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 17:59:25
Quote from: "Fred Elliot"
Quote from: "Sussex Red"
Quote from: "Sharky"
I am not normally one for public speaking


Didn't Mike Diamandis say something very similar in his statement a few months ago?

Go digging kids.



 :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


rolling on your back isn't the best digging tool


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Simon Pieman on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 18:01:09
But the feet are scraping the ground away Bennett. Sure beats digging with a spoon in your mouth.

Them two obviously can't use shovels because they don't have any arms.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Bennett on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 18:10:32
i'm just saying there's better ways that's all


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 18:11:15
I'm not so sure about this Sharky guy now actually.

I've been doing some digging: How does a guy who drives an RX-8, who works in conveyancing and goes on xmas do's in a minibus afford to 'invest' in a football club :?:


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 18:15:29
Quote from: "sam_stfc"
I'm not so sure about this Sharky guy now actually.

I've been doing some digging: How does a guy who drives an RX-8, who works in conveyancing and goes on xmas do's in a minibus afford to 'invest' in a football club :?:


Can I please refer you to Hertha's post   :D


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 18:17:17
Ah. Missed that. Well pointed out Fred  :D


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: ron dodgers on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 18:17:33
what you saying about RX8 drivers Sam ? You want some ?


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 18:19:34
Quote from: "ron dodgers"
what you saying about RX8 drivers Sam ? You want some ?


I'm saying you can't afford to invest in a football club. Ok, you must be on alright money to afford an RX-8 (they're nice cars btw) but not enough to put a few million into a football club.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 18:19:55
Quote from: "sam_stfc"
Ah. Missed that. Well pointed out Fred  :D


Ace


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: pumbaa on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 18:20:55
Quote from: "sam_stfc"
I'm not so sure about this Sharky guy now actually.

I've been doing some digging: How does a guy who drives an RX-8, who works in conveyancing and goes on xmas do's in a minibus afford to 'invest' in a football club :?:


Who knows? I'd like to drive an RX-8, and given the cost of fuel and the fact it only does about 15mpg would suggest he's not on a par with sonic and FB financially (no disrespect to you both of course, just trying to make a point).

I'd like to suggest a degree of caution here; there is a veiled suggestion that we have another potential investor lurking, in some form or other, and to be publically dissing him on this forum is not going to make him feel welcome. He has already agreed to meet with the Trust & Fans Consortium, lets just leave it there and see what develops. Lets face it, all sources of investment, providing they are legal, are more than welcome right now, and if we can get further backing behind the Consortium, then thats a good thing, right?


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: DiV on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 18:21:18
Sturrock has only been here 5 minutes.

We'll see what he says when he asks for some money in january to buy some players....

Dennis Wise said similiar things when he joined about being behind the board etc now where is he? he jumped the first chance he got to leave.

The fact that the club HAVENT paid the CVA bill and told us they HAD should be enough for ANYONE to realise they are liars and cant be trusted.

DIDNT PAY THE C-V-FUCKING-A!!!!!!!!!!

get a grip ffs!


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: ron dodgers on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 18:25:07
if I put my fucking petrol money in the club it would pay for Lukas' wages!


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 18:27:36
Quote from: "DV85"
Sturrock has only been here 5 minutes.

We'll see what he says when he asks for some money in january to buy some players....

Dennis Wise said similiar things when he joined about being behind the board etc now where is he? he jumped the first chance he got to leave.

The fact that the club HAVENT paid the CVA bill and told us they HAD should be enough for ANYONE to realise they are liars and cant be trusted.

DIDNT PAY THE C-V-FUCKING-A!!!!!!!!!!

get a grip ffs!


The official line is that they HAD the money and STILL have the money, but CHOSE not topay it.

Now that to me means the framework of the CVA is worthless.

Now, what would happen if I rang up the Stroud and Swindon Building Society and said

"I have got the money to pay this month's mortgage but I dont really want to - can I roll that in with my final payment in 5 years time ?"

What do you think they would say ??????


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 18:27:51
Quote from: "DV85"
Sturrock has only been here 5 minutes.

We'll see what he says when he asks for some money in january to buy some players....

Dennis Wise said similiar things when he joined about being behind the board etc now where is he? he jumped the first chance he got to leave.

The fact that the club HAVENT paid the CVA bill and told us they HAD should be enough for ANYONE to realise they are liars and cant be trusted.

DIDNT PAY THE C-V-FUCKING-A!!!!!!!!!!

get a grip ffs!


  As I never tire of pointing out  when questioned at an AGM,  maybe 3 years ago....Holt stated publically, there was no plan to pay the CVA, without a ground development.   It was also stated that this eventuality could see the club fold.

 Now this was a self evident truth....and there still appears to be no plan, other than the ludicrously Stalinist 5 year plan.   It looks like Blodwyn has been dragged in as a last throw of the dice.....


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Sussex on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 18:36:02
Quote from: "Sussex Red"
Quote from: "Sharky"
I am not normally one for public speaking


Didn't Mike Diamandis say something very similar in his statement a few months ago?

Go digging kids.


Seems Fred's a very good digger..

Quote
The following is a statement from Mike Diamandis and provides a brief history of his direct involvement with Swindon Town Football Club:
îI have been involved with the Club for more than 15 years as a supplier, however I became seriously involved about 5 yearsí ago when Sir Seton Wills and Cliff Puffett asked me to help when things had gone seriously wrong. I supplied the management and financial support on a day-to-day basis with backing of the Wills family. At that time some of my advice was not heeded and control of the Club was handed to a consortium which you all know about.
It is well documented that a new consortium made up of Willy Carson, James Wills, Cliff Puffett and myself (represented by Bob Holt) was formed. This consortium fought for about a year to remove the incumbent consortium, which is also well documented. Upon taking control of the club we discovered that the clubís balance sheet had now deteriorated to minus £14 million.
The club was within two hours of going into liquidation. With the help of Hacker Young we were able to rescue the club by raising £1.5 million through the Wills family and a further £1.5 million through St Modwen.
At about that time you would have read in the Adver that at the time the Club had a debenture over it and without itís removal the Club would have been destroyed. With the help of the Wills family and St. Modwen we were able to remove this threat.
I found myself in the unenviable position of being responsible for putting the necessary resources together to ensure the clubís survival. The Wills family would not have continued to support the Club had I not been involved. Since then every year through one method or another, I have been able to raise approximately £750,000 a year to keep the Club going. During this period before Bill Power joined, more than £5.5 million was raised through my leadership, through my own company, with the dynamic share coming from the Willsí family and St. Modwen.
Through successful negotiation we have been able to negotiate with all the creditors so that for the first time in the next month or so our balance sheet will go from a minus to a plus £3-4 million and, with Bill Powers total monies raised will top £6.5 million. The Club will still however require the average gate to rise for it to be safe and in the long term we do require a new stadium to ensure the future stability of the Club.
In 2000 Swindon Town FC employed 98 staff and was loosing over £2m a year. I brought in a professional manager, Bob Holt, who then carried out the cost cutting plan I had developed with the then Finance Director, reducing the staff on the payroll from 98 people to 61, and eventually to the 48 it is today. At this time brought in Mike Sullivan as Marketing Manager (someone who had worked for me in the past). I knew of Mark Devlin as a customer of my company; he was a Commercial Manager at QPR. Mark Devlin then joined us as Chief Executive and as a result of his football knowledge and his media skills we were able to steer the Club successfully for the period that he was with us.
When the opportunity came for him to return to QPR as Chief Executive as you all know he left STFC. Last autumn as soon as I heard that he had left QPR I telephoned him and asked him to return as we all know we had dropped the ball when it came to PR.
After his return we eventually had a discussion that lead to me meeting Bill Power.
I believed that with Bill Powerís football knowledge and Mark Devlin skills, they would create a great management team for our Club and after further negotiations it was agreed that Bill Power would invest in the club and join the Board. That investment is still to be completed. We are hoping it will be complete in the next few days.
Recently many discussions took place amongst the Board regarding the clubís manager. Mark Devlin had the idea that Dennis Wise would be an excellent candidate. I had met Dennis Wise recently at Chelsea when I was a guest of a mutual friend, who is also Dennis Wiseís agent. I met with Dennis Wise again in a London hotel the following day and we struck a deal. I am absolutely delighted that he is joining us with Gus and his team and so is Mark Devlin and Bill Power. For those of you who did listen to the press conference you would have heard Dennis Wise confirm that he was persuaded by a nice man, called Michael, who had talked him into joining. That Michael was me!
During my working life I have employed many people and unfortunately once or twice these relationships have failed. Certain people who have been associated with me in the past are using your forum which is for the specific purpose of discussing football matters as a method of attacking me. I cannot say I am too pleased about all these attacks.
I have now reached a point whether these personal attacks just have to stop to protect myself and my family. For those of you that are interested I am married with a young child and have two grown up children. I have been an employer for more than 25 years and within my various companies there are over 200 employees whose welfare is replied upon and obtained on my ability to move amongst the business community in an open manner.
I have known the Wills family for the last five years and I have come to think of the family and of Willie Carson as my friends. I have worked previously with the ex-board, in particular Cliff Puffett and Mike Spearman, to improve the Clubís position. All of the current Board, and everyone involved with the Club knows me, speaks with me and deals with me in normal manner. I speak to Bill Power everyday and we are all looking forward to the footballing future of our club.
I am often persuaded to take a more public role. However, I am not the best public speaker, in-fact I get tongue tied the minute a microphone gets thrust in my face, and although I have tried to overcome this I am not a natural, and I have always felt that there are other people who are better spokesmen for the club than me. My preferred choice is that on a Saturday I go to the game with my family, sit in the seats that Iíve always sat in, and watch a game of football. I am not interested in a high profile life and I hope you all enjoy Mark Devlin as the public face and spearhead of our Football Club.
The Adver has removed various posts because they have been of a libellous and non-proven nature. My lawyers have written to the Adver and explained how we understand the legal position with regards to chat rooms. Once the Adver have been notified by the person who is being libelled they have no alternative but to respond and remove the postings otherwise they will be knowingly publishing a libel.
This is the only statement I am ever going to make on this subject, thank you for taking the time to read it."
Mike Diamandis
26.5.06


Just got me wondering Sharky..

(one day I'll get a life)


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 18:43:18
"I brought in a professional manager Bob Holt"

 :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:

Fuck me you could not make it up !


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: pumbaa on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 18:46:45
I thought Bob Holt was a professional?

You'll be telling me Santa isn't real next, and this close to Christmas, thats going to cause me to hyper-ventilate.

Oh, just realised I missed a word of the end of my first paragraph. Fuckwit. There, fixed.

 :wink:


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 18:53:51
Quote from: "coxernator"
I thought Bob Holt was a professional?

You'll be telling me Santa isn't real next, and this close to Christmas, thats going to cause me to hyper-ventilate.

Oh, just realised I missed a word of the end of my first paragraph. Fuckwit. There, fixed.

 :wink:


THE PROFESSIONALS

http://i109.photobucket.com/albums/n70/FredElliot_2006/B0007MAO0C_01__PE50__The-Profession.jpg

Ill leave it up to you guys to put names to faces    :wink:


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 18:54:44
ROUGH

TOUGH

AND


READY !!!!!!!


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: genf_stfc on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 18:56:04
also apparently we are 6.5 million quid up - I make that 5.6 million once the CVA is paid !


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 19:01:09
Quote from: "genf_stfc"
also apparently we are 6.5 million quid up - I make that 5.6 million once the CVA is paid !


 We went from 6.5 mill up to 750K down in the space of 4 months without paying the CVA.....another impressive first from the Otago School of Accountancy.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Batch on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 19:26:40
What an interesting thread. I guess Sharky genuinely could be an investor who is looking to help the board out.

If you are then I ask you this. I am firmly behind the Power/Trust/Wilks consortium. But if this doesn't come to fruition and somehow on the off chance you become a major player then please get a fan on the board and get the accounts (and Diamandis) out in the open and accountable. If you don't, the things said on here wilill come back again and again to haunt you again and again.

Of course I think the fans consortium will succeed eventually.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 19:33:33
The Fans Consortium WILL succeed. It is inevitable.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 19:38:05
Quote from: "OOH!  SHAUN TAYLOR"
The Fans Consortium WILL succeed. It is inevitable.


Too much momentum now OST for it not to

Too many Fans asking too many questions !


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Whits on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 19:46:29
Quote from: "RobertT"
Quote from: "sam_stfc"
Sort it out Rob, 80% bollocks :wink:


That's just bollocks.


to be honest, i think its slowly moving back to the 90% mark


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Sharky on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 21:04:47
Hi guys, sorry about earlier, that was not me posting, I passed my details on to a friend of mine that I thought may be able to help out the club (and have ben trying to convince for some time mind you) so that if he ever wanted to make a few comments on here with you guys he could do to get a feel for fans opinions and what they want.

he is not an investor himself but represents a group of people that are looking to invest.

I have been trying to tell you guys for ages that I was not on the board etc and that all I wanted was to try and help in some way and finally I think I may have found a way to do so other than the trust.

I have nothing against the trust but in fairness the more options (and money) avilable to STFC at the minute the better as at least its not a case of having to take hatever come along to save our club!

I am going to be speaking to my friend tomorrow evening anyway as I have a meeting with my work (yes I do do conveyancing to whoever decided to dig that out and yes I drive an RX-* which EATS fuel!!) and the meeting is near where he lives so if I will try and see what his thoughts are on the idea as I think before posting today he had already made some form of enquiries into the status of play with the club.

anyway I dont know to be honest wheter he has taken my request with a pinch of salt at the moment or whether having done some digging they are looking seriously at the prospect, but I will hopefully find out more tomorrow evening.

Befor you ask, I can obviously not say anything at the minute about identity as I know he would not want me to for the sake of his partners otherwise he would have said something today.  Oh and he is really bad at trying to cover who he is actually as I think he said he was a STFC fan.....thats a lie, he has a hard on for Japanese football but just doest like to say!!

Let you know more when I do! sorry for the long winded post but I cant be on here long as have to go out for the night...


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: red macca on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 21:11:41
Whats the story jackanory la la la la la


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 21:12:27
:boring:

Sorry Sharky but it just does not wash with me.

Why on earth would anyone give away their log in details to a potential investor so that he can do some digging around on the consensus of opinion amongst the fans.



Nah................ sorry mate !   :shake:


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: RobertT on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 21:15:20
Sharky, while I respect you can't name names and stuff, can you confirm if they are looking to work with the current owner and invest, or purchase a controlling interest?

Quite frankly, while I can see way forward that keep SSW involved, via terms to repay his loans lets say and offer him Life presidency, I cannot support any move to simply top up the current gang anymore.  I did that this summer and it's got us nowhere fast.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 21:15:50
This fantasist has to be something to do with the Board.......script writer perhaps.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: red macca on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 21:17:09
Fuck it let me play

Me and my Mate Dan morandes want to buy the club aswell

May the best man win sharky :D


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: herthab on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 21:17:11
Quote from: "herthab"
Quote from: "Sharky"
Thanks Robert,

I am sure that at first a general discussion will be the best course of action, either by attending the next consortium meeting in January or be it that we discuss things over a bovril and mars bar at the ground.

Either way I will look forward to hearing more detail about the intended actions of the consortium and look forward also to trying to find the best way to progress our own intentions, albeit I do not believe we will have a potential working relationship.

Regardless, my colleague's and I are of course open to further debate on perhaps more educated grounds outside of this site but will require a couple of weeks to be able to meet with the relevant people.

Look forward to seeing those of you who attend the consortium meetings at the next meet.


Call me a cynic, but if this guy is really a potential investor, why is he asking questions with regards to The Consortium, on a fans forum?

Sniff, sniff.........Is it cow?.........................


No.............................................................



It's BULLSHIT.


Just thought I'd reiterate my feelings..............


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: TalkTalk on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 21:18:11
:blahblahblah:

Actually I have been keeping it a bit quiet, but in fact I am the son of a considerably wealthy Arab sheik who is seriously thinking of giving a lot of money away to anybody who is interested in racehorses (as breeding the buggers is what we do in Arabia).

Does anybody know any connected people? Like a jockey perhaps?

If they have any ins with any football clubs then perhaps my father could bung them a few mill as well?

 :blahblahblah:


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 21:19:42
Fucking Walter Mitty's the lot of ya

You ought to all be ashamed !!!!!!!

 :D


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 21:20:58
Quote from: "TalkTalk"
:blahblahblah:

Actually I have been keeping it a bit quiet, but in fact I am the son of a considerably wealthy Arab sheik who is seriously thinking of giving a lot of money away to anybody who is interested in racehorses (as breeding the buggers is what we do in Arabia).

Does anybody know any connected people? Like a jockey perhaps?

If they have any ins with any football clubs then perhaps my father could bung them a few mill as well?

 :blahblahblah:


Is his name Lawrence ?


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: red macca on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 21:21:34
I have images now of opening next months rich list and richard branson saying

"well last month i nearly bought stfc but those cunts on the Townend forum put me right off that idea"

 :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 21:22:13
Quote from: "red macca"
I have images now of opening next months rich list and richard branson saying

"well last month i nearly bought stfc but those cunts on the Townend forum put me right off that idea"

 :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Ill blame you Dean


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: TalkTalk on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 21:22:24
Quote from: "Fred Elliot"
Is his name Lawrence ?

No.

It's Sheik Yer-belief en Jerku-Off


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: herthab on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 21:22:30
Quote from: "Fred Elliot"
Fucking Walter Mitty's the lot of ya

You ought to all be ashamed !!!!!!!

 :D


Quite right Fred.

As a multimillionaire myself, I'm disgusted at these bullshitters!!

I can't divulge when, but look out for a sizeable investment from Somerset soon.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 21:23:54
Quote from: "TalkTalk"
Quote from: "Fred Elliot"
Is his name Lawrence ?

No.

It's Sheik Yer-belief en Jerku-Off



 :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:

wanker

still chuckling now !


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: red macca on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 21:26:20
On a serious note sonic know who this bloke is.Im sure he said this the other day didnt he


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 21:28:01
Yep


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Whits on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 21:31:01
i kind of do, but its not my place to say anything.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 21:31:03
Quote from: "red macca"
On a serious note sonic know who this bloke is.Im sure he said this the other day didnt he


   Maverick....who's the other Newbury mole.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: red macca on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 21:34:38
Cheers reg

Whits if your not at liberty to say could you at least clarify if he could be a potential investor.(Then i can edit my posts :D )


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Whits on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 21:35:21
no idea if hes rich or not  :D


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 21:38:48
Nah

Rich hasnt been on here for days


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 22:07:16
Quote from: "Fred Elliot"
Nah

Rich hasnt been on here for days


well im here  :D


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: pauld on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 23:25:09
Quote from: "Reg Smeeton"
Quote from: "red macca"
On a serious note sonic know who this bloke is.Im sure he said this the other day didnt he


   Maverick....who's the other Newbury mole.

He's not Reg - he may have a slightly unusual and one-sided interpretation of what being an "independent" constitutes, but he ain't Newbury. And to be fair the questions he has asked are legitimate - what I think has perhaps wound people up a bit is that he won't accept the questions have been answered and seems strangely reluctant to ask similar questions of the Newbury crew.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Boeta on Friday, December 15, 2006, 00:29:55
i know the discussion has moved on a far way since the original lthread but...

what the fuck is sturrock playing at

it would be in his interests to shut the fuck up and let others worry about the long term future of the club


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Frasier3 on Friday, December 15, 2006, 00:30:12
It seems unbelievable that someone considering an investment would come onto a forum to ask who to speak to. Obviously knows the football industry not to mention the goings on at STFC well then? I hope your mate Sharkey is better prepared when he speaks to the club and the consortium.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Samdy Gray on Friday, December 15, 2006, 08:18:13
Whits, Sonic - Who is Sharky? I think you're duty bound to your fellow TEF'ers to tell us who he is!  :wink:


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: SwindonTartanArmy on Friday, December 15, 2006, 11:16:39
Funilly enough, I spoke to a friend of the families a few years ago to see if he fancied buying the club. He owns two well known french make-up companies. Unforetunately he said no. Might ask him again when I am in Paris for the Scotland game in March. :mrgreen:


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Sharky on Friday, December 15, 2006, 12:24:04
Quote from: "sam_stfc"
Whits, Sonic - Who is Sharky? I think you're duty bound to your fellow TEF'ers to tell us who he is!  :wink:


My name is Mattius but my friends just call me Matt as Mattius sounds pretty gay!

Bird could have told you my name was Matt as I'm pretty sure I told her before...

Either way i'm pretty certain you actually dont care what my name is but are more interested in the name of my friend or the validitiy of their identity, well you'll find that all out at the next Trust meeting by the sound of it but i'm checking tonight that his colleagues are definately going to attend.

Don't know why everyone is being so hostile, all i did was try to find some more money for the club and if my friends colleagues are interested having spoken to Wilks and Co I dont see where I've done wrong?

Even if they decide not to join the Consortium, surely extra interest in investing in the club would still be welcomed would it not? (obviously more so if the current regime is changed dramatically)


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: RobertT on Friday, December 15, 2006, 12:29:28
problem Sharky, is I think I'm at the point that I'm wary of investment (which is fucking terrible thing to admit) if it still means the same mad man is in charge in his unofficial capacity, along with his yes men.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: Samdy Gray on Friday, December 15, 2006, 12:33:01
It just stinks of BS though Sharky.

Did Bill Power come posting on here before he decided he wanted to invest originally? No.

It's just not good practice, you should have approached the club first.


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: pauld on Friday, December 15, 2006, 12:33:04
Sharky if this is a genuine legit approach, PM me with contact details for your mate/his backers etc and we'll set up a meet before then. Although I agree with others it's a slightly odd way of going about making an approach on serious investment, but every avenue has to be worth exploring


Title: Sturrock: Takeover Will Not Benefit the club
Post by: lebowski on Friday, December 15, 2006, 12:40:12
he doesn't even know if his friend wants in or not!