|
Title: how many pens should we have had last night? Post by: SwindonStevo on Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 13:30:40 1. Hand ball, everyone at the front of the town end saw is clear as day; ref was other side of the player. Question on intent?
Not Given 2. Roberts goes down, maybe slightly to easy but I’ve seen them given. Was twice as bad as what Drogba got a pen for last night. Not Given 3. Roberts gets bundled over. Surely this one isn’t even questionable, stone waller pen. Not Given 4. Ince is taken out in the area, may have got a bit of the ball after but that wasn’t the intention. Ref doesn’t give it; thankfully the lino has more sense. Given 5. Paul Evans pen, to be fair i was in the town end so I didn’t see the incident very well. I will leave this one for you to decide. Given Title: how many pens should we have had last night? Post by: my-velocity on Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 13:32:14 I thought it was just 4? I lost count after that, the referee was so shite.
Title: how many pens should we have had last night? Post by: Chubbs on Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 13:34:19 spot on, but dont big up the lino, twice he gave offiside once to the cock and once to robbo when it wasnt.
Both of those i was inline with the lino and it was not was offside. Title: how many pens should we have had last night? Post by: SwindonStevo on Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 13:36:00 well people seem to have forgotten about the questionable handball which i saw, only question was intent. as for the offsides thats another thing thats hard to tell from the town end.
think i might revert to nationwide for next game. Title: how many pens should we have had last night? Post by: mr ian on Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 13:38:26 1,dont think so
2,wasnt a penalty thats for sure but in my blind rage state i screamed for it anyway Title: how many pens should we have had last night? Post by: Boeta on Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 13:45:30 the handball would have been harsh and no. 2 never was, 3 was, 4 i'm not sure, 5 was
Title: how many pens should we have had last night? Post by: Piemonte on Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 13:46:55 I thought we should have had 4.
Didnt really see the handball incedent so cant really comment on that. Title: how many pens should we have had last night? Post by: SwindonStevo on Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 13:53:44 i hope they show a few of these incidents on the highlights.
Title: how many pens should we have had last night? Post by: singingiiiffy on Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 14:06:36 Quote from: "Boeta" the handball would have been harsh and no. 2 never was, 3 was, 4 i'm not sure, 5 was agreed. no.2 shoulder barge, roberts bounced off him rather than other way around. Title: how many pens should we have had last night? Post by: Cookie on Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 14:34:19 Number 5 was correct, great run by Caton bought down just inside the area.
Title: how many pens should we have had last night? Post by: Spud on Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 14:46:46 3 was a definite penalty, Roberts went down too easily for the 2nd to be given but number 3 should have been given.
Title: how many pens should we have had last night? Post by: DV on Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 20:58:50 from the nation wide I thought 3 was and 5 was....couldnt see clearly enough for 4....and never saw 1 at all
Title: how many pens should we have had last night? Post by: ibelieveinmrreeves on Thursday, September 14, 2006, 18:57:41 Having seen both penalty incidents again on the football league review tonight, I don't see how the Dons have the temerity to claim that they were 'dubious'. Honestly, it baffles me. I though the first was soft, but seeing it again, Lewington was already grounded but leapt like a wounded salmon to get to Ince.
Slightly more on topic - we should've had four. I didn't see 1 but thought 2 was a stonewaller. Title: how many pens should we have had last night? Post by: Bennett on Thursday, September 14, 2006, 19:06:03 Quote from: "ibelieveinmrreeves" temerity good word |